Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 6/2016

29.02.2016 | Clinical Research

Validation of the KOOS, JR: A Short-form Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes Survey

verfasst von: Stephen Lyman, PhD, Yuo-Yu Lee, MS, Patricia D. Franklin, MD, MBA, MPH, Wenjun Li, PhD, Michael B. Cross, MD, Douglas E. Padgett, MD

Erschienen in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Ausgabe 6/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Medicare is rapidly moving toward using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for outcomes assessment and justification of orthopaedic and other procedures. Numerous measures have been developed to study knee osteoarthritis (OA); however, many of these surveys are long, disruptive to clinic flow, and result in incomplete data capture and/or low followup rates. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome (KOOS) physical function short-form (KOOS-PS), while shorter, ignores pain, which is a primary concern of patients with advanced knee OA.

Questions/purposes

Our objective was to derive and validate a short-form survey focused on the patient with end-stage knee OA undergoing TKA.

Methods

Using our hospital’s knee replacement registry, we retrospectively identified 2291 patients with knee OA who underwent primary unilateral TKA and had completed preoperative and 2-year postoperative PROMs. We assessed 30 items from the 42-item KOOS that were quantitatively most difficult for patients to perform before TKA and qualitatively most relevant to patients with end-stage knee OA. Rasch analysis identified the KOOS, JR, a seven-item instrument, representing a single dimension, which we define as “knee health” because it reflects aspects of pain, symptom severity, and activities of daily living (ADL) including movements or activities that are directly relevant and difficult for patients with advanced knee OA. We assessed the internal consistency, external validity (versus KOOS and WOMAC domains), responsiveness, and floor and ceiling effects of the KOOS, JR. External validation was performed using calculated KOOS, JR scores in collaboration with a nationally representative joint replacement registry, the Function and Outcomes Research for Comparative Effectiveness in Total Joint Replacement (FORCE-TJR).

Results

Internal consistency for the KOOS, JR was high (Person Separation Index, 0.84; and 0.85 [FORCE]), external validity against other validated knee surveys was excellent (Spearman correlation coefficient, ρ 0.54–0.91), particularly for the KOOS pain (ρ 0.89 [95% CI, 0.88–0.91] Hospital for Special Surgery [HSS]; and 0.91 [95% CI, 0.90–0.93] [FORCE]) and KOOS ADL (ρ 0.87 [95% CI, 0.85–0.88] [HSS]; and 0.84 [95% CI, 0.81–0.87] [FORCE]). The KOOS, JR responsiveness (standardized response means, 1.79 [95% CI, 1.70–1.88] [HSS]; and 1.70 [95% CI, 1.54–1.86] [FORCE]) was high and floor 0.4–1.2%) and ceiling (18.8–21.8%) effects were favorable.

Conclusions

The new short knee PROM, the KOOS, JR, provides a single score representing “knee health” as it combines pain, symptoms, and functional limitations in a single score. This short-form PROM is patient-relevant and efficient.

Level of Evidence

Level III, diagnostic study.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson JC, Gerbing DW. Predicting the performance of measures in a confirmatory factor analysis with a pretest assessment of their substantive validities. J Appl Psychol. 1991;76:732–740.CrossRef Anderson JC, Gerbing DW. Predicting the performance of measures in a confirmatory factor analysis with a pretest assessment of their substantive validities. J Appl Psychol. 1991;76:732–740.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ayers DC, Zheng H, Franklin PD. Integrating patient-reported outcomes into orthopaedic clinical practice: proof of concept from FORCE-TJR. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:3419–3425.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ayers DC, Zheng H, Franklin PD. Integrating patient-reported outcomes into orthopaedic clinical practice: proof of concept from FORCE-TJR. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:3419–3425.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Bellamy N. WOMAC: a 20-year experiential review of a patient-centered self-reported health status questionnaire. J Rheumatol. 2002;29:2473–2476.PubMed Bellamy N. WOMAC: a 20-year experiential review of a patient-centered self-reported health status questionnaire. J Rheumatol. 2002;29:2473–2476.PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Bond M, Davis A, Lohmander S, Hawker G. Responsiveness of the OARSI-OMERACT osteoarthritis pain and function measures. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012;20:541–547.CrossRefPubMed Bond M, Davis A, Lohmander S, Hawker G. Responsiveness of the OARSI-OMERACT osteoarthritis pain and function measures. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012;20:541–547.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Conaghan PG, Emerton M, Tennant A. Internal construct validity of the Oxford Knee Scale: evidence from Rasch measurement. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;57:1363–1367.CrossRefPubMed Conaghan PG, Emerton M, Tennant A. Internal construct validity of the Oxford Knee Scale: evidence from Rasch measurement. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;57:1363–1367.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Fisher WP Jr. Reliability, separation, strata statistics. Rasch Measurement Transactions. 1992;6:238. Fisher WP Jr. Reliability, separation, strata statistics. Rasch Measurement Transactions. 1992;6:238.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Fitzpatrick R, Davey C, Buxton MJ, Jones DR. Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technol Assess. 1998;2:i-iv, 1–74. Fitzpatrick R, Davey C, Buxton MJ, Jones DR. Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technol Assess. 1998;2:i-iv, 1–74.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Franklin PD, Harrold L, Ayers DC. Incorporating patient-reported outcomes in total joint arthroplasty registries: challenges and opportunities. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:3482–3488.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Franklin PD, Harrold L, Ayers DC. Incorporating patient-reported outcomes in total joint arthroplasty registries: challenges and opportunities. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:3482–3488.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Higgins LD, Taylor MK, Park D, Ghodadra N, Marchant M, Pietrobon R, Cook C; International Knee Documentation Committee. Reliability and validity of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form. Joint Bone Spine. 2007;74:594–599.CrossRefPubMed Higgins LD, Taylor MK, Park D, Ghodadra N, Marchant M, Pietrobon R, Cook C; International Knee Documentation Committee. Reliability and validity of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form. Joint Bone Spine. 2007;74:594–599.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:780–785.CrossRefPubMed Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:780–785.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Liang MH, Fossel AH, Larson MG. Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation. Med Care. 1980;28:632–642.CrossRef Liang MH, Fossel AH, Larson MG. Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation. Med Care. 1980;28:632–642.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Lyman S, Lee YY, Franklin PD, Li W, Mayman DJ, Padgett DE. Validation of HOOS, JR: a short-form hip replacement survey. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016. doi:10.1007/s11999-016-4718-2 Lyman S, Lee YY, Franklin PD, Li W, Mayman DJ, Padgett DE. Validation of HOOS, JR: a short-form hip replacement survey. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016. doi:10.​1007/​s11999-016-4718-2
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Masters GN. A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika. 1982;47:149–174.CrossRef Masters GN. A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika. 1982;47:149–174.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat McCarthy CJ, Oldham JA. The reliability, validity and responsiveness of an aggregated locomotor function (ALF) score in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2004;43:514–517.CrossRefPubMed McCarthy CJ, Oldham JA. The reliability, validity and responsiveness of an aggregated locomotor function (ALF) score in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2004;43:514–517.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Perruccio AV, Stefan Lohmander L, Canizares M, Tennant A, Hawker GA, Conaghan PG, Roos EM, Jordan JM, Maillefert JF, Dougados M, Davis AM. The development of a short measure of physical function for knee OA KOOS-Physical Function Shortform (KOOS-PS): an OARSI/OMERACT initiative.Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008;16:542–550.CrossRefPubMed Perruccio AV, Stefan Lohmander L, Canizares M, Tennant A, Hawker GA, Conaghan PG, Roos EM, Jordan JM, Maillefert JF, Dougados M, Davis AM. The development of a short measure of physical function for knee OA KOOS-Physical Function Shortform (KOOS-PS): an OARSI/OMERACT initiative.Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008;16:542–550.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Roos EM, Brandsson S, Karlsson J. Validation of the foot and ankle outcome score for ankle ligament reconstruction. Foot Ankle Int. 2001;22:788–794.PubMed Roos EM, Brandsson S, Karlsson J. Validation of the foot and ankle outcome score for ankle ligament reconstruction. Foot Ankle Int. 2001;22:788–794.PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS, Ekdahl C, Beynnon BD. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 1998;28:88–96.CrossRefPubMed Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS, Ekdahl C, Beynnon BD. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 1998;28:88–96.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Rothman M, Burke L, Erickson P, Leidy NK, Patrick DL, Petrie CD. Use of existing patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments and their modification: The ISPOR good research practices for evaluating and documenting content validity for the use of existing instruments and their modification PRO task force report. Value Health. 2009;12:1075–1083.CrossRefPubMed Rothman M, Burke L, Erickson P, Leidy NK, Patrick DL, Petrie CD. Use of existing patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments and their modification: The ISPOR good research practices for evaluating and documenting content validity for the use of existing instruments and their modification PRO task force report. Value Health. 2009;12:1075–1083.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith AB, Rush R, Fallowfield LJ, Velikova G, Sharpe M. Rasch fit statistics and sample size considerations for polytomous data. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8:33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Smith AB, Rush R, Fallowfield LJ, Velikova G, Sharpe M. Rasch fit statistics and sample size considerations for polytomous data. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8:33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Steiner DL, Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. London, UK: Oxford University Press; 2003. Steiner DL, Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. London, UK: Oxford University Press; 2003.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Wainer H, Kiely GL. Item clusters and computerized adaptive testing: a case for testlets. J Educ Meas. 1987;24:185–202.CrossRef Wainer H, Kiely GL. Item clusters and computerized adaptive testing: a case for testlets. J Educ Meas. 1987;24:185–202.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Wechsler S. Statistics at Square One. 9th ed. London, UK: BMJ Publishing Group; 1996. Wechsler S. Statistics at Square One. 9th ed. London, UK: BMJ Publishing Group; 1996.
Metadaten
Titel
Validation of the KOOS, JR: A Short-form Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes Survey
verfasst von
Stephen Lyman, PhD
Yuo-Yu Lee, MS
Patricia D. Franklin, MD, MBA, MPH
Wenjun Li, PhD
Michael B. Cross, MD
Douglas E. Padgett, MD
Publikationsdatum
29.02.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Ausgabe 6/2016
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Elektronische ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-016-4719-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2016

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 6/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Symposium: Current Issues in Orthopaedic Trauma: Tribute to Clifford H. Turen

Editorial Comment: Current Issues in Orthopaedic Trauma: Tribute to Clifford H. Turen

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.