Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®
Erschienen in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 4/2017

30.01.2017 | CORR Insights

CORR Insights®: No Clinically Important Difference in Knee Scores or Instability Between Transtibial and Inlay Techniques for PCL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

verfasst von: Freddie H. Fu, MD

Erschienen in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Ausgabe 4/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

Shin and colleagues performed a systematic review of Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library comparing outcomes of transtibial and inlay techniques for posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction and found no clinical difference between the two techniques. When looking at residual laxity, there were no differences in the two PCL reconstruction approaches. These observations support the finding of an earlier study by MacAllister and colleagues [12] who also demonstrated no difference in outcomes at 2 years between transtibial and open inlay techniques. …
Literatur
1.
Bergfeld JA, McAllister DR, Parker RD, Valdevit AD, Kambic HE. A biomechanical comparison of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29:129–136.PubMed
2.
Campbell RB, Torrie A, Hecker A, Sekiya JK. Comparison of tibial graft fixation between simulated arthroscopic and open inlay techniques for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35:1731–1738.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Cooper DE, Stewart D. Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using single-bundle patella tendon graft with tibial inlay fixation: 2- to 10-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32:346–360.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Ettinger M, Büermann S, Calliess T, Omar M, Krettek C, Hurschler C, Jagodzinski M, Petri M. Tibial inlay press-fit fixation versus interference screw in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2013;5:e35.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Fanelli GC, Beck JD, Edson CJ. Double bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Surgical technique and results. Sports Medicine Arthrosc. 2010;18:242–248.CrossRef
6.
Fu FH, van Eck CF, Tashman S, Irrgang JJ, Moreland MS. Anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A changing paradigm. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23:640–648.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Harner CD, Janaushek MA, Kanamori A, Yagi M, Vogrin TM, Woo SL. Biomechanical analysis of a double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2000;28:144–151.PubMed
8.
Kim SJ, Kim SH, Kim SG, Kung YP. Comparison of the clinical results of three posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques: surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:145–157.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Li Y, Li J, Wang J, Gao S, Zhang Y. Comparison of single-bundle and double-bundle isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with allograft: A prospective, randomized study. Arthroscopy. 2014;30:695–700.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Markolf KL, Feeley BT, Jackson SR, McAllister DR. Biomechanical studies of double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1788–1794.PubMed
11.
Maruyama Y, Shitoto K, Baba T, Kaneko K. Evaluation of the clinical results of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction -a comparison between the use of the bone tendon bone and semitendinosus and gracilis tendons. Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol. 2012;4:30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
McAllister DR, Markolf KL, Oakes DA, Young CR, McWilliams J. A biomechanical comparison of tibial inlay and tibial tunnel posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques: graft pretension and knee laxity. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30:312–317.PubMed
13.
Nuelle CW, Milles JL, Pfeiffer FM, Stannard JP, Smith PA, Kfuri M Jr, Cook JL. Biomechanical comparison of five posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques. J Knee Surg. [Published online ahead of print October 25, 2016]. DOI: 10.​1055/​s-0036-1593625.
14.
Rahnemai-Azar AA, Sabzevari S, Irarrazaval S, Chao T, Fu FH. Restoring nature through individualized anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2016;4:289–290.PubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Wijdicks CA, Kennedy NI, Goldsmith MT, Devitt BM, Michalski MP, Årøen A, Engebretsen L, LaPrade RF. Kinematic analysis of the posterior cruciate ligament, part 2: A comparison of anatomic single- versus double-bundle reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41:2839–2848.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
CORR Insights®: No Clinically Important Difference in Knee Scores or Instability Between Transtibial and Inlay Techniques for PCL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
verfasst von
Freddie H. Fu, MD
Publikationsdatum
30.01.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Ausgabe 4/2017
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Elektronische ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-016-5206-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2017

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 4/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Symposium: 2016 Bernese Hip Symposium

What Are the Risk Factors for Revision Surgery After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement at 7-year Followup?

CORR Insights

CORR Insights®: Does Surgeon Experience Impact the Risk of Complications After Bernese Periacetabular Osteotomy?

Clinical Research

Lawnmowers Versus Children: The Devastation Continues

Symposium: 2016 Bernese Hip Symposium

Femoral Morphology in the Dysplastic Hip: Three-dimensional Characterizations With CT

Symposium: 2016 Bernese Hip Symposium

Operative Fluoroscopic Correction Is Reliable and Correlates With Postoperative Radiographic Correction in Periacetabular Osteotomy

Symposium: 2016 Bernese Hip Symposium

Is Increased Acetabular Cartilage or Fossa Size Associated With Pincer Femoroacetabular Impingement?

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

16.04.2024 | Spondylitis ankylosans | Nachrichten

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

15.04.2024 | Knie-TEP | Nachrichten

Brustkrebs in der Vorgeschichte macht Gelenkersatz komplikationsträchtiger

11.04.2024 | Spondyloarthritiden | Nachrichten

Zwei neue Alternativen zu TNF-Inhibitoren bei axSpA

11.04.2024 | Rückenschmerzen | Nachrichten

Diclofenac-Gel versus Ibuprofen bei akuten Rückenschmerzen
weitere anzeigen

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise