Abstract
Social media is broadening opportunities to engage in discussions about biomedical advances such as stem cell research. However, little is known about how information pertaining to stem cells is disseminated on platforms such as Twitter. To fill this gap, we conducted a content analysis of tweets containing (i) a stem cell keyword, and (ii) a keyword related to either spinal cord injury (SCI) or Parkinson disease (PD). We found that the discussion about stem cells and SCI or PD revolves around different aspects of the research process. We also found that the tone of most tweets about stem cells is either positive or neutral. The findings contribute new knowledge about Twitter as a connecting platform for many voices and as a key tool for the dissemination of information about stem cells and disorders of the central nervous system.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ehnert, S., Glanemann, M., Schmitt, A., Vogt, S., Shanny, N., Nussler, N. C., & Nussler, A. (2009). The possible use of stem cells in regenerative medicine: dream or reality? Langenbeck’s Archives of Surgery / Deutsche Gesellschaft Für Chirurgie, 394(6), 985–997. doi:10.1007/s00423-009-0546-0.
McMahill, B. G., Borjesson, D. L., Sieber-Blum, M., Nolta, J. A., & Sturges, B. K. (2014). Stem cells in canine spinal cord injury - promise for regenerative therapy in a large animal model of human disease. Stem Cell Reviews. doi:10.1007/s12015-014-9553-9.
Liu, A. K. L. (2013). Stem cell therapy for Alzheimer’s disease: hype or hope? Bioscience Horizons, 6, hzt011.
Gage, F. H., & Temple, S. (2013). Neural stem cells: generating and regenerating the brain. Neuron, 80(3), 588–601. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.037.
Politis, M., & Lindvall, O. (2012). Clinical application of stem cell therapy in Parkinson’s disease. BMC Medicine, 10, 1. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-10-1.
Jensen, E. (2012). Mediating subpolitics in US and UK science news. Public Understanding of Science Bristol, England, 21(1), 68–83.
Reis, R. (2008). How Brazilian and North American newspapers frame the stem cell research debate. Science Communication, 29(3), 316–334. doi:10.1177/1075547007312394.
Bubela, T., Li, M. D., Hafez, M., Bieber, M., & Atkins, H. (2012). Is belief larger than fact: expectations, optimism and reality for translational stem cell research. BMC Medicine, 10, 133. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-10-133.
Scott, C. T., DeRouen, M. C., & Crawley, L. M. (2010). The language of hope: therapeutic intent in stem-cell clinical trials. AJOB Primary Research, 1(3), 4–11.
Caulfield, T., & McGuire, A. (2012). Athletes’ use of unproven stem cell therapies: adding to inappropriate media hype? Molecular Therapy: The Journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy, 20(9), 1656–1658. doi:10.1038/mt.2012.172.
Caulfield, T., & Rachul, C. (2011). Science spin: iPS cell research in the news. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 89(5), 644–646. doi:10.1038/clpt.2010.309.
Kehn, M., & Kroll, T. (2011). Reporting trends of spinal cord injury research representation: a media content analysis. Disability and Health Journal, 4(2), 121–128. doi:10.1016/j.dhjo.2010.09.001.
Adams, A., Lomax, G., & Santarini, A. (2011). Social media & stem cell science: examining the discourse. Regenerative Medicine, 6(6s), 121–124.
Robillard, J. M., Whiteley, L., Johnson, T. W., Lim, J., Wasserman, W. W., & Illes, J. (2013). Utilizing social media to study information-seeking and ethical issues in gene therapy. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(3), e44. doi:10.2196/jmir.2313.
Robillard, J. M., Johnson, T. W., Hennessey, C., Beattie, B. L., & Illes, J. (2013). Aging 2.0: health information about dementia on twitter. PLoS ONE, 8(7), e69861. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0069861.
Thurman, N. (2008). Forums for citizen journalists? Adoption of user generated content initiatives by online news media. New Media & Society, 10(1), 139–157.
Chou, W. S., Hunt, Y. M., Beckjord, E. B., Moser, R. P., & Hesse, B. W. (2009). Social media use in the United States: implications for health communication. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 11(4), e48. doi:10.2196/jmir.1249.
Adams, S. A. (2010). Revisiting the online health information reliability debate in the wake of “web 2.0”: an inter-disciplinary literature and website review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 79(6), 391–400.
Moorhead, S. A., Hazlett, D. E., Harrison, L., Carroll, J. K., Irwin, A., & Hoving, C. (2013). A new dimension of health care: systematic review of the uses, benefits, and limitations of social media for health communication. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(4), e85. doi:10.2196/jmir.1933.
Petersen, A., & Seear, K. (2011). Technologies of hope: techniques of the online advertising of stem cell treatments. New Genetics and Society, 30(4), 329–346. doi:10.1080/14636778.2011.592003.
Prasad, A. (2014). Ambivalent journeys of hope: embryonic stem cell therapy in a clinic in India. Health. doi:10.1177/1363459314556906.
Thackeray, R., Crookston, B. T., & West, J. H. (2013). Correlates of health-related social media use among adults. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(1), e21. doi:10.2196/jmir.2297.
Hill, S., Merchant, R., & Ungar, L. (2013). Lessons learned about public health from online crowd surveillance. Big Data, 1(3), 160–167. doi:10.1089/big.2013.0020.
Laranjo, L., Arguel, A., Neves, A. L., Gallagher, A. M., Kaplan, R., Mortimer, N., & Lau, A. Y. S. (2014). The influence of social networking sites on health behavior change: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA. doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002841.
Illes, J., Reimer, J. C., & Kwon, B. K. (2011). Stem cell clinical trials for spinal cord injury: readiness, reluctance, redefinition. Stem Cell Reviews, 7(4), 997–1005. doi:10.1007/s12015-011-9259-1.
Chew, C., & Eysenbach, G. (2010). Pandemics in the age of twitter: content analysis of tweets during the 2009 H1N1 outbreak. PLoS ONE, 5(11), e14118. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0014118.
Scanfeld, D., Scanfeld, V., & Larson, E. L. (2010). Dissemination of health information through social networks: twitter and antibiotics. American Journal of Infection Control, 38(3), 182–188. doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2009.11.004.
Lee, J. L., DeCamp, M., Dredze, M., Chisolm, M. S., & Berger, Z. D. (2014). What are health-related users tweeting? a qualitative content analysis of health-related users and their messages on twitter. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(10), e237. doi:10.2196/jmir.3765.
Bosslet, G. T., Torke, A. M., Hickman, S. E., Terry, C. L., & Helft, P. R. (2011). The patient-doctor relationship and online social networks: results of a national survey. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 26(10), 1168–1174. doi:10.1007/s11606-011-1761-2.
Lupiáñez-Villanueva, F., Mayer, M. A., & Torrent, J. (2009). Opportunities and challenges of Web 2.0 within the health care systems: an empirical exploration. Informatics for Health & Social Care, 34(3), 117–126. doi:10.1080/17538150903102265.
McGowan, B. S., Wasko, M., Vartabedian, B. S., Miller, R. S., Freiherr, D. D., & Abdolrasulnia, M. (2012). Understanding the factors that influence the adoption and meaningful use of social media by physicians to share medical information. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 14(5), e117. doi:10.2196/jmir.2138.
Keller, B., Labrique, A., Jain, K. M., Pekosz, A., & Levine, O. (2014). Mind the gap: social media engagement by public health researchers. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(1), e8. doi:10.2196/jmir.2982.
Rowlands, I., Nicholas, D., Russell, B., Canty, N., & Watkinson, A. (2011). Social media use in the research workflow. Learned Publishing, 24(3), 183–195.
Hodges, R. J., Bardien, N., & Wallace, E. (2012). Acceptability of stem cell therapy by pregnant women. Birth (Berkeley, California), 39(2), 91–97. doi:10.1111/j.1523-536X.2012.00527.x.
Purcell-Davis, A. (2013). The representations of novel neurotechnologies in social media: five case studies. The New Bioethics: A Multidisciplinary Journal of Biotechnology and the Body, 19(1), 30–45.
Duggan, M., Ellison, N. B., Lampe, C., Am, Lenhart, A, & Madden, M. (n.d.). Demographics of Key Social Networking Platforms. Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/01/09/demographics-of-key-social-networking-platforms-2/
Funding Sources
The research was supported by a public policy impact grant from the Stem Cell Network, a Canadian Network of Centres of Excellence, and by the Canada Research Chairs Program (JI, Canada Research Chair in Neuroethics).
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Robillard, J.M., Cabral, E., Hennessey, C. et al. Fueling Hope: Stem Cells in Social Media. Stem Cell Rev and Rep 11, 540–546 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12015-015-9591-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12015-015-9591-y