Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Lack of prognostic value of EGFR mutations in primary resected non-small cell lung cancer

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Medical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the prognostic value of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in a series of Taiwanese patients with primary resected lung adenocarcinomas never treated with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase (TK) inhibitor.

Patients and methods

A total of 27 of 35 patients whose EGFR mutational status in exons 18, 19, and 21 of the TK domain had been previously determined using nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were included in this retrospective study. All 27 patients underwent potentially curative pulmonary resection. Clinicopathological information was obtained from patient records and pathology reports. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients were estimated with the Kaplan–Meier method, and Cox regression model was used for multivariate analysis.

Results

Heterozygous EGFR mutations were detected in 15 of 27 patients (55.5%). There was no significant difference in DFS between patients with wild-type EGFR (median, 16.87 months) and mutant EGFR (median, 18.13 months; P = 0.83). No significant difference in OS was also noted between the wild-type and mutant groups (P = 0.45, median follow-up 22.6 months). Cox regression model and multivariate analysis of survival difference by age, stage, histology, and adjuvant treatment did not reach statistical significance.

Conclusion

EGFR mutations do not have significant prognostic value in primary resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and further well-designed large prospective studies are warranted to determine the prognostic value of EGFR mutations in NSCLC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jemal A, et al. Cancer statistics, 2006. CA Cancer J Clin 2006;56:106–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mountain CF. Revisions in the international system for Staging Lung Cancer. Chest 1997;111:1710–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nicholson RI, Gee JM, Harper ME. EGFR and cancer prognosis. Eur J Cancer 2001;37 Suppl 4:S9–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Onn A, et al. Synchronous overexpression of epidermal growth factor receptor and HER2-neu protein is a predictor of poor outcome in patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:136–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lynch TJ, et al. Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. N Engl J Med 2004;350:2129–39.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Paez JG, et al. EGFR mutations in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy. Science 2004;304:1497–500.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sordella R, Bell DW, Haber DA, Settleman J. Gefitinib-sensitizing EGFR mutations in lung cancer activate anti-apoptotic pathways. Science 2004;305:1163–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hsieh RK, Lim KH, Kuo HT, Tzen CY, Huang MJ. Female sex and bronchioloalveolar pathologic subtype predict EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer. Chest 2005;128:317–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kosaka T, et al. Mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene in lung cancer: biological and clinical implications. Cancer Res 2004;64:8919–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Shigematsu H, et al. Clinical and biological features associated with epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations in lung cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97:339–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sasaki H, et al. EGFR and erbB2 mutation status in Japanese lung cancer patients. Int J Cancer 2006;118:180–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Eberhard DA, et al. Mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor and in KRAS are predictive and prognostic indicators in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated with chemotherapy alone and in combination with erlotinib. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:5900–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tsao MS, et al. Erlotinib in lung cancer—molecular and clinical predictors of outcome. N Engl J Med 2005;353:133–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Shepherd FA, Tsao MS. Unraveling the mystery of prognostic and predictive factors in epidermal growth factor receptor therapy. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:1219–20; author reply 1220–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hirsch FR, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor in non-small-cell lung carcinomas: correlation between gene copy number and protein expression and impact on prognosis. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:3798–807.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hirsch FR, et al. Molecular predictors of outcome with gefitinib in a phase III placebo-controlled study in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:5034–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This study was supported in part by grants from AstraZeneca.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruey-Kuen Hsieh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lim, KH., Huang, MJ., Liu, HC. et al. Lack of prognostic value of EGFR mutations in primary resected non-small cell lung cancer. Med Oncol 24, 388–393 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-007-0018-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-007-0018-8

Keywords

Navigation