Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Medical Oncology 11/2014

01.11.2014 | Short Communication

Glasgow Prognostic Score predicts poor prognosis among advanced biliary tract cancer patients with good performance status

verfasst von: Toshikazu Moriwaki, Kazunori Ishige, Masahiro Araki, Shigemasa Yoshida, Masaaki Nishi, Mikio Sato, Takeshi Yamada, Yoshiyuki Yamamoto, Mitsuharu Ozeki, Hiroyasu Ishida, Takashi Yamaguchi, Kenji Matsuda, Tetsuya Murashita, Masato Abei, Ichinosuke Hyodo

Erschienen in: Medical Oncology | Ausgabe 11/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Advanced cancer patients with good performance status (PS) sometimes show poor prognosis despite receiving some chemotherapies. We evaluated prognosis of chemo-naïve advanced biliary tract cancer (ABTC) patients with good PS by Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS). Sixty-two patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group PS 0 or 1 were retrospectively analyzed, using multivariate Cox regression. GPS was defined with serum levels of two parameters, albumin >3.5 g/dl and C-reactive protein <1.0 mg/dl (both as 0, either as 1, and neither as 2). PS 0 (n = 32) and 1 (n = 30) patients had similar survival (P = 0.98). The median overall survival (OS) was 17.0 months for GPS 0 (n = 19), 14.2 months for GPS 1 (n = 17), and 6.4 months for GPS 2 (n = 26). GPS 2 had significantly shorter OS than GPS 0 (P = 0.002) or 1 (P = 0.033). Multivariate analysis identified two independent prognostic factors: GPS (hazard ratio 0.60, 95 % confidence interval 0.40–0.90, P = 0.012) and liver metastasis (hazard ratio 0.43, 95 % CI 0.20–0.90, P = 0.026). GPS was useful for chemo-naïve ABTC patients with good PS.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Miyakawa S, Ishihara S, Horiguchi A, et al. Biliary tract cancer treatment: 5,584 results from the Biliary Tract Cancer Statistics Registry from 1998 to 2004 in Japan. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2009;16(1):1–7.PubMedCrossRef Miyakawa S, Ishihara S, Horiguchi A, et al. Biliary tract cancer treatment: 5,584 results from the Biliary Tract Cancer Statistics Registry from 1998 to 2004 in Japan. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2009;16(1):1–7.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Valle J, Wasan H, Palmer DH, et al. Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(14):1273–81.PubMedCrossRef Valle J, Wasan H, Palmer DH, et al. Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(14):1273–81.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Crumley AB, Stuart RC, McKernan M, et al. Comparison of an inflammation-based prognostic score (GPS) with performance status (ECOG-ps) in patients receiving palliative chemotherapy for gastroesophageal cancer. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;23(8 Pt 2):e325–9.PubMedCrossRef Crumley AB, Stuart RC, McKernan M, et al. Comparison of an inflammation-based prognostic score (GPS) with performance status (ECOG-ps) in patients receiving palliative chemotherapy for gastroesophageal cancer. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;23(8 Pt 2):e325–9.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Forrest LM, McMillan DC, McArdle CS, et al. Evaluation of cumulative prognostic scores based on the systemic inflammatory response in patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer. 2003;89(6):1028–30.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Forrest LM, McMillan DC, McArdle CS, et al. Evaluation of cumulative prognostic scores based on the systemic inflammatory response in patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer. 2003;89(6):1028–30.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Forrest LM, McMillan DC, McArdle CS, et al. A prospective longitudinal study of performance status, an inflammation-based score (GPS) and survival in patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer. 2005;92(10):1834–6.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Forrest LM, McMillan DC, McArdle CS, et al. A prospective longitudinal study of performance status, an inflammation-based score (GPS) and survival in patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer. 2005;92(10):1834–6.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hwang JE, Kim HN, Kim DE, et al. Prognostic significance of a systemic inflammatory response in patients receiving first-line palliative chemotherapy for recurred or metastatic gastric cancer. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:489.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Hwang JE, Kim HN, Kim DE, et al. Prognostic significance of a systemic inflammatory response in patients receiving first-line palliative chemotherapy for recurred or metastatic gastric cancer. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:489.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Iwaku A, Kinoshita A, Onoda H, et al. The Glasgow Prognostic Score accurately predicts survival in patients with biliary tract cancer not indicated for surgical resection. Med Oncol. 2014;31(1):787.PubMedCrossRef Iwaku A, Kinoshita A, Onoda H, et al. The Glasgow Prognostic Score accurately predicts survival in patients with biliary tract cancer not indicated for surgical resection. Med Oncol. 2014;31(1):787.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat McMillan DC. The systemic inflammation-based Glasgow Prognostic Score: a decade of experience in patients with cancer. Cancer Treat Rev. 2013;39(5):534–40.PubMedCrossRef McMillan DC. The systemic inflammation-based Glasgow Prognostic Score: a decade of experience in patients with cancer. Cancer Treat Rev. 2013;39(5):534–40.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Oshiro Y, Sasaki R, Fukunaga K, et al. Inflammation-based prognostic score is a useful predictor of postoperative outcome in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013;20(3):389–95.PubMedCrossRef Oshiro Y, Sasaki R, Fukunaga K, et al. Inflammation-based prognostic score is a useful predictor of postoperative outcome in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013;20(3):389–95.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Falcone A, Ricci S, Brunetti I, et al. Phase III trial of infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) compared with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: the Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(13):1670–6.PubMedCrossRef Falcone A, Ricci S, Brunetti I, et al. Phase III trial of infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) compared with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: the Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(13):1670–6.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Buzdar AU, Suman VJ, Meric-Bernstam F, et al. Fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC-75) followed by paclitaxel plus trastuzumab versus paclitaxel plus trastuzumab followed by FEC-75 plus trastuzumab as neoadjuvant treatment for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer (Z1041): a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(13):1317–25.PubMedCrossRef Buzdar AU, Suman VJ, Meric-Bernstam F, et al. Fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC-75) followed by paclitaxel plus trastuzumab versus paclitaxel plus trastuzumab followed by FEC-75 plus trastuzumab as neoadjuvant treatment for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer (Z1041): a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(13):1317–25.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M, et al. FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(19):1817–25.PubMedCrossRef Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M, et al. FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(19):1817–25.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Heinemann V, von Weikersthal LF, Decker T, et al. FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (FIRE-3): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70330-4. Heinemann V, von Weikersthal LF, Decker T, et al. FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (FIRE-3): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;. doi:10.​1016/​S1470-2045(14)70330-4.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Ueno H, Ioka T, Ikeda M, et al. Randomized phase III study of gemcitabine plus S-1, S-1 alone, or gemcitabine alone in patients with locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer in Japan and Taiwan: GEST study. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(13):1640–8.PubMedCrossRef Ueno H, Ioka T, Ikeda M, et al. Randomized phase III study of gemcitabine plus S-1, S-1 alone, or gemcitabine alone in patients with locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer in Japan and Taiwan: GEST study. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(13):1640–8.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu YL, Zhou C, Hu CP, et al. Afatinib versus cisplatin plus gemcitabine for first-line treatment of Asian patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring EGFR mutations (LUX-Lung 6): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(2):213–22.PubMedCrossRef Wu YL, Zhou C, Hu CP, et al. Afatinib versus cisplatin plus gemcitabine for first-line treatment of Asian patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring EGFR mutations (LUX-Lung 6): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(2):213–22.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Morizane C, Okusaka T, Mizusawa J, et al. Randomized phase II study of gemcitabine plus S-1 versus S-1 in advanced biliary tract cancer: a Japan Clinical Oncology Group trial (JCOG 0805). Cancer Sci. 2013;104(9):1211–6.PubMedCrossRef Morizane C, Okusaka T, Mizusawa J, et al. Randomized phase II study of gemcitabine plus S-1 versus S-1 in advanced biliary tract cancer: a Japan Clinical Oncology Group trial (JCOG 0805). Cancer Sci. 2013;104(9):1211–6.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Okusaka T, Nakachi K, Fukutomi A, et al. Gemcitabine alone or in combination with cisplatin in patients with biliary tract cancer: a comparative multicentre study in Japan. Br J Cancer. 2010;103(4):469–74.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Okusaka T, Nakachi K, Fukutomi A, et al. Gemcitabine alone or in combination with cisplatin in patients with biliary tract cancer: a comparative multicentre study in Japan. Br J Cancer. 2010;103(4):469–74.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Park JS, Oh SY, Kim SH, et al. Single-agent gemcitabine in the treatment of advanced biliary tract cancers: a phase II study. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2005;35(2):68–73.PubMedCrossRef Park JS, Oh SY, Kim SH, et al. Single-agent gemcitabine in the treatment of advanced biliary tract cancers: a phase II study. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2005;35(2):68–73.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Glasgow Prognostic Score predicts poor prognosis among advanced biliary tract cancer patients with good performance status
verfasst von
Toshikazu Moriwaki
Kazunori Ishige
Masahiro Araki
Shigemasa Yoshida
Masaaki Nishi
Mikio Sato
Takeshi Yamada
Yoshiyuki Yamamoto
Mitsuharu Ozeki
Hiroyasu Ishida
Takashi Yamaguchi
Kenji Matsuda
Tetsuya Murashita
Masato Abei
Ichinosuke Hyodo
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2014
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Medical Oncology / Ausgabe 11/2014
Print ISSN: 1357-0560
Elektronische ISSN: 1559-131X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-014-0287-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2014

Medical Oncology 11/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.