Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Vegetable Intake in College-Aged Adults Is Explained by Oral Sensory Phenotypes and TAS2R38 Genotype

  • Published:
Chemosensory Perception

Abstract

Taste and oral sensations vary in humans. Some of this variation has a genetic basis, and two commonly measured phenotypes are the bitterness of propylthiouracil (PROP) and the number of fungiform papillae on the anterior tongue. While the genetic control of fungiform papilla is unclear, PROP bitterness associates with allelic variation in the taste receptor gene, TAS2R38. The two common alleles are AVI and PAV (proline, alanine, valine, and isoleucine); AVI/AVI homozygotes taste PROP as less bitter than heterozygous or homozygous PAV carriers. In this laboratory-based study, we determined whether taste of a bitter probe (quinine) and vegetable intake varied by taste phenotypes and TAS2R38 genotype in healthy adults (mean age = 26 years). Vegetable intake was assessed via two validated, complementary methods: food records (Food Pyramid servings standardized to energy intake) and food frequency questionnaire (general intake question and composite vegetable groups). Quinine bitterness varied with phenotypes but not TAS2R38; quinine was more bitter to those who tasted PROP as more bitter or had more papillae. Nontasters by phenotype or genotype reported greater consumption of vegetables, regardless of type (i.e., the effect generalized to all vegetables and was not restricted to those typically thought of as being bitter). Furthermore, nontasters with more papillae reported greater vegetable consumption than nontasters with fewer papillae, suggesting that when bitterness does not predominate, more papillae enhance vegetable liking. These findings suggest that genetic variation in taste, measured by multiple phenotypes or TAS2R38 genotype, can explain differences in overall consumption of vegetables, and this was not restricted to vegetables that are predominantly bitter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bajec MR, Pickering GJ (2008) Thermal taste, PROP responsiveness, and perception of oral sensations. Physiol Behav 95(4):581–590

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bajec MR, Pickering GJ (2010) Association of thermal taste and PROP responsiveness with food liking, neophobia, body mass index, and waist circumference. Food Qual Prefer 21(6):589–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bamshad M, Wooding S, Salisbury BA, Stephens JC (2004) Deconstructing the relationship between genetics and race. Nat Rev Genet 5(8):598–609

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barnicot NA, Harris H, Kalmus H (1951) Taste thresholds of further eighteen compounds and their correlation with P.T.C. thresholds. Annals of Eugenics 16:119–128

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bartoshuk LM (2000) Comparing sensory experiences across individuals: recent psychophysical advances illuminate genetic variation in taste perception. Chem Senses 25(4):447–460

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bartoshuk LM, Duffy VB, Reed D, Williams A (1996) Supertasting, earaches and head injury: genetics and pathology alter our taste worlds. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 20(1):79–87

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bartoshuk LM, Fast K, Snyder DJ (2005a) Differences in our sensory worlds: invalid comparisons with labeled scales. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 14(3):122–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartoshuk LM, Snyder DJ, Grushka M, Berger AM, Duffy VB, Kveton JF (2005b) Taste damage: previously unsuspected consequences. Chem Senses 30(Suppl 1):i218–i219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basson MD, Bartoshuk LM, Dichello SZ, Panzini L, Weiffenbach JM, Duffy VB (2005) Association between 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) bitterness and colonic neoplasms. Dig Dis Sci 50(3):483–489

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bathalon G, Tucker K, Hays N, Vinken A, Greenberg A, McCrory M, Roberts S (2000) Psychological measures of eating behavior and the accuracy of 3 common dietary assessment methods in healthy postmenopausal women. Am J Clin Nutr 71(3):739–745

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bell KI, Tepper BJ (2006) Short-term vegetable intake by young children classified by 6-n-propylthoiuracil bitter-taste phenotype. Am J Clin Nutr 84(1):245–251

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berkley Nutrition Services (2003) www.nutritionquest.com/validation/html

  • Blakeslee AF (1932) Genetics of sensory thresholds: taste for phenyl thio carbamide. Proc Natl Acad Sci 18:120–130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bufe B, Breslin PA, Kuhn C, Reed DR, Tharp CD, Slack JP, Kim UK, Drayna D, Meyerhof W (2005) The molecular basis of individual differences in phenylthiocarbamide and propylthiouracil bitterness perception. Curr Biol 15(4):322–327

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cardello A (1996) The role of the human senses in food acceptance. In: Meiselman HL, MacFie HJH (eds) Food choice, acceptance, and consumption, 1st edn. Blackie Academic & Professional, London

    Google Scholar 

  • CDC (2007) Fruit and vegetable consumption among adults: United States, 2005. Morb Mortal (MMWR) 56(10):213–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook A, Friday J (2000a) Pyramid servings database for USDA survey food codes version 1 [Internet]. USDA, Agricultural Research Service. http://www.ars.usda.gov/Services/docs.htm?docid=8503

  • Cook A, Friday J (2000b) PYRAMID SERVINGS INTAKES By U.S. Children and Adults 1994–96, 1998 [Internet]. USDA, Agricultural Research Service. http://www.ars.usda.gov/ba/bhnrc/cnrg

  • de Castro JM (1994) Methodology, correlational analysis, and interpretation of diet diary records of the food and fluid intake of free-living humans. Appetite 23(2):179–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delwiche JF, Buletic Z, Breslin PA (2001) Relationship of papillae number to bitter intensity of quinine and PROP within and between individuals. Physiol Behav 74(3):329–337

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dick DM, Rose RJ, Viken RJ, Kaprio J, Koskenvuo M (2001) Exploring gene-environment interactions: socioregional moderation of alcohol use. J Abnorm Psychol 110(4):625–632

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dinehart ME, Hayes JE, Bartoshuk LM, Lanier SL, Duffy VB (2006) Bitter taste markers explain variability in vegetable sweetness, bitterness, and intake. Physiol Behav 87(2):304–313

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Drewnowski A, Gomez-Carneros C (2000) Bitter taste, phytonutrients, and the consumer: a review. Am J Clin Nutr 72(6):1424–1435

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Drewnowski A, Henderson SA, Shore AB (1997) Taste responses to naringin, a flavonoid, and the acceptance of grapefruit juice are related to genetic sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil. Am J Clin Nutr 66:391–397

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Drewnowski A, Henderson SA, Levine A, Hann C (1999) Taste and food preferences as predictors of dietary practices in young women. Public Health Nutr 2(4):513–519

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Drewnowski A, Henderson SA, Hann CS, Berg WA, Ruffin MT (2000) Genetic taste markers and preferences for vegetables and fruit of female breast care patients. J Am Diet Assoc 100(2):191–197

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy VB, Bartoshuk LM (2000) Food acceptance and genetic variation in taste. J Am Diet Assoc 100(6):647–655

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy V, Lucchina L, Bartoshuk L (2004a) Genetic variation in taste: potential biomarker for cardiovascular disease risk? In: Prescott J, Tepper BJ (eds) Genetic variations in taste sensitivity: measurement, significance and implications. Dekker, New York, pp 195–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy VB, Davidson AC, Kidd JR, Kidd KK, Speed WC, Pakstis AJ, Reed DR, Snyder DJ, Bartoshuk LM (2004b) Bitter receptor gene (TAS2R38), 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) bitterness and alcohol intake. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 28(11):1629–1637

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy VB, Peterson J, Bartoshuk LM (2004c) Associations between taste genetics, oral sensations and alcohol intake. Physiol Behav 82(2–3):435–445

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy VB, Hayes JE, Sullivan BS, Faghri P (2009) Surveying food/beverage liking: a tool for epidemiological studies to connect chemosensation with health outcomes. Ann NY Acad Sci 1170:558–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Essick GK, Chopra A, Guest S, McGlone F (2003) Lingual tactile acuity, taste perception, and the density and diameter of fungiform papillae in female subjects. Physiol Behav 80(2–3):289–302

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A (2007) G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 39(2):175–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox AL (1931) Six in ten “tasteblind” to bitter chemical. Sci News Lett 9:249

    Google Scholar 

  • Gayathri DA, Henderson SA, Drewnowski A (1997) Sensory acceptance of Japanese green tea and soy products is linked to genetic sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil. Nutr Cancer 29:146–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorman B, Allison D (1995) Handbook of assessment methods for eating behaviors and weight-related problems. Sage, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Green BG, Hayes JE (2004) Individual differences in perception of bitterness from capsaicin, piperine and zingerone. Chem Senses 29(1):53–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green BG, Dalton P, Cowart B, Shaffer G, Rankin K, Higgins J (1996) Evaluating the ‘Labeled Magnitude Scale’ for measuring sensations of taste and smell. Chem Senses 21(3):323–334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen JL, Reed DR, Wright MJ, Martin NG, Breslin PA (2006) Heritability and genetic covariation of sensitivity to PROP, SOA, quinine HCl, and caffeine. Chem Senses 31(5):403–413

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes JE, Duffy VB (2008) Oral sensory phenotype identifies level of sugar and fat required for maximal liking. Physiol Behav 95(1–2):77–87. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.04.023

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes JE, Bartoshuk LM, Kidd JK, Duffy VB (2008a) Supertasting and PROP bitterness depends on more than the TAS2R38 gene. Chem Senses 33(3):255–265. doi:10.1093/chemse/bjm084

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes JE, Wallace MR, Bartoshuk LM, Herbstman D, Duffy VB (2008b) Novel TAS2R SNP associations with taste sensations, liking or intake for alcoholic and bitter non-alcoholic beverages. Chem Senses 33(8):S40–S40 [Abstract]

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes JE, Sullivan BS, Duffy VB (2010) Explaining variability in sodium intake through oral sensory phenotype, salt sensation and liking. Physiol Behav 100(4):369–380

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herman C, Polivy J (1975) Anxiety, restraint, and eating behavior. J Abnorm Psychol 84:666–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herman C, Polivy J (1980) Restrained eating. In: Stunkard A (ed) Obesity. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 208–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Intranuovo LR, Powers AS (1998) The perceived bitterness of beer and 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) taste sensitivity. Ann NY Acad Sci 855:813–815

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kalmus H (1958) Improvements in the classification of the taster genotypes. Ann Hum Genet 22(3):222–230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaminski LC, Henderson SA, Drewnowski A (2000) Young women’s food preferences and taste responsiveness to 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP). Physiol Behav 68(5):691–697

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keller KL, Steinmann L, Nurse RJ, Tepper BJ (2002) Genetic taste sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil influences food preference and reported intake in preschool children. Appetite 38(1):3–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keppel G (1991) Design and analysis: a researcher’s handbook. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidd K, Davidson A, Pakstis A, Speed W, Bartoshuk L, Duffy V, JR K (2004) PTC-tasting and negative evidence for balancing selection (abstract). Am J Hum Genet Suppl. 75:abstract 1175

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim UK, Jorgenson E, Coon H, Leppert M, Risch N, Drayna D (2003) Positional cloning of the human quantitative trait locus underlying taste sensitivity to phenylthiocarbamide. Science 299(5610):1221–1225

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn C, Bufe B, Winnig M, Hofmann T, Frank O, Behrens M, Lewtschenko T, Slack JP, Ward CD, Meyerhof W (2004) Bitter taste receptors for saccharin and acesulfame K. J Neurosci 24(45):10260–10265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lanier SA, Hayes JE, Duffy VB (2005) Sweet and bitter tastes of alcoholic beverages mediate alcohol intake in of-age undergraduates. Physiol Behav 83(5):821–831

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lawless HT (1980) A comparison of different methods used to assess sensitivity to the taste of phenylthiocarbamide (PTC). Chem Senses 5(3):247–256

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lock K, Pomerleau J, Causer L, Altmann DR, McKee M (2005) The global burden of disease attributable to low consumption of fruit and vegetables: implications for the global strategy on diet. Bull World Health Organ 83(2):100–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdiarmid J, Blundell J (1998) Assessing dietary intake: who, what and why of under-reporting. Nutr Res Rev 11(2):231–253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McBurney D, Collings VB (1977) Introduction to sensation/perception. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller I, Reedy F (1990) Variation in human taste bud density and taste intensity perception. Physiol Behav 47:1213–1219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Napoleone G, Conliffe C, Hayes JE, Kneeland K, Sullivan BS, Duffy VB (2007) Modifying vegetable tastes to improve liking. J Am Diet Assoc 107(8):A55 [Abstract]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Sciences (2002) Dietary reference intakes for energy, carbohydrate, fiber, fat, fatty acids, cholesterol, protein and amino acids. Institute of Medicine, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Prescott J, Bartoshuk LM, Prutkin J (2004) 6-n-Propylthiouracil tasting and the perception of nontaste oral sensations. In: Prescott J, Tepper BJ (eds) Genetic variation in taste sensitivity. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 89–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Prutkin J, Fisher EM, Etter L, Fast K, Gardner E, Lucchina LA, Snyder DJ, Tie K, Weiffenbach J, Bartoshuk LM (2000) Genetic variation and inferences about perceived taste intensity in mice and men. Physiol Behav 69(1–2):161–173

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reed DR (2008) Birth of a new breed of supertaster. Chem Senses 33:489–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacerdote C, Guarrera S, Smith GD, Grioni S, Krogh V, Masala G, Mattiello A, Palli D, Panico S, Tumino R et al (2007) Lactase persistence and bitter taste response: instrumental variables and mendelian randomization in epidemiologic studies of dietary factors and cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol 166(5):576–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandell MA, Breslin PA (2006) Variability in a taste-receptor gene determines whether we taste toxins in food. Curr Biol 16(18):R792–R794

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schonhof I, Krumbein A, Bruckner B (2004) Genotypic effects on glucosinolates and sensory properties of broccoli and cauliflower. Nahrung-Food 48(1):25–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shiffman D, O’Meara ES, Bare LA, Rowland CM, Louie JZ, Arellano AR, Lumley T, Rice K, Iakoubova O, Luke MM et al (2008) Association of gene variants with incident myocardial infarction in the Cardiovascular Health Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 28(1):173–179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder DJ, Prescott J, Bartoshuk LM (2006) Modern psychophysics and the assessment of human oral sensation. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 63:221–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinmetz KA, Potter JD (1996) Vegetables, fruit, and cancer prevention: a review. J Am Diet Assoc 96(10):1027–1039

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stunkard A, Messick S (1985) The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition, and hunger. J Psychosom Res 29(1):71–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Subar AF, Thompson FE, Kipnis V, Midthune D, Hurwitz P, McNutt S, McIntosh A, Rosenfeld S (2001) Comparative validation of the Block, Willett, and National Cancer Institute food frequency questionnaires: the Eating at America’s Table Study. Am J Epidemiol 154(12):1089–1099

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2000) Using multivariate statistics. Allyn and Bacon, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Tepper BJ, Nurse RJ (1997) Fat perception is related to PROP taster status. Physiol Behav 61(6):949–954

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tepper BJ, Ullrich NV (2002) Influence of genetic taste sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP), dietary restraint and disinhibition on body mass index in middle-aged women. Physiol Behav 75(3):305–312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Timpson NJ, Christensen M, Lawlor DA, Gaunt TR, Day IN, Smith GD (2005) TAS2R38 (phenylthiocarbamide) haplotypes, coronary heart disease traits, and eating behavior in the BritishWomen’s Heart and Health Study. Am J Clin Nutr 81(5):1005–1011

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull B, Matisoo-Smith E (2002) Taste sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil predicts acceptance of bitter-tasting spinach in 3-6-y-old children. Am J Clin Nutr 76(5):1101–1105

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • USDA (1998) Food and Nutrient Intakes by Individuals in the United States, by Sex and Age, 1994–96, Nationwide Food Surveys Report No. 96–2 [Internet]. http://www.ars.usda.gov/SP2Userfiles/Place/12355000/pdf/3yr_py.PDF

  • US Department of Agriculture, US Department of Health and Human Services (2010) Report of the Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee on the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2010. Available at: www.cnpp.usda.gov/DGAs2010-DGACReport.htm. Accessed on August 9, 2010

  • Wang JC, Hinrichs AL, Bertelsen S, Stock H, Budde JP, Dick DM, Bucholz KK, Rice J, Saccone N, Edenberg HJ et al (2007) Functional variants in TAS2R38 and TAS2R16 influence alcohol consumption in high-risk families of African-American origin. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 31(2):209–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead MC, Beeman CS, Kinsella BA (1985) Distribution of taste and general sensory nerve endings in fungiform papillae of the hamster. Am J Anat 173:185–201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wright J, Wang C, Kennedy-Stephenson J, Ervin R (2003) Dietary intake of ten key nutrients for public health, United States: 1999–2000. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville. No. 334

  • Zuniga JR, Chen N, Miller IJ Jr (1994) Effects of chorda-lingual nerve injury and repair on human taste. Chem Senses 19(6):657–665

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Julie M. Peterson, MS, RD and Megan N. Phillips, MS, RD for collecting the data; and Denise Anamani MA, CLSpMB for obtaining the blood samples. This work was supported by USDA Hatch Project CONS00827 and NIH grant numbers DC00283 and AA09379.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valerie B. Duffy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Duffy, V.B., Hayes, J.E., Davidson, A.C. et al. Vegetable Intake in College-Aged Adults Is Explained by Oral Sensory Phenotypes and TAS2R38 Genotype. Chem. Percept. 3, 137–148 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12078-010-9079-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12078-010-9079-8

Keywords

Navigation