Skip to main content
Log in

Creating Aging-Friendly Communities in the United States

  • Published:
Ageing International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An aging United States population, combined with traditional American values of independence and individualism, is fostering increased interest in community efforts to promote aging in place. This article describes the types of community aging-friendly initiatives that currently exist in the United States, and the roles that various sectors (e.g., public, non-profit, private) have played in their development. Findings from a national internet-based survey identified 292 current aging-friendly community initiatives, of four types: community planning, system coordination and program development, co-location of services, and consumer associations. Most represent local community interventions, developed in the absence of federal funding or guidance and often hampered by limited political authority or economic resources. Private sector solutions, such as mutual-benefit associations, appear to be on the rise; however, such initiatives are not widely accessible, especially to those individuals with insufficient resources or political power to participate in the private market. Taken together, these findings raise questions regarding the sustainability of current efforts, their availability to less-resourced individuals and communities, and the long-term ability of communities in the United States to make the infrastructure changes required to meet the needs of an aging society without an increased government role.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AARP PPI (2008). The role of the older Americans Act in providing long-term care. Fact Sheet. Washington, DC: AARP PPI. Retrieved on May 27, 2009 from: http://assets.aarp.org/rgcenter/il/fs12r_oaa_ltc.pdf.

  • Abramson, L., Seligman, M., & Teasdale, J. (1978). Learned helplessness in humans: critique and reformulation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87, 49–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atchley, R. (1989). A continuity theory of normal aging. Gerontologist, 29, 183–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloomberg, M., & Quinn, C. (2009). Age-friendly NYC. New York

  • Bolda, E., Saucier, P., Maddox, G., Wetle, T., & Lowe, J. I. (2006). Governance and management structures for community partnerships: experiences from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation’s Community Partnerships for Older Adults Program. Gerontologist, 46, 391–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carstensen, L., Fung, H., & Charles, S. (2003). Socioemotional selectivity theory and the regulation of emotion in the second half of life. Motivation and Emotion, 27, 103–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, P., & George, L. K. (2005). The role of the built environment in the disablement process. American Journal of Public Health, 95, 1933–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard, J. (2008). Older drivers’ “high per-mile crash involvement”: the implications for licensing authorities. Traffic Injury Prevention, 9, 284–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, P. H., Oberlink, M. R., Simantov, E., & Gursen, M. D. (2004). A tale of two older Americas: Community opportunities and challenges. Advantage Initiative 2003 National Survey of Adults Aged 65 and Older. New York: Center for Home Care Policy and Research, Visiting Nurse Service of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartocollis, A. (2010). A fast-paced city tries to be a gentler place to grow old. New York Times, July 18, 2010. Retrieved from: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/19/nyregion/19aging.html.

  • Keenan, T. (2010). Home and community preferences of the 45+ population. Accessed January 31. 2011, from http://www.aarp.org/home-garden/livable-communities/info-11-2010/home-community-services-10.html.

  • Lawton, M. P., & Nahemow, L. (1973). Ecology and the aging process. In C. Eisdorfer & M. P. Lawton (Eds.), Psychology of adult development and aging (pp. 657–668). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehning, A., Chun, Y., & Scharlach, A. (2007). Structural barriers to developing ‘aging-friendly’ communities. Public Policy & Aging Report, 17, 15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezuk, B., & Rebok, G. W. (2008). Social integration and social support among older adults following driving cessation. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 63, S298–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Association of Home Builders (NAHB). (2009). Planning for aging-in-place remodeling on the rise. Accessed January 31. 2011, from http://www.nahb.org/news_details.aspx?newsID=9008.

  • NORC Aging in Place Initiative. (2011). History of the Jewish Federations of North America’s Aging in Place Initiative. Accessed January 31. 2011, from http://www.norcs.org/page.aspx?id=160579.

  • NORC Blueprint. (2011). NORC Blueprint: A guide to community action. Accessed January 31. 2011, from http://www.norcblueprint.org/.

  • National Association of Area Agencies on Aging (N4A) and Partners for Livable Communities. (2007). A blueprint for action: Developing a livable community for all ages. Washington, D.C. Retrieved August 2009 from: http://www.n4a.org/files/programs/livable-communities/blueprint-for-action.pdf.

  • Rosenbloom, S. (2009). Meeting transportation needs in an aging-friendly community. Generations, 33(2), 33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, J., & Kahn, R. (1999). Successful aging. New York: Dell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharlach, A. E., Lehning, A. J., & Graham, C. L. (2010). Proliferation of the “Village” model: Neighborhood associations for aging in place. New Orleans: Paper presented at the Annual Scientific Meeting of the Gerontological Society of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, W. H., & Blanchard, J. M. (2009). Moving beyond place: aging in community. Generations, 33(2), 12–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timiras, P. (2007). Physiological basis of aging and geriatrics (4th ed.). London: Informa Healthcare.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau (2004). U.S. interim projections by age, sex, race, and Hispanic origin. Retrieved on July 9, 2007 from: http://www.census.gov/ipc/www/usinterimproj/natprojtab02a.pdf.

  • U.S. Census Bureau (2009). Facts for features: Older Americans month: 2009. Retrieved on June 1, 2009 from: http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/releases/archives/facts_for_features_special_editions/013384.html.

  • U.S. Department of Transportation: Federal Highway Administration. (2007). Accommodating bicycle and pedestrian travel: a recommended approach. US DOT policy statement integrating bicycling and walking into transportation infrastructure. Washington, DC. Retrieved July 2007 from: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/bikeped/design.htm.

  • Verbrugge, L. M., & Jette, A. M. (1994). The disablement process. Social Science & Medicine, 38, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wider Opportunities for Women. (2009, March). Factsheet: Elder Economic Security Initiative. Retrieved on December 30, 2009, from: http://www.wowonline.org/ourprograms/eesi/documents/NatlEESIFactSheet2008FINAL.pdf.

  • Zucker, A., Ostrove, J., & Stewart, A. (2002). College-educated women’s personality development in adulthood: perceptions and age differences. Psychology and Aging, 17, 236–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was conducted with generous support from the MetLife Foundation, the SCAN Foundation, and the Kleiner Family Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew Scharlach.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scharlach, A. Creating Aging-Friendly Communities in the United States. Ageing Int 37, 25–38 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-011-9140-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-011-9140-1

Keywords

Navigation