Skip to main content
Log in

Sunk Cost and Commitment to Medical Treatment

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The influence of prior, irretrievable, investment (sunk cost) on commitment to medical treatment was investigated. Three studies were run investigating the influence of sunk cost in the form of money, time, and effort. A total of 637 participants (314 male) with a mean age of 19.58 years were recruited from an undergraduate population. A computer program simulated the process of arranging a course of physiotherapy. Participants invested one of three amounts of sunk cost (under budget, on budget, or over budget) into arranging sessions with a chiropractor. Participants then decided how much time they wished to commit to these chiropractor sessions or to an alternative treatment with a better chance of success. Results revealed a significant effect of invested money, a significant effect of invested effort, but no effect of invested time. Invested money produced a sunk cost effect, while invested effort appeared to exert influence via cognitive dissonance. The implications for healthcare decision-making are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychological Association. (1992). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 47, 1597–1611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arkes, H. R. (1996). The psychology of waste. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 9, 213–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arkes, H. R., & Blumer, C. (1985). The psychology of sunk cost. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35, 124–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ǻstebro, T., Jeffrey, S. A., & Adomdza, G. K. (2007). Inventor perseverance after being told to quit: the role of cognitive biases. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 20, 253–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1967). Self-perception: an alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychological Review, 74, 183–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boehne, D. M., & Paese, P. W. (2000). Deciding whether to complete or terminate an unfinished project: a strong test of the project completion hypothesis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 81, 178–194.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, M. D. (2009). Sunk cost and commitment to dates arranged online. Current Psychology, 28, 45–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberger, R. (1992). Learned industriousness. Psychological Review, 99, 248–267.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland, H., Sandefur, C. A., & Rogers, A. C. (1990). De-escalation of commitment in oil exploration: when sunk costs and negative feedback coincide. Journal of Applied Psychology, 6, 721–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girandola, F., & Gauthier, E. (2001). Organizational decision making: effects of accountability on escalation of commitment. European Review of Applied Psychology, 51, 111–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, C. (1995). Escalation and de-escalation in response to sunk cost: the role of budgeting in mental accounting. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62, 38–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juliusson, E. Á., Karlsson, N., & Gärling, T. (2005). Weighing the past and the future in decision making. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17, 561–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klaczynski, P. A., & Cottrell, J. M. (2004). A dual-process approach to cognitive development: the case of children’s understanding of sunk cost decisions. Thinking and Reasoning, 10, 147–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ku, G., Galinsky, A. D., & Murnigham, J. K. (2006). Starting low but ending high: a reversal of the anchoring effect in auctions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 975–986.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liersch, M. J. (2007). Testing the boundary conditions of biases resulting from heuristic processes. US Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 68, 3418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, H. (2001). Looking forward and looking back: integrating completion and sunk cost effects within an escalation of commitment progress decision. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 104–113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rasker, J. J. (1995). Rheumatology in general practice. British Journal of Rheumatology, 34, 494–497.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soman, D. (2001). The mental accounting of sunk time costs: why time is not like money. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 14, 169–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staw, B. M. (1976). Knee deep in the big muddy: a study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 27–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R. (1980). Towards a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1, 39–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US Bureau of the Census. (2003). Cited in, Effects of health care spending on the US economy. Retrieved January 19, 2010 from the World Wide Web http://aspe.hhs.gov/health/costgrowth/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin D. Coleman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Coleman, M.D. Sunk Cost and Commitment to Medical Treatment. Curr Psychol 29, 121–134 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-010-9077-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-010-9077-7

Keywords

Navigation