nach oben

Erschienen in:

01.07.2009 | Original Article

Dual-time point ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scan for differentiation between ¹⁸F-FDG-avid non-small cell lung cancer and benign lesions

verfasst von: Kazuyoshi Suga, Yasuhiko Kawakami, Atsuto Hiyama, Kazurou Sugi, Kazutomo Okabe, Tsuneo Matsumoto, Kazuhiro Ueda, Nobuyuki Tanaka, Naofumi Matsunaga

Erschienen in: Annals of Nuclear Medicine | Ausgabe 5/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study is to clarify the difference of F-18 FDG uptake kinetics between FDG-avid non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and benign lesions associated with various etiologies on dual-time point PET/CT scan, and to determine the optimal parameter for differentiation.

Materials and methods

The materials were 76 FDG-avid solitary NSCLC in 76 patients and 57 FDG-avid solitary benign lesions associated with various etiologies in 61 patients. FDG PET/CT scan was performed at 60 and 120 min after intravenous injection of 4.4 MBq/kg F-18 FDG. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) on early and delayed scans and the percent change of SUVmax (%ΔSUVmax) between the two time points were measured. The optimal differential parameter was determined by receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis and evaluation of diagnostic accuracy.

Results

The mean ± SD of early SUV max, delayed SUVmax and %ΔSUVmax were 8.3 ± 5.2, and 10.2 ± 6.5, and 21.9% ± 18.9 in FDG-avid NSCLC, and 3.8 ± 3.2, 4.0 ± 3.7, and 11.3% ± 26.0 in FDG-avid benign lesions, respectively. Delayed SUVmax in NSCLC was significantly higher than early SUVmax (P < 0.0001); while not different in benign lesions. Percent change of SUVmax in NSCLC was also significantly higher than that in benign lesions (P < 0.01). The optimal parameter for the differentiation was delayed SUVmax > 5.5 and yielded sensitivity of 77.6%, specificity of 80.7% and accuracy of 78.9%, which provided better differentiation than the use of %ΔSUVmax or the traditional parameter of early SUVmax > 2.5. However, 11 (19.2%) benign lesions were indistinguishable from NSCLC.

Conclusion

Although delayed PET/CT scan enhances the difference of FDG uptake between FDG-avid NSCLC and benign lesions, and the use of delayed SUVmax > 5.5 appears to improve the differentiation of these hypermetabolic lesions compared with an early scan, careful interpretation and management for correct differentiation are still required.

Shulkin AN. Management of the indeterminate solitary pulmonary nodule: a co-operative study. Ann Thorac Surg. 1993;56:743–4.PubMedCrossRef

Odell MJ, Reid KR. Does percutaneous fine-needle aspiration biopsy aid in the diagnosis and surgical management of lung masses? Can J Surg. 1999;42:297–301.PubMed

Tsukada H, Satou T, Iwashima A, Souma T. Diagnostic accuracy of CT-guided automated needle biopsy of lung nodules. Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175:239–43.

Dewan NA, Reeb SD, Gupta NC, Gobar LS, Scott WJ. PET-FDG imaging and transthoracic needle lung aspiration biopsy in evaluation of pulmonary lesions. A comparative risk-benefit analysis. Chest. 1995;108:441–6.PubMedCrossRef

Gould MK, Maclean CC, Kuschner WG, Rydzak CE, Owens DK. Accuracy of positron emission tomography for diagnosis of pulmonary nodules and mass lesions: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2001;285:914–24.PubMedCrossRef

Schrevens L, Lorent N, Dooms C, Vansteenkiste J. The role of PET scan in diagnosis, staging, and management of non-small cell lung cancer. Oncologist. 2004;9:633–43.PubMedCrossRef

Hamberg LM, Hunter GJ, Alpert NM, Choi NC, Babich JW, Fischman AJ. The dose uptake ratio as an index of glucose metabolism: useful parameter or oversimplification? J Nucl Med. 1994;35:1308–12.PubMed

Fischer BM, Mortensen J, Hojgaard L. Positron emission tomography in the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer: a systematic, quantitative review. Lancet Oncol. 2001;2:659–66.PubMedCrossRef

Mavi A, Lakhani P, Zhuang H, Gupta NC, Alavi A. Fluorodeoxyglucose-PET in characterizing solitary pulmonary nodules, assessing pleural diseases, and the initial staging, restaging, therapy planning, and monitoring response of lung cancer. Radiol Clin North Am. 2005;43:1–21.PubMedCrossRef

10.

Shon IH, O’doherty MJ, Maisey MN. Positron emission tomography in lung cancer. Semin Nucl Med. 2002;32:240–71.PubMedCrossRef

11.

Bunyaviroch T, Coleman RE. PET evaluation of lung cancer. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:451–69.PubMed

12.

Pitman AG, Hicks RJ, Binns DS, Ware RE, Kalff V, McKenzie AF, et al. Positron emission tomography in pulmonary masses where tissue diagnosis is unhelpful or not possible. Med J Aust. 2001;175:303–7.PubMed

13.

Fletcher JW, Djulbegovic B, Soares HP, Barry A, Siegel BA, Lowe VJ, et al. Recommendations on the Use of ¹⁸F-FDG PET in Oncology. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:480–508.PubMedCrossRef

14.

Blodgett T, Meltzer CC, Townsend DW. PET/CT: form and function. Radiology. 2007;242:360–85.PubMedCrossRef

15.

Bury T, Dowlati A, Paulus P, Corhay JL, Benoit T, Kayembe JM, et al. Evaluation of the solitary pulmonary nodule by positron emission tomography imaging. Eur Respir J. 1996;9:410–4.PubMedCrossRef

16.

Alavi A, Gupta N, Alberini JL, Hickeson M, Adam LE, Bhargava P, et al. Positron emission tomography imaging in nonmalignant thoracic disorders. Semin Nucl Med. 2002;32:293–321.PubMedCrossRef

17.

Bakheet SM, Powe J. Benign causes of 18-FDG uptake on whole body imaging. Semin Nucl Med. 1998;28:352–8.PubMedCrossRef

18.

Zhuang H, Pourdehnad M, Lambright ES, Yamamoto AJ, Lanuti M, Li P, et al. Dual time point ¹⁸F-FDG PET imaging for differentiating malignant from inflammatory processes. J Nucl Med. 2001;42:1412–7.PubMed

19.

Lan XL, Zhang YX, Wu ZJ, Jia Q, Wei H, Gao ZR. The value of dual time point ¹⁸F-FDG PET imaging for the differentiation between malignant and benign lesions. Clin Radiol. 2008;63:756–64.PubMedCrossRef

20.

Goo JM, Im JG, Do KH, Yeo JS, Seo JB, Kim HY, et al. Pulmonary tuberculoma evaluated by means of FDG PET: findings in 10 cases. Radiology. 2000;216:117–21.PubMed

21.

Bakheet SM, Saleem M, Powe J, Al-Amro A, Larsson SG, Mahassin Z. F-18 fluorode-oxyglucose chest uptake in lung inflammation and infection. Clin Nucl Med. 2000;25:273–8.PubMedCrossRef

22.

Brudin LH, Valind SO, Rhodes CG, Pantin CF, Sweatman M, Jones T, et al. Fluorine-18 deoxyglucose uptake in sarcoidosis measured with positron emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med. 1994;21:297–305.PubMedCrossRef

23.

Demura Y, Tsuchida T, Ishizaki T, Mizuno S, Totani Y, Ameshina S, et al. ¹⁸F-FDG accumulation with PET for differentiation between benign and malignant lesions in the thorax. J Nucl Med. 2003;44:540–8.PubMed

24.

Alkhawaldeh K, Bural G, Kumar R, Alavi A. Impact of dual-time-point ¹⁸F-FDG PET imaging and partial volume correction in the assessment of solitary pulmonary nodules. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35:246–52.PubMedCrossRef

25.

Lowe VJ, DeLong DM, Hoffman JM, Coleman RE. Optimum scanning protocol for FDG-PET evaluation of pulmonary malignancy. J Nucl Med. 1995;36:883–7.PubMed

26.

Xiu Y, Bhutani C, Dhurairaj T, Yu JQ, Dadparvar S, Reddy S, et al. Dual-time point FDG PET imaging in the evaluation of pulmonary nodules with minimally increased metabolic activity. Clin Nucl Med. 2007;32:101–5.PubMedCrossRef

27.

Matthies A, Hickeson M, Cuchiara A, Alavi A. Dual time point ¹⁸F-FDG PET for the evaluation of pulmonary nodules. J Nucl Med. 2002;43:871–5.PubMed

28.

Conrad GR, Sinha P. Narrow time window dual-point 18F-FDG PET for the diagnosis of thoracic malignancy. Nucl Med Commun. 2003;24:1129–37.PubMedCrossRef

29.

Chen CJ, Lee BF, Yao WJ, Cheng L, Wu PS, Chu CL, et al. Dual-phase 18F-FDG PET in the diagnosis of pulmonary nodules with an initial standard uptake value less than 2.5. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191:475–9.PubMedCrossRef

30.

Kubota K, Matsuzawa T, Fujiwara T, Ito M, Hatazawa J, Ishiwata K, et al. Differential diagnosis of lung tumor with positron emission tomography: a prospective study. J Nucl Med. 1990;31:1927–32.PubMed

31.

Beuthien-Baumann B, Hamacher K, Oberdorfer F, Steinbach J. Preparation of fluorine-18 labelled sugars and derivatives and their application as tracer for positron-emission-tomography. Carbohydr Res. 2000;327:107–18.PubMedCrossRef

32.

Browne J, De Pierro A. A row-action alternative to the EM algorithm for maximizing likelihood in emission tomography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1996;15:687–99.PubMedCrossRef

33.

Núñez R, Kalapparambath A, Varela J. Improvement in sensitivity with delayed imaging of pulmonary lesions with FDG-PET. Rev Esp Med Nucl. 2007;26:196–207.PubMedCrossRef

34.

Kubota R, Yamada S, Kubota K, Ishiwata K, Tamahashi N, Ido T. Intratumoral distribution of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose in vivo: high accumulation in macrophages and granulation tissues studied by microautoradiography. J Nucl Med. 1992;33:1972–80.PubMed

35.

Hubner KF, Buonocore E, Gould HR, Thie J, Smith GT, Stephens S, et al. Differentiating benign from malignant lung lesions using “quantitative” parameters of FDG PET images. Clin Nucl Med. 1996;21:941–9.PubMedCrossRef

36.

Tsushima Y, Tateishi U, Uno H, Takeuchi M, Terauchi T, Goya T, et al. Diagnostic performance of PET/CT in differentiation of malignant and benign non-solid solitary pulmonary nodules. Ann Nucl Med. 2008;22:571–7.PubMedCrossRef

37.

Higashi K, Ueda Y, Seki H, Yuasa K, Oguchi M, Noguchi T, et al. Fluorine-18-FDG PET imaging is negative in bronchioalveolar carcinoma. J Nucl Med. 1998;39:1016–20.PubMed

38.

Bryant AS, Cerfolio RJ. The maximum standardized uptake values on integrated FDG-PET/CT is useful in differentiating benign from malignant pulmonary nodules. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;82:1016–20.PubMedCrossRef

39.

Hustinx R, Smith RJ, Benard F, Rosenthal DI, Machtay M, Farber LA, et al. Dual time point fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography: a potential method to differentiate malignancy from inflammation and normal tissue in head and neck. Eur J Nucl Med. 1999;26:1345–8.PubMedCrossRef

40.

Uesaka D, Demura Y, Ishizaki T, Ameshima S, Miyamori I, Sasaki M, et al. Evaluation of dual-time-point 18F-FDG PET for staging in patients with lung cancer. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:1606–12.PubMedCrossRef

41.

Mavi A, Urhan M, Yu JQ, Zhuang H, Houseni M, Cermik TF, et al. Dual time point ¹⁸F-FDG PET imaging detects breast cancer with high sensitivity and correlates well with histologic subtypes. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:1440–6.PubMed

42.

Torizuka T, Zasadny KR, Recker B, Wahl RL. Untreated primary lung and breast cancers: correlation between F-18 FDG kinetic rate constants and findings of in vitro studies. Radiology. 1998;207:767–74.PubMed

43.

Fin L, Daouk J, Morvan J, Bailly P, Esper I, Saidi L, et al. Initial clinical results for breath-hold CT-based processing of respiratory-gated PET acquisitions. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35:1971–80.PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Dual-time point 18F-FDG PET/CT scan for differentiation between 18F-FDG-avid non-small cell lung cancer and benign lesions
verfasst von: Kazuyoshi Suga
Yasuhiko Kawakami
Atsuto Hiyama
Kazurou Sugi
Kazutomo Okabe
Tsuneo Matsumoto
Kazuhiro Ueda
Nobuyuki Tanaka
Naofumi Matsunaga
Publikationsdatum: 01.07.2009
Verlag: Springer Japan
Erschienen in: Annals of Nuclear Medicine / Ausgabe 5/2009
Print ISSN: 0914-7187
Elektronische ISSN: 1864-6433
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-009-0260-6

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Dual-time point ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scan for differentiation between ¹⁸F-FDG-avid non-small cell lung cancer and benign lesions

Abstract

Objective

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusion

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Objective

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2009

Metallic artifacts caused by dental metal prostheses on PET images: a PET/CT phantom study using different PET/CT scanners

Clinical significance of performing 18F-FDG PET on patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a summary of a Japanese multicenter study

Comparison of subareolar injection lymphoscintigraphy with the 1-day and the 2-day protocols for the detection of sentinel lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer

Nesidioblastosis as a cause of focal pancreatic 111In-pentetreotide uptake in a patient with putative VIPoma: another differential diagnosis

Parathyroid changes after high dose radioactive iodine in patients with thyroid cancer

Attenuation correction of myocardial SPECT by scatter-photopeak window method in normal subjects