Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Nuclear Medicine 7/2018

01.06.2018 | Original Article

Assessment of tumor response to chemoradiotherapy and predicting prognosis in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma by PERCIST

verfasst von: Takayuki Katsuura, Kazuhiro Kitajima, Masayuki Fujiwara, Tomonori Terada, Nobuhiro Uwa, Kazuma Noguchi, Hiroshi Doi, Yukihisa Tamaki, Rika Yoshida, Tatsuya Tsuchitani, Masahiro Fujita, Koichiro Yamakado

Erschienen in: Annals of Nuclear Medicine | Ausgabe 7/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate therapeutic response to chemoradiotherapy and prediction of recurrence and death in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) using Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST).

Materials and methods

Forty-two patients (mean 63.4, range 20–79 years) with nasopharyngeal (n = 10), oropharyngeal (n = 13), hypopharyngeal (n = 11), or laryngeal (n = 8) cancer underwent fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) before and approximately 3 months (mean 95.0, range 70–119 days) after undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The effect of PERCIST regarding progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was examined using log-rank and Cox methods.

Results

Complete metabolic response (CMR), partial metabolic response (PMR), stable metabolic disease (SMD), and progressive metabolic disease shown by PERCIST were seen in 30 (71.4%), 9 (21.4%), 3 (7.1%), and 0 patients, respectively. Fourteen (33.3%) developed recurrent disease (median follow-up 27.2, range 8.7–123.1 months) and 9 (21.4%) died (median follow-up 43.6, range 9.6–132.6 months). Furthermore, 4 (13.3%) of 30 patients with CMR developed recurrence, while 7 (77.8%) of 9 with PMR and all 3 (100%) with SMD developed recurrence. Two (6.7%) of 30 patients with CMR, 4 (44.4%) of 9 with PMR, and all 3 (100%) with SMD died. Patients who achieved CMR showed significantly longer PFS and OS as compared to those who did not (PMR and SMD) (both, p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

PERCIST is useful for evaluating therapeutic response to chemoradiotherapy and predicting recurrence and death in HNSCC patients.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferlito A, Corry J, Silver CE, Shaha AR, Thomas Robbins K, Rinaldo A. Planned neck dissection for patients with complete response to chemoradiotherapy: a concept approaching obsolescence. Head Neck. 2010;32:253–61.PubMed Ferlito A, Corry J, Silver CE, Shaha AR, Thomas Robbins K, Rinaldo A. Planned neck dissection for patients with complete response to chemoradiotherapy: a concept approaching obsolescence. Head Neck. 2010;32:253–61.PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Esteller E, Vega MC, Lopez M, Quer M, León X. Salvage surgery after locoregional failure in head and neck carcinoma patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;268:295–301.CrossRefPubMed Esteller E, Vega MC, Lopez M, Quer M, León X. Salvage surgery after locoregional failure in head and neck carcinoma patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;268:295–301.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228 – 47.CrossRefPubMed Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228 – 47.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Wahl RL, Jacene H, Kasamon Y, Lodge MA. From RECIST to PERCIST: evolving considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors. J Nucl Med. 2009;50(Suppl 1):122S-50S.PubMed Wahl RL, Jacene H, Kasamon Y, Lodge MA. From RECIST to PERCIST: evolving considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors. J Nucl Med. 2009;50(Suppl 1):122S-50S.PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Odawara S, Kitajima K, Katsuura T, Kurahashi Y, Shinohara H, Yamakado K. Tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer assessed with CT and FDG-PET/CT—RECIST 1.1 vs. PERCIST 1.0. Eur J Radiol. 2018;101:65–71.CrossRefPubMed Odawara S, Kitajima K, Katsuura T, Kurahashi Y, Shinohara H, Yamakado K. Tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer assessed with CT and FDG-PET/CT—RECIST 1.1 vs. PERCIST 1.0. Eur J Radiol. 2018;101:65–71.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Isles MG, McConkey C, Mehanna HM. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of positron emission tomography in the follow up of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma following radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. Clin Otolaryngol. 2008;33:210–22.CrossRefPubMed Isles MG, McConkey C, Mehanna HM. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of positron emission tomography in the follow up of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma following radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. Clin Otolaryngol. 2008;33:210–22.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Gupta T, Master Z, Kannan S, Agarwal JP, Ghsoh-Laskar S, Rangarajan V, et al. Diagnostic performance of post-treatment FDG PET or FDG PET/CT imaging in head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38:2083–95.CrossRefPubMed Gupta T, Master Z, Kannan S, Agarwal JP, Ghsoh-Laskar S, Rangarajan V, et al. Diagnostic performance of post-treatment FDG PET or FDG PET/CT imaging in head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38:2083–95.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kapoor V, Fukui MB, McCook BM. Role of 18FFDG PET/CT in the treatment of head and neck cancers: posttherapy evaluation and pitfalls. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184:589–97.CrossRefPubMed Kapoor V, Fukui MB, McCook BM. Role of 18FFDG PET/CT in the treatment of head and neck cancers: posttherapy evaluation and pitfalls. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184:589–97.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Passero VA, Branstetter BF, Shuai Y, Heron DE, Gibson MK, Lai SY, et al. Response assessment by combined PET-CT scan versus CT scan alone using RECIST in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy. Ann Oncol. 2010;21:2278–83.CrossRefPubMed Passero VA, Branstetter BF, Shuai Y, Heron DE, Gibson MK, Lai SY, et al. Response assessment by combined PET-CT scan versus CT scan alone using RECIST in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy. Ann Oncol. 2010;21:2278–83.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Matoba M, Tuji H, Shimode Y, Kondo T, Oota K, Tonami H. Lesion regression rate based on RECIST: prediction of treatment outcome in patients with head and neck cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy compared with FDG PET-CT. J Radiat Res. 2015;56:553 – 60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Matoba M, Tuji H, Shimode Y, Kondo T, Oota K, Tonami H. Lesion regression rate based on RECIST: prediction of treatment outcome in patients with head and neck cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy compared with FDG PET-CT. J Radiat Res. 2015;56:553 – 60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Bird T, Barrington S, Thavaraj S, Jeannon JP, Lyons A, Oakley R, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT to assess response and guide ris-stratified follow-up after chemoradiotherapy for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43:1239–47.CrossRefPubMed Bird T, Barrington S, Thavaraj S, Jeannon JP, Lyons A, Oakley R, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT to assess response and guide ris-stratified follow-up after chemoradiotherapy for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43:1239–47.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Skougaard K, Nielsen D, Jensen BV, Hendel HW. Comparison of EORTC criteria and PERCIST for PET/CT response evaluation of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with irinotecan and cetuximab. J Nucl Med. 2013;54:1026–31.CrossRefPubMed Skougaard K, Nielsen D, Jensen BV, Hendel HW. Comparison of EORTC criteria and PERCIST for PET/CT response evaluation of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with irinotecan and cetuximab. J Nucl Med. 2013;54:1026–31.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Minamimoto R, Fayad L, Advani R, Vose J, Macapinlac H, Meza J, et al. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: Prospective multicenter comparison of early interim FLT PET/CT versus FDG PET/CT with IHP, EORTC, Deauville, and PERCIST criteria for early therapeutic monitoring. Radiology. 2016;280:220–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Minamimoto R, Fayad L, Advani R, Vose J, Macapinlac H, Meza J, et al. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: Prospective multicenter comparison of early interim FLT PET/CT versus FDG PET/CT with IHP, EORTC, Deauville, and PERCIST criteria for early therapeutic monitoring. Radiology. 2016;280:220–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Cho SY, Lipson EJ, Im HJ, Rowe SP, Gonzalez EM, Blackford A, et al. Prediction of Response to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy using early-time-point 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging in patients with advanced melanoma. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:1421–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cho SY, Lipson EJ, Im HJ, Rowe SP, Gonzalez EM, Blackford A, et al. Prediction of Response to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy using early-time-point 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging in patients with advanced melanoma. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:1421–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Fledelius J, Winther-Larsen A, Khalil AA, Bylov CM, Hjorthaug K, Bertelsen A, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT for vry erly rsponse ealuation pedicts CT rsponse in elotinib-teated non-small cell lung cancer patients: a comparison of assessment methods. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:1931–7.CrossRefPubMed Fledelius J, Winther-Larsen A, Khalil AA, Bylov CM, Hjorthaug K, Bertelsen A, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT for vry erly rsponse ealuation pedicts CT rsponse in elotinib-teated non-small cell lung cancer patients: a comparison of assessment methods. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:1931–7.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Assessment of tumor response to chemoradiotherapy and predicting prognosis in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma by PERCIST
verfasst von
Takayuki Katsuura
Kazuhiro Kitajima
Masayuki Fujiwara
Tomonori Terada
Nobuhiro Uwa
Kazuma Noguchi
Hiroshi Doi
Yukihisa Tamaki
Rika Yoshida
Tatsuya Tsuchitani
Masahiro Fujita
Koichiro Yamakado
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2018
Verlag
Springer Japan
Erschienen in
Annals of Nuclear Medicine / Ausgabe 7/2018
Print ISSN: 0914-7187
Elektronische ISSN: 1864-6433
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-018-1267-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2018

Annals of Nuclear Medicine 7/2018 Zur Ausgabe