Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Neuroethics 2/2008

01.07.2008 | Brief Communication

Freedom of Memory Today

verfasst von: Adam Kolber

Erschienen in: Neuroethics | Ausgabe 2/2008

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Emerging technologies raise the possibility that we may be able to treat trauma victims by pharmaceutically dampening factual or emotional aspects of their memories. Such technologies raise a panoply of legal and ethical issues. While many of these issues remain off in the distance, some have already arisen. In this brief commentary, I discuss a real-life case of memory erasure. The case reveals why the contours of our freedom of memory—our limited bundle of rights to control our memories and be free of outside control—already merit some attention.
Fußnoten
1
We happen to live in a world where memory erasure is strange and peculiar. If it were more common, doctors might be sued for negligently failing to erase memories. Then, we would confront questions about the valuation of traumatic memories that could have been erased but were not due to a physician’s failure to erase memories in a timely fashion.
 
2
There is even a growing field of “relaxation” dentistry that takes advantage of memory dampening techniques. According to an article in the New York Times, “[i]n the last five years, thousands of dentists have been trained to administer drugs to anxious patients using medications that doctors say create a mild amnesia for patients who are awake, but not necessarily alert, and may forget the whole experience or have only vague recollections” [9].
 
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Kolber, A.J. 2006. Therapeutic forgetting: The legal and ethical implications of memory dampening. Vanderbilt Law Review 59: 1561–1626. Kolber, A.J. 2006. Therapeutic forgetting: The legal and ethical implications of memory dampening. Vanderbilt Law Review 59: 1561–1626.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Pitman, R.K. et al. 2002. Pilot study of secondary prevention of posttraumatic stress disorder with propranolol. Biological Psychiatry 51: 189–192.CrossRef Pitman, R.K. et al. 2002. Pilot study of secondary prevention of posttraumatic stress disorder with propranolol. Biological Psychiatry 51: 189–192.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Vaiva, G. et al. 2003. Immediate treatment with propranolol decreases posttraumatic stress disorder two months after trauma. Biological Psychiatry 54: 947–949.CrossRef Vaiva, G. et al. 2003. Immediate treatment with propranolol decreases posttraumatic stress disorder two months after trauma. Biological Psychiatry 54: 947–949.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Cahill, L., and J.L. McGaugh. 1995. A novel demonstration of enhanced memory associated with emotional arousal. Consciousness & Cognition 4: 410–421.CrossRef Cahill, L., and J.L. McGaugh. 1995. A novel demonstration of enhanced memory associated with emotional arousal. Consciousness & Cognition 4: 410–421.CrossRef
7.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kershaw, S. 2008. My root canal? It’s a blur. New York Times, Mar. 6, 2008, G1. Kershaw, S. 2008. My root canal? It’s a blur. New York Times, Mar. 6, 2008, G1.
Metadaten
Titel
Freedom of Memory Today
verfasst von
Adam Kolber
Publikationsdatum
01.07.2008
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Neuroethics / Ausgabe 2/2008
Print ISSN: 1874-5490
Elektronische ISSN: 1874-5504
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-008-9011-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2008

Neuroethics 2/2008 Zur Ausgabe

Introduction

Editorial

Leitlinien kompakt für die Neurologie

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Neurologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.