Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine 2/2017

23.03.2017 | Motion Preserving Spine Surgery (C Kepler, section editor)

Adjacent level disease-background and update based on disc replacement data

verfasst von: I. David Kaye, Alan S. Hilibrand

Erschienen in: Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine | Ausgabe 2/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose of review

The precise etiology of adjacent segment disease following cervical spine surgery is controversial. Theories for development include inevitable changes secondary to the natural progression of the degenerative cascade and changes secondary to altered biomechanics of the fused cervical spine. Motion preserving techniques, such as cervical disc arthroplasties (CDA), have been introduced with the hopes of reducing the rates of adjacent segment pathology. Recently, 7-year data from the investigational device exemption (IDE) studies have been published. The purpose of this review is to provide an update on cervical adjacent segment disease incorporating this emerging data into the analysis.

Recent findings

Although the 7-year data for CDA has confirmed continued success, specifically regarding improved neck pain and reduced re-operation rates, the influence of CDA on reducing rates of adjacent segment pathology remains questionable. Although some studies have found more radiographic adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) compared to CDA, an association between these findings and clinical symptoms has not been established.

Summary

Cervical disc arthroplasty continues to outperform cervical disc fusion regarding some patient specific parameters, however, whether CDA reduces rates of radiographic and clinical adjacent segment pathology remains unknown. Without studies developed specifically to address this question, the answer remains elusive.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Burkhardt BW, Brielmeier M, Schwerdtfeger K, Oertel JM. 311 smith-Robinson procedure with an autologous iliac crest bone graft with and without Caspar plating as a treatment for soft cervical disc herniation: report of 122 patients with an average follow-up of 25 years. Neurosurgery. 2016;63(Suppl 1):189–90.CrossRefPubMed Burkhardt BW, Brielmeier M, Schwerdtfeger K, Oertel JM. 311 smith-Robinson procedure with an autologous iliac crest bone graft with and without Caspar plating as a treatment for soft cervical disc herniation: report of 122 patients with an average follow-up of 25 years. Neurosurgery. 2016;63(Suppl 1):189–90.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Goffin J, Geusens E, Vantomme N, et al. Long-term follow-up after interbody fusion of the cervical spine. J Spin Disorders Tech. 2004;17:79–85.CrossRef Goffin J, Geusens E, Vantomme N, et al. Long-term follow-up after interbody fusion of the cervical spine. J Spin Disorders Tech. 2004;17:79–85.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Bohlman HH, Emery SE, Goodfellow DB, Jones PK. Robinson anterior cervical discectomy and arthrodesis for cervical radiculopathy: long-term follow-up of one hundred and twenty-two patients. JBJS (Am). 1993;75:1298–307.CrossRef Bohlman HH, Emery SE, Goodfellow DB, Jones PK. Robinson anterior cervical discectomy and arthrodesis for cervical radiculopathy: long-term follow-up of one hundred and twenty-two patients. JBJS (Am). 1993;75:1298–307.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat • Hilibrand AS, Bohlman HH. Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. JBJS Am. 1999;81:519–28. Landmark study evaluating the incidence, prevalence, and radiographic progression of symptomatic adjacent-segment disease through a review of 374 patients (409 ACDF) with up to 21 year follow up. Symptomatic adjacent-segment disease occurred at 2.9% annually during the first ten post-operative years with 25.6% of patients predicted to develop ASD during that time. The authors found a reduced risk of ASD for multilevel fusions compared to single level (p<0.001). CrossRefPubMed • Hilibrand AS, Bohlman HH. Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. JBJS Am. 1999;81:519–28. Landmark study evaluating the incidence, prevalence, and radiographic progression of symptomatic adjacent-segment disease through a review of 374 patients (409 ACDF) with up to 21 year follow up. Symptomatic adjacent-segment disease occurred at 2.9% annually during the first ten post-operative years with 25.6% of patients predicted to develop ASD during that time. The authors found a reduced risk of ASD for multilevel fusions compared to single level (p<0.001). CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat •• Lee JC, Lee SH, Peters C, Riew D. Adjacent segment pathology requiring reoperation after anterior cervical arthrodesis: the influence of smoking, sex, and number of operated levels. Spine. 2015;40:E571–7. Single surgeon series of 1038 patients undergoing ACDF which found a rate of adjacent segment re-operation of 2.4% annually and a 22.2% chance of requiring an operation 10 years after ACDF. Risk factors for re-operation were smoking, female sex, and fewer fusion levels (one or two vs three). CrossRefPubMed •• Lee JC, Lee SH, Peters C, Riew D. Adjacent segment pathology requiring reoperation after anterior cervical arthrodesis: the influence of smoking, sex, and number of operated levels. Spine. 2015;40:E571–7. Single surgeon series of 1038 patients undergoing ACDF which found a rate of adjacent segment re-operation of 2.4% annually and a 22.2% chance of requiring an operation 10 years after ACDF. Risk factors for re-operation were smoking, female sex, and fewer fusion levels (one or two vs three). CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Coric D, Nunley PD, Guyer RD, et al. Prospective, randomized, multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty: 269 patients from the Kineflex C artificial disc investigational device exemption study with a minimum 2-year follow-up: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;15:348.CrossRefPubMed Coric D, Nunley PD, Guyer RD, et al. Prospective, randomized, multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty: 269 patients from the Kineflex C artificial disc investigational device exemption study with a minimum 2-year follow-up: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;15:348.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Burkus JK, Haid RW, Traynelis VC, et al. Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of cervical disc replacement with the prestige disc: results from a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010;13:308–18.CrossRefPubMed Burkus JK, Haid RW, Traynelis VC, et al. Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of cervical disc replacement with the prestige disc: results from a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010;13:308–18.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Murrey D, Janssen M, Delamarter R, et al. Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease. Spine J. 2009;9:275–86.CrossRefPubMed Murrey D, Janssen M, Delamarter R, et al. Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease. Spine J. 2009;9:275–86.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Sasso RC, Anderson PA, Riew KD, et al. Results of cervical arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: four-year clinical outcomes in a prospective, randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:1684–92.CrossRefPubMed Sasso RC, Anderson PA, Riew KD, et al. Results of cervical arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: four-year clinical outcomes in a prospective, randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:1684–92.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Verma K, Gandhi SD, Maltenfort M, Albert TJ, Hilibrand AS, Vaccaro AR, Radcliff KE. Rate of adjacent segment disease in cervical disc arthroplasty versus single level fusion. Meta-analysis of prospective studies. Spine. 2013;38:2253–7.CrossRefPubMed Verma K, Gandhi SD, Maltenfort M, Albert TJ, Hilibrand AS, Vaccaro AR, Radcliff KE. Rate of adjacent segment disease in cervical disc arthroplasty versus single level fusion. Meta-analysis of prospective studies. Spine. 2013;38:2253–7.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat •• Phillips FM, Geisler FH, Gilder KM, Reah C, Howell KM, PC MA. Long-term outcomes of the US FDA IDE prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial comparing PCM cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine. 2015;40:674–83. 7 year follow up data from the IDE study of the PCM Cervical Disc (68 patients) compared to ACDF (42 patients) for single level degenerative cervical disease with radiculopathy and/or myelopathy. PCM patients showed greater improvement in neck pain and neck disability scores and trended toward fewer secondary surgical surgeries. Although RASP was more frequent after ACDF (33.1% PCM, 50.9% ACDF; P=0.006), a direct correlation to clinical symptoms could not be drawn. CrossRefPubMed •• Phillips FM, Geisler FH, Gilder KM, Reah C, Howell KM, PC MA. Long-term outcomes of the US FDA IDE prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial comparing PCM cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine. 2015;40:674–83. 7 year follow up data from the IDE study of the PCM Cervical Disc (68 patients) compared to ACDF (42 patients) for single level degenerative cervical disease with radiculopathy and/or myelopathy. PCM patients showed greater improvement in neck pain and neck disability scores and trended toward fewer secondary surgical surgeries. Although RASP was more frequent after ACDF (33.1% PCM, 50.9% ACDF; P=0.006), a direct correlation to clinical symptoms could not be drawn. CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat •• Burkus JK, Traynelis VC, Haid Jr RW, Mummaneni PV. Clinical and radiographic analysis of an artificial cervical disc: 7-year follow-up from the prestige prospective randomized controlled clinical trial clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;21:516–28. 7 year follow up of IDE study for Prestige Cervical Disc (212 patients) compared to ACDF (182 patients) for single level cervical disc disease with radiculopathy. There were statistically significant improvements in neck disability scores and in neurological status for the CDA compared to ACDF cohorts but only a trend towards reduced secondary procedures at adjacent levels. CrossRefPubMed •• Burkus JK, Traynelis VC, Haid Jr RW, Mummaneni PV. Clinical and radiographic analysis of an artificial cervical disc: 7-year follow-up from the prestige prospective randomized controlled clinical trial clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;21:516–28. 7 year follow up of IDE study for Prestige Cervical Disc (212 patients) compared to ACDF (182 patients) for single level cervical disc disease with radiculopathy. There were statistically significant improvements in neck disability scores and in neurological status for the CDA compared to ACDF cohorts but only a trend towards reduced secondary procedures at adjacent levels. CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Gornet MF, Burkus JK, Shaffrey ME, Nian H, Harrell FE. Cervical disc arthroplasty with Prestige LP Disc versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: seven-year outcomes. IJSS. Gornet MF, Burkus JK, Shaffrey ME, Nian H, Harrell FE. Cervical disc arthroplasty with Prestige LP Disc versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: seven-year outcomes. IJSS.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat •• Janssen ME, Zigler JE, Spivak JM, Delamarter RB, Darden II BV, Kopjar B. ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for single level symptomatic cervical disc disease: seven year follow-up of the prospective randomized US Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study. JBJS Am. 2015;97:1738–47. 7 year follow up IDE study of the ProDisc-C (103 patients) compared to ACDF (106 patients). 22 procedures in 13 patients were performed for adjacent segments in the ACDF cohort compared to only six procedures in six patients in the ProDisc-C cohort (p=0.01). CrossRefPubMed •• Janssen ME, Zigler JE, Spivak JM, Delamarter RB, Darden II BV, Kopjar B. ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for single level symptomatic cervical disc disease: seven year follow-up of the prospective randomized US Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study. JBJS Am. 2015;97:1738–47. 7 year follow up IDE study of the ProDisc-C (103 patients) compared to ACDF (106 patients). 22 procedures in 13 patients were performed for adjacent segments in the ACDF cohort compared to only six procedures in six patients in the ProDisc-C cohort (p=0.01). CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Boden SD, McCowin PR, Davis DO, Dina TS, Mark AS, Wiesel S. Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the cervical spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation. JBJS Am. 1990;72:1178–84.CrossRefPubMed Boden SD, McCowin PR, Davis DO, Dina TS, Mark AS, Wiesel S. Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the cervical spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation. JBJS Am. 1990;72:1178–84.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Matsumoto M, Fujimura Y, Suzuki N, Nishi Y, Nakamura M, Yabe Y, Shiga H. MRI of cervical intervertebral discs in asymptomatic subjects. JBJS Br. 1998;80:19–24.CrossRefPubMed Matsumoto M, Fujimura Y, Suzuki N, Nishi Y, Nakamura M, Yabe Y, Shiga H. MRI of cervical intervertebral discs in asymptomatic subjects. JBJS Br. 1998;80:19–24.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Okada E, Matsumoto M, Ichihara D, Chiba K, Toyama Y, Fujiwara H, Momoshima S, Nishiwaki Y, Hashimoto T, Ogawa J, Watanabe M, Takahata T. Aging of the cervical spine in healthy volunteers: a 10-year longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging study. Spine. 2009;34:706–12.CrossRefPubMed Okada E, Matsumoto M, Ichihara D, Chiba K, Toyama Y, Fujiwara H, Momoshima S, Nishiwaki Y, Hashimoto T, Ogawa J, Watanabe M, Takahata T. Aging of the cervical spine in healthy volunteers: a 10-year longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging study. Spine. 2009;34:706–12.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Hilibrand AS, Robbins M. Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion? Spine J. 2004;4:190S–4S.CrossRefPubMed Hilibrand AS, Robbins M. Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion? Spine J. 2004;4:190S–4S.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Matsumoto M, Okada E, Ichihara D, et al. Anterior cervical decompression and fusion accelerates adjacent segment degeneration: comparison with asymptomatic volunteers in a ten-year magnetic resonance imaging follow-up study. Spine. 2010;35:36–43.CrossRefPubMed Matsumoto M, Okada E, Ichihara D, et al. Anterior cervical decompression and fusion accelerates adjacent segment degeneration: comparison with asymptomatic volunteers in a ten-year magnetic resonance imaging follow-up study. Spine. 2010;35:36–43.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Herkowitz HN, Kurz LT, Overholt DP. Surgical management of cervical soft disc herniation. A comparison between the anterior and posterior approach. Spine. 1990;15:1026–30.CrossRefPubMed Herkowitz HN, Kurz LT, Overholt DP. Surgical management of cervical soft disc herniation. A comparison between the anterior and posterior approach. Spine. 1990;15:1026–30.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Henderson CM, Hennessy RG, Shuey Jr HM, Shackelford EG. Posterior-lateral foraminotomy as an exclusive operative technique for cervical radiculopathy: a review of 846 consecutively operated cases. Neurosurgery. 1983;13:504–12.CrossRefPubMed Henderson CM, Hennessy RG, Shuey Jr HM, Shackelford EG. Posterior-lateral foraminotomy as an exclusive operative technique for cervical radiculopathy: a review of 846 consecutively operated cases. Neurosurgery. 1983;13:504–12.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee JC, Lee SH. Peters C, KD Riew. Risk-factor analysis of adjacent-segment pathology requiring surgery following anterior, posterior, fusion, and nonfusion cervical spine operations. JBJS Am. 2014;6:1761–7.CrossRef Lee JC, Lee SH. Peters C, KD Riew. Risk-factor analysis of adjacent-segment pathology requiring surgery following anterior, posterior, fusion, and nonfusion cervical spine operations. JBJS Am. 2014;6:1761–7.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat White III AA, Panjabi MM. Clinical biomechanics of the spine. Ed. 2 ed. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott; 1990. p. 98. White III AA, Panjabi MM. Clinical biomechanics of the spine. Ed. 2 ed. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott; 1990. p. 98.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Nunley PD, Jawahar A, Kerr EJ, Gordon CJ, Cavanaugh DA, Birdsong EM, Stocks M, Danielson G. Factors affecting the incidence of symptomatic adjacent-level disease in cervical spine after total disc arthroplasty. 2 to 4 year follow-up of 3 prospective randomized trials. Spine. 2012;37:445–51.CrossRefPubMed Nunley PD, Jawahar A, Kerr EJ, Gordon CJ, Cavanaugh DA, Birdsong EM, Stocks M, Danielson G. Factors affecting the incidence of symptomatic adjacent-level disease in cervical spine after total disc arthroplasty. 2 to 4 year follow-up of 3 prospective randomized trials. Spine. 2012;37:445–51.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Song JS, Choi BW, Song KJ. Risk factors for the development of adjacent segment disease following anterior cervical arthrodesis for degenerative cervical disease: comparison between fusion methods. J Clin Neurosci. 2014;21:794–8.CrossRefPubMed Song JS, Choi BW, Song KJ. Risk factors for the development of adjacent segment disease following anterior cervical arthrodesis for degenerative cervical disease: comparison between fusion methods. J Clin Neurosci. 2014;21:794–8.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Park JB, Cho YS, Riew KD. Development of adjacent-level ossification in patients with an anterior cervical plate. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:558–63.CrossRefPubMed Park JB, Cho YS, Riew KD. Development of adjacent-level ossification in patients with an anterior cervical plate. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:558–63.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Nassr A, Lee JY, Bashir RS, et al. Does incorrect level needle localization during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion lead to accelerated disc degeneration? Spine. 2009;34:189–92.CrossRefPubMed Nassr A, Lee JY, Bashir RS, et al. Does incorrect level needle localization during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion lead to accelerated disc degeneration? Spine. 2009;34:189–92.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Eck JC, Humphreys SC, Lim TH, et al. Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion. Spine. 2002;27:2431–4.CrossRefPubMed Eck JC, Humphreys SC, Lim TH, et al. Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion. Spine. 2002;27:2431–4.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Cunningham BW, Hu N, Zorn CM, McAfee PC. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics. Spine J. 2010;10:341–9.CrossRefPubMed Cunningham BW, Hu N, Zorn CM, McAfee PC. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics. Spine J. 2010;10:341–9.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Dmitriev AE, Cunningham BW, Hu N, et al. Adjacent level intradiscal pressure and segmental kinematics following a cervical total disc arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model. Spine. 2005;30:1165–72.CrossRefPubMed Dmitriev AE, Cunningham BW, Hu N, et al. Adjacent level intradiscal pressure and segmental kinematics following a cervical total disc arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model. Spine. 2005;30:1165–72.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Park J, Shin JJ, Lim J. Biomechanical analysis of disc pressure and facet contact force after simulated two-level cervical surgeries (fusion and arthroplasty) and hybrid surgery. World Neurosurg. 2014;82:1388–93.CrossRefPubMed Park J, Shin JJ, Lim J. Biomechanical analysis of disc pressure and facet contact force after simulated two-level cervical surgeries (fusion and arthroplasty) and hybrid surgery. World Neurosurg. 2014;82:1388–93.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Matsunaga S, Kabayama S, Yamamoto T, et al. Strain on intervertebral discs after anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Spine. 1999;24:670–5.CrossRefPubMed Matsunaga S, Kabayama S, Yamamoto T, et al. Strain on intervertebral discs after anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Spine. 1999;24:670–5.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Kelly MP, et al. Adjacent segment motion after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus Prodisc-c cervical total disk arthroplasty: analysis from a randomized, controlled trial. Spine. 2011;36:1171–9.CrossRefPubMed Kelly MP, et al. Adjacent segment motion after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus Prodisc-c cervical total disk arthroplasty: analysis from a randomized, controlled trial. Spine. 2011;36:1171–9.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Sasso RC, et al. Motion analysis of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior discectomy and fusion: results from a prospective, randomized, multicenter, clinical trial. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008;21:393–9.CrossRefPubMed Sasso RC, et al. Motion analysis of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior discectomy and fusion: results from a prospective, randomized, multicenter, clinical trial. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008;21:393–9.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Fleck S, Langner S, Rosenstengel C, Kessler R, Matthes M, Müller J, Langner I, Marx S, Schroeder HWS. 3 Tesla kinematic MRI of the cervical spine for evaluation of adjacent level disease after monosegmental anterior cervical discectomy and arthroplasty: results of 2-year follow-up. Spine. Fleck S, Langner S, Rosenstengel C, Kessler R, Matthes M, Müller J, Langner I, Marx S, Schroeder HWS. 3 Tesla kinematic MRI of the cervical spine for evaluation of adjacent level disease after monosegmental anterior cervical discectomy and arthroplasty: results of 2-year follow-up. Spine.
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Maldonado CV, Paz RD, Martin CB. Adjacent-level degeneration after cervical disc arthroplasty versus fusion. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(suppl3):403–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Maldonado CV, Paz RD, Martin CB. Adjacent-level degeneration after cervical disc arthroplasty versus fusion. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(suppl3):403–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
37.
Zurück zum Zitat • Zhu Y, Zhang B, Liu H, Wu Y, Zhu Q. Cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for incidence of symptomatic adjacent segment disease. A meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials. Spine. 2016;41:1493–502. Meta-analysis of RCT comparing CDA and ACDF (14 total studies, 3235 patients) with 2-7 year follow up which aimed to evaluate the differences in rates of ASD. In this study, CDA was superior to ACDF regarding ASD (RR 0.57, P = 0.009) as well as lower rates of re-operation (RR 0.47, P = 0.0002). CrossRefPubMed • Zhu Y, Zhang B, Liu H, Wu Y, Zhu Q. Cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for incidence of symptomatic adjacent segment disease. A meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials. Spine. 2016;41:1493–502. Meta-analysis of RCT comparing CDA and ACDF (14 total studies, 3235 patients) with 2-7 year follow up which aimed to evaluate the differences in rates of ASD. In this study, CDA was superior to ACDF regarding ASD (RR 0.57, P = 0.009) as well as lower rates of re-operation (RR 0.47, P = 0.0002). CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Shriver MF, Lubelski D, Sharma AM, Steinmetz MP, Benzel EC, Mroz TE. Adjacent segment degeneration and disease following cervical arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine J. 2016;16:168–81.CrossRefPubMed Shriver MF, Lubelski D, Sharma AM, Steinmetz MP, Benzel EC, Mroz TE. Adjacent segment degeneration and disease following cervical arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine J. 2016;16:168–81.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Kong L, Cao J, Wang L, Shen Y. Prevalence of adjacent segment disease following cervical spine surgery a PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine. 2016;95(e4171):27. Kong L, Cao J, Wang L, Shen Y. Prevalence of adjacent segment disease following cervical spine surgery a PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine. 2016;95(e4171):27.
Metadaten
Titel
Adjacent level disease-background and update based on disc replacement data
verfasst von
I. David Kaye
Alan S. Hilibrand
Publikationsdatum
23.03.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine / Ausgabe 2/2017
Elektronische ISSN: 1935-9748
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-017-9396-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2017

Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine 2/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Orthopaedic Health Policy (A Miller, section editor)

Patient satisfaction in musculoskeletal medicine

Motion Preserving Spine Surgery (C Kepler, section editor)

Temporary stabilization of unstable spine fractures

Motion Preserving Spine Surgery (C Kepler, section editor)

Bias in cervical total disc replacement trials

Orthopaedic Health Policy (A Miller, section editor)

Current concepts of shared decision making in orthopedic surgery

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.