Skip to main content
Log in

Pathways to Resilience Among Israeli Child Victims of Abuse and Neglect

  • Published:
Child Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present a model of the structure and dynamics of the development of resilience among maltreated children. We created the model from a qualitative analysis of in-depth, semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of 40 Israeli victims of child abuse and neglect. Findings indicate that children develop resilience by using their cognitive processes to distance themselves from their harsh reality and move to alternative “places of being.” Such movement along with the new locations creates various pathways for building resilience to abuse. The development of alternative worlds provides these children and youth with the opportunity to create new meaning systems that buffer the detrimental effects of abuse and enhance their resilience. Implications for policy and practice concerning children and youth at-risk are suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The quantitative component included a national survey to determine the incidence and prevalence of child abuse and the reasons for disclosure or lack of disclosure. Correlates of child abuse and types of abuse were also explored. The qualitative component consisted of in-depth interviews with 130 male and female, children and youths, aged 12 to 17, victims of neglect and abuse, across various cultural groups living in Israel, including Jews and Israeli Arabs. The study also includes 80 interviews with professionals, meant to enable the multifaceted exploration of abuse from the perspective of various participants in the process. The information will be presented to practitioners and researchers in the form of a national database, which can be used for the development of intervention models.

References

  • Alink, L., Cicchetti, D., Kim, J., & Rogosch, F. (2012). Longitudinal associations among child maltreatment, social functional and cortisol regulation. Developmental Psychology, 48(1), 224–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aronowitz, T. (2005). The role of “envisioning the future” in the development of resilience among at-risk youth. Public Health Nursing, 22(3), 200–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banyard, V. L., Williams, L. M., Siegal, J. A., & West, C. M. (2002). Childhood sexual abuse in the lives of Black women: Risk and resilience in a longitudinal study. Women & Therapy, 25(3–4), 45–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolger, K., & Patterson, C. (2003). Sequelae of child maltreatment: Vulnerability and resilience. In S. S. Luthar (Ed.), Resilience and vulnerability: Adaptations in the context of childhood adversities (pp. 156–181). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bonanno, G. A. (2004). Loss, trauma, and human resilience: Have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events? American Psychologist, 59, 20–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, R. B. (2013). The power of parenting. In S. Goldstein & R. B. Brooks (Eds.), Handbook of resilience in children (2nd ed., pp. 443–458). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cicchetti, D., & Rogosch, F. (1997). The role of self-organization in the promotion of resilience in maltreated children. Development and Psychopathology, 9, 797–815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cicchetti, D., Rogosch, F., Lynch, M., & Holt, K. (1993). Resilience in maltreated children: Process leading to adaptive children. Development and Psychopathology, 5, 629–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, W. J., & Cicchetti, D. (2003). Moving research on resilience into the 21st century: Theoretical and methodological considerations in examining the biological contributors to resilience. Development and Psychopathology, 15, 773–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daro, D., & Dodge, K. A. (2009). Creating community responsibility for protection: Possibilities and challenges. The Future of Children, 19, 67–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DuMont, K., Widom, C., & Czaja, S. (2007). Predictors of resilience in abused and neglected children grown-up: The role of individual and neighborhood characteristics. Child Abuse and Neglect, 31, 255–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egeland, B. E., Carlson, E., & Sroufe, L. A. (1993). Resilience as process. Special issue: Milestones in the development of resilience. Development and Psychopathology, 5, 517–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farber, E. A., & Egeland, B. (1987). Invulnerability among abused and neglected children. In E. J. Anthony & B. Cohler (Eds.), The invulnerable child (pp. 253–288). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felner, R. D., & DeVries, M. (2013). Poverty in childhood and adolescence: A transactional-ecological approach to understanding and enhancing resilience in context of disadvantage and development risk. In S. Goldstein & R. B. Brooks (Eds.), Handbook of resilience in children (2nd ed., pp. 105–126). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fergusson, D. M., & Horwood, L. J. (2003). Resilience to childhood adversity. In S. S. Luthar (Ed.), Resilience and vulnerability: Adaptations in the context of childhood adversities (pp. 131–155). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelhor, D. (2008). Childhood victimization violence, crime and abuse in the lives of young people. New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195342857.001.0001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelhor, D., Ormrod, R. K., & Turner, H. A. (2009). Lifetime assessment of poly-victimization in a national sample of children and youth. Child Abuse & Neglect, 33(7), 403–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, M. W., Kirby, L. D., & Smokowski, P. R. (2004). Risk and resilience in childhood. In M. W. Fraser (Ed.), Risk and resilience in childhood: An ecological perspective (2nd ed., pp. 13–66). Washington, DC: NASW Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garmezy, N. (1991). Resiliency and vulnerability to adverse developmental outcomes associated with poverty. The American Behavioral Scientist, 34, 416–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, S., & Brooks, R. B. (2013). Why study resilience? In S. Goldstein & R. B. Brooks (Eds.), Handbook of resilience in children (2nd ed., pp. 3–14). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hecht, D. B., & Hansen, D. J. (2001). The environment of child maltreatment: Contextual factors and the development of psychopathology. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 6, 433–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houshyar, S., Gold, A., & DeVries, M. (2013). Understanding and promoting the development of resilience in families. In S. Goldstein & R. B. Brooks (Eds.), Handbook of resilience in children (2nd ed., pp. 143–160). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luthar, S. S., Cicchetti, D., & Beker, B. (2000). The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development, 71(3), 543–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M., & Cicchetti, D. (1998). An ecological-transactional analysis of children and contexts: The longitudinal interplay among child maltreatment, community violence, and children’s symptomatology. Development and Psychopathology, 10, 235–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masten, A. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American Psychologist, 53, 205–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masten, A., & Powell, J. (2003). A resilience framework for research, policy and practice. In S. S. Luthar (Ed.), Resilience and vulnerability: Adaptations in the context of childhood adversities (pp. 156–181). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClure, F. H., Chavez, D. V., Agars, M. D., Peacock, M. J., & Matosian, A. (2008). Resilience in sexually abused women: Risk and protective factors. Journal of Family Violence, 23, 81–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGloin, J. M., & Widom, C. S. (2001). Resilience among abused and neglected children grown up. Development and Psychopathology, 13, 1021–1038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Dougherty Wright, M., Masten, A. S., & Narayan, A. J. (2013). Resilience processes in development: Four waves of research on positive adaptation in the context of adversity. In S. Goldstein & R. B. Brooks (Eds.), Handbook of resilience in children (2nd ed., pp. 15–38). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Orbke, S., & Smith, H. (2013). A developmental framework for enhancing resiliency in adult survivors of childhood abuse. International Journal for the Advancement of Counseling, 35(1), 46–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutter, M. (2000). Resilience reconsidered: Conceptual considerations, empirical findings, and policy implications. In J. P. Shonkoff & S. J. Meisels (Eds.), Handbook of early intervention (2nd ed., pp. 651–675). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, A., & Luckman, T. (1973). The structures of the life world. Northwestern University Press.

  • Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. London: Sage.

  • Sokolowski, R. (2000). Introduction to phenomenology. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomlinson, B. (2004). Child maltreatment: A risk and protective factor perspective. In M. W. Fraser (Ed.), Risk and resilience in childhood (pp. 89–132). Washington, DC: NASW Press.

  • Veltman, M. W., & Browne, K. D. (2001). Three decades of child maltreatment research: Implications for the school years. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse: A Review Journal, 2, 215–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner, E. (2000). Protective factors and individual resilience. In J. P. Shonkoff & S. J. Meisels (Eds.), Handbook of early intervention (2nd ed., pp. 115–132). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zimrin, H. (1986). A profile of survival. Child Abuse & Neglect, 10(3), 339–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was supported and funded by Traiana Technologies, Inc.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Sigad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carmel, Y., Sigad, L., Lev-Wiesel, R. et al. Pathways to Resilience Among Israeli Child Victims of Abuse and Neglect. Child Ind Res 8, 551–570 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-014-9255-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-014-9255-5

Keywords

Navigation