Skip to main content
Log in

Cultural Importance Indices: A Comparative Analysis Based on the Useful Wild Plants of Southern Cantabria (Northern Spain)1

  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cultural Importance Indices: A Comparative Analysis Based on the Useful Wild Plants of Southern Cantabria (Northern Spain). This paper compares four indices based on informant consensus. Each index aims to assess the cultural significance of plant species and is suitable for statistical testing of different hypotheses. For the comparison, we used data concerning plants traditionally used in the Campoo area of southern Cantabria in northern Spain. Our results show a positive and significant correlation between the number of uses (NU) and the frequency of citation (FC) of the species. It seems to be a general rule that the more versatile a plant, the more widespread its usefulness. In addition, NU is highly influenced by the number of use-categories in the study. Consequently, an objective index must rely on FC more than NU. We propose the use of the cultural importance index (CI), which is defined as the summation of the informants’ proportions that mention each of the uses of the species. The CI index is highly correlated with FC and, although it also considers diversity of use, each use-category is conveniently weighted by the number of informants mentioning it. Despite the use of cultural significance indices being questioned, we believe that indices based on in-depth, semi-structured interviews are still very useful for compilation studies of passive knowledge, such as most ethnobotanical works conducted in the last three decades in Europe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Adu-Tutu, Y., M. Afful, K. Asante-Appiah, D. Lieberman, J. B. Hall, and M. Elvin-Lewis. 1979. Chewing Stick Usage in Southern Ghana. Economic Botany 33:320–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albuquerque, U. P. and R. F. P. Lucena. 2005. Can Apparency Affect the Use of Plants by Local People in Tropical Forests? Interciencia 30(8):506–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • ________, R. F. P. Lucena, J. M. Monteiro, A. T. N. Florentino, and C. F. C. B. R. Almeida. 2006. Evaluating Two Quantitative Ethnobotanical Techniques. Ethnobotany Research and Applications 4:51–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, B. C. and G. T. Prance. 2000. Introduced Plants in the Indigenous Pharmacopoeia of Northern South America. Economic Botany 54(1):90–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, B. 1992. Ethnobiological Classification: Principles of Categorization of Plants and Animals in Traditional Societies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonet, M. A. and J. Vallès. 2003. Pharmaceutical Ethnobotany in the Montseny Biosphere Reserve (Catalonia, Iberian Peninsula): General Results and New or Rarely Reported Medicinal Plants. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology 55(2):259–270.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ________, C. Blanché, and J. Vallès. 1992. Ethnobotanical Study in River Tenes Valley (Catalonia, Iberian Peninsula). Journal of Ethnopharmacology 37:205–212.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ________, and J. Vallès. 2002. Use of Non-Crop Food Vascular Plants in Montseny Biosphere Reserve (Catalonia, Iberian Peninsula). International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition 53:225–248.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Byg, A. and H. Balslev. 2001. Diversity and Use of Palms in Zahamena, Eastern Madagascar. Biodiversity and Conservation 10:951–970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camejo-Rodrigues, J., L. Ascensão, M. A. Bonet, and J. Vallès. 2003. An Ethnobotanical Study of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants in the Natural Park of “Serra de São Mamede” (Portugal). Journal of Ethnopharmacology 89:199–209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Canales, M., T. Hernandez, J. Caballero, A. R. de Vivar, G. Avila, A. Duran, and R. Lira. 2005. Informant Consensus Factor and Antibacterial Activity of the Medicinal Plants Used by the People of San Rafael Coxcatlan, Puebla, Mexico. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 97(3):429–439.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, A. M. 2005. Etnobotánica del Parque Natural de Montesinho. Plantas, tradición y saber popular en un territorio del Nordeste de Portugal. Ph.D. dissertation, Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain.

  • Case, R. J., S. G. Franzblau, Y. H. Wang, S. H. Cho, D. D. Soejarto, and G. F. Pauli. 2006. Ethnopharmacological Evaluation of the Informant Consensus Model on Anti-Tuberculosis Claims among the Manus. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 106(1):82–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Estomba, D., A. H. Ladio, and M. Lozada. 2006. Medicinal Wild Plant Knowledge and Gathering Patterns in a Mapuche Community from North-western Patagonia. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 103(1):109–119.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Galeano, G. 2000. Forest Use at the Pacific Coast of Chocó, Colombia: A Quantitative Approach. Economic Botany 54(3):358–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garibaldi, A. and N. J. Turner. 2004. Cultural Keystone Species: Implications for Ecological Conservation and Restoration. Ecology and Society 9(3):1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garibay-Orijel, R., J. Caballero, A. Estrada-Torres, and J. Cifuentes. 2007. Understanding Cultural Significance, the Edible Mushrooms Case. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 3:4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, M., A. Ankli, B. Frei, C. Weimann, and O. Sticher. 1998. Medicinal Plants in Mexico: Healers’ Consensus and Cultural Importance. Social Science and Medicine 47:1859–1871.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Höft, M., S. K. Barik, and A. M. Lykke. 1999. Quantitative Ethnobotany. Applications of Multivariate and Statistical Analyses in Ethnobotany. People and Plants working paper 6. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Paris.

  • Hoffman, B. and T. Gallaher. 2007. Importance Indices in Ethnobotany. Ethnobotany Research and Applications 5:201–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen, M. and H. Balslev. 2003. Perceptions, Use and Availability of Woody Plants among the Gourounsi in Burkina Faso. Biodiversity and Conservation 12:1715–1739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kufer, J., H. Förther, E. Pöll, and M. Heinrich. 2005. Historical and Modern Medicinal Plant Uses—The Example of the Ch’orti’ Maya and Ladinos in Eastern Guatemala. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology 57(9):1127–1152.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ladio, A. H. and M. Lozada. 2001. Nontimber Forest Product Use in Two Human Populations from Northwest Patagonia: A Quantitative Approach. Human Ecology 29(4):367–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lastra, J. J. 2003. Etnobotánica en el Parque Nacional de Picos de Europa. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente. Parques Nacionales, Madrid, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lozada, M., A. H. Ladio, and M. Weigandt. 2006. Cultural Transmission of Ethnobotanical Plant Knowledge in a Rural Community of Northwestern Patagonia, Argentina. Economic Botany 60(4):374–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moerman, D. E. 1994. North American Food and Drug Plants. Pages 1–21 in N. L. Etkin, ed., Eating on the Wild Side. The University of Arizona Press, Tucson, Arizona.

    Google Scholar 

  • ________. 2007. Agreement and Meaning: Rethinking Consensus Analysis. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 112:451–460.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Monteiro, J. M., U. P. de Albuquerque, E. M. de Freitas Lins-Neto, E. L. de Araujo, and E. L. C. de Amorim. 2006. Use Patterns and Knowledge of Medicinal Species among Two Rural Communities in Brazil’s Semi-Arid Northeastern Region. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 105(1–2):173–186.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pardo-de-Santayana, M. 2003a. Las plantas en la cultura tradicional de la antigua Merindad de Campoo. Ph.D. dissertation, Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain.

  • ________. 2003b. Nomenclatura popular de Quercus (Fagaceae) en los valles meridionales de Cantabria. Anales del Jardín Botánico de Madrid 60(1):189–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • ________, J. Tardío, and R. Morales. 2005. The Gathering and Consumption of Wild Edible Plants in the Campoo (Cantabria, Spain). International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition 56(7):529–542.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ________, J. Tardío, M. Heinrich, A. Touwaide, and R. Morales. 2006. Plants in the Works of Cervantes. Economic Botany 60(2):159–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ________, J. Tardío, E. Blanco, A. M. Carvalho, J. J. Lastra, E. San Miguel, and R. Morales. 2007. Traditional Knowledge on Wild Edible Plants in the Northwest of the Iberian Peninsula (Spain and Portugal): A Comparative Study. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 3:27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pelto, P. J. and G. H. Pelto. 1975. Intra-Cultural Diversity: Some Theoretical Issues. American Ethnologist 2(1):1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, O. 1996. Some Quantitative Methods for Analyzing Ethnobotanical Knowledge. Pages 171–197 in M. N. Alexiades, ed., Selected Guidelines for Ethnobotanical Research: A Field Manual. New York Botanical Garden, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • ________ and A. H. Gentry. 1993a. The Useful Plants of Tambopata, Peru: I. Statistical Hypotheses Tests with A New Quantitative Technique. Economic Botany 47(1):15–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • ________ and A. H. Gentry. 1993b. The Useful Plants of Tambopata, Peru: II. Additional Hypothesis-Testing in Quantitative Ethnobotany. Economic Botany 47(1):33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieroni, A. 1999. Gathered Wild Food Plants in the Upper Valley of the Serchio River (Garfagnana), Central Italy. Economic Botany 53(3):327–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • ________. 2001. Evaluation of the Cultural Significance of Wild Food Botanicals Traditionally Consumed in Northwestern Tuscany, Italy. Journal of Ethnobiology 21(1):89–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • _________, H. Muenz, M. Akbulut, K. H. C. Baser, and C. Durmuskahya. 2005. Traditional Phytotherapy and Trans-Cultural Pharmacy among Turkish Migrants Living in Cologne, Germany. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 102(1):69–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prance, G. T., W. Balee, B. M. Boom, and R. L. Carneiro. 1987. Quantitative Ethnobotany and the Case for Conservation in Amazonia. Conservation Biology 1(4):296–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyes-García, V., T. Huanca, V. Vadez, W. Leonard, and D. Wilkie. 2006. Cultural, Practical, and Economic Value of Wild Plants: A Quantitative Study in the Bolivian Amazon. Economic Botany 60(1):62–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossato, S., H. F. Leitão-Filho, and A. Begossi. 1999. Ethnobotany of Caiçaras of the Atlantic Forest Coast (Brazil). Economic Botany 53(3):377–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • San Miguel, E. 2004. Etnobotánica de Piloña (Asturias). Cultura y saber popular sobre las plantas en un concejo del Centro-Oriente Asturiano. Ph.D. Dissertation, Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain.

  • Silva, V. A., L. H. C. Andrade, and U. P. Albuquerque. 2006. Revising the Cultural Significance Index: The Case of the Fulni-ô in Northeastern Brazil. Field Methods 18(1):98–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stepp, J. R. and D. E. Moerman. 2001. The Importance of Weeds in Ethnopharmacology. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 75:19–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stoffle, R. W., D. B. Halmo, M. J. Evans, and J. E. Olmsted. 1990. Calculating the Cultural Significance of American Indian Plants: Pauiute and Shoshone Ethnobotany at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. American Anthropologist 92(2):416–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tardío, J., H. Pascual, and R. Morales. 2005. Wild Food Plants Traditionally Used in the Province of Madrid. Economic Botany 59(2):122–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trotter, R. T. and M. H. Logan. 1986. Informant Consensus: A New Approach for Identifying Potentially Effective Medicinal Plants. Pages 91–112 in N. L. Etkin, ed., Plants in Indigenous Medicine and Diet: Biobehavioral Approaches. Redgrave Publishing Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, N. J. 1988. “The Importance of a Rose”: Evaluating the Cultural Significance of Plants in Thompson and Lilloet Interior Salish. American Anthropologist 90:272–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wan, C., C. Chiu, K. Tam, S. Lee, I. Y. Lau, and S. Peng. 2007. Perceived Cultural Importance and Actual Self-Importance of Values in Cultural Identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 92(2):337–354.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to all the people of the Campoo region who kindly shared their knowledge and time and to everyone who provided introductions to local people. We also thank the Spanish Ministry of Science and Education for financing this work (AP97 00827638, CGL2006-09546/BOS) and Ramón Morales for his help and encouragement during the fieldwork and for revising the manuscript. We are also grateful to Lesley Ashcroft, Roy Thompson, Marisa Tello, Susana González, and Laura Aceituno for checking the manuscript and to three anonymous reviewers and Daniel Moerman for their valuable remarks.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Javier Tardío.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tardío, J., Pardo-de-Santayana, M. Cultural Importance Indices: A Comparative Analysis Based on the Useful Wild Plants of Southern Cantabria (Northern Spain)1 . Econ Bot 62, 24–39 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-007-9004-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-007-9004-5

Keywords

Navigation