Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Breast Cancer 2/2013

01.04.2013 | Review Article

The current status of positron emission mammography in breast cancer diagnosis

verfasst von: Vasileios Kalles, George C. Zografos, Xeni Provatopoulou, Dimitra Koulocheri, Antonia Gounaris

Erschienen in: Breast Cancer | Ausgabe 2/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Mammography is currently the standard breast cancer screening procedure, even though it is constrained by low specificity in the detection of malignancy and low sensitivity in women with dense breast tissue. Modern imaging modalities, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), have been developed in an effort to replace or complement mammography, because the early detection of breast cancer is critical for efficient treatment and long-term survival of patients. Nuclear medicine imaging technology has been introduced in the field of oncology with the development of positron emission tomography (PET), positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and, ultimately, positron emission mammography (PEM). PET offers the advantage of precise diagnosis, by measuring metabolism with the use of a radiotracer and identifying changes at the cellular level. PET/CT imaging allows for a more accurate assessment by merging the anatomic localization to the functional image. However, both techniques have not yet been established as diagnostic tools in early breast cancer detection, primarily because of low sensitivity, especially for sub-centimeter and low-grade tumors. PEM, a breast-specific device with increased spatial resolution, has been developed in order to overcome these limitations. It has demonstrated higher detectability than PET/CT and comparable or better sensitivity than MRI. The ability to target the lesions visible in PEM with PEM-guided breast biopsy systems adds to its usability in the early diagnosis of breast cancer. The results from recent studies summarized in this review indicate that PEM may prove to be a useful first-line diagnostic tool, although further evaluation and improvement are required.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat DeSantis C, Siegel R, Bandi P, Jemal A. Breast cancer statistics, 2011. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;61:409–18. DeSantis C, Siegel R, Bandi P, Jemal A. Breast cancer statistics, 2011. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;61:409–18.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Halladay JR, Yankaskas BC, Bowling JM, Alexander C. Positive predictive value of mammography: comparison of interpretations of screening and diagnostic images by the same radiologist and by different radiologists. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195:782–5.PubMedCrossRef Halladay JR, Yankaskas BC, Bowling JM, Alexander C. Positive predictive value of mammography: comparison of interpretations of screening and diagnostic images by the same radiologist and by different radiologists. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195:782–5.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Berg WA, Blume JD, Adams AM, Jong RA, Barr RG, Lehrer DE, et al. Reasons women at elevated risk of breast cancer refuse breast MR imaging screening: ACRIN 6666. Radiology. 2010;254:79–87.PubMedCrossRef Berg WA, Blume JD, Adams AM, Jong RA, Barr RG, Lehrer DE, et al. Reasons women at elevated risk of breast cancer refuse breast MR imaging screening: ACRIN 6666. Radiology. 2010;254:79–87.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Jackson VP, Hendrick RE, Feig SA, Kopans DB. Imaging of the radiographically dense breast. Radiology. 1993;188:297–301.PubMed Jackson VP, Hendrick RE, Feig SA, Kopans DB. Imaging of the radiographically dense breast. Radiology. 1993;188:297–301.PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Rijnsburger AJ, Obdeijn IM, Kaas R, Tilanus-Linthorst MM, Boetes C, Loo CE, et al. BRCA1-associated breast cancers present differently from BRCA2-associated and familial cases: long-term follow-up of the Dutch MRISC Screening Study. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:5265–73.PubMedCrossRef Rijnsburger AJ, Obdeijn IM, Kaas R, Tilanus-Linthorst MM, Boetes C, Loo CE, et al. BRCA1-associated breast cancers present differently from BRCA2-associated and familial cases: long-term follow-up of the Dutch MRISC Screening Study. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:5265–73.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Bartella L, Liberman L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD. Nonpalpable mammographically occult invasive breast cancers detected by MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186:865–70.PubMedCrossRef Bartella L, Liberman L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD. Nonpalpable mammographically occult invasive breast cancers detected by MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186:865–70.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee SG, Orel SG, Woo IJ, Cruz-Jove E, Putt ME, Solin LJ, et al. MR imaging screening of the contralateral breast in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer: preliminary results. Radiology. 2003;226:773–8.PubMedCrossRef Lee SG, Orel SG, Woo IJ, Cruz-Jove E, Putt ME, Solin LJ, et al. MR imaging screening of the contralateral breast in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer: preliminary results. Radiology. 2003;226:773–8.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK, Hendrick RE, Pisano ED, Hanna L, et al. MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1295–303.PubMedCrossRef Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK, Hendrick RE, Pisano ED, Hanna L, et al. MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1295–303.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Liberman L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, Abramson AF, Tan LK. MR imaging of the ipsilateral breast in women with percutaneously proven breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180:901–10.PubMedCrossRef Liberman L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, Abramson AF, Tan LK. MR imaging of the ipsilateral breast in women with percutaneously proven breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180:901–10.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P, Lord SJ, Warren RM, Dixon JM, et al. Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3248–58.PubMedCrossRef Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P, Lord SJ, Warren RM, Dixon JM, et al. Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3248–58.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Katipamula R, Degnim AC, Hoskin T, Boughey JC, Loprinzi C, Grant CS, et al. Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: effect of surgical year and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4082–8.PubMedCrossRef Katipamula R, Degnim AC, Hoskin T, Boughey JC, Loprinzi C, Grant CS, et al. Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: effect of surgical year and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4082–8.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Pettit K, Swatske ME, Gao F, Salavaggione L, Gillanders WE, Aft RL, et al. The impact of breast MRI on surgical decision-making: are patients at risk for mastectomy? J Surg Oncol. 2009;100:553–8.PubMedCrossRef Pettit K, Swatske ME, Gao F, Salavaggione L, Gillanders WE, Aft RL, et al. The impact of breast MRI on surgical decision-making: are patients at risk for mastectomy? J Surg Oncol. 2009;100:553–8.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Bleicher RJ, Ciocca RM, Egleston BL, Sesa L, Evers K, Sigurdson ER, et al. Association of routine pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging with time to surgery, mastectomy rate, and margin status. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209:180–7. quiz 294–5.PubMedCrossRef Bleicher RJ, Ciocca RM, Egleston BL, Sesa L, Evers K, Sigurdson ER, et al. Association of routine pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging with time to surgery, mastectomy rate, and margin status. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209:180–7. quiz 294–5.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Angarita FA, Acuna SA, Fonseca A, Crystal P, Escallon J. Impact of preoperative breast MRIs on timing of surgery and type of intervention in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(Suppl 3):273–9.PubMedCrossRef Angarita FA, Acuna SA, Fonseca A, Crystal P, Escallon J. Impact of preoperative breast MRIs on timing of surgery and type of intervention in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(Suppl 3):273–9.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Morrow M, Waters J, Morris E. MRI for breast cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment. Lancet. 2011;378:1804–11.PubMedCrossRef Morrow M, Waters J, Morris E. MRI for breast cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment. Lancet. 2011;378:1804–11.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Fletcher JW, Djulbegovic B, Soares HP, Siegel BA, Lowe VJ, Lyman GH, et al. Recommendations on the use of 18F-FDG PET in oncology. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:480–508.PubMedCrossRef Fletcher JW, Djulbegovic B, Soares HP, Siegel BA, Lowe VJ, Lyman GH, et al. Recommendations on the use of 18F-FDG PET in oncology. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:480–508.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Vallabhajosula S, Solnes L, Vallabhajosula B. A broad overview of positron emission tomography radiopharmaceuticals and clinical applications: what is new? Semin Nucl Med. 2011;41:246–64.PubMedCrossRef Vallabhajosula S, Solnes L, Vallabhajosula B. A broad overview of positron emission tomography radiopharmaceuticals and clinical applications: what is new? Semin Nucl Med. 2011;41:246–64.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Lavayssiere R, Cabee AE, Filmont JE. Positron emission tomography (PET) and breast cancer in clinical practice. Eur J Radiol. 2009;69:50–8.PubMedCrossRef Lavayssiere R, Cabee AE, Filmont JE. Positron emission tomography (PET) and breast cancer in clinical practice. Eur J Radiol. 2009;69:50–8.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Schilling K, Narayanan D, Kalinyak JE, The J, Velasquez MV, Kahn S, et al. Positron emission mammography in breast cancer presurgical planning: comparisons with magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38:23–36.PubMedCrossRef Schilling K, Narayanan D, Kalinyak JE, The J, Velasquez MV, Kahn S, et al. Positron emission mammography in breast cancer presurgical planning: comparisons with magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38:23–36.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Weinberg IN. Applications for positron emission mammography. Phys Med. 2006;21(Suppl 1):132–7.PubMedCrossRef Weinberg IN. Applications for positron emission mammography. Phys Med. 2006;21(Suppl 1):132–7.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Segaert I, Mottaghy F, Ceyssens S, De Wever W, Stroobants S, Van Ongeval C, et al. Additional value of PET-CT in staging of clinical stage IIB and III breast cancer. Breast J. 2010;16:617–24.PubMedCrossRef Segaert I, Mottaghy F, Ceyssens S, De Wever W, Stroobants S, Van Ongeval C, et al. Additional value of PET-CT in staging of clinical stage IIB and III breast cancer. Breast J. 2010;16:617–24.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Avril N, Adler LP. F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography imaging for primary breast cancer and loco-regional staging. Radiol Clin N Am. 2007;45:645–57. vi.PubMedCrossRef Avril N, Adler LP. F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography imaging for primary breast cancer and loco-regional staging. Radiol Clin N Am. 2007;45:645–57. vi.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Avril N, Dose J, Janicke F, Bense S, Ziegler S, Laubenbacher C, et al. Metabolic characterization of breast tumors with positron emission tomography using F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14:1848–57.PubMed Avril N, Dose J, Janicke F, Bense S, Ziegler S, Laubenbacher C, et al. Metabolic characterization of breast tumors with positron emission tomography using F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14:1848–57.PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Heinisch M, Gallowitsch HJ, Mikosch P, Kresnik E, Kumnig G, Gomez I, et al. Comparison of FDG-PET and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the evaluation of suggestive breast lesions. Breast. 2003;12:17–22.PubMedCrossRef Heinisch M, Gallowitsch HJ, Mikosch P, Kresnik E, Kumnig G, Gomez I, et al. Comparison of FDG-PET and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the evaluation of suggestive breast lesions. Breast. 2003;12:17–22.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Avril N, Rose CA, Schelling M, Dose J, Kuhn W, Bense S, et al. Breast imaging with positron emission tomography and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose: use and limitations. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:3495–502.PubMed Avril N, Rose CA, Schelling M, Dose J, Kuhn W, Bense S, et al. Breast imaging with positron emission tomography and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose: use and limitations. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:3495–502.PubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Blodgett TM, Meltzer CC, Townsend DW. PET/CT: form and function. Radiology. 2007;242:360–85.PubMedCrossRef Blodgett TM, Meltzer CC, Townsend DW. PET/CT: form and function. Radiology. 2007;242:360–85.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Townsend DW, Beyer T, Blodgett TM. PET/CT scanners: a hardware approach to image fusion. Semin Nucl Med. 2003;33:193–204.PubMedCrossRef Townsend DW, Beyer T, Blodgett TM. PET/CT scanners: a hardware approach to image fusion. Semin Nucl Med. 2003;33:193–204.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsujikawa T, Tsuchida T, Yoshida Y, Kurokawa T, Kiyono Y, Okazawa H, et al. Role of PET/CT in gynecological tumors based on the revised FIGO staging classification. Clin Nucl Med. 2011;36:e114–8.PubMedCrossRef Tsujikawa T, Tsuchida T, Yoshida Y, Kurokawa T, Kiyono Y, Okazawa H, et al. Role of PET/CT in gynecological tumors based on the revised FIGO staging classification. Clin Nucl Med. 2011;36:e114–8.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Ozkan E, Soydal C, Araz M, Kir KM, Ibis E. The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting colorectal cancer recurrence in patients with elevated CEA levels. Nucl Med Commun. 2012;33:395–402.PubMedCrossRef Ozkan E, Soydal C, Araz M, Kir KM, Ibis E. The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting colorectal cancer recurrence in patients with elevated CEA levels. Nucl Med Commun. 2012;33:395–402.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Christensen JA, Nathan MA, Mullan BP, Hartman TE, Swensen SJ, Lowe VJ. Characterization of the solitary pulmonary nodule: 18F-FDG PET versus nodule-enhancement CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:1361–7.PubMedCrossRef Christensen JA, Nathan MA, Mullan BP, Hartman TE, Swensen SJ, Lowe VJ. Characterization of the solitary pulmonary nodule: 18F-FDG PET versus nodule-enhancement CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:1361–7.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Schwarz JK, Siegel BA, Dehdashti F, Grigsby PW. Association of posttherapy positron emission tomography with tumor response and survival in cervical carcinoma. JAMA. 2007;298:2289–95.PubMedCrossRef Schwarz JK, Siegel BA, Dehdashti F, Grigsby PW. Association of posttherapy positron emission tomography with tumor response and survival in cervical carcinoma. JAMA. 2007;298:2289–95.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Cooper KL, Harnan S, Meng Y, Ward SE, Fitzgerald P, Papaioannou D, et al. Positron emission tomography (PET) for assessment of axillary lymph node status in early breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011;37:187–98.PubMedCrossRef Cooper KL, Harnan S, Meng Y, Ward SE, Fitzgerald P, Papaioannou D, et al. Positron emission tomography (PET) for assessment of axillary lymph node status in early breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011;37:187–98.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Bernsdorf M, Berthelsen AK, Wielenga VT, Kroman N, Teilum D, Binderup T, et al. Preoperative PET/CT in early-stage breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:2277–82.PubMedCrossRef Bernsdorf M, Berthelsen AK, Wielenga VT, Kroman N, Teilum D, Binderup T, et al. Preoperative PET/CT in early-stage breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:2277–82.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Garami Z, Hascsi Z, Varga J, Dinya T, Tanyi M, Garai I, et al. The value of 18-FDG PET/CT in early-stage breast cancer compared to traditional diagnostic modalities with an emphasis on changes in disease stage designation and treatment plan. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012;38:31–7.PubMedCrossRef Garami Z, Hascsi Z, Varga J, Dinya T, Tanyi M, Garai I, et al. The value of 18-FDG PET/CT in early-stage breast cancer compared to traditional diagnostic modalities with an emphasis on changes in disease stage designation and treatment plan. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012;38:31–7.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Alberini JL, Lerebours F, Wartski M, Fourme E, Le Stanc E, Gontier E, et al. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) imaging in the staging and prognosis of inflammatory breast cancer. Cancer. 2009;115:5038–47.PubMedCrossRef Alberini JL, Lerebours F, Wartski M, Fourme E, Le Stanc E, Gontier E, et al. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) imaging in the staging and prognosis of inflammatory breast cancer. Cancer. 2009;115:5038–47.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Walker GV, Niikura N, Yang W, Rohren E, Valero V, Woodward WA, et al. Pretreatment staging positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with inflammatory breast cancer influences radiation treatment field designs. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;83:1381–6.PubMedCrossRef Walker GV, Niikura N, Yang W, Rohren E, Valero V, Woodward WA, et al. Pretreatment staging positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with inflammatory breast cancer influences radiation treatment field designs. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;83:1381–6.PubMedCrossRef
38.
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Rousseau C, Devillers A, Sagan C, Ferrer L, Bridji B, Campion L, et al. Monitoring of early response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage II and III breast cancer by [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:5366–72.PubMedCrossRef Rousseau C, Devillers A, Sagan C, Ferrer L, Bridji B, Campion L, et al. Monitoring of early response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage II and III breast cancer by [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:5366–72.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Ueda S, Saeki T, Shigekawa T, Omata J, Moriya T, Yamamoto J, et al. (18)F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography optimizes neoadjuvant chemotherapy for primary breast cancer to achieve pathological complete response. Int J Clin Oncol. 2012;17:276–82. Ueda S, Saeki T, Shigekawa T, Omata J, Moriya T, Yamamoto J, et al. (18)F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography optimizes neoadjuvant chemotherapy for primary breast cancer to achieve pathological complete response. Int J Clin Oncol. 2012;17:276–82.
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Keam B, Im SA, Koh Y, Han SW, Oh DY, Cho N, et al. Early metabolic response using FDG PET/CT and molecular phenotypes of breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:452.PubMedCrossRef Keam B, Im SA, Koh Y, Han SW, Oh DY, Cho N, et al. Early metabolic response using FDG PET/CT and molecular phenotypes of breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:452.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Park JS, Moon WK, Lyou CY, Cho N, Kang KW, Chung JK. The assessment of breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Acta Radiol. 2011;52:21–8.PubMedCrossRef Park JS, Moon WK, Lyou CY, Cho N, Kang KW, Chung JK. The assessment of breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Acta Radiol. 2011;52:21–8.PubMedCrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Radan L, Ben-Haim S, Bar-Shalom R, Guralnik L, Israel O. The role of FDG-PET/CT in suspected recurrence of breast cancer. Cancer. 2006;107:2545–51.PubMedCrossRef Radan L, Ben-Haim S, Bar-Shalom R, Guralnik L, Israel O. The role of FDG-PET/CT in suspected recurrence of breast cancer. Cancer. 2006;107:2545–51.PubMedCrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Eubank WB, Mankoff D, Bhattacharya M, Gralow J, Linden H, Ellis G, et al. Impact of FDG PET on defining the extent of disease and on the treatment of patients with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183:479–86.PubMedCrossRef Eubank WB, Mankoff D, Bhattacharya M, Gralow J, Linden H, Ellis G, et al. Impact of FDG PET on defining the extent of disease and on the treatment of patients with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183:479–86.PubMedCrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Goerres GW, Michel SC, Fehr MK, Kaim AH, Steinert HC, Seifert B, et al. Follow-up of women with breast cancer: comparison between MRI and FDG PET. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:1635–44.PubMedCrossRef Goerres GW, Michel SC, Fehr MK, Kaim AH, Steinert HC, Seifert B, et al. Follow-up of women with breast cancer: comparison between MRI and FDG PET. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:1635–44.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Grahek D, Montravers F, Kerrou K, Aide N, Lotz JP, Talbot JN. [18F]FDG in recurrent breast cancer: diagnostic performances, clinical impact and relevance of induced changes in management. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004;31:179–88.PubMedCrossRef Grahek D, Montravers F, Kerrou K, Aide N, Lotz JP, Talbot JN. [18F]FDG in recurrent breast cancer: diagnostic performances, clinical impact and relevance of induced changes in management. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004;31:179–88.PubMedCrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Constantinidou A, Martin A, Sharma B, Johnston SR. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the management of recurrent/metastatic breast cancer: a large retrospective study from the Royal Marsden Hospital. Ann Oncol. 2011;22:307–14.PubMedCrossRef Constantinidou A, Martin A, Sharma B, Johnston SR. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the management of recurrent/metastatic breast cancer: a large retrospective study from the Royal Marsden Hospital. Ann Oncol. 2011;22:307–14.PubMedCrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Pennant M, Takwoingi Y, Pennant L, Davenport C, Fry-Smith A, Eisinga A, et al. A systematic review of positron emission tomography (PET) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for the diagnosis of breast cancer recurrence. Health Technol Assess. 2010;14:1–103. Pennant M, Takwoingi Y, Pennant L, Davenport C, Fry-Smith A, Eisinga A, et al. A systematic review of positron emission tomography (PET) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for the diagnosis of breast cancer recurrence. Health Technol Assess. 2010;14:1–103.
49.
Zurück zum Zitat National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology™. Breast Cancer V.2.2011. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology™. Breast Cancer V.2.2011.
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Thompson CJ, Murthy K, Weinberg IN, Mako F. Feasibility study for positron emission mammography. Med Phys. 1994;21:529–38.PubMedCrossRef Thompson CJ, Murthy K, Weinberg IN, Mako F. Feasibility study for positron emission mammography. Med Phys. 1994;21:529–38.PubMedCrossRef
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Weinberg I, Majewski S, Weisenberger A, Markowitz A, Aloj L, Majewski L, et al. Preliminary results for positron emission mammography: real-time functional breast imaging in a conventional mammography gantry. Eur J Nucl Med. 1996;23:804–6.PubMedCrossRef Weinberg I, Majewski S, Weisenberger A, Markowitz A, Aloj L, Majewski L, et al. Preliminary results for positron emission mammography: real-time functional breast imaging in a conventional mammography gantry. Eur J Nucl Med. 1996;23:804–6.PubMedCrossRef
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Murthy K, Aznar M, Thompson CJ, Loutfi A, Lisbona R, Gagnon JH. Results of preliminary clinical trials of the positron emission mammography system PEM-I: a dedicated breast imaging system producing glucose metabolic images using FDG. J Nucl Med. 2000;41:1851–8.PubMed Murthy K, Aznar M, Thompson CJ, Loutfi A, Lisbona R, Gagnon JH. Results of preliminary clinical trials of the positron emission mammography system PEM-I: a dedicated breast imaging system producing glucose metabolic images using FDG. J Nucl Med. 2000;41:1851–8.PubMed
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Levine EA, Freimanis RI, Perrier ND, Morton K, Lesko NM, Bergman S, et al. Positron emission mammography: initial clinical results. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10:86–91.PubMedCrossRef Levine EA, Freimanis RI, Perrier ND, Morton K, Lesko NM, Bergman S, et al. Positron emission mammography: initial clinical results. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10:86–91.PubMedCrossRef
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosen EL, Turkington TG, Soo MS, Baker JA, Coleman RE. Detection of primary breast carcinoma with a dedicated, large-field-of-view FDG PET mammography device: initial experience. Radiology. 2005;234:527–34.PubMedCrossRef Rosen EL, Turkington TG, Soo MS, Baker JA, Coleman RE. Detection of primary breast carcinoma with a dedicated, large-field-of-view FDG PET mammography device: initial experience. Radiology. 2005;234:527–34.PubMedCrossRef
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Tafra L, Cheng Z, Uddo J, Lobrano MB, Stein W, Berg WA, et al. Pilot clinical trial of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission mammography in the surgical management of breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2005;190:628–32.PubMedCrossRef Tafra L, Cheng Z, Uddo J, Lobrano MB, Stein W, Berg WA, et al. Pilot clinical trial of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission mammography in the surgical management of breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2005;190:628–32.PubMedCrossRef
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Berg WA, Weinberg IN, Narayanan D, Lobrano ME, Ross E, Amodei L, et al. High-resolution fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with compression (“positron emission mammography”) is highly accurate in depicting primary breast cancer. Breast J. 2006;12:309–23.PubMedCrossRef Berg WA, Weinberg IN, Narayanan D, Lobrano ME, Ross E, Amodei L, et al. High-resolution fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with compression (“positron emission mammography”) is highly accurate in depicting primary breast cancer. Breast J. 2006;12:309–23.PubMedCrossRef
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Eo JS, Chun IK, Paeng JC, Kang KW, Lee SM, Han W, et al. Imaging sensitivity of dedicated positron emission mammography in relation to tumor size. Breast. 2012;21:66–71.PubMedCrossRef Eo JS, Chun IK, Paeng JC, Kang KW, Lee SM, Han W, et al. Imaging sensitivity of dedicated positron emission mammography in relation to tumor size. Breast. 2012;21:66–71.PubMedCrossRef
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Viehweg P, Heinig A, Kuchler C. Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: accuracy, value, controversies, solutions. Eur J Radiol. 1997;24:94–108.PubMedCrossRef Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Viehweg P, Heinig A, Kuchler C. Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: accuracy, value, controversies, solutions. Eur J Radiol. 1997;24:94–108.PubMedCrossRef
59.
Zurück zum Zitat Degani H, Chetrit-Dadiani M, Bogin L, Furman-Haran E. Magnetic resonance imaging of tumor vasculature. Thromb Haemost. 2003;89:25–33.PubMed Degani H, Chetrit-Dadiani M, Bogin L, Furman-Haran E. Magnetic resonance imaging of tumor vasculature. Thromb Haemost. 2003;89:25–33.PubMed
60.
Zurück zum Zitat Tafra L. Positron emission mammography: a new breast imaging device. J Surg Oncol. 2008;97:372–3.PubMedCrossRef Tafra L. Positron emission mammography: a new breast imaging device. J Surg Oncol. 2008;97:372–3.PubMedCrossRef
61.
Zurück zum Zitat Berg WA, Madsen KS, Schilling K, Tartar M, Pisano ED, Larsen LH, et al. Breast cancer: comparative effectiveness of positron emission mammography and MR imaging in presurgical planning for the ipsilateral breast. Radiology. 2011;258:59–72.PubMedCrossRef Berg WA, Madsen KS, Schilling K, Tartar M, Pisano ED, Larsen LH, et al. Breast cancer: comparative effectiveness of positron emission mammography and MR imaging in presurgical planning for the ipsilateral breast. Radiology. 2011;258:59–72.PubMedCrossRef
62.
Zurück zum Zitat Berg WA, Madsen KS, Schilling K, Tartar M, Pisano ED, Larsen LH, et al. Comparative effectiveness of positron emission mammography and MRI in the contralateral breast of women with newly diagnosed breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198:219–32.PubMedCrossRef Berg WA, Madsen KS, Schilling K, Tartar M, Pisano ED, Larsen LH, et al. Comparative effectiveness of positron emission mammography and MRI in the contralateral breast of women with newly diagnosed breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198:219–32.PubMedCrossRef
63.
Zurück zum Zitat Kalinyak JE, Schilling K, Berg WA, Narayanan D, Mayberry JP, Rai R, et al. PET-guided breast biopsy. Breast J. 2011;17:143–51.PubMedCrossRef Kalinyak JE, Schilling K, Berg WA, Narayanan D, Mayberry JP, Rai R, et al. PET-guided breast biopsy. Breast J. 2011;17:143–51.PubMedCrossRef
64.
Zurück zum Zitat MacDonald L, Edwards J, Lewellen T, Haseley D, Rogers J, Kinahan P. Clinical imaging characteristics of the positron emission mammography camera: PEM Flex Solo II. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:1666–75.PubMedCrossRef MacDonald L, Edwards J, Lewellen T, Haseley D, Rogers J, Kinahan P. Clinical imaging characteristics of the positron emission mammography camera: PEM Flex Solo II. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:1666–75.PubMedCrossRef
65.
Zurück zum Zitat Vranjesevic D, Schiepers C, Silverman DH, Quon A, Villalpando J, Dahlbom M, et al. Relationship between 18F-FDG uptake and breast density in women with normal breast tissue. J Nucl Med. 2003;44:1238–42.PubMed Vranjesevic D, Schiepers C, Silverman DH, Quon A, Villalpando J, Dahlbom M, et al. Relationship between 18F-FDG uptake and breast density in women with normal breast tissue. J Nucl Med. 2003;44:1238–42.PubMed
66.
Zurück zum Zitat Swedish Medical Center. Clinical value of pre-surgery positron emission mammography (PEM) in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. In: ClinicalTrials.gov [Internet]. Bethesda: National Library of Medicine (US); 2000. http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01241721. NLM Identifier: NCT01241721. Swedish Medical Center. Clinical value of pre-surgery positron emission mammography (PEM) in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. In: ClinicalTrials.gov [Internet]. Bethesda: National Library of Medicine (US); 2000. http://​clinicaltrials.​gov/​show/​NCT01241721. NLM Identifier: NCT01241721.
67.
Zurück zum Zitat The University of Chicago Medical Center. Role of PEM Flex Solo II PET Scanner in evaluating neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in patients with breast cancer. In: ClinicalTrials.gov [Internet]. Bethesda: National Library of Medicine (US); 2000. http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01012440. NLM Identifier: NCT01012440. The University of Chicago Medical Center. Role of PEM Flex Solo II PET Scanner in evaluating neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in patients with breast cancer. In: ClinicalTrials.gov [Internet]. Bethesda: National Library of Medicine (US); 2000. http://​clinicaltrials.​gov/​show/​NCT01012440. NLM Identifier: NCT01012440.
68.
Zurück zum Zitat Boston Medical Center. Positron emission mammography and standard mammography in women with dense breast tissue or who are at high risk of breast cancer. In: ClinicalTrials.gov [Internet]. Bethesda: National Library of Medicine (US); 2000. http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00896649. NLM Identifier: NCT00896649. Boston Medical Center. Positron emission mammography and standard mammography in women with dense breast tissue or who are at high risk of breast cancer. In: ClinicalTrials.gov [Internet]. Bethesda: National Library of Medicine (US); 2000. http://​clinicaltrials.​gov/​show/​NCT00896649. NLM Identifier: NCT00896649.
69.
Zurück zum Zitat Rice SL, Roney CA, Daumar P, Lewis JS. The next generation of positron emission tomography radiopharmaceuticals in oncology. Semin Nucl Med. 2011;41:265–82.PubMedCrossRef Rice SL, Roney CA, Daumar P, Lewis JS. The next generation of positron emission tomography radiopharmaceuticals in oncology. Semin Nucl Med. 2011;41:265–82.PubMedCrossRef
70.
Zurück zum Zitat Vandromme MJ, Umphrey H, Krontiras H. Image-guided methods for biopsy of suspicious breast lesions. J Surg Oncol. 2011;103:299–305.PubMedCrossRef Vandromme MJ, Umphrey H, Krontiras H. Image-guided methods for biopsy of suspicious breast lesions. J Surg Oncol. 2011;103:299–305.PubMedCrossRef
71.
Zurück zum Zitat Han BK, Schnall MD, Orel SG, Rosen M. Outcome of MRI-guided breast biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191:1798–804.PubMedCrossRef Han BK, Schnall MD, Orel SG, Rosen M. Outcome of MRI-guided breast biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191:1798–804.PubMedCrossRef
72.
Zurück zum Zitat Schell AM, Rosenkranz K, Lewis PJ. Role of breast MRI in the preoperative evaluation of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192:1438–44.PubMedCrossRef Schell AM, Rosenkranz K, Lewis PJ. Role of breast MRI in the preoperative evaluation of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192:1438–44.PubMedCrossRef
73.
Zurück zum Zitat Raylman RR, Majewski S, Weisenberger AG, Popov V, Wojcik R, Kross B, et al. Positron emission mammography-guided breast biopsy. J Nucl Med. 2001;42:960–6.PubMed Raylman RR, Majewski S, Weisenberger AG, Popov V, Wojcik R, Kross B, et al. Positron emission mammography-guided breast biopsy. J Nucl Med. 2001;42:960–6.PubMed
74.
Zurück zum Zitat Issa N, Poggio ED, Fatica RA, Patel R, Ruggieri PM, Heyka RJ. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis and its association with gadolinium exposure during MRI. Cleve Clin J Med. 2008;75:95–7. 103–4, 6 passim.PubMedCrossRef Issa N, Poggio ED, Fatica RA, Patel R, Ruggieri PM, Heyka RJ. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis and its association with gadolinium exposure during MRI. Cleve Clin J Med. 2008;75:95–7. 103–4, 6 passim.PubMedCrossRef
75.
Zurück zum Zitat Shellock FG, Spinazzi A. MRI safety update 2008: part 1, MRI contrast agents and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191:1129–39.PubMedCrossRef Shellock FG, Spinazzi A. MRI safety update 2008: part 1, MRI contrast agents and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191:1129–39.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The current status of positron emission mammography in breast cancer diagnosis
verfasst von
Vasileios Kalles
George C. Zografos
Xeni Provatopoulou
Dimitra Koulocheri
Antonia Gounaris
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2013
Verlag
Springer Japan
Erschienen in
Breast Cancer / Ausgabe 2/2013
Print ISSN: 1340-6868
Elektronische ISSN: 1880-4233
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-012-0433-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2013

Breast Cancer 2/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.