Skip to main content
Erschienen in: MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY 1/2013

01.04.2013 | Original Article

The Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage: medium follow-up results

verfasst von: J. Lamo-Espinosa, J. Duart Clemente, P. Díaz-Rada, J. Pons-Villanueva, J. R. Valentí-Nín

Erschienen in: MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY | Ausgabe 1/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

With the development of hip prosthesis, younger patients may need more than one revision surgery, with less bone stock available in each subsequent surgery. We retrospectively reviewed the hip revision surgeries in which a Burch-Schneider device has been used. Patients were classified according to the Paprosky score. Functional and clinical evaluation was assessed by the Merlé-Daubigné score. Radiolucencies were assessed by Gill’s criteria. Sixteen patients with a mean age of 66.1 years were reviewed at a mean follow-up of 60.7 months. According to Paprosky classification, 18.7 % were grade IIb, 56.3 % grade IIIa and 25 % grade IIIb. The mean Merlé-Daubigné score improved from 10 to 15 points. Radiologically, 12 patients had no radiolucencies, two had grade I radiolucencies and two had grade III radiolucencies. In greater than 50 % of acetabular defects, the Burch-Schneider seems to be useful providing clinical and functional improvement. Immediately, non-progressive radiolucencies are not associated with implant loosening at the end of follow-up. The ischial flap should be inserted inside the ischial portion of the acetabulum.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Jasty M, Harris WH (1990) Salvage total hip reconstruction in patients with major acetabular bone deficiency using structural femoral head allografts. J Bone Joint Surg Br 72:63–67PubMed Jasty M, Harris WH (1990) Salvage total hip reconstruction in patients with major acetabular bone deficiency using structural femoral head allografts. J Bone Joint Surg Br 72:63–67PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Salvati EA, Bullough P, Wilson PD Jr (1975) Intrapelvic protrusion of the acetabular component following total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 111:212–227PubMedCrossRef Salvati EA, Bullough P, Wilson PD Jr (1975) Intrapelvic protrusion of the acetabular component following total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 111:212–227PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Jasty M, Harris WH (1988) Results of total hip reconstruction using acetabular mesh in patients with central acetabular deficiency. Clin Orthop Relat Res 237:142–149PubMed Jasty M, Harris WH (1988) Results of total hip reconstruction using acetabular mesh in patients with central acetabular deficiency. Clin Orthop Relat Res 237:142–149PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Eftekhar NS, Nercessian O (1990) Intrapelvic migration of total hip prostheses. Operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71:1480–1486 Erratum in: J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1990;72: 310 Eftekhar NS, Nercessian O (1990) Intrapelvic migration of total hip prostheses. Operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71:1480–1486 Erratum in: J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1990;72: 310
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Udomkiat P, Dorr LD, Won YY, Longjohn D, Wan Z (2001) Technical factors for success with metal ring acetabular reconstruction. J Arthroplasty 16:961–969PubMedCrossRef Udomkiat P, Dorr LD, Won YY, Longjohn D, Wan Z (2001) Technical factors for success with metal ring acetabular reconstruction. J Arthroplasty 16:961–969PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Padgett DE, Kull L, Rosenberg A, Sumner DR, Galante JO (1993) Revision of the acetabular component without cement after total hip arthroplasty. Three to six-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75:663–673PubMed Padgett DE, Kull L, Rosenberg A, Sumner DR, Galante JO (1993) Revision of the acetabular component without cement after total hip arthroplasty. Three to six-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75:663–673PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Garcia-Cimbrelo E (1999) Porous-coated cementless acetabular cups in revision surgery: a 6- to 11-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 14:397–406PubMedCrossRef Garcia-Cimbrelo E (1999) Porous-coated cementless acetabular cups in revision surgery: a 6- to 11-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 14:397–406PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen WM, Engh CA Jr, Hopper RH Jr, McAuley JP, Engh CA (2000) Acetabular revision with use of a bilobed component inserted without cement in patients who have acetabular bone-stock deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82:197–206PubMed Chen WM, Engh CA Jr, Hopper RH Jr, McAuley JP, Engh CA (2000) Acetabular revision with use of a bilobed component inserted without cement in patients who have acetabular bone-stock deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82:197–206PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Berry DJ, Sutherland CJ, Trousdale RT, Colwell CW Jr, Chandler HP, Ayres D, Yashar AA (2000) Bilobed oblong porous coated acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 371:154–160PubMedCrossRef Berry DJ, Sutherland CJ, Trousdale RT, Colwell CW Jr, Chandler HP, Ayres D, Yashar AA (2000) Bilobed oblong porous coated acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 371:154–160PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Moskal JT, Shen FH (2004) The use of bilobed porous-coated acetabular components without structural bone graft for type III acetabular defects in revision total hip arthroplasty: a prospective study with a minimum 2-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 19:867–873PubMedCrossRef Moskal JT, Shen FH (2004) The use of bilobed porous-coated acetabular components without structural bone graft for type III acetabular defects in revision total hip arthroplasty: a prospective study with a minimum 2-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 19:867–873PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Hendricks KJ, Harris WH (2006) High placement of noncemented acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty. A concise follow-up, at a minimum of fifteen years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:2231–2236PubMedCrossRef Hendricks KJ, Harris WH (2006) High placement of noncemented acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty. A concise follow-up, at a minimum of fifteen years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:2231–2236PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Muller ME (1981) Acetabular revision. The Hip. In: Proceedings of 9th meeting of the Hip Society. St Louis pp 46–56 Muller ME (1981) Acetabular revision. The Hip. In: Proceedings of 9th meeting of the Hip Society. St Louis pp 46–56
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Berry DJ (2004) Antiprotrusio cages for acetabular revision. Clin Orthop Relat Res 420:106–112PubMedCrossRef Berry DJ (2004) Antiprotrusio cages for acetabular revision. Clin Orthop Relat Res 420:106–112PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Gross AE, Wong P, Saleh KJ (2002) Don’t throw away the ring: indications and use. J Arthroplasty 17(4 Suppl 1):162–166PubMedCrossRef Gross AE, Wong P, Saleh KJ (2002) Don’t throw away the ring: indications and use. J Arthroplasty 17(4 Suppl 1):162–166PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Berry DJ (1995) Acetabular anti-protrusio rings and cages in revision total hip arthroplasty. Semin Arthroplasty 6:68–75PubMed Berry DJ (1995) Acetabular anti-protrusio rings and cages in revision total hip arthroplasty. Semin Arthroplasty 6:68–75PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Paprosky WG, Perona PG, Lawrence JM (1994) Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 9:33–44PubMedCrossRef Paprosky WG, Perona PG, Lawrence JM (1994) Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 9:33–44PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat D’aubigne RM, Postel M (1954) Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 36:451–475PubMed D’aubigne RM, Postel M (1954) Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 36:451–475PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Gill TJ, Sledge JB, Müller ME (1998) The Bürch-Schneider anti-protrusio cage in revision total hip arthroplasty: indications, principles and long-term results. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:946–953PubMedCrossRef Gill TJ, Sledge JB, Müller ME (1998) The Bürch-Schneider anti-protrusio cage in revision total hip arthroplasty: indications, principles and long-term results. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:946–953PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat DeLee JG, Charnley J (1976) Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 121:20–32PubMed DeLee JG, Charnley J (1976) Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 121:20–32PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Amstutz HC, Ma SM, Jinnah RH, Mai L (1982) Revision of aseptic loose total hip arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 170:21–33PubMed Amstutz HC, Ma SM, Jinnah RH, Mai L (1982) Revision of aseptic loose total hip arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 170:21–33PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Slooff TJ, Buma P, Schreurs BW, Schimmel JW, Huiskes R, Gardeniers J (1996) Acetabular and femoral reconstruction with impacted graft and cement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 324:108–115PubMedCrossRef Slooff TJ, Buma P, Schreurs BW, Schimmel JW, Huiskes R, Gardeniers J (1996) Acetabular and femoral reconstruction with impacted graft and cement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 324:108–115PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Garbuz D, Morsi E (1996) Revision of the acetabular component of a total hip arthroplasty with a massive structural allograft. Study with a minimum five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78:693–697PubMed Garbuz D, Morsi E (1996) Revision of the acetabular component of a total hip arthroplasty with a massive structural allograft. Study with a minimum five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78:693–697PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Haentjens P, de Boeck H, Handelberg F, Casteleyn PP, Opdecam P (1993) Cemented acetabular reconstruction with the Müller support ring. A minimum five-year clinical and roentgenographic follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 290:225–235PubMed Haentjens P, de Boeck H, Handelberg F, Casteleyn PP, Opdecam P (1993) Cemented acetabular reconstruction with the Müller support ring. A minimum five-year clinical and roentgenographic follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 290:225–235PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Schatzker J, Glynn MK, Ritter D (1984) A preliminary review of the Müller acetabular and Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio support rings. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 103:5–12PubMedCrossRef Schatzker J, Glynn MK, Ritter D (1984) A preliminary review of the Müller acetabular and Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio support rings. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 103:5–12PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Zehntner MK, Ganz R (1994) Midterm results (5.5–10 years) of acetabular allograft reconstruction with the acetabular reinforcement ring during total hip revision. J Arthroplasty 9:469–479PubMedCrossRef Zehntner MK, Ganz R (1994) Midterm results (5.5–10 years) of acetabular allograft reconstruction with the acetabular reinforcement ring during total hip revision. J Arthroplasty 9:469–479PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosson J, Schatzker J (1992) The use of reinforcement rings to reconstruct deficient acetabula. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74:716–720PubMed Rosson J, Schatzker J (1992) The use of reinforcement rings to reconstruct deficient acetabula. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74:716–720PubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Berry DJ, Müller ME (1992) Revision arthroplasty using an anti-protrusio cage for massive acetabular bone deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74:711–715PubMed Berry DJ, Müller ME (1992) Revision arthroplasty using an anti-protrusio cage for massive acetabular bone deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74:711–715PubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Sembrano JN, Cheng EY (2008) Acetabular cage survival and analysis of factors related to failure. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:1657–1665PubMedCrossRef Sembrano JN, Cheng EY (2008) Acetabular cage survival and analysis of factors related to failure. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:1657–1665PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Schlegel UJ, Bitsch RG, Pritsch M, Aldinger PR, Mau H, Breusch SJ (2008) Acetabular reinforcement rings in revision total hip arthroplasty: midterm results in 298 cases. Orthopade 37(904):906–913 Schlegel UJ, Bitsch RG, Pritsch M, Aldinger PR, Mau H, Breusch SJ (2008) Acetabular reinforcement rings in revision total hip arthroplasty: midterm results in 298 cases. Orthopade 37(904):906–913
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Gaiani L, Bertelli R, Palmonari M, Vicenzi G (2009) Total hip arthroplasty revision in elderly people with cement and Burch-Schneider anti-protrusio cage. Chir Organi Mov 93:15–19PubMed Gaiani L, Bertelli R, Palmonari M, Vicenzi G (2009) Total hip arthroplasty revision in elderly people with cement and Burch-Schneider anti-protrusio cage. Chir Organi Mov 93:15–19PubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Regis D, Magnan B, Sandri A, Bartolozzi P (2008) Long-term results of anti-protrusion cage and massive allografts for the management of periprosthetic acetabular bone loss. J Arthroplasty 6:826–832CrossRef Regis D, Magnan B, Sandri A, Bartolozzi P (2008) Long-term results of anti-protrusion cage and massive allografts for the management of periprosthetic acetabular bone loss. J Arthroplasty 6:826–832CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Winter E, Piert M, Volkmann R, Maurer F, Eingartner C, Weise K, Weller S (2001) Allogeneic cancellous bone graft and a Burch-Schneider ring for acetabular reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83:862–867PubMed Winter E, Piert M, Volkmann R, Maurer F, Eingartner C, Weise K, Weller S (2001) Allogeneic cancellous bone graft and a Burch-Schneider ring for acetabular reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83:862–867PubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Azuma T, Yasuda H, Okagaki K, Sakai K (1994) Compressed allograft chips for acetabular reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76:740–744PubMed Azuma T, Yasuda H, Okagaki K, Sakai K (1994) Compressed allograft chips for acetabular reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76:740–744PubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Kondo K, Nagaya I (1993) Bone incorporation of frozen femoral head allograft in revision total hip replacement. Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi 67:408–416PubMed Kondo K, Nagaya I (1993) Bone incorporation of frozen femoral head allograft in revision total hip replacement. Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi 67:408–416PubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Peters CL, Curtain M, Samuelson KM (1995) Acetabular revision with the Burch-Schnieder antiprotrusio cage and cancellous allograft bone. J Arthroplasty 10:307–312PubMedCrossRef Peters CL, Curtain M, Samuelson KM (1995) Acetabular revision with the Burch-Schnieder antiprotrusio cage and cancellous allograft bone. J Arthroplasty 10:307–312PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Saleh KJ, Jaroszynski G, Woodgate I, Saleh L, Gross AE (2000) Revision total hip arthroplasty with the use of structural acetabular allograft and reconstruction ring: a case series with a 10-year average follow-up. J Arthroplasty 15:951–958PubMedCrossRef Saleh KJ, Jaroszynski G, Woodgate I, Saleh L, Gross AE (2000) Revision total hip arthroplasty with the use of structural acetabular allograft and reconstruction ring: a case series with a 10-year average follow-up. J Arthroplasty 15:951–958PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoell S, Dedy N, Gosheger G, Dieckmann R, Daniilidis K, Hardes J (2012) The Burch-Schneider cage for reconstruction after metastatic destruction of the acetabulum: outcome and complications. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132:405–410PubMedCrossRef Hoell S, Dedy N, Gosheger G, Dieckmann R, Daniilidis K, Hardes J (2012) The Burch-Schneider cage for reconstruction after metastatic destruction of the acetabulum: outcome and complications. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132:405–410PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Coscujuela-Mañá A, Angles F, Tramunt C, Casanova X (2010) Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage for acetabular revision: a 5- to 13-year follow-up study. Hip Int 27(S7):112–118 Coscujuela-Mañá A, Angles F, Tramunt C, Casanova X (2010) Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage for acetabular revision: a 5- to 13-year follow-up study. Hip Int 27(S7):112–118
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Böhm P, Banzhaf S (1999) Acetabular revision with allograft bone. 103 revisions with 3 reconstruction alternatives, followed for 0.3-13 years. Acta Orthop Scand 70:240–249PubMedCrossRef Böhm P, Banzhaf S (1999) Acetabular revision with allograft bone. 103 revisions with 3 reconstruction alternatives, followed for 0.3-13 years. Acta Orthop Scand 70:240–249PubMedCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Regis D, Sandri A, Bonetti I, Bortolami O, Bartolozzi P (2012) A minimum of 10-year follow-up of the Burch-Schneider cage and bulk allografts for the revision of pelvic discontinuity. J Arthroplasty 27:1057–1063PubMedCrossRef Regis D, Sandri A, Bonetti I, Bortolami O, Bartolozzi P (2012) A minimum of 10-year follow-up of the Burch-Schneider cage and bulk allografts for the revision of pelvic discontinuity. J Arthroplasty 27:1057–1063PubMedCrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones L, Grammatopoulos G, Singer G (2012) The Burch-Schneider cage: 9-year survival in Paprosky type 3 acetabular defects. Clinical and radiological follow-up. Hip Int 22:28–34PubMedCrossRef Jones L, Grammatopoulos G, Singer G (2012) The Burch-Schneider cage: 9-year survival in Paprosky type 3 acetabular defects. Clinical and radiological follow-up. Hip Int 22:28–34PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Blacha J, Gagała J (2004) The Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage in revision hip arthroplasty with acetabular bone defect. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 30:631–637 Blacha J, Gagała J (2004) The Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage in revision hip arthroplasty with acetabular bone defect. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 30:631–637
43.
Zurück zum Zitat van Koeveringe AJ, Ochsner PE (2002) Revision cup arthroplasty using Burch-Schneider anti-protrusio cage. Int Orthop 26:291–295PubMedCrossRef van Koeveringe AJ, Ochsner PE (2002) Revision cup arthroplasty using Burch-Schneider anti-protrusio cage. Int Orthop 26:291–295PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage: medium follow-up results
verfasst von
J. Lamo-Espinosa
J. Duart Clemente
P. Díaz-Rada
J. Pons-Villanueva
J. R. Valentí-Nín
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2013
Verlag
Springer Milan
Erschienen in
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY / Ausgabe 1/2013
Print ISSN: 2035-5106
Elektronische ISSN: 2035-5114
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-012-0233-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2013

MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY 1/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.