Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Horseshoe-Shaped Commissure of Wernekinck or the Decussation of the Brachium Conjunctivum Methodological Changes in the 1840s

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The Cerebellum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Up till the 1840s, gross dissection was the only method available to study the tracts and fascicles of the white matter of the human brain. This changed dramatically with the introduction by Stilling (1842, 1843, 1846) of the microscopy of serial sections and his demonstration of the discriminative power of this method. The decussation of the brachium conjunctivum (the superior cerebellar peduncle) (International Anatomical Terminology (1998)) originally was known as the horseshoe-shaped commissure of Wernekinck. The first use of this name and the first illustrations of this commissure date from a book by Wernekinck’s successor, Wilbrand (1840). Using gross dissection, he concluded that the commissure connects the dentate nucleus with the contralateral inferior olive. A few years later, Stilling (1846), using microscopy of serial sections through the human brain stem, illustrated the entire course of the brachium conjunctivum, its decussation, and its crossed ascending branch, up to the red nucleus. From his work, it became clear that Wernekinck and Wilbrand had included the central tegmental tract in their commissure, and that they had failed to identify its ascending branch.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stilling B. Über die Medulla oblongata. Erlangen: F.Enke; 1843.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Stilling B. Untersuchungen über den Bau und die Verrichtungen des Gehirns. I. Über den Bau des Hirnknotens oder der Varolischen Brücke. Jena Deuck und Verlag von Friedrich Make; 1846.

  3. Stilling B, Wallach BF. Untersuchungen über die Textur des Rückenmarks. Leipzig; 1842.

  4. Federative committee on anatomical terminology. International Anatomical Terminology. Terminologia anatomica. Stuttgart: Thieme; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Stedman TL. Stedman’s medical dictionary. 28th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2006.

  6. van Baarsen K, Kleinnijenhuuis M, Konert T, van Capellen van Walsum A-M, Grotenhuis A. Tractography demonstrates dentato-rubro-thalamic tract disruption in an adult with cerebellar mutism. Cerebellum. 2013;12:617–22.

  7. Hess W. Wernekink, Friedrich Christ.Gregor. Allgemeine Deutsche Biographie. 1897

  8. Wilbrand FJJ. Anatomie und Physiologie der Centralgebilde des Nervensystems. Giessen Ricker Buchhandlung. 1840.

  9. Stilling B. Stilling, Benedict. Allgemeine Deutsche Biographie. http://de/wikisource.org/wiki/ADB:Stilling. Benedict 1893. p. 247–9.

  10. Stilling B. Untersuchungen über den Bau des kleinen Gehirns des Menschen. Cassel Fischer; 1864.

  11. Bechterew W von. Über eine bisher unbekannte Verbindung der grosen Oliven mit den Grosshirn. Neurol Centralbl. 1885.

  12. Verhaart WJC. Die zentrale Haubenbahn bei Affen und Menschen. Schweiz Arch Neurol Psychiat. 1936;38:270–83.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gerlach I. Mikroskopische Studien aus dem Gebiete der menschlichen Morphologie. Erlangen F.Enke; 1858.

  14. Hannover A. Die Chromsäure, ein vorzügliches Mittel bei mikroskopischen Untersuchungen. Arch Anat Physiol Wiss. 1840;1:649–558.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Alzheimer A. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der pathologischen Glia und ihre Beziehungen zu den Abbauprodukten in Nervengewebe. Histologische und histopathologische Arbeiten. 1910;3:401–554.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Häggqvist G. Analyse der Faserverteilung in einem Rückenmarkquerschnitt (Th 3). Mikrosk Anat Forsch. 1936;39:1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Duval M. De l’emploi du collodion humide pour la practique des coupes microscopiques. J Anat Physiol. 1879;15:185–8.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Blum F. Der formaldehyd als Härtungsmittel. Z Wiss Mikrosk. 1893;10:314–5.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Weigert K. Ueber eine neue Untersuchungsmethode des Centralnervensystems. Z med Wissensch. 1882;20:753–74.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nissl E. Ueber eine neue Untersuchungsmethode des Centralorgans speciell zur Feststellung der Lokalisation der Nervenzellen. Neurol Centralbl. 1894;13:507–8.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Türck L. Über sekundärer Erkrankung einzelner Rückenmarkstränge und ihren Fortsetzungen zum Gehirne. Sitzungsberichte der math-nat Cl der k Akademie der Wissenschaften. 1851;6:427–312.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Marchi V, Algieri G. Sulle dgenerazione discendento consecutive a lesioni sperimentale in diverse zone della coteccia cerebrale. Riv Sper Freniatr Med Leg Alienazioni ment. 1886;14:1–49.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Von Gudden B. Über einen bisher nicht beschriebenen Nervenfaserstrang im Gehirne der Saugerthiere and des Menschen. Arch Psychiat u Nerv Krankh. 1870;2:364–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Forel A. Untersuchungen über die Haubenregio und ihre obere Verknüpfungen im Gehirn des Menschen und einiger Säugethiere mit Beiträgen zu den Methoden der Gehirnuntersuchung. Arch f Psychiat. 1877;7:392–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Probst M. Zur Kenntnis des Bindearms, der Haubenstrahlung under Regio subthalamica. Mschr f Psychiat u Neurol. 1901;10:288–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Burdach KF. Vom Baue und Leben des Gehirns. Leipzig: Dykschen Buchgandlung; 1822.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Vesalius A. On the fabric of the human body: a translation of de humani corporis fabrica libri septem. The heart and associated organs. The brain. Volumes 6-7. Novato: Norman; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Vicq’d Azir F. Traité d’anatomie et de physiologie. Paris: Franç Amb Pidot l’Aine; 1786.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Pourfour du Petit F. Lettres d’un médicin des hospitaux du roi á un autre médicin de ses amis. Namur1710.

  30. Wiberg J. The anatomy of the brain in the works of Galen and "Ali" Abbas: a comparative historical-anatomical study. Janus. 1914;19:17–32.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Arnold F. Icones cerebri et medullae spinalis, decem tabulae elaboratae et totidem adumbratae. Zurich: Orellii & Fuesslini; 1842.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Reil JC. Fragmente über die Bildung des kleinen Gehirns. Arch Physiol. 1807–1808;8:1–58.

  33. Malacarne MVG. Nuova esposizione della vera struttura del cerveletto umano. Torino: Briolo; 1776.

  34. Kruger L, Swanson LW. 1710: The introduction of experimental nervous system physiology and anatomy by François Pourfour du Petit. In: Whitaker H, Smith CUM, Finger S, editors. Brain, mind and medicine: essays in eighteenth-century neuroscience. New York: Springer; 2007. p. 99–113.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  35. Lhermitte F. Le syndrome cérébelleux. Étude anatomo-clinique chez l’adulte. Rev Neurol. 1958;98:435–77.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Mossuto-Agatiello L. Caudal paramedian midbrain syndrome. Neurology. 2006;66:16681671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Liu H, Qiao L, He Z. Wernekink commissure syndrome: a rare midbrain syndrome. Neurol Sci. 2012;33:1419–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Uchino Y, Sasaki M, Isu N, Hirai N, Imagawa M, Endo K, et al. Second-order vestibular morphology of the extra-MLF anterior canal pathway in the cat. Exp Brain Res. 1994;97:387–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Jellinger K. Hypertrophy of the inferior olives. Report on 29 cases. Z Neurol. 1973;205:153–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Boesten AJ, Voogd J. Hypertrophy of neurons in the inferior olive after cerebellar ablations in the cat. Neurosci Lett. 1985;61:49–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Legendre A, Courville J. Origin and trajectory of the cerebello-olivary projection: an experimental study with radioactive and fluorescent tracers in the cat. Neurosci. 1987;21:877–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Mugnaini E, Oertel WH. GABAergic neurons and terminals in the rat CNS as revealed by GAD-immuno histochemistry. Part 1. In: Björklund A, Hökfelt T, editors. GABA and neuropeptides in the CNS. The handbook of chemical neuroanatomy, vol. 4. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Bazzigaluppi P, Ruigrok T, Saisan P, De Zeeuw CI, de Jeu M. Properties of the nucleo-olivary pathway: an in vivo whole-cell patch clamp study. PLoS One. 2012;7:e46360.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Larry W. Swanson Ph.D. for his directions to Galen’s and Vesalius’ descriptions of the brachium conjunctivum, and Dr. Irmgart Hort from the University Library Giessen for biographical information on Franz J.J. Wilbrand. Marjan Veltkamp checked the correct spelling for the greek term for “tendons”.

Conflict of interest

The authors do not have any financial or personal relationships that might bias the content of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Voogd.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Voogd, J., van Baarsen, K. The Horseshoe-Shaped Commissure of Wernekinck or the Decussation of the Brachium Conjunctivum Methodological Changes in the 1840s. Cerebellum 13, 113–120 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-013-0520-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-013-0520-9

Keywords

Navigation