Outcomes Following Implantation of Two Second-Generation Trabecular Micro-Bypass Stents in Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma on One Medication: 18-Month Follow-Up

The most important risk factor for glaucoma, the leading cause of permanent blindness worldwide [1], is elevated intraocular pressure (IOP). Thus, a central goal of all glaucoma therapy is IOP reduction, which can be achieved through pharmacologic, laser, or surgical means. Traditionally, trabeculectomy has been considered the gold standard of glaucoma surgery, but typically it has been reserved for more advanced stages of the disease [2]. Over the past decade, the development of microinvasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) procedures has increased the surgical options available to clinicians treating mild to moderate open-angle glaucoma (OAG). The first FDA-approved MIGS device, the first-generation iStent (iStent^® Trabecular Micro-Bypass, Glaukos Corporation, San Clemente, CA, USA), is a single-piece titanium stent designed to bypass the main site of aqueous fluid outflow resistance in OAG, the trabecular meshwork, with minimal trauma to intraocular and extraocular structures. A substantial body of literature has shown that ab interno implantation of these stents can reduce IOP and medication burden for up to 5 years postoperatively in patients with mild to moderate OAG. Key studies have evaluated outcomes after implantation of single [3‐6] and multiple [7] iStent devices during cataract surgery, and with multiple iStent devices as a standalone procedure [8‐11].

More recent years have brought the advent of second-generation trabecular micro-bypass stents (iStent inject ^® Trabecular Micro-Bypass, Glaukos Corporation, San Clemente, CA, USA). Several studies have demonstrated substantial IOP and medication reduction following implantation of 2 iStent inject devices during cataract surgery [12] or in standalone procedures [13‐16]. In addition to their clinical effectiveness, these devices have shown a favorable safety profile, which is an important advantage over traditional surgeries such as trabeculectomy or tube placement, or more recently developed suprachoroidal stents [17, 18].

This was a prospective, unmasked, single-arm study designed to enroll phakic or pseudophakic (with posterior chamber intraocular lens) subjects with OAG, medicated IOP at screening of 18–30 mmHg on 1 topical ocular hypotensive medication, and unmedicated (post-washout) IOP of 22–38 mmHg. Medication washout included 5 days for carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, 2 weeks for alpha agonists, and 4 weeks for beta blockers and prostaglandin analogues. Subjects were to have cup to disc (C:D) ratio of ≤0.9, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/100 or better, and normal angle anatomy. Exclusion criteria included pseudoexfoliative, pigmentary, uveitic, traumatic, neovascular, or angle-closure glaucoma; glaucoma associated with vascular disorders; and prior glaucoma surgery of any kind.

This single-site study was conducted at the S.V. Malayan Ophthalmological Center in Yerevan, Armenia. All surgeries were performed by the staff surgeon (L. Voskanyan) and 10 visiting surgeons from the MIGS Study Group (Supplementary Material—Appendix 1). Pre- and postoperative examinations were completed by glaucoma-trained ophthalmologists at the Center. All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964, as revised in 2013. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study. The ClinicalTrials.gov registration number for this study is NCT02868190.

As described previously in detail [12‐15], the second-generation iStent inject device is a single-piece, titanium, heparin-coated stent with 360 µm length, 230 µm maximum width, and multiple lateral outlet lumens to facilitate aqueous fluid outflow (Fig. 1). Two stents are pre-loaded in a single disposable stainless steel inserter, which is advanced ab internally through a temporal clear corneal incision to implant 2 stents through the trabecular meshwork into the nasal Schlemm’s canal at approximately 2 clock-hours apart. The bypassing of the trabecular meshwork is designed to promote aqueous outflow and thereby decrease IOP. Using this technique, all subjects had implantation of 2 iStent inject devices in the nasal Schlemm’s canal at approximately 2 clock-hours apart. Postoperatively, patients received topical anti-infective medication (for 1 week) and anti-inflammatory medication (for 4 weeks).

Efficacy and safety evaluations included IOP measurement (Goldmann applanation tonometry), BCVA (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study scale), slit lamp biomicroscopy, indirect ophthalmoscopy, C:D ratio, visual field (Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm Standard 24-2 automated perimetry), pachymetry, medication use, and ocular complications and secondary surgical interventions. Postoperative examinations occurred at Day 1; Week 1; Months 1, 3, 6, and 12; and are planned for every 6 months, thereafter until Month 60. Additional ocular hypotensive medication was to be started if postoperative IOP exceeded 21 mmHg at any postoperative visit, and/or in the case of concerning optic nerve findings, at the discretion of the investigator.

The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients with a Month 12 mean unmedicated IOP reduced by ≥20% versus baseline unmedicated IOP. The secondary efficacy endpoints included the proportion of patients with Month 12 IOP of ≤18 or ≤15 mmHg without medications; and the proportion of patients with Month 12 IOP reduced by ≥20% without medication versus baseline medicated IOP. Proportional analyses were performed for the primary and secondary efficacy endpoints. For continuous variables, mean and standard deviation values were calculated. Statistical tests were performed using software from the R Project for Statistical Computing (version 3.1.3, The R Foundation, Vienna, Austria).

These outcomes corroborate the considerable existing body of research showing substantial IOP and medication reduction and favorable safety of ab interno trabecular micro-bypass implantation in patients with mild to moderate glaucoma. Prior studies have evaluated single [3‐6] and multiple [7] first-generation stents (iStent) during cataract surgery; multiple first-generation stents as a standalone procedure [8‐11]; and two second-generation stents (iStent inject) either with [12] or without cataract surgery in OAG patients with moderate IOP elevation and/or medication burden [13‐16]. In the present study, the observed IOP reduction of 10.2 mmHg was similar to the 7.0–10.5 mmHg reduction observed in these earlier studies of standalone iStent inject implantation in phakic eyes with OAG [13‐16]. The present study analyzes IOP and medication use after standalone iStent inject implantation in phakic OAG eyes with IOP not managed to below 18 mmHg on 1 preoperative medication. Thus, the findings shed light on the utility of these stents in a relatively early stage of managing the disease.

The reduction in medication-free IOP supports the independent effect of second-generation trabecular micro-bypass stents without the confounding factors of concomitant cataract surgery or medication use. Perhaps even more meaningful, subjects’ postoperative IOP was 27% lower without medications 18 months after receiving 2 iStent inject devices than with medication before surgery. The elimination of medication represents a benefit in terms of both cost [19] and compliance [20‐23] to glaucoma patients, most of whom have at least one other chronic condition demanding their funds and attention [24]. Indeed, an inherent advantage of ab interno trabecular bypass stents over medications is reduced dependence on medication compliance, which theoretically may increase long-term treatment success.

Safety outcomes were favorable through the 18 months of follow-up, with only 1 postoperative adverse event (BCVA loss due to cataract progression; cataract surgery has been planned) and no intraoperative or device-related adverse events. Furthermore, the study’s involvement of multiple surgeons offers external validation of safety of the implantation technique. This favorable safety profile is consistent with that observed in previous studies of iStent inject in subjects with mild to moderate primary OAG [12‐16]. One additional medication was started in 1 eye at 18 months (IOP was 17.7 mmHg), but all remaining eyes remained medication-free, and no eyes underwent secondary surgery. Subject accountability was 100% through 18 months, supporting the validity of the study’s findings.

This is a nonrandomized, open-label, single-arm study with several limitations which may be noted. The study’s single-site design prevents a consideration of site-specific effects or measurement variability as potential confounders. Since multiple IOP readings were not taken, regression to the mean is a possibility. Because stent implantation was completed as a standalone procedure in this study, a sham surgical control group (consisting of merely injecting and removing viscoelastic) was not considered for ethical reasons. However, we considered it reasonable that patients’ preoperative data served as their own control. The patient population was 100% Caucasian and included only phakic eyes, making it impossible to stratify by race or lens status. IOP measurements at multiple time points were not taken for every visit, diurnal IOP was not measured, and standardized preoperative grading of the crystalline lens was not completed.