Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Advances in Therapy 5/2019

Open Access 14.03.2019 | Original Research

A Relative Cost of Control Analysis of Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Exenatide Extended-Release and Dulaglutide for Bringing Patients to HbA1c and Weight Loss Treatment Targets in the USA

verfasst von: Pierre Johansen, Barnaby Hunt, Neeraj N. Iyer, Tam Dang-Tan, Richard F. Pollock

Erschienen in: Advances in Therapy | Ausgabe 5/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

The SUSTAIN 3 and 7 clinical trials compared the efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide relative to exenatide extended-release (ER) and dulaglutide, respectively, in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). The trials included a series of clinically relevant single and composite endpoints focused on improving glycemic control and reducing body weight, while avoiding hypoglycemia. The present study combined SUSTAIN 3 and 7 outcomes with short-term treatment costs to evaluate the relative cost of control of once-weekly semaglutide versus exenatide ER and dulaglutide.

Methods

Proportions of patients reaching three endpoints were taken from SUSTAIN 3 and 7 for comparisons with exenatide ER and dulaglutide, respectively. The endpoints investigated were HbA1c < 7.0%, HbA1c < 7.0% without hypoglycemia or weight gain, and a ≥ 1.0% HbA1c reduction with ≥ 5.0% weight loss. Annual per patient treatment costs were based on US wholesale acquisition costs from July 2018. Relative cost of control was calculated by plotting the ratio of the treatment costs and the ratio of the proportions of patients reaching each endpoint on the cost–efficacy plane.

Results

Once-weekly semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1.0 mg were most effective at bringing patients to each of the three endpoints across both SUSTAIN trials. The efficacy-to-cost ratios for once-weekly semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1.0 mg were also superior to all comparators when assessing both the single endpoint of HbA1c < 7.0% and the two composite endpoints including weight loss and hypoglycemia.

Conclusions

The present study showed that once-weekly semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1.0 mg offer superior cost of control versus exenatide ER and dulaglutide in terms of achieving single and composite endpoints, based on an analysis of retrieved dropout data. Once-weekly semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1.0 mg would therefore represent good value for money in the USA, particularly in the attainment of multi-model T2D treatment goals.

Funding

Novo Nordisk A/S.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat American Diabetes Association. 8. Pharmacologic approaches to glycemic treatment. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(Suppl 1):S64–S74. American Diabetes Association. 8. Pharmacologic approaches to glycemic treatment. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(Suppl 1):S64–S74.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat American Diabetes Association. Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2017. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(5):917–928. American Diabetes Association. Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2017. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(5):917–928.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Dall TM, Mann SE, Zhang Y, et al. Distinguishing the economic costs associated with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Popul Health Manag. 2009;12(2):103–10.CrossRefPubMed Dall TM, Mann SE, Zhang Y, et al. Distinguishing the economic costs associated with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Popul Health Manag. 2009;12(2):103–10.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Riddle MC, Herman WH. The cost of diabetes care—an elephant in the room. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(5):929–32.CrossRefPubMed Riddle MC, Herman WH. The cost of diabetes care—an elephant in the room. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(5):929–32.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet. 1998;352:837–53. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet. 1998;352:837–53.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). Lancet 1998;352:854–865. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). Lancet 1998;352:854–865.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Ismail-Beigi F, Craven T, Banerji MA, et al. Effect of intensive treatment of hyperglycaemia on microvascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes: an analysis of the ACCORD randomised trial. Lancet. 2010;376:419–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ismail-Beigi F, Craven T, Banerji MA, et al. Effect of intensive treatment of hyperglycaemia on microvascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes: an analysis of the ACCORD randomised trial. Lancet. 2010;376:419–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat American Diabetes Association. 6. Glycemic targets. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(Suppl 1):S48–S56. American Diabetes Association. 6. Glycemic targets. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(Suppl 1):S48–S56.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat American Diabetes Association. 7. Obesity management for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(Suppl 1):S57–S63. American Diabetes Association. 7. Obesity management for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(Suppl 1):S57–S63.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilkinson L, Hunt B, Johansen P, Iyer NN, Dang-Tan T, Pollock RF. Cost of achieving HbA1c treatment targets and weight loss responses with once-weekly semaglutide versus dulaglutide in the United States. Diabetes Ther. 2018;9(3):951–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wilkinson L, Hunt B, Johansen P, Iyer NN, Dang-Tan T, Pollock RF. Cost of achieving HbA1c treatment targets and weight loss responses with once-weekly semaglutide versus dulaglutide in the United States. Diabetes Ther. 2018;9(3):951–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Kelly M, Ratitch B. Clinical trials with missing data: a guide for practitioners. Chapter 5: Mixed models for repeated measures using categorical time effects (MMRM). Wiley, New York; 2014. O’Kelly M, Ratitch B. Clinical trials with missing data: a guide for practitioners. Chapter 5: Mixed models for repeated measures using categorical time effects (MMRM). Wiley, New York; 2014.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Ahmann AJ, Capehorn M, Charpentier G, et al. Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide versus exenatide ER in subjects with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 3): a 56-week, open-label, randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(2):258–66.CrossRefPubMed Ahmann AJ, Capehorn M, Charpentier G, et al. Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide versus exenatide ER in subjects with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 3): a 56-week, open-label, randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(2):258–66.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Pratley RE, Aroda VR, Lingvay I, et al. Semaglutide versus dulaglutide once weekly in patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 7): a randomised, open-label, phase 3b trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6(4):275−286. Pratley RE, Aroda VR, Lingvay I, et al. Semaglutide versus dulaglutide once weekly in patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 7): a randomised, open-label, phase 3b trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6(4):275−286.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Langer J, Hunt B, Valentine WJ. Evaluating the short-term cost-effectiveness of liraglutide versus sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes failing metformin monotherapy in the United States. J Manag Care Pharm. 2013;19(3):237–46.PubMed Langer J, Hunt B, Valentine WJ. Evaluating the short-term cost-effectiveness of liraglutide versus sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes failing metformin monotherapy in the United States. J Manag Care Pharm. 2013;19(3):237–46.PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu AR, Bech PG, Leiter LA, Moreno SI, Håkan-Bloch J, Johansen P. Once-weekly semaglutide provides better value for money than a broad range of other type 2 diabetes treatments in Canada: a relative cost of control analysis. Can J Diab. 2018;42(5):S41.CrossRef Liu AR, Bech PG, Leiter LA, Moreno SI, Håkan-Bloch J, Johansen P. Once-weekly semaglutide provides better value for money than a broad range of other type 2 diabetes treatments in Canada: a relative cost of control analysis. Can J Diab. 2018;42(5):S41.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Ismail-Beigi F, Craven T, Banerji MA et al. (ACCORD trial group). Effect of intensive treatment of hyperglycaemia on microvascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes: an analysis of the ACCORD randomised trial. Lancet. 2010; 376: 419–30. Ismail-Beigi F, Craven T, Banerji MA et al. (ACCORD trial group). Effect of intensive treatment of hyperglycaemia on microvascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes: an analysis of the ACCORD randomised trial. Lancet. 2010; 376: 419–30.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Patel A, MacMahon S, Chalmers J, et al. Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358: 2560–72. Patel A, MacMahon S, Chalmers J, et al. Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358: 2560–72.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Holman RR, Paul SK, Bethel MA, Matthews DR, Neil HA. 10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1577–89.CrossRefPubMed Holman RR, Paul SK, Bethel MA, Matthews DR, Neil HA. 10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1577–89.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Stettler C, Allemann S, Jüni P, et al. Glycemic control and macrovascular disease in types 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus: meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am Heart J. 2006;152(1):27–38.CrossRefPubMed Stettler C, Allemann S, Jüni P, et al. Glycemic control and macrovascular disease in types 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus: meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am Heart J. 2006;152(1):27–38.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Gaede P, Lund-Andersen H, Parving HH, Pedersen O. Effect of a multifactorial intervention on mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:580–91.CrossRefPubMed Gaede P, Lund-Andersen H, Parving HH, Pedersen O. Effect of a multifactorial intervention on mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:580–91.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Griffin SJ, Borch-Johnsen K, Davies MJ, et al. Effect of early intensive multifactorial therapy on 5-year cardiovascular outcomes in individuals with type 2 diabetes detected by screening (ADDITION-Europe): a cluster-randomised trial. Lancet. 2011;378(9786):156–67.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Griffin SJ, Borch-Johnsen K, Davies MJ, et al. Effect of early intensive multifactorial therapy on 5-year cardiovascular outcomes in individuals with type 2 diabetes detected by screening (ADDITION-Europe): a cluster-randomised trial. Lancet. 2011;378(9786):156–67.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Viljoen A, Hoxer CS, Johansen P, Malkin S, Hunt B, Bain SC. Evaluation of the long-term cost-effectiveness of once-weekly semaglutide versus dulaglutide for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the UK. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.13564. Viljoen A, Hoxer CS, Johansen P, Malkin S, Hunt B, Bain SC. Evaluation of the long-term cost-effectiveness of once-weekly semaglutide versus dulaglutide for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the UK. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​dom.​13564.
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Johansen P, Håkan-Bloch J, Liu AR, Persson S, Grip ET. Cost-effectiveness of once-weekly semaglutide 1.0 mg vs. dulaglutide 1.5 mg as add-on to metformin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes in Canada. Diabetes. 2018; 67(Suppl 1). Johansen P, Håkan-Bloch J, Liu AR, Persson S, Grip ET. Cost-effectiveness of once-weekly semaglutide 1.0 mg vs. dulaglutide 1.5 mg as add-on to metformin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes in Canada. Diabetes. 2018; 67(Suppl 1).
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Tikkanen CK, Johansen P, Hunt B, Malkin S, Pollock RF. Once-weekly semaglutide provides better health outcomes compared to dulaglutide as dual therapy in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Diabetologia. 2018;61(Suppl 1):S426–S427427. Tikkanen CK, Johansen P, Hunt B, Malkin S, Pollock RF. Once-weekly semaglutide provides better health outcomes compared to dulaglutide as dual therapy in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Diabetologia. 2018;61(Suppl 1):S426–S427427.
Metadaten
Titel
A Relative Cost of Control Analysis of Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Exenatide Extended-Release and Dulaglutide for Bringing Patients to HbA1c and Weight Loss Treatment Targets in the USA
verfasst von
Pierre Johansen
Barnaby Hunt
Neeraj N. Iyer
Tam Dang-Tan
Richard F. Pollock
Publikationsdatum
14.03.2019
Verlag
Springer Healthcare
Erschienen in
Advances in Therapy / Ausgabe 5/2019
Print ISSN: 0741-238X
Elektronische ISSN: 1865-8652
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-019-00915-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2019

Advances in Therapy 5/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.