nach oben

Erschienen in:

01.10.2018 | ASNC SPECT IMAGING GUIDELINES

Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Guidelines: Instrumentation, Acquisition, Processing, and Interpretation

verfasst von: Sharmila Dorbala, MD, MPH, Karthik Ananthasubramaniam, MD, Ian S. Armstrong, PhD, MIPEM, Panithaya Chareonthaitawee, MD, E. Gordon DePuey, MD, Andrew J. Einstein, MD, PhD, Robert J. Gropler, MD, Thomas A. Holly, MD, John J. Mahmarian, MD, Mi-Ae Park, PhD, Donna M. Polk, MD, MPH, Raymond Russell III, MD, PhD, Piotr J. Slomka, PhD, Randall C. Thompson, MD, R. Glenn Wells, PhD

Erschienen in: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology | Ausgabe 5/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

The purpose of this document is to update the “ASNC Imaging Guidelines for Nuclear Cardiology Procedures: Single photon-emission computed tomography”1 in several areas in which novel evidence has emerged since its publication. Recent advances in Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) have fundamentally changed acquisition, processing, and interpretation of myocardial perfusion images using new technology. Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) can now be personalized and tailored to the individual patient and the clinical question. This publication is designed to provide MPI guidelines for conventional and novel SPECT for qualified medical professionals engaged in the practice of nuclear cardiology. While the information supplied in this document has been carefully reviewed by experts in the field, the document should not be considered as medical advice or a professional service. We recognize that SPECT technology is evolving rapidly and that these recommendations may need further revision in the near future. Hence, the imaging guidelines described in this publication should be applied clinically only after review and approval by qualified local institutional physicians and technologists. …

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Holly TA, Abbott BG, Al-Mallah M, Calnon DA, Cohen MC, DiFilippo FP, et al. ASNC Imaging Guidelines for Nuclear Cardiology Procedures: Single photon-emission computed tomography. J Nucl Cardiol. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-010-9246-y.CrossRefPubMed

Tilkemeier PL, Bourque J, Doukky R, Sanghani R, Weinberg RL. ASNC Imaging Guidelines for Nuclear Cardiology Procedures: Standardized reporting of nuclear cardiology procedures. J Nucl Cardiol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-017-1057-y.CrossRefPubMed

Slomka PJ, Patton JA, Berman DS, Germano G. Advances in technical aspects of myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2009;16:255–76.CrossRefPubMed

O’Connor MK. Instrument- and computer-related problems and artifacts in nuclear medicine. Semin Nucl Med. 1996;26:256–77.CrossRefPubMed

Bai C, Conwell R, Kindem J, Babla H, Gurley M, De Los Santos R, et al. Phantom evaluation of a cardiac SPECT/VCT system that uses a common set of solid-state detectors for both emission and transmission scans. J Nucl Cardiol. 2010;17:459–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-010-9204-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Bocher M, Blevis IM, Tsukerman L, Shrem Y, Kovalski G, Volokh L. A fast cardiac gamma camera with dynamic SPECT capabilities: Design, system validation and future potential. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37:1887–902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-010-1488-z.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Erlandsson K, Kacperski K, van Gramberg D, Hutton BF. Performance evaluation of D-SPECT: A novel SPECT system for nuclear cardiology. Phys Med Biol. 2009;54:2635–49.CrossRefPubMed

Bushberg JT, Seibert JA, Leidholt EM, Boone JM. The essential physics of medical imaging. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1994.

Cherry SR, Sorenson JA, Phelps ME. Physics in nuclear medicine. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Science; 2003.

10.

DiFilippo FP, Abreu SH, Majmundar H. Collimator integrity. J Nucl Cardiol. 2006;13:889–91.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Hawman PC, Haines EJ. The cardiofocal collimator: A variable-focus collimator for cardiac SPECT. Phys Med Biol. 1994;39:439–50.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Caobelli F, Ren Kaiser S, Thackeray JT, Bengel FM, Chieregato M, Soffientini A, et al. The importance of a correct positioning of the heart using IQ-SPECT system with multifocal collimators in myocardial perfusion imaging: A phantom study. J Nucl Cardiol. 2015;22:57–65.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Steele PP, Kirch DL, Koss JE. Comparison of simultaneous dual-isotope multipinhole SPECT with rotational SPECT in a group of patients with coronary artery disease. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:1080–9.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Esteves FP, Raggi P, Folks RD, Keidar Z, Askew JW, Rispler S, et al. Novel solid-state-detector dedicated cardiac camera for fast myocardial perfusion imaging: Multicenter comparison with standard dual detector cameras. J Nucl Cardiol. 2009;16:927–34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Ben-Haim S, Murthy VL, Breault C, Allie R, Sitek A, Roth N, et al. Quantification of myocardial perfusion reserve using dynamic SPECT imaging in humans: A feasibility study. J Nucl Med. 2013;54:873–9.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Wells RG, Marvin B, Poirier M, Renaud JM, deKemp RA, Ruddy TD. Optimization of SPECT measurement of myocardial blood flow with corrections for attenuation, motion, and blood-binding compared to PET. J Nucl Med. 2017. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.117.191049.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Nkoulou R, Fuchs TA, Pazhenkottil AP, Kuest SM, Ghadri JR, Stehli J, et al. Absolute myocardial blood flow and flow reserve assessed by gated SPECT with cadmium–zinc–telluride detectors using 99mTc-tetrofosmin: Head to head comparison with 13N-ammonia PET. J Nucl Med. 2016;57:1887–92.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Shin JH, Pokharna HK, Williams KA, Mehta R, Ward RP. SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging with prone-only acquisitions: Correlation with coronary angiography. J Nucl Cardiol. 2009;16:590–6.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Nishina H, Slomka PJ, Abidov A, Yoda S, Akincioglu C, Kang X, et al. Combined supine and prone quantitative myocardial perfusion SPECT: Method development and clinical validation in patients with no known coronary artery disease. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:51–8.PubMed

20.

Nakazato R, Slomka PJ, Fish M, Schwartz RG, Hayes SW, Thomson LE, et al. Quantitative high-efficiency cadmium–zinc–telluride SPECT with dedicated parallel-hole collimation system in obese patients: results of a multi-center study. J Nucl Cardiol. 2015;22:266–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-014-9984-3.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Nakazato R, Tamarappoo BK, Kang X, Wolak A, Kite F, Hayes SW, et al. Quantitative upright-supine high-speed SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of coronary artery disease: correlation with invasive coronary angiography. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:1724–31. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.110.078782.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Schepis T, Gaemperli O, Koepfli P, Ruegg C, Burger C, Leschka S, et al. Use of coronary calcium score scans from stand-alone multislice computed tomography for attenuation correction of myocardial perfusion SPECT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007;34:11–9.CrossRefPubMed

23.

National Electrical Manufacturers Association. NEMA Standards Publication NU 1-2012: Performance Measurements of Gamma Cameras. Washington, DC: National Electrical Manufacturers Association. Published Sept 5, 2013.

24.

Esser PD, Graham LS. A quality control program for nuclear medicine cameras. In: Henkin RE, editor. nuclear medicine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Mosby; 2006. p. 246–56.

25.

ACR–AAPM Technical Standard for Medical Physics Performance Monitoring of SPECT-CT Equipment. Revised 2014 (Resolution 35). https://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/Practice-Parameters/SPECT-CT-Equip.pdf

26.

American Society of Nuclear Cardiology. ASNC imaging guidelines for nuclear cardiology procedures: Introduction of new technology for clinical use. J Nucl Cardiol. 2009;16:166.CrossRef

27.

Nichols KG, Galt JR. Quality control for SPECT imaging. In: DePuey EG, Berman DS, Garcia EV, editors. Cardiac SPECT imaging. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001. p. 17–40.

28.

DePuey EG. How to detect and avoid myocardial perfusion SPECT artifacts. J Nucl Med. 1994;35:699–702.PubMed

29.

Galt JR, Faber T. Principles of single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging. In: Christian PE, Bernier DR, Langan JK, editors. Nuclear medicine and PET: Technology and techniques. St. Louis: Mosby; 2003. p. 242–84.

30.

Cerqueira MD, Matsuoka D, Ritchie JL, Harp GD. The influence of collimators on SPECT center of rotation measurements: Artifact generation and acceptance testing. J Nucl Med. 1988;29:1393–7.PubMed

31.

Hines H, Kayayan R, Colsher J, Hashimoto D, Schubert R, Fernando J, et al. National Electrical Manufacturers Association recommendation for implementing SPECT instrumentation quality control. J Nucl Med. 2000;41:383–9.PubMed

32.

Greer KL, Jaszczak RJ, Coleman RE. An overview of a camera-based SPECT system. Med Phys. 1982;9:455–63.CrossRefPubMed

33.

Kennedy JA, Yosilevsky G, Przewloka K, Israel O, Frenkel A. 3D spatial resolution map and sensitivity characterization of a dedicated cardiac CZT SPECT camera. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:107.CrossRef

34.

American College of Radiology. ACR Web site. http://www.acr.org.

35.

American Association of Physicists in Medicine. AAPM Web site. http://www.aapm.org.

36.

Seo Y, Mari C, Hasegawa BH. Technological development and advances in single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography. Semin Nucl Med. 2008;38:177–98. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2008.01.001.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

37.

Chang SM, Nabi F, Xu J, Raza U, Mahmarian JJ. Normal stress-only versus standard stress/rest myocardial perfusion imaging: Similar patient mortality with reduced radiation exposure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:221–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.09.022.CrossRefPubMed

38.

Einstein AJ, Johnson LL, DeLuca AJ, Kontak AC, Groves DW, Stant J, et al. Radiation dose and prognosis of ultra-low-dose stress-first myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients with chest pain using a high-efficiency camera. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:545–51. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.114.150664.CrossRefPubMed

39.

Henzlova MJ, Duvall WL, Einstein AJ, Travin MI, Verberne HJ. ASNC imaging guidelines for SPECT nuclear cardiology procedures: Stress, protocols, and tracers. J Nucl Cardiol. 2016;23:606–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-015-0387-x.CrossRefPubMed

40.

Zeintl J, Vija AH, Yahil A, Hornegger J, Kuwert T. Quantitative accuracy of clinical 99mTc SPECT/CT using ordered-subset expectation maximization with 3-dimensional resolution recovery, attenuation, and scatter correction. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:921–8. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.109.071571.CrossRefPubMed

41.

Garcia EV, Faber TL, Esteves FP. Cardiac dedicated ultrafast SPECT cameras: New designs and clinical implications. J Nucl Med. 2011;52:210–7. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.110.081323.CrossRefPubMed

42.

Lyon MC, Foster C, Ding X, Dorbala S, Spence D, Bhattacharya M, et al. Dose reduction in half-time myocardial perfusion SPECT-CT with multi-focal collimation. J Nucl Cardiol. 2016;23:657–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-016-0471-x.CrossRefPubMed

43.

Nakazato R, Berman DS, Hayes SW, Fish M, Padgett R, Xu Y, et al. Myocardial perfusion imaging with a solid-state camera: Simulation of a very low dose imaging protocol. J Nucl Med. 2013;54:373–9. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.112.110601.CrossRefPubMed

44.

Segall GM, Davis MJ. Prone versus supine thallium myocardial SPECT: A method to decrease artifactual inferior wall defects. J Nucl Med. 1989;30:548–55.PubMed

45.

Kiat H, Van Train KF, Friedman JD, Germano G, Silagan G, Wang FP, et al. Quantitative stress-redistribution thallium-201 SPECT using prone imaging: Methodologic development and validation. J Nucl Med. 1992;33:1509–15.PubMed

46.

Guner LA, Caliskan B, Isik I, Aksoy T, Vardareli E, Parspur A. Evaluating the role of routine prone acquisition on visual evaluation of SPECT images. J Nucl Med Technol. 2015;43:282–8. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.115.165936.CrossRefPubMed

47.

Taasan V, Wokhlu A, Taasan MV, Dusaj RS, Mehta A, Kraft S, et al. Comparative accuracy of supine-only and combined supine-prone myocardial perfusion imaging in men. J Nucl Cardiol. 2016;23:1470–6.CrossRefPubMed

48.

Esquerre JP, Coca FJ, Martinez SJ, Guiraud RF. Prone decubitus: A solution to inferior wall attenuation in thallium-201 myocardial tomography. J Nucl Med. 1989;30:398–401.PubMed

49.

Slomka PJ, Nishina H, Abidov A, Hayes SW, Friedman JD, Berman DS, et al. Combined quantitative supine-prone myocardial perfusion SPECT improves detection of coronary artery disease and normalcy rates in women. J Nucl Cardiol. 2007;14:44–52.CrossRefPubMed

50.

Ben-Haim S, Almukhailed O, Neill J, Slomka P, Allie R, Shiti D, et al. Clinical value of supine and upright myocardial perfusion imaging in obese patients using the D-SPECT camera. J Nucl Cardiol. 2014;21:478–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-014-9853-0.CrossRefPubMed

51.

Hindorf C, Oddstig J, Hedeer F, Hansson MJ, Jogi J, Engblom H. Importance of correct patient positioning in myocardial perfusion SPECT when using a CZT camera. J Nucl Cardiol. 2014;21:695–702.CrossRefPubMed

52.

Friedman J, Van Train K, Maddahi J, Rozanski A, Prigent F, Bietendorf J, et al. “Upward creep” of the heart: A frequent source of false-positive reversible defects during thallium-201 stress-redistribution SPECT. J Nucl Med. 1989;30:1718–22.PubMed

53.

Ben-Haim S, Kacperski K, Hain S, Van Gramberg D, Hutton BF, Erlandsson K, et al. Simultaneous dual-radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging with a solid-state dedicated cardiac camera. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37:1710–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-010-1441-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

54.

Blaire T, Bailliez A, Bouallegue FB, Bellevre D, Agostini D, Manrique A. Left ventricular function assessment using 123I/99mTc dual-isotope acquisition with two semi-conductor cadmium–zinc–telluride (CZT) cameras: A gated cardiac phantom study. EJNMMI Physics. 2016;3:27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-016-0163-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

55.

Patil HR, Bateman TM, McGhie AI, Burgett EV, Courter SA, Case JA, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of high-resolution attenuation-corrected Anger-camera SPECT in the detection of coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol. 2014;21:127–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-013-9817-9.CrossRefPubMed

56.

Bateman TM, Berman DS, Heller GV, Brown KA, Cerqueira MD, Verani MS, et al. American Society of Nuclear Cardiology position statement on electrocardiographic gating of myocardial perfusion SPECT scintigrams. J Nucl Cardiol. 1999;6:470–1.CrossRefPubMed

57.

Cullom SJ, Case JA, Bateman TM. Electrocardiographically gated myocardial perfusion SPECT: Technical principles and quality control considerations. J Nucl Cardiol. 1998;5:418–25.CrossRefPubMed

58.

DePuey EG, Nichols K, Dobrinsky C. Left ventricular ejection fraction assessed from gated technetium-99m-sestamibi SPECT. J Nucl Med. 1993;34:1871–6.PubMed

59.

Smanio PE, Watson DD, Segalla DL, Vinson EL, Smith WH, Beller GA. Value of gating of technetium-99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomographic imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:1687–92.CrossRefPubMed

60.

Germano G, Berman DS. On the accuracy and reproducibility of quantitative gated myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Med. 1999;40:810–3.PubMed

61.

Navare SM, Wackers FJ, Liu YH. Comparison of 16-frame and 8-frame gated SPET imaging for determination of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2003;30:1330–3.CrossRefPubMed

62.

He ZX, Verani MS, Liu XJ. Nitrate-augmented myocardial imaging for assessment of myocardial viability. J Nucl Cardiol. 1995;2:352–7.CrossRefPubMed

63.

Hendel RC, Berman DS, Cullom SJ, Follansbee W, Heller GV, Kiat H, et al. Multicenter clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of correction for photon attenuation and scatter in SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. Circulation. 1999;99:2742–9.CrossRefPubMed

64.

Thompson RC, Heller GV, Johnson LL, Case JA, Cullom SJ, Garcia EV, et al. Value of AC on ECG-gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging related to body mass index. J Nucl Cardiol. 2005;12:195–202.CrossRefPubMed

65.

Arsanjani R, Xu Y, Hayes SW, Fish M, Lemley M Jr, Gerlach J, et al. Comparison of fully automated computer analysis and visual scoring for detection of coronary artery disease from myocardial perfusion SPECT in a large population. J Nucl Med. 2013;54:221–8. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.112.108969.CrossRefPubMed

66.

Hansen CL. Digital image processing for clinicians, part I: Basics of image formation. J Nucl Cardiol. 2002;9:343–9.CrossRefPubMed

67.

Hansen CL, Kramer M, Rastogi A. Lower accuracy of Tl-201 SPECT in women is not improved by size-based normal databases or Wiener filtering. J Nucl Cardiol. 1999;6:177–82.CrossRefPubMed

68.

King MA, Glick SJ, Penney BC, Schwinger RB, Doherty PW. Interactive visual optimization of SPECT prereconstruction filtering. J Nucl Med. 1987;28:1192–8.PubMed

69.

Hansen CL. Digital image processing for clinicians, part II: Filtering. J Nucl Cardiol. 2002;9:429–37.CrossRefPubMed

70.

Hudson HM, Larkin RS. Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1994;13:601–9.CrossRefPubMed

71.

Yester MV. SPECT image reconstruction. In: Henkin RE, editor. Nuclear medicine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Mosby; 2006. p. 185–95.

72.

DePuey EG. Advances in SPECT camera software and hardware (review article). J Nucl Cardiol. 2012;19:551–81.CrossRefPubMed

73.

Borges-Neto S, Pagnanelli RA, Shaw LJ, Honeycutt E, Shwartz SC, Adams GL, et al. J Nucl Cardiol. 2007;14:555–65.CrossRefPubMed

74.

DePuey EG, Gadiraju R, Clark J, Thompson L, Anstett F, Shwartz SC. Ordered subset expectation maximization and wide beam reconstruction ‘‘half-time’’ gated myocardial perfusion SPECT functional imaging: A comparison to ‘‘full-time’’ filtered backprojection. J Nucl Cardiol. 2008;14:547–63.CrossRef

75.

DePuey EG, Bommireddipalli S, Clark J, Thompson L, Srour Y. Wide beam reconstruction ‘‘quarter-time’’ gated myocardial perfusion SPECT functional imaging: A comparison to ‘‘full-time’’ ordered subset expectation maximum. J Nucl Cardiol. 2009;16:736–52.CrossRefPubMed

76.

Metz CE. The geometric transfer function component for scintillation camera collimators with straight parallel holes. Phys Med Biol. 1980;25:1059–70.CrossRefPubMed

77.

Tsui BM, Gullberg GT. The geometric transfer function for cone and fan beam collimators. Phys Med Biol. 1990;35:81–93.CrossRefPubMed

78.

Tsui BMW, Hu HB, Gillard DR, Gullberg GT. Implementation of simultaneous attenuation and detector response correction in SPECT. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 1988;35:778–83.CrossRef

79.

Tsui BM, Frey EC, Zhao X, Lalush DS, Johnston RE. McCartney WH. The importance and implementation of accurate three-dimensional compensation methods for quantitative SPECT. Phys Med Biol. 1994;39:509–30.CrossRefPubMed

80.

Tsui BMW, Zhao XD, Frey EC, Ju ZQ, Gullberg GT. Characteristics of reconstructed point response in three-dimensional spatially variant detector response compensation in SPECT. In: Grangeat P, Amans JL, editors. Three-Dimensional Image Reconstruction in Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. Computational Imaging and Vision. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1996. p. 509–30.

81.

Philipe P, Bruyant J. Analytic and iterative reconstruction algorithms in SPECT. J Nucl Med. 2002;43:1343–58.

82.

King MA, Tsui BM, Pan TS. Attenuation compensation for cardiac single-photon emission computed tomographic imaging: Part 1. Impact of attenuation and methods of estimating attenuation maps. J Nucl Cardiol. 1995;2:513–24.CrossRefPubMed

83.

European Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom on basic safety standards for protection against the dangers arising from exposure to ionising radiation. OJ of the EU 2014. L13; 57: 1–73.

84.

Gambhir SS, Berman DS, Ziffer J, Nagler M, Sandler M, Patton J, et al. A novel high-sensitivity rapid-acquisition single-photon cardiac imaging camera. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:635–43. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.108.060020.CrossRefPubMed

85.

Kennedy JA, Israel O, Frenkel A. 3D iteratively reconstructed spatial resolution map and sensitivity characterization of a dedicated cardiac SPECT camera. J Nucl Cardiol. 2014;21:443–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-013-9851-7.CrossRefPubMed

86.

Fiechter M, Gebhard C, Fuchs TA, Ghadri JR, Stehli J, Kazakauskaite E, et al. Cadmium–zinc–telluride myocardial perfusion imaging in obese patients. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:1401–6. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.111.102434.CrossRefPubMed

87.

Duvall WL, Slomka PJ, Gerlach JR, Sweeny JM, Baber U, Croft LB, et al. High-efficiency SPECT MPI: Comparison of automated quantification, visual interpretation, and coronary angiography. J Nucl Cardiol. 2013;20:763–73.CrossRefPubMed

88.

Hansen CL. The role of the translation table in cardiac image display. J Nucl Cardiol. 2006;13:571–5.CrossRefPubMed

89.

Mahmarian JJ, Boyce TM, Goldberg RK, Cocanougher MK, Roberts R, Verani MS. Quantitative exercise thallium-201 single photon emission computed tomography for the enhanced diagnosis of ischemic heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;15:318–29.CrossRefPubMed

90.

Friedman J, Berman DS, Van Train K, Garcia EV, Bietendorf J, Prigent F, et al. Patient motion in thallium-201 myocardial SPECT imaging. An easily identified frequent source of artifactual defect. Clin Nucl Med. 1988;13:321–4.CrossRefPubMed

91.

Cooper JA, Neumann PH, McCandless BK. Effect of patient motion on tomographic myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Med. 1992;33:1566–71.PubMed

92.

Choi JY, Lee KH, Kim SJ, Kim SE, Kim BT, Lee SH, et al. Gating provides improved accuracy for differentiating artifacts from true lesions in equivocal fixed defects on technetium 99m tetrofosmin perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol. 1998;5:395–401.CrossRefPubMed

93.

Ficaro EP, Fessler JA, Shreve PD, Kritzman JN, Rose PA, Corbett JR. Simultaneous transmission/emission myocardial perfusion tomography. Diagnostic accuracy of attenuation-corrected 99mTc-sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography. Circulation. 1996;93:463–73.CrossRefPubMed

94.

Fricke H, Fricke E, Weise R, Kammeier A, Lindner O, Burchert W. A method to remove artifacts in attenuation-corrected myocardial perfusion SPECT. Introduced by misalignment between emission scan and CT-derived attenuation maps. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:1619–25.PubMed

95.

Grossman GB, Garcia EV, Bateman T, Heller GV, Johnson LL, Folks RD, et al. Quantitative Tc-99m sestamibi attenuation-corrected SPECT: Development and multicenter trial validation of myocardial perfusion stress gender-independent normal database in obese population. J Nucl Cardiol. 2004;11:263–72.CrossRefPubMed

96.

Weiss AT, Berman DS, Lew AS, Nielsen J, Potkin B, Swan HJ, Waxman A, et al. Transient ischemic dilation of the left ventricle on stress thallium-201 scintigraphy: A marker of severe and extensive coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987;9:752–9.CrossRefPubMed

97.

McLaughlin MG, Danias PG. Transient ischemic dilation: A powerful diagnostic and prognostic finding of stress myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2002;9:663–7.CrossRefPubMed

98.

Xu Y, Arsanjani R, Clond M, Hyun M, Lemley M Jr, Fish M, et al. Transient ischemic dilation for coronary artery disease in quantitative analysis of same-day sestamibi myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol. 2012;19:465–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-012-9527-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

99.

Hansen CL, Sangrigoli R, Nkadi E, Kramer M. Comparison of pulmonary uptake with transient cavity dilation after exercise thallium-201 perfusion imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33:1323–7.CrossRefPubMed

100.

Hansen CL, Cen P, Sanchez B, Robinson R. Comparison of pulmonary uptake with transient cavity dilation after dipyridamole Tl-201 perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2002;9:47–51.CrossRefPubMed

101.

Chouraqui P, Rodrigues EA, Berman DS, Maddahi J. Significance of dipyridamole-induced transient dilation of the left ventricle during thallium-201 scintigraphy in suspected coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1990;66:689–94.CrossRefPubMed

102.

Abidov A, Bax JJ, Hayes SW, Cohen I, Nishina H, Yoda S, et al. Integration of automatically measured transient ischemic dilation ratio into interpretation of adenosine stress myocardial perfusion SPECT for detection of severe and extensive CAD. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:1999–2007.PubMed

103.

Gill JB, Ruddy TD, Newell JB, Finkelstein DM, Strauss HW, Boucher CA. Prognostic importance of thallium uptake by the lungs during exercise in coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1987;317:1486–9.CrossRef

104.

Wackers FJT. On the bright side. J Nucl Cardiol. 2005;12:378–80.CrossRefPubMed

105.

Williams KA, Schneider CM. Increased stress right ventricular activity on dual isotope perfusion SPECT: A sign of multivessel and/or left main coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34:420–7.CrossRefPubMed

106.

Williams KA, Hill KA, Sheridan CM. Noncardiac findings on dual-isotope myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol. 2003;10:395–402.CrossRefPubMed

107.

Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, Jacobs AK, Kaul S, Laskey WK, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. J Nucl Cardiol. 2002;9:240–5.CrossRefPubMed

108.

Tilkemeier PL, Cooke CD, Grossman GB, McCallister BD, Ward RP. ASNC imaging guidelines for nuclear cardiology procedures: Standardized reporting of myocardial perfusion images. J Nucl Cardiol. 2009;16:165.CrossRef

109.

Xu Y, Hayes S, Ali I, Ruddy TD, Wells RG, Berman DS, et al. Automatic and visual reproducibility of perfusion and function measures for myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol. 2010;17:1050–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-010-9297-0.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

110.

Hachamovitch R, Berman DS, Kiat H, Cohen I, Cabico JA, Friedman J, et al. Exercise myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients without known coronary artery disease: Incremental prognostic value and use in risk stratification. Circulation. 1996;93:905–14.CrossRefPubMed

111.

Berman DS, Abidov A, Kang X, Hayes SW, Friedman JD, Sciammarella MG, et al. Prognostic validation of a 17-segment score derived from a 20-segment score for myocardial perfusion SPECT interpretation. J Nucl Cardiol. 2004;11:414–23.CrossRefPubMed

112.

Hachamovitch R, Berman DS, Shaw LJ, Kiat H, Cohen I, Cabico JA, et al. Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography for the prediction of cardiac death: Differential stratification for risk of cardiac death and myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1998;97:535–43.CrossRefPubMed

113.

Travin MI. The oft neglected rest study. J Nucl Cardiol. 2009;15:739–42.CrossRef

114.

Shaw LJ, Hendel RC, Heller GV, Borges-Neto S, Cerqueira M, Berman DS. Prognostic estimation of coronary artery disease risk with resting perfusion abnormalities and stress ischemia on myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol. 2009;15:762–73.CrossRef

115.

Hachamovitch R, Hayes SW, Friedman JD, Cohen I, Berman DS. Comparison of the short-term survival benefit associated with revascularization compared with medical therapy in patients with no prior coronary artery disease undergoing stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. Circulation. 2003;107:2900–7.CrossRefPubMed

116.

Patel MR, Calhoon JH, Dehmer GJ, Grantham JA, Maddox TM, Maron DJ, et al. ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/STS 2017 appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularization in patients with stable ischemic heart disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69:2212–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.02.001.CrossRefPubMed

117.

Berman DS, Kang X, Van Train KF, Lewin HC, Cohen I, Areeda J, et al. Comparative prognostic value of automatic quantitative analysis versus semiquantitative visual analysis of exercise myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:1987–95.CrossRefPubMed

118.

Leslie WB, Tully SA, Yogendran MS, Ward LM, Nour KA, Metge CJ. Prognostic value of automated quantification of 99mTc-sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:204–11.PubMed

119.

Rubeaux M, Xu Y, Germano G, Berman DS, Slomka PJ. Normal databases for the relative quantification of myocardial perfusion. Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12410-016-9385-x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

120.

Berman DS, Kang X, Gransar H, Gerlach J, Friedman JD, Hayes SW, et al. Quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion abnormality on SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging is more reproducible than expert visual analysis. J Nucl Cardiol. 2009;16:45–53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

121.

Iskandrian AS, Garcia EV, Faber T, Mahmarian JJ. Automated assessment of serial SPECT myocardial perfusion images. J Nucl Cardiol. 2009;16:6–9.CrossRefPubMed

122.

Mahmarian JJ, Cerqueira MD, Iskandrian AS. Regadenoson induces comparable left ventricular perfusion defects as adenosine: A quantitative analysis from the ADVANCE MPI 2 Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2009;2:959–68.CrossRef

123.

Nakazato R, Berman DS, Gransar H, Hyun M, Miranda-Peats R, Kite FC, et al. Prognostic value of quantitative high-speed myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2012;19:1113–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-012-9619-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

124.

Slomka PJ, Nishina H, Berman DS, Kang X, Friedman JD, Hayes SW, Aladl UE, Germano G. Automatic quantification of myocardial perfusion stress-rest change: A new measure of ischemia. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:183–91.PubMed

125.

Takeishi Y, Sukekawa H, Fujiwara S, Ikeno E, Sasaki Y, Tomoike H. Reverse redistribution of technetium-99m-sestamibi following direct PTCA in acute myocardial infarction. J Nucl Med. 1996;37:1289–94.PubMed

126.

Weiss AT, Maddahi J, Lew AS, Shah PK, Ganz W, Swan HJ, et al. Reverse redistribution of thallium-201: A sign of nontransmural myocardial infarction with patency of the infarct-related coronary artery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986;7:61–7.CrossRefPubMed

127.

Slomka PJ, Berman DS, Xu Y, Kavanagh P, Hayes SW, Dorbala S, et al. Fully automated wall motion and thickening scoring system for myocardial perfusion SPECT: Method development and validation in large population. J Nucl Cardiol. 2012;19:291–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-011-9502-9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

128.

Sharir T, Kang X, Germano G, Bax JJ, Shaw LJ, Gransar H, et al. Prognostic value of post-stress left ventricular volume and ejection fraction by gated myocardial perfusion SPECT in women and men: Gender-related differences in normal limits and outcomes. J Nucl Cardiol. 2006;13:495–506.CrossRefPubMed

129.

Vallejo E, Dione DP, Bruni WL, Constable RT, Borek PP, Soares JP, et al. Reproducibility and accuracy of gated SPECT for determination of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: Experimental validation using MRI. J Nucl Med. 2000;41:874–82.PubMed

130.

Emmett L, Iwanochko RM, Freeman MR, Barolet A, Lee DS, Husain M. Reversible regional wall motion abnormalities on exercise technetium-99m-gated cardiac single photon emission computed tomography predict high-grade angiographic stenoses. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:991–8.CrossRefPubMed

131.

Sharir T, Bacher-Stier C, Dhar S, Lewin HC, Miranda R, Friedman JD, et al. Identification of severe and extensive coronary artery disease by postexercise regional wall motion abnormalities in Tc-99m sestamibi gated single-photon emission computed tomography. Am J Cardiol. 2000;86:1171–5.CrossRefPubMed

132.

Chen J, Garcia EV, Folks RD, Cooke CD, Faber TL, Tauxe L, et al. Onset of left ventricular mechanical contraction as determined by phase analysis of ECG-gated myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging: Development of a diagnostic tool for assessment of cardiac mechanical dyssynchrony. J Nucl Cardiol. 2005;12:687–95.CrossRefPubMed

133.

Henneman MM, Chen J, Ypenburg C, Dibbets P, Bleeker GB, Boersma E, et al. Phase analysis of gated myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography compared with tissue Doppler imaging for the assessment of left ventricular dyssynchrony. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:1708–14.CrossRefPubMed

134.

Henneman MM, Chen J, Dibbets-Schneider P, Stokkel MP, Bleeker GB, Ypenburg C, et al. Can LV dyssynchrony as assessed with phase analysis on gated myocardial perfusion SPECT predict response to CRT? J Nucl Med. 2007;48:1104–11.CrossRefPubMed

135.

Heydari B, Jerosch-Herold M, Kwong R. Imaging for planning of cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Am Coll Cardiovasc Imag. 2012;5:93–110.CrossRef

136.

Tracy CM, Epstein AE, Darbar D, DiMarco JP, Dunbar SB, Estes NAM 3rd, et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused update of the 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2012;126:00–1.CrossRef

137.

Duvernoy CS, Ficaro EP, Karabajakian MZ, Rose PA, Corbett JR. Improved detection of left main coronary artery disease with attenuation-corrected SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol. 2000;7:639–48.CrossRefPubMed

138.

Gibbons RJ, Balady GJ, Bricker JT, Chaitman BR, Fletcher GF, Froelicher VF, et al. ACC/AHA 2002 Guideline Update for Exercise Testing. Circulation. 2002;106:1883–92. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000034670.06526.15.CrossRefPubMed

139.

Sciagrà R, Leoncini M, Marcucci G, Dabizzi RP, Pupi A. Technetium-99m sestamibi imaging to predict left ventricular ejection fraction outcome after revascularisation in patients with chronic coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction: comparison between baseline and nitrate-enhanced imaging. Eur J Nucl Med. 2001;28:680–7.CrossRefPubMed

140.

Leoncini M, Sciagrà R, Bellandi F, Maioli M, Sestini S, Marcucci G, et al. Low-dose dobutamine nitrate-enhanced technetium 99m sestamibi gated SPECT versus low-dose dobutamine echocardiography for detecting reversible dysfunction in ischemic cardiomyopathy. J Nucl Cardiol. 2002;9:402–6.CrossRefPubMed

141.

Dilsizian V, Bacharach SL, Beanlands RS, Bergmann SR, Delbeke D, Dorbala S, et al. ASNC imaging guidelines/SNMMI procedure standard for positron emission tomography (PET) nuclear cardiology procedures. J Nucl Cardiol. 2016;23:1187–226.CrossRefPubMed

142.

Schinkel AF, Bax JJ, Poldermans D, Elhendy A, Ferrari R, Rahimtoola SH. Hibernating myocardium: Diagnosis and patient outcomes. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2007;32:375–410.CrossRefPubMed

143.

Dilsizian V, Rocco TP, Freedman NM, Leon MB, Bonow RO. Enhanced detection of ischemic but viable myocardium by the reinjection of thallium after stress-redistribution imaging. N Engl J Med. 1990;323:141–6.CrossRefPubMed

144.

He ZX, Medrano R, Hays JT, Mahmarian JJ, Verani MS. Nitroglycerin-augmented 201T1 reinjection enhances detection of reversible myocardial hypoperfusion. A randomized, double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled trial. Circulation. 1997;95:1799–805.CrossRefPubMed

145.

Dilsizian V, Bonow RO. Current diagnostic techniques of assessing myocardial viability in patients with hibernating and stunned myocardium. Circulation. 1993;87:1–20.CrossRefPubMed

146.

Uebleis C, Hellweger S, Laubender RP, Becker A, Sohn HY, Lehner S, et al. The amount of dysfunctional but viable myocardium predicts long-term survival in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and left ventricular dysfunction. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;29:1645–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-013-0254-2.CrossRefPubMed

147.

Ling LF, Marwick TH, Flores DR, Jaber WA, Brunken RC, Cerqueira MD, et al. Identification of therapeutic benefit from revascularization in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction: Inducible ischemia versus hibernating myocardium. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6:363–72. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.112.000138.CrossRefPubMed

148.

Bax JJ, Delgado V. Myocardial viability as integral part of the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to ischemic heart failure. J Nucl Cardiol. 2015;22:229–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-015-0096-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

149.

Beanlands RS, Nichol G, Huszti E, Humen D, Racine N, Freeman M, et al. F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging-assisted management of patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction and suspected coronary disease: a randomized, controlled trial (PARR-2). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:2002–12.CrossRefPubMed

150.

Cleland JG, Calvert M, Freemantle N, Arrow Y, Ball SG, Bonser RS, et al. The heart failure revascularisation trial (HEART). Eur J Heart Fail. 2011;13:227–33. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjhf/hfq230.CrossRefPubMed

151.

Velazquez EJ, Lee KL, Deja MA, Jain A, Sopko G, Marchenko A, et al. Coronary-artery bypass surgery in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1607–16. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1100356.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

152.

Velazquez EJ, Lee KL, Jones RH, Al-Khalidi HR, Hill JA, Panza JA, et al. Coronary-artery bypass surgery in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:1511–20. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1602001.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

153.

Bonow RO, Maurer G, Lee KL, Holly TA, Binkley PF, Desvigne-Nickens P, et al. Myocardial viability and survival in ischemic left ventricular dysfunction. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1617–25. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1100358.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

154.

Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, Butler J, Casey DE Jr, Drazner MH, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. Circulation. 2013;128:e240–327. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0b013e31829e8776.CrossRefPubMed

155.

Wells RG, Timmins R, Klein R, Lockwood J, Marvin B, deKemp RA, et al. Dynamic SPECT measurement of absolute myocardial blood flow in a porcine model. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:1685–91.CrossRefPubMed

156.

Shrestha U, Sciammarella M, Alhassen F, Yeghiazarians Y, Ellin J, Verdin E, et al. Measurement of absolute myocardial blood flow in humans using dynamic cardiac SPECT and 99mTc-tetrofosmin: Method and validation. J Nucl Cardiol. 2017;24:268–77.CrossRefPubMed

157.

Hsu B, Hu LH, Yang BH, Chen LC, Chen YK, Ting CH, et al. SPECT myocardial blood flow quantitation toward clinical use: a comparative study with 13N-Ammonia PET myocardial blood flow quantitation. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44:117–28.CrossRefPubMed

158.

Shiraishi S, Sakamoto F, Tsuda N, Yoshida M, Tomiguchi S, Utsunomiya D, Ogawa H, et al. Prediction of left main or 3-vessel disease using myocardial perfusion reserve on dynamic thallium-201 single-photon emission computed tomography with a semiconductor gamma camera. Circ J. 2015;79:623–31. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-14-0932.CrossRefPubMed

159.

Ben Bouallègue F, Roubille F, Lattuca B, Cung TT, Macia JC, Gervasoni R, et al. SPECT myocardial perfusion reserve in patients with multivessel coronary disease: correlation with angiographic findings and invasive fractional flow reserve measurements. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:1712–7.CrossRefPubMed

160.

Murthy VL, Naya M, Foster CR, Hainer J, Gaber M, Di Carli G, et al. Improved cardiac risk assessment with noninvasive measures of coronary flow reserve. Circulation. 2011;124:2215–24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

161.

Herzog BA, Husmann L, Gaemperli O, Valenta I, Siegrist PT, Tay FM, et al. Long-term prognostic value of 13N-ammonia myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography added value of coronary flow reserve. J Am Coll Card. 2009;54:150–6.CrossRef

162.

Ziadi MC, Dekemp RA, Williams KA, Guo A, Chow BJ, Renaud JM, et al. Impaired myocardial flow reserve on rubidium-82 positron emission tomography imaging predicts adverse outcomes in patients assessed for myocardial ischemia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:740–8.CrossRefPubMed

163.

Gould KL, Johnson NP, Bateman TM, Beanlands RS, Bengel FM, Bober R, et al. Anatomic versus physiologic assessment of coronary artery disease. Role of coronary flow reserve, fractional flow reserve, and positron emission tomography imaging in revascularization decision-making. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:1639–53.CrossRefPubMed

164.

Askew JW, Miller TD, Ruter RL, Jordan LG, Hodge DO, Gibbons RJ, et al. Early image acquisition using a solid-state cardiac camera for fast myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2011;18:840–6.CrossRefPubMed

165.

Duvall WL, Wijetunga MN, Klein TM, Razzouk L, Godbold J, Croft LB, et al. The prognosis of a normal stress-only Tc-99m myocardial perfusion imaging study. J Nucl Cardiol. 2010;17:370–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-010-9210-x.CrossRefPubMed

166.

Einstein AJ, Blankstein R, Andrews H, Fish M, Padgett R, Hayes SW, et al. Comparison of image quality, myocardial perfusion, and left ventricular function between standard imaging and single-injection ultra-low-dose imaging using a high-efficiency SPECT camera: The MILLISIEVERT study. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:1430–7.CrossRefPubMed

167.

Thompson RC, O’Keefe JH, McGhie AI, Bybee KA, Thompson EC, Bateman TM. Reduction of SPECT MPI radiation dose using contemporary protocols and technology. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.03.008.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

168.

Duvall WL, Guma KA, Kamen J, Croft LB, Parides M, George T, et al. Reduction in occupational and patient radiation exposure from myocardial perfusion imaging: impact of stress-only imaging and high-efficiency SPECT camera technology. J Nucl Med. 2013;54:1251–7. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.112.112680.CrossRefPubMed

169.

Nabi F, Kassi M, Muhyieddeen K, Chang SM, Xu J, Peterson LE, et al. Optimizing evaluation of patients with low-to-intermediate-risk acute chest pain: A randomized study comparing stress myocardial perfusion tomography incorporating stress-only imaging versus cardiac CT. J Nucl Med. 2016;57:378–84. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.115.166595.CrossRefPubMed

170.

Thompson RC, Allam AH. More risk factors, less ischemia, and the relevance of MPI testing. J Nucl Cardiol. 2015;22:552–4.CrossRefPubMed

171.

Mahmarian JJ. Implementation of stress-only imaging: What will it take? J Nucl Cardiol. 2017;24:821–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-015-0346-6.CrossRefPubMed

172.

Cerqueira MD, Allman KC, Ficaro EP, Hansen CL, Nichols KJ, Thompson RC, et al. Recommendations for reducing radiation exposure in myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2010;17:709–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-010-9244-0.CrossRefPubMed

173.

Heller GV, Bateman TM, Johnson LL, Cullom SJ, Case JA, Galt JR, et al. Clinical value of attenuation correction in stress-only Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2004;11:273–81.CrossRefPubMed

174.

Thomas GS, Cullom SJ, Kitt TM, Feaheny KM, Ananthasubramaniam K, Gropler RJ, et al. The EXERRT trial: EXErcise to Regadenoson in Recovery Trial: A phase 3b, open-label, parallel group, randomized, multicenter study to assess regadenoson administration following an inadequate exercise stress test as compared to regadenoson without exercise for myocardial perfusion imaging using a SPECT protocol. J Nucl Cardiol. 2017;24:788–802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-017-0813-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

175.

Mahmarian JJ. Regadenoson stress during low-level exercise: The EXERRT trial-does it move the needle? J Nucl Cardiol. 2017;24:803–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-017-0873-4.CrossRefPubMed

176.

Duvall WL, Baber U, Levine EJ, Croft LB, Henzlova MJ. A model for the prediction of a successful stress-first Tc-99m SPECT MPI. J Nucl Cardiol. 2012;19:1124–34.CrossRefPubMed

177.

Gowdar S, Chaudhry W, Ahlberg AW, Henzlova MJ, Duvall WL. Triage of patients for attenuation-corrected stress-first Tc-99m SPECT MPI using a simplified clinical pre-test scoring model. J Nucl Cardiol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-017-0832-0.CrossRefPubMed

178.

Gemignani AS, Muhlebach SG, Abbott BG, Roye GD, Harrington DT, Arrighi JA. Stress-only or stress/rest myocardial perfusion imaging in patients undergoing evaluation for bariatric surgery. J Nucl Cardiol. 2011;18:886–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-011-9405-9.CrossRefPubMed

179.

Mathur S, Heller GV, Bateman TM, Ruffin R, Yekta A, Katten D, et al. Clinical value of stress-only Tc-99m SPECT imaging: Importance of attenuation correction. J Nucl Cardiol. 2013;20:27–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-012-9633-7.CrossRefPubMed

180.

Bloom SA, Meyers K. Reducing radiation to patients and improving image quality in a real-world nuclear cardiology laboratory. J Nucl Cardiol. 2017;24:1871–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-017-0851-x.CrossRefPubMed

181.

DePuey EG, Mahmarian JJ, Miller TD, Einstein AJ, Hansen CL, Holly TL, et al. ASNC preferred practice statement: Patient-centered imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2012;19:185–215.CrossRefPubMed

182.

Einstein AJ, Berman DS, Min JK, Hendel RC, Gerber TC, Carr JJ, et al. Patient centered imaging: Shared decision making for cardiac imaging procedures with exposure to ionizing radiation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:1480–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

183.

Jha S, Boonn W. Patient-centered imaging: Opportunities and challenges. J Am Coll Rad. 2012;9:157–9.CrossRef

184.

Swensen SJ. Patient-centered imaging. Am J Med. 2012;125:115–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.06.002.CrossRefPubMed

185.

Thompson RC, Burgett EV. Patient centered imaging and the dose of radiopharmaceuticals. J Nucl Cardiol. 2016;23:143–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-015-0263-8.CrossRefPubMed

186.

van Dijk JD, Jager PL, Ottervanger JP, de Boer J, Oostdijk AHJ, Engbers EM, et al. Development and validation of a patient-tailored dose regime in myocardial perfusion imaging using conventional SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol. 2016;23:134–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-015-0246-9.CrossRefPubMed

187.

van Dijk JD, Jager PL, Mouden M, Slump CH, Ottervanger JP, de Boer J, et al. Development and validation of a patient-tailored dose regime in myocardial perfusion imaging using CZT-SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol. 2014;21:1158–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-014-9942-0.CrossRefPubMed

188.

Herzog BA, Buechel RR, Katz R, Brueckner M, Husmann L, Burger IA, et al. Nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging with a cadmium-zinc-telluride detector technique: Optimized protocol for scan time reduction. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:46–51. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.109.065532.CrossRefPubMed

189.

Greenland P, Alpert JS, Beller GA, Benjamin EJ, Budoff MJ, Fayad ZA, et al. 2010 ACCF/AHA guideline for assessment of cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic adults: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:e50–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.09.001.CrossRefPubMed

190.

Thompson RC, McGhie AI, Moser KW, O’Keefe JH Jr, Stevens TL, House J, et al. Clinical utility of coronary artery calcium scoring after nonischemic myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2005;12:392–400.CrossRefPubMed

191.

Rozanski A, Gransar H, Shaw LJ, Kim J, Miranda-Peats L, Wong ND, et al. Impact of coronary artery calcium scanning on coronary risk factors and downstream testing the EISNER (Early Identification of Subclinical Atherosclerosis by Noninvasive Imaging Research) prospective randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:1622–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.01.019.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

192.

Schenker MP, Dorbala S, Hong EC, Rybicki FJ, Hachamovitch R, Kwong RY, et al. Interrelation of coronary calcification, myocardial ischemia, and outcomes in patients with intermediate likelihood of coronary artery disease: A combined positron emission tomography/computed tomography study. Circulation. 2008;117:1693–700. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.717512.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

193.

Chang SM, Nabi F, Xu J, Pratt CM, Mahmarian AC, Frias ME, et al. Value of CACS compared with ETT and myocardial perfusion imaging for predicting long-term cardiac outcome in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients at low risk for coronary disease: Clinical implications in a multimodality imaging world. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:134–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.11.008.CrossRefPubMed

194.

Engbers EM, Timmer JR, Ottervanger JP, Mouden M, Knollema S, Jager PL. Prognostic value of coronary artery calcium scoring in addition to single-photon emission computed tomographic myocardial perfusion imaging in symptomatic patients. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1161/circimaging.115.003966.CrossRefPubMed

195.

Einstein AJ, Johnson LL, Bokhari S, Son J, Thompson RC, Bateman TM, et al. Agreement of visual estimation of coronary artery calcium from low-dose CT attenuation correction scans in hybrid PET/CT and SPECT/CT with standard Agatston score. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:1914–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.05.057.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

196.

Takx RA, Išgum I, Willemink MJ, van der Graaf Y, de Koning HJ, Vliegenthart R, et al. Quantification of coronary artery calcium in nongated CT to predict cardiovascular events in male lung cancer screening participants: results of the NELSON study. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2015;9:50–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2014.11.006.CrossRefPubMed

197.

Mylonas I, Kazmi M, Fuller L, deKemp RA, Yam Y, Chen L, et al. Measuring coronary artery calcification using positron emission tomography-computed tomography attenuation correction images. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;13:786–92. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jes079.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Guidelines: Instrumentation, Acquisition, Processing, and Interpretation
verfasst von: Sharmila Dorbala, MD, MPH
Karthik Ananthasubramaniam, MD
Ian S. Armstrong, PhD, MIPEM
Panithaya Chareonthaitawee, MD
E. Gordon DePuey, MD
Andrew J. Einstein, MD, PhD
Robert J. Gropler, MD
Thomas A. Holly, MD
John J. Mahmarian, MD
Mi-Ae Park, PhD
Donna M. Polk, MD, MPH
Raymond Russell III, MD, PhD
Piotr J. Slomka, PhD
Randall C. Thompson, MD
R. Glenn Wells, PhD
Publikationsdatum: 01.10.2018
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology / Ausgabe 5/2018
Print ISSN: 1071-3581
Elektronische ISSN: 1532-6551
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-018-1283-y

Neu im Fachgebiet Kardiologie

25.04.2024 | Hypotonie | Nachrichten

Update Kardiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Guidelines: Instrumentation, Acquisition, Processing, and Interpretation

Excerpt

Neu im Fachgebiet Kardiologie

Niedriger diastolischer Blutdruck erhöht Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

Adipositas-Medikament auch gegen Schlafapnoe wirksam

Myokarditis nach Infekt – Richtig schwierig wird es bei Profisportlern

Update Kardiologie

Springer Medizin

Excerpt

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2018

Diagnosis of extensive myocardial infiltration by diffuse large B-cell lymphoma using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18-FDG PET)

Cardiac ATTR amyloid nuclear imaging—not all bone scintigraphy radionuclide tracers are created equal

Setting the stage for the next step in cardiac amyloidosis imaging: Serial quantitative studies to assess disease activity

Variations in the referral patterns to pharmacologic and exercise myocardial perfusion imaging

In search of the vulnerable patient or the vulnerable plaque: 18F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography for cardiovascular risk stratification

Isolated right ventricular ischemia by SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in a patient with coronary artery disease and pulmonary hypertension

Neu im Fachgebiet Kardiologie

Niedriger diastolischer Blutdruck erhöht Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

Adipositas-Medikament auch gegen Schlafapnoe wirksam

Myokarditis nach Infekt – Richtig schwierig wird es bei Profisportlern

Update Kardiologie