nach oben

International Journal of Behavioral Medicine

Erschienen in:

20.07.2017

Theoretical Perspectives of Adherence to Web-Based Interventions: a Scoping Review

verfasst von: Cathal Ryan, Michael Bergin, John SG Wells

Erschienen in: International Journal of Behavioral Medicine | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to review the literature as this relates to theoretical perspectives of adherence to web-based interventions, drawing upon empirical evidence from the fields of psychology, business, information technology and health care.

Methods

A scoping review of the literature utilising principles outlined by Arksey and O’Malley was undertaken.

Results

Several relevant theoretical perspectives have emerged, eight of which are charted and discussed in this review. These are the Internet Intervention Model, Persuasive Systems Design, the ‘PERMA’ framework, the Support Accountability Model, the Model of User Engagement, the Technology Acceptance Model, the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of IT and the Conceptual Model of User Engagement.

Conclusions

The findings of the review indicate that an interdisciplinary approach, incorporating a range of technological, environmental and individual factors, may be needed in order to comprehensively explain user adherence to web-based interventions.

Bewick BM, Trusler K, Barkham M, Hill AJ, Cahill J, Mulhern B. The effectiveness of web-based interventions designed to decrease alcohol consumption—a systematic review. Prev Med. 2008;47(1):17–26.CrossRefPubMed

Neve M, Morgan PJ, Jones P, Collins C. Effectiveness of web-based interventions in achieving weight loss and weight loss maintenance in overweight and obese adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2010;11(4):306–21.CrossRefPubMed

Copeland J, Martin G. Web-based interventions for substance use disorders: a qualitative review. J Subst Abus Treat. 2004;26(2):109–16.CrossRef

Powell J, Hamborg T, Stallard N, Burls A, McSorley J, Bennett K, et al. Effectiveness of a web-based cognitive-behavioral tool to improve mental well-being in the general population: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(1):e2.CrossRefPubMedCentral

Murray E, White IR, Varagunam M, Godfrey C, Khadjesari Z, McCambridge J. Attrition revisited: adherence and retention in a web-based alcohol trial. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(8):83–93.CrossRef

Eysenbach G. The law of attrition. J Med Internet Res. 2005;7(1):e11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Kelders SM, Kok RN, Ossebaard HC, Van Gemert-Pijnen JE. Persuasive system design does matter: a systematic review of adherence to web-based interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(6):e152.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Wangberg SC, Bergmo TS, Johnsen J. Adherence in internet-based interventions. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2008;2:57–65.PubMedPubMedCentral

Vandelanotte C, Müller AM, Short CE, Hingle M, Nathan N, Williams SL, et al. Past, present, and future of eHealth and mHealth research to improve physical activity and dietary behaviors. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2016;48(3):219–28. e1.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Prestwich A, Sniehotta FF, Whittington C, Dombrowski SU, Rogers L, Michie S. Does theory influence the effectiveness of health behavior interventions? Meta-analysis. Am Psychol Assoc; 2014.

11.

Wantland DJ, Portillo CJ, Holzemer WL, Slaughter R, McGhee EM. The effectiveness of Web-based vs. non-Web-based interventions: a meta-analysis of behavioral change outcomes. J Med Internet Res. 2004;6(4):e40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Michie S, Johnston M, Francis J, Hardeman W, Eccles M. From theory to intervention: mapping theoretically derived behavioural determinants to behaviour change techniques. Appl Psychol. 2008;57(4):660–80.CrossRef

13.

Perski O, Blandford A, West R, Michie S. Conceptualising engagement with digital behaviour change interventions: a systematic review using principles from critical interpretive synthesis. Transl Behav Med. 2016:1–14.

14.

Postel MG, de Haan HA, ter Huurne ED, van der Palen J, Becker ES, de Jong CAJ. Attrition in web-based treatment for problem drinkers. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(4):e117-e.CrossRef

15.

Neil A, Batterham P, Christensen H, Bennett K, Griffiths K. Predictors of adherence by adolescents to a cognitive behavior therapy website in school and community-based settings. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11(1):e6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Rothert K, Strecher VJ, Doyle LA, Caplan WM, Joyce JS, Jimison HB, et al. Web-based weight management programs in an integrated health care setting: a randomized, controlled trial. Obesity. 2006;14(2):266–72.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Kelders SM, Van Gemert-Pijnen JE, Werkman A, Nijland N, Seydel ER. Effectiveness of a Web-based intervention aimed at healthy dietary and physical activity behavior: a randomized controlled trial about users and usage. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(2):e32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Balmford J, Borland R, Benda P. Patterns of use of an automated interactive personalized coaching program for smoking cessation. J Med Internet Res. 2008;10(5):e54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Schubart JR, Stuckey HL, Ganeshamoorthy A, Sciamanna CN. Chronic health conditions and internet behavioral interventions: a review of factors to enhance user engagement. CIN: Comput Inform Nurs. 2011;29(2):81–92.PubMed

20.

Brouwer W, Kroeze W, Crutzen R, de Nooijer J, de Vries NK, Brug J, et al. Which intervention characteristics are related to more exposure to internet-delivered healthy lifestyle promotion interventions? A systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(1):e2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Beatty L, Binnion C. A systematic review of predictors of, and reasons for, adherence to online psychological interventions. Int J Behav Med. 2016;23(6):776–94.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Rogers Everett M. Diffusion of innovations. New York. 1995;12.

23.

Christensen H, Griffiths KM, Farrer L. Adherence in internet interventions for anxiety and depression: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11(2):e13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

24.

Christensen H, Mackinnon A. The law of attrition revisited. J Med Internet Res. 2006;8(3):e20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Cavanagh K. Turn on, tune in and [don’t] drop out: engagement, adherence, attrition, and alliance with internet-based interventions. In: Bennett-Levy J, Richards DA, Farrand P, Christensen H, Griffiths KM, Kavanaugh DJ, et al., editors. Oxford guide to low intensity CBT interventions. Oxford guides in cognitive behavioural therapy. New York: Oxford University Press; 2010. p. 227–33.

26.

Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5(1):69.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

27.

Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32.CrossRef

28.

Maxwell JA. Qualitative research design: an interactive approach. Thousand Oaks: Sage publications; 2012.

29.

Ritterband LM, Thorndike FP, Cox DJ, Kovatchev BP, Gonder-Frederick LA. A behavior change model for internet interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2009;38(1):18–27.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

30.

Oinas-Kukkonen H, Harjumaa M. Persuasive systems design: key issues, process model, and system features. Commun Assoc Inf Syst. 2009;24(1):28.

31.

Ludden GDS, van Rompay TJL, Kelders SM, van Gemert-Pijnen JEWC. How to increase reach and adherence of web-based interventions: a design research viewpoint. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(7):e172-e.CrossRef

32.

Short CE, Rebar AL, Plotnikoff RC, Vandelanotte C. Designing engaging online behaviour change interventions: a proposed model of user engagement. Eur Health Psychol. 2015;17(1):32–8.

33.

Petty RE, Cacioppo JT. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Communication and persuasion: Springer; 1986. p. 1–24.

34.

Beatty L, Binnion C. A systematic review of predictors of, and reasons for, adherence to online psychological interventions. Int J behav Med. 2016;23(6):776–94.CrossRefPubMed

35.

O’Brien HL, Toms EG. What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2008;59(6):938–55.CrossRef

36.

Crutzen R, Cyr D, de Vries NK. Bringing loyalty to E-health: theory validation using three internet-delivered interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(3):107–17.CrossRef

37.

Mohr D, Cuijpers P, Lehman K. Supportive accountability: a model for providing human support to enhance adherence to eHealth interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(1):e30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

38.

Davis FD Jr. A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 1986.

39.

Dennison L, Morrison L, Lloyd S, Phillips D, Stuart B, Williams S, et al. Does brief telephone support improve engagement with a web-based weight management intervention? Randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(3):e95.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

40.

Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 2003:425–78.

41.

Sun H, Zhang P. Causal relationships between perceived enjoyment and perceived ease of use: an alternative approach. J Assoc Inf Syst. 2006;7(9):24.

42.

Attuquayefio S, Addo H. Review of studies with UTAUT as conceptual framework. Eur Sci J, ESJ. 2014;10(8).

43.

Taiwo AA, DOWNE AG. The theory of user acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): a meta-analytic review of empirical findings. J Theor Appl Inf Technol. 2013;49(1).

44.

Khechine H, Lakhal S, Ndjambou P. A meta-analysis of the UTAUT model: eleven years later. Can J Adm Sci/Rev Can Sci Adm. 2016;33(2):138–52.CrossRef

45.

Farrer LM, Griffiths KM, Christensen H, Mackinnon AJ, Batterham PJ. Predictors of adherence and outcome in internet-based cognitive behavior therapy delivered in a telephone counseling setting. Cogn Ther Res. 2014;38(3):358–67.CrossRef

46.

Fogg BJ. Persuasive technologies. Commun ACM. 1999;42(5):27–9.CrossRef

47.

Fogg BJ. Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do. Ubiquity. 2002;2002:5.CrossRef

48.

Fogg BJ, editor A behavior model for persuasive design. Proceedings of the 4th international Conference on Persuasive Technology; 2009: ACM.

49.

Wildeboer G, Kelders SM, van Gemert-Pijnen JEWC. The relationship between persuasive technology principles, adherence and effect of web-based interventions for mental health: a meta-analysis. Int J Med Inform. 2016;96:71–85.CrossRefPubMed

50.

Wildeboer L. Does the number of persuasive technology principles used in web-based interventions concerning mental health affect the effectiveness: a meta-analysis: University of Twente; 2015.

51.

Pohlmeyer A. Design for happiness. Interfaces. 2012;92(8–11).

52.

Seligman ME. Flourish: a visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. Policy. 2011;27(3):60–1.

53.

Titov N, Dear BF, Johnston L, Lorian C, Zou J, Wootton B, et al. Improving adherence and clinical outcomes in self- guided internet treatment for anxiety and depression: randomised controlled trial. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(7).

54.

Furmark T, Carlbring P, Hedman E, Sonnenstein A, Clevberger P, Bohman B, et al. Guided and unguided self-help for social anxiety disorder: randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2009;195(5):440–7.CrossRefPubMed

55.

Alfonsson S, Olsson E, Linderman S, Winnerhed S, Hursti T. Is online treatment adherence affected by presentation and therapist support? A randomized controlled trial. Comput Hum Behav. 2016;60:550–8.CrossRef

56.

Mohr DC, Duffecy J, Ho J, Kwasny M, Cai X, Burns MN, et al. A randomized controlled trial evaluating a manualized telecoaching protocol for improving adherence to a web-based intervention for the treatment of depression. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):1–9.CrossRef

57.

Duffecy J, Sanford S, Wagner L, Begale M, Nawacki E, Mohr DC. Project onward: an innovative e-health intervention for cancer survivors. Psycho-Oncology. 2013;22(4):947–51.CrossRefPubMed

58.

Pilutti L, Dlugonski D, Sandroff B, Klaren R, Motl R. Randomized controlled trial of a behavioral intervention targeting symptoms and physical activity in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler J. 2014;20(5):594–601.CrossRef

59.

Schueller SM, Mohr DC, editors. Initial field trial of a coach-supported web-based depression treatment. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare; 2015: ICST [Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering].

60.

Zarski A-C, Lehr D, Berking M, Riper H, Cuijpers P, Ebert DD. Adherence to internet-based mobile-supported stress management: a pooled analysis of individual participant data from three randomized controlled trials. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(6).

61.

Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Reading: Addison-Wesley; 1975.

62.

Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manag Sci. 2000;46(2):186–204.CrossRef

63.

King WR, He J. A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Inf Manag. 2006;43(6):740–55.CrossRef

64.

Yarbrough AK, Smith TB. Technology acceptance among physicians: a new take on TAM. Med Care Res Rev. 2007;64(6):650–72.CrossRefPubMed

65.

Holden RJ, Karsh B-T. The technology acceptance model: its past and its future in health care. J Biomed Inform. 2010;43(1):159–72.CrossRefPubMed

66.

Ma Q, Liu L. The technology acceptance model: a meta-analysis of empirical findings. J Organ End User Comput [JOEUC]. 2004;16(1):59–72.CrossRef

67.

Yousafzai SY, Foxall GR, Pallister JG. Technology acceptance: a meta-analysis of the TAM: part 1. J Model Manag. 2007;2(3):251–80.CrossRef

68.

Murugesh-Warren A, Dubb S, Sudbury D, Nnajiuba U, Abdel-Gadir S, Caris J. An extension of the UTAUT 2 with a focus of age in healthcare: what do different ages want? Int J Integrat Care [IJIC]. 2015;15:1–3.

69.

Csikszentmihalyi M. Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. Harper Collins: New York; 1996.

70.

Beardsley MC. Some persistent issues in aesthetics. The aesthetic point of view: selected essays 1982:285–7.

71.

Stephenson W. The play theory of mass communication. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers; 1964.

72.

Toms EG. Information interaction: providing a framework for information architecture. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2002;53(10):855–62.CrossRef

73.

O’Brien H. Theoretical perspectives on user engagement. In: O’Brien H, Cairns P, editors. Why engagement matters: cross-disciplinary perspectives and innovations on user engagement with digital media. New York: Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated; 2016. p. 1–26.

74.

Short CE, Vandelanotte C, Dixon MW, Rosenkranz R, Caperchione C, Hooker C, et al. Examining participant engagement in an information technology-based physical activity and nutrition intervention for men: the manup randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res protoc. 2014;3(1):e2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

75.

O’Brien HL, Toms EG. Examining the generalizability of the User Engagement Scale (UES) in exploratory search. Inf Process Manag. 2013;49(5):1092–107.CrossRef

76.

O’Brien H, Cairns P. Why engagement matters: cross-disciplinary perspectives and innovations on user engagement with digital media. New York: Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated; 2016.

77.

Wiebe EN, Lamb A, Hardy M, Sharek D. Measuring engagement in video game-based environments: investigation of the user engagement scale. Comput Hum Behav. 2014;32:123–32.CrossRef

78.

van Gemert-Pijnen JE, Nijland N, van Limburg M, Ossebaard HC, Kelders SM, Eysenbach G, et al. A holistic framework to improve the uptake and impact of eHealth technologies. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(4):e111.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

79.

Stegemann SK, Weg R, Ebenfeld L, Thiart H, Berking M, Funk B. Towards measuring user engagement in internet interventions for common mental disorders. In: Proceedings of the HCI 2012, the 26th BCS Conference on Human Computer Interaction, Birmingham, 12–14 September 2012. p. 1–4. Available from http://ewic.bcs.org/. Accessed 12 Dec 2016.

80.

Guertler D, Vandelanotte C, Kirwan M, Duncan MJ. Engagement and nonusage attrition with a free physical activity promotion program: the case of 10,000 steps Australia. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(7):e176-e.CrossRef

81.

Donkin L, Glozier N. Motivators and motivations to persist with online psychological interventions: a qualitative study of treatment completers. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(3):284–95.CrossRef

82.

Donkin L, Hickie IB, Christensen H, Naismith SL, Neal B, Cockayne NL, et al. Rethinking the dose-response relationship between usage and outcome in an online intervention for depression: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(10):e231.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

83.

Alfonsson, S. Treatment adherence in internet-based CBT. The effects of presentation, support and motivation. PhD [dissertation]. Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Medicine. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis; 2016. Available from: Uppsala universitetsbibliotek.

84.

Yardley L, Spring BJ, Riper H, Morrison LG, Crane DH, Curtis K, et al. Understanding and promoting effective engagement with digital behavior change interventions. Am J Prev Med. 2016;51(5):833–42.CrossRefPubMed

85.

Kelders SM, Oinas-Kukkonen H, Oörni A, van Gemert-Pijnen JE. Health behavior change support systems as a research discipline; a viewpoint. Int J Med Inform. 2016;96:3–10.CrossRefPubMed

86.

Sundström C, Gajecki M, Johansson M, Blankers M, Sinadinovic K, Stenlund-Gens E, et al. Guided and unguided internet-based treatment for problematic alcohol use—a randomized controlled pilot trial. PLoS One. 2016;11(7):e0157817.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

87.

Johansson M, Sinadinovic K, Hammarberg A, Sundström C, Hermansson U, Andreasson S, et al. Web-based self-help for problematic alcohol use: a large naturalistic study. Int J Behav Med. 2016:1–11.

Titel: Theoretical Perspectives of Adherence to Web-Based Interventions: a Scoping Review
verfasst von: Cathal Ryan
Michael Bergin
John SG Wells
Publikationsdatum: 20.07.2017
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: International Journal of Behavioral Medicine / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 1070-5503
Elektronische ISSN: 1532-7558
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-017-9678-8

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Theoretical Perspectives of Adherence to Web-Based Interventions: a Scoping Review

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

Cognitive and Perceptual Factors, Not Disease Severity, Are Linked with Anxiety in COPD: Results from a Cross-Sectional Study

The Stability of Type D Personality in Dialysis Patients

Low Income as a Multiplicative Risk Factor for Oral Pain and Dental Problems Among U.S. Veteran Smokers

Effectiveness of Mindfulness- and Relaxation-Based eHealth Interventions for Patients with Medical Conditions: a Systematic Review and Synthesis

Risk Compensation Following Medical Male Circumcision: Results from a 1-Year Prospective Cohort Study of Young School-Going Men in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

Cross-Cultural Study of Information Processing Biases in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Comparison of Dutch and UK Chronic Fatigue Patients