Skip to main content
Log in

The influence of leadership behavior and organizational commitment on organizational readiness for change in a higher learning institution

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Education Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many factors contribute to the effectiveness in implementing organizational change. However, many change effort fail due to several factors such as lack of commitment, style of leadership, and emotional distress of the employees who have to implement the change. This study was intended to determine the influence of leadership behavior and organizational commitment on organizational readiness for change in a higher learning institution. It was based on a conceptual framework that combined part of an adapted model from organizational development and change theory. A total of 169 academic staff from the main and branch campuses UiTM throughout Malaysia were selected based on stage and cluster sampling to participate in this study. The result shows that there is a significant relationship between organizational commitment and leadership behavior on organizational readiness for change. The findings also revealed that 36.5% of the variance in readiness for change is explained by organizational commitment and transactional leadership behavior. In determining the role of the organization commitment as a moderating variable, the result of the study indicates significant moderating effect of affective commitment on the relationship between transformational leadership behavior and organizational readiness for change. This study implied that building organizational commitment as well as developing transformational and transactional leadership behavior could contribute to formulation of organizational readiness for change and subsequently lead to the success of a change program.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of occupational Psychology, 63, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Applebaum, S. H., Pierre, N., & Glavas, W. (1998). Strategic organizational change: The role of leadership, learning, motivation and productivity. Management Decision, 36, 289–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armenakis, A. A., & Harris, S. G. (2002). Crafting a change message to create transformational readiness. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 15, 169–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armenakis, A. A., Harris, S. G., & Field, H. (1999). Paradigms in organizational change: Change agent and change target perspectives. In R. Golembiewski (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior. New York: Marcel Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectation. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M. (1998). Transformational leadership: Industrial, military and educational impact. New Jersey: Lawrence Erbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1990). Transformational leadership development: Manual for multifactor leadership questionnaire. CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2000). Multifactor leadership questionnaire. Redwood City, California: Mind Garden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., Avolio, B. J., Jung, D., & Berson, Y. (2003). Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 207–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, N., Crawford, M., & Riches, C. (1992). Managing change in education: Individual and organizational perspectives. London: Sage Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernerth, J. (2004). Expanding our understanding of the change message. Human Resource Development Review, 3, 36–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, W., & Litwin, G. (1992). A causal model of organizational performance and change. Journal of Management, 18, 523–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterworth, J., Fesko, M., & McGaughey, M. (1997). Conversion to integrated employment: Case studies of organizational change. Boston, MN: Institute of community inclusion, Center for promoting employment.

  • Carnall, C. A. (1986). Toward a theory for the evaluation of organizational change. Human Relations, 39, 745–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnall, C. A. (1995). Managing change in organizations (2nd ed.). London: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chrusciel, D. (2006). Considerations of emotional intelligence in dealing with change decision management. Management Decision, 44, 644–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, T. G., & Worley, C. G. (1993). Organizational development and change. Minneapolis: West Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, C., Woodward, C., Shahnon, H., MacIntosh, J., Lendrum, B., Rosenbloom, D., et al. (2002). Readiness for organizational change: A longitudinal study of workplace psychological and behavioral correlates. Journal of Occupational and Organizational psychology, 75, 377–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwish, Y. (2000). Organizational commitment and job satisfaction as predictors of attitudes toward organizational change in a non-Western setting. Personnel Review, 29, 6–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deetz, S. A., Tracy, S. J., & Simpson, J. L. (2000). Leading organizations through transitions: Communication and cultural change. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dvir, T., Kass, N., & Shamir, B. (2004). The emotional bond: Vision and Organizational commitment among the High-Tech employees. Journal of organizational Change Management, 17, 126–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eby, L. T., Adam, D. M., Russell, J. E. A., & Gaby, S. H. (2000). Perceptions of organizational readiness for change: Factors related to employee’s reactions to the implementation of team-based selling. Human Relations, 53, 419–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenbach, R., Watson, K., & Pillai, R. (1999). Transformational leadership in the context of organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 12, 80–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortmann, K., Feinzimer, B., Thompson, C., Glover, B., Moras A., & Frame, M. (2003). The effects of transformational and transactional leadership on affective organizational commitment. Poster session presented at the 24th annual IOOB conference, Akron.

  • Fullan, M. G. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. London: Caswell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getzels, J., & Guba, E. (1957). Social behavior and the administrative process. School Review, 65, 423–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J., & Baron, R. A. (2003). Behavior in organizations (8th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanafi, H. (2004). Peranan komitmen organisasi sebagai pengantara antara etika kerja Islam, kepuasan kerja, beban tugas berlebihan dan sikap terhadap perubahan organisasi. Tesis Masters, Universiti Putra Malaysia.

  • Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture consequences, international differences in work-related values. CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, J. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1993). Transformational leadership, transactional leadership, locus of control and support for innovation: key predictor of consolidated business unit performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 891–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inta, C., Linda, D., & Chris, E. (2009). Measurement of perceived organziational readiness for change in public sector. British Journal of Management, 20, 265–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iverson, R. D. (1996). Employee acceptance of organizational change. The role of organizational commitment. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 7, 147–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iverson, R. D., & Buttigieg, D. M. (1998). Affective, normative and continuance commitment: Can the right kind of commitment be managed? Department of management working paper in human resource management & industrial relations, no 7.

  • John, G. (1983). Organizational behavior: Understanding life at work. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foreman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2000). Five factor model of personality and transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 751–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khaliq, A., & Singh, S. (2001). Leading and motivating a Malaysian workforce. In A. Asma & A. H. M. Low (Eds.), Understanding the Malaysian workforce: Guideline for managers. Kuala Lumpur: Malaysian Institute of Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koslowsky, M. (1998). Modeling the stress–strain relationship in work settings. London and New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kwahk, K., & Lee, J. (2008). The role of readiness for change in ERP implementation: Theoretical bases and empirical validation. Information and Management, 45(7), 474–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau, C., & Woodman, R. C. (1995). Understanding organizational change: A schematic perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 537–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leban, W., & Zulauf, C. (2004). Linking emotional intelligence abilities and transformational leadership styles. Leadership and Organizational Development Journal, 25, 554–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics. Human Relations, 1, 5–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social sciences—Selected theoretical paper. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, K. B., Kroeck, K. G., & Subramaniam, N. (1996). Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review. Leadership Quarterly, 7, 385–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. P. (2002). Employee commitment is a key to success of organizational change. Society for industrial and organizational psychology Inc. Retrieved March 2006 from: http://www.siop.org/Media/News/Employee.htm.

  • Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1988). Links between work experience and organizational commitment during the years of employment: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 61, 195–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research and application. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. P., Irving, G. P., & Allen, N. J. (1998). Examination of the combine effects of work values and early work experiences on organizational commitment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 29–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mossholder, K. W., Settoon, R. P., Armenankis, A. A., & Harris, S. G. (2000). Emotion during organizational transformations: An interactive model of survivor reactions. Group & Organization Management, 25, 220–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mowday, R. T., Porter, L. W., & Steers, R. M. (1982). Employee-organization linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterman, P. (2000). Work reorganization in an era of restructuring: Trend in diffusion and effects on employee welfare. Industrial Labor Relations Review, 53, 173–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, S. P. (2003). Organizational behavior (10th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roselina, A. S., & Mohd Yusof, Z. H. (2002) Leadership preferences of Malaysian Managers. Malaysia Management Review, 37(1), June.

  • Schalk, R., Campbell, J. W., & Freese, C. (1998). Change and employee behavior. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 19, 157–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seltzer, J., & Bass, B. M. (1990). Transformational leadership: Beyond initiation and consideration. Journal of Management, 16, 693–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shamir, B., House, R. J., & Arthur, M. B. (1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization Science, 4, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, D., Saunders, M. N. K., & Thornhill, A. (1993). Human resource management in a changing world. Strategic Change, 11, 341–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, I. (2005). Achieving readiness for organizational change. Libray Management, 26, 408–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Somers, M. J. (1995). Organizational commitment, turnover and absenteeism: An examination of direct and interaction effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 49–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thang, L. C., & Quang, T. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of dimensions of human resource management practices in Vietnam. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16, 1830–1846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tichy, N. M., & Devanna, M. A. (1986). The transformational leader. New York: Addison Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vakola, M., & Nikolaou, I. (2005). Attitudes towards organizational change: What is role of employee’s’ stress and commitment. Employees Relations, 27, 160–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, C., Cunningham, C., Shahnon, H., MacIntosh, J., Lendrum, B., Rosenbloom, D., et al. (1999). The impact of re-engineering and other cost reduction strategies on the staff of a large teaching hospital: Longitudinal Study. Journal of medical Care, 37, 547–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, H., Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2002). The effects of transformational leadership on teachers’ commitment to change in Hong Kong. Journal of Educational Administration, 40, 368–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Norshidah Nordin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nordin, N. The influence of leadership behavior and organizational commitment on organizational readiness for change in a higher learning institution. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 13, 239–249 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-011-9200-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-011-9200-y

Keywords

Navigation