Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 4/2010

01.04.2010 | Reports of Original Investigations

Single-operator real-time ultrasound-guidance to aim and insert a lumbar epidural needle

verfasst von: Denis Tran, MEng, Allaudin A. Kamani, MD, Elias Al-Attas, MD, Victoria A. Lessoway, RDMS, Simon Massey, MD, Robert N. Rohling, PhD

Erschienen in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie | Ausgabe 4/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

In conventional practice of epidural needle placement, determining the interspinous level and choosing the puncture site are based on palpation of anatomical landmarks, which can be difficult with some subjects. Thereafter, the correct passage of the needle towards the epidural space is a blind “feel as you go” method. An aim-and-insert single-operator ultrasound-guided epidural needle placement is described and demonstrated.

Method

Nineteen subjects undergoing elective Cesarean delivery consented to undergo both a pre-puncture ultrasound scan and real-time paramedian ultrasound-guidance for needle insertion. Following were the study objectives: to measure the success of a combined spinal-epidural needle insertion under real-time guidance, to compare the locations of the chosen interspinous levels as determined by both ultrasound and palpation, to measure the change in depth of the epidural space from the skin surface as pressure is applied to the ultrasound transducer, and to investigate the geometric limitations of using a fixed needle guide.

Results

One subject did not participate in the study because pre-puncture ultrasound examination showed unrecognizable bony landmarks. In 18 of 19 subjects, the epidural needle entered the epidural space successfully, as defined by a loss-of-resistance. In two subjects, entry into the epidural space was not achieved despite ultrasound guidance. Eighteen of the 19 interspinous spaces that were identified using palpation were consistent with those determined by ultrasound. The transducer pressure changed the depth of the epidural space by 2.8 mm. The measurements of the insertion lengths corresponded with the geometrical model of the needle guide, but the needle required a larger insertion angle than would be needed without the guide.

Conclusion

This small study demonstrates the feasibility of the ultrasound-guidance technique. Areas for further development are identified for both ultrasound software and physical design.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Wallace DH, Currie JM, Gilstrap LC, Santos R. Indirect sonographic guidance for epidural anesthesia in obese pregnant patients. Reg Anesth 1992; 17: 233-6.PubMed Wallace DH, Currie JM, Gilstrap LC, Santos R. Indirect sonographic guidance for epidural anesthesia in obese pregnant patients. Reg Anesth 1992; 17: 233-6.PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Furness G, Reilly MP, Kuchi S. An evaluation of ultrasound imaging for identification of lumbar intervertebral level. Anaesthesia 2002; 57: 277-80.CrossRefPubMed Furness G, Reilly MP, Kuchi S. An evaluation of ultrasound imaging for identification of lumbar intervertebral level. Anaesthesia 2002; 57: 277-80.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Grau T, Bartusseck E, Conradi R, Martin E, Motsch J. Ultrasound imaging improves learning curves in obstetric epidural anesthesia: a preliminary study. Can J Anesth 2003; 50: 1047-50.CrossRefPubMed Grau T, Bartusseck E, Conradi R, Martin E, Motsch J. Ultrasound imaging improves learning curves in obstetric epidural anesthesia: a preliminary study. Can J Anesth 2003; 50: 1047-50.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Grau T, Leipold RW, Conradi R, Martin E. Ultrasound control for presumed difficult epidural puncture. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2001; 45: 766-71.CrossRefPubMed Grau T, Leipold RW, Conradi R, Martin E. Ultrasound control for presumed difficult epidural puncture. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2001; 45: 766-71.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Grau T, Leipold RW, Conradi R, Martin E, Motsch J. Efficacy of ultrasound imaging in obstetric epidural anesthesia. J Clin Anesth 2002; 14: 169-75.CrossRefPubMed Grau T, Leipold RW, Conradi R, Martin E, Motsch J. Efficacy of ultrasound imaging in obstetric epidural anesthesia. J Clin Anesth 2002; 14: 169-75.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Arzola C, Davies S, Rofaeel A, Carvalho JC. Ultrasound using the transverse approach to the lumbar spine provides reliable landmarks for labor epidurals. Anesth Analg 2007; 104: 1188-92.CrossRefPubMed Arzola C, Davies S, Rofaeel A, Carvalho JC. Ultrasound using the transverse approach to the lumbar spine provides reliable landmarks for labor epidurals. Anesth Analg 2007; 104: 1188-92.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Grau T, Leipold RW, Fatehi S, Martin E, Motsch J. Real-time ultrasonic observation of combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2004; 21: 25-31.PubMed Grau T, Leipold RW, Fatehi S, Martin E, Motsch J. Real-time ultrasonic observation of combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2004; 21: 25-31.PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Willschke H, Marhofer P, Bosenberg A, et al. Epidural catheter placement in children: comparing a novel approach using ultrasound guidance and a standard loss-of-resistance technique. Br J Anaesth 2006; 97: 200-7.CrossRefPubMed Willschke H, Marhofer P, Bosenberg A, et al. Epidural catheter placement in children: comparing a novel approach using ultrasound guidance and a standard loss-of-resistance technique. Br J Anaesth 2006; 97: 200-7.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Karmakar MK, Li X, Ho AM, Kwok WH, Chui PT. Real-time ultrasound-guided paramedian epidural access: evaluation of a novel in-plane technique. Br J Anaesth 2009; 102: 845-54.CrossRefPubMed Karmakar MK, Li X, Ho AM, Kwok WH, Chui PT. Real-time ultrasound-guided paramedian epidural access: evaluation of a novel in-plane technique. Br J Anaesth 2009; 102: 845-54.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Matalon TA, Silver B. US guidance of interventional procedures. Radiology 1990; 174: 43-7.PubMed Matalon TA, Silver B. US guidance of interventional procedures. Radiology 1990; 174: 43-7.PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Chestnut DH. Obstetric anesthesia: principles and practice, 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Mosby; 2004. Chestnut DH. Obstetric anesthesia: principles and practice, 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Mosby; 2004.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Grau T, Leipold RW, Horter J, Conradi R, Martin EO, Motsch J. Paramedian access to the epidural space: the optimum window for ultrasound imaging. J Clin Anesth 2001; 13: 213-7.CrossRefPubMed Grau T, Leipold RW, Horter J, Conradi R, Martin EO, Motsch J. Paramedian access to the epidural space: the optimum window for ultrasound imaging. J Clin Anesth 2001; 13: 213-7.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Lyons G, MacDonald R, Mikl B. Combined epidural/spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: through the needle or in separate spaces? Anaesthesia 1992; 47: 199-201.CrossRefPubMed Lyons G, MacDonald R, Mikl B. Combined epidural/spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: through the needle or in separate spaces? Anaesthesia 1992; 47: 199-201.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Tanaka N, Ohkubo S, Takasaki M. Evaluation of a lockable combined spinal-epidural device for use with needle-through-needle technique (Japanese). Masui 2004; 53: 173-7.PubMed Tanaka N, Ohkubo S, Takasaki M. Evaluation of a lockable combined spinal-epidural device for use with needle-through-needle technique (Japanese). Masui 2004; 53: 173-7.PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Bluvol N, Komecki A, Shaikh A, Del Rey Fernandez D, Taves DH, Fenster A. Freehand versus guided breast biopsy: comparison of accuracy, needle motion, and biopsy time in a tissue model. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 192: 1720-5.CrossRefPubMed Bluvol N, Komecki A, Shaikh A, Del Rey Fernandez D, Taves DH, Fenster A. Freehand versus guided breast biopsy: comparison of accuracy, needle motion, and biopsy time in a tissue model. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 192: 1720-5.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Single-operator real-time ultrasound-guidance to aim and insert a lumbar epidural needle
verfasst von
Denis Tran, MEng
Allaudin A. Kamani, MD
Elias Al-Attas, MD
Victoria A. Lessoway, RDMS
Simon Massey, MD
Robert N. Rohling, PhD
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2010
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie / Ausgabe 4/2010
Print ISSN: 0832-610X
Elektronische ISSN: 1496-8975
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-009-9252-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2010

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 4/2010 Zur Ausgabe

Review Article/Brief Review

Local anesthetic systemic toxicity

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.