Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 7/2013

01.07.2013 | Reports of Original Investigations

The catheter-over-needle assembly facilitates delivery of a second local anesthetic bolus to prolong supraclavicular brachial plexus block without time-consuming catheterization steps: a randomized controlled study

verfasst von: Vivian H. Y. Ip, MBChB, Ban C. H. Tsui, MD

Erschienen in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie | Ausgabe 7/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Single-shot delivery of a supraclavicular brachial plexus block is effective for providing outpatient surgical anesthesia; however, patients generally must use oral analgesics to control pain shortly after discharge from the hospital. Catheterized delivery of supraclavicular blocks can be challenging to perform. We aimed to show that administering a second postoperative bolus of local anesthetic through a catheter placed by a catheter-over-needle assembly not only avoids time-consuming steps but also provides an extended analgesic effect compared with the traditional single-shot approach.

Methods

Patients were randomized into two groups: one group received a single-shot supraclavicular block with 25-30 mL of local anesthetic (1.5% lidocaine and 0.125% bupivacaine mixture), while the other group received a supraclavicular block via a catheter-over-needle assembly with the same volume and concentration of local anesthetic as for the single-shot block, which was followed by a second bolus of analgesic solution (0.2 % ropivacaine 20 mL) administered postoperatively through the catheter before its removal. The duration between the initial bolus and onset of pain was measured as well as the duration of pain relief from the last bolus.

Results

Thirty patients were enrolled and randomized into the single-shot supraclavicular block group (n = 15) and the catheter-over-needle group (n = 15). One patient withdrew from the study, and five patients were lost to follow-up. We observed no significant difference between the two groups in time to perform the blocks. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) times were 3.1 (1.9) min and 4.4 (2.7) min for the top-up group and single-shot group, respectively (single-shot took 1.3 min longer than the catheter-over-needle group; 95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.65 to 3.25; P = 0.17). The mean (SD) duration of analgesia, measured from the beginning of the local anesthetic bolus to the onset of pain requiring rescue analgesia was 617.5 (288) min in the catheter-over-needle group and 377.2 (161.3) min in the single-shot control group (difference = 240.3 min; 95% CI: 46.8 to 433.8; P = 0.03).

Conclusions

Using the catheter-over-needle assembly for supraclavicular brachial plexus block facilitated effective delivery of a supplementary bolus of local anesthetic without extending the time to perform the block or increasing the number of steps. It also prolonged analgesia significantly compared with the single-shot approach. This trial was registered at: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT01522066.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Bridenbaugh LD. The upper extremity: somatic blockade. In: Cousins MJ, Bridenbaugh PO, editors. Neural Blockade in Clinical Anesthesia and Management of Pain. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1988. p. 387-416. Bridenbaugh LD. The upper extremity: somatic blockade. In: Cousins MJ, Bridenbaugh PO, editors. Neural Blockade in Clinical Anesthesia and Management of Pain. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1988. p. 387-416.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kapral S, Krafft P, Eibenberger K, Fitzgerald R, Gosch M, Weinstabl C. Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular approach for regional anesthesia of the brachial plexus. Anesth Analg 1994; 78: 507-13.PubMedCrossRef Kapral S, Krafft P, Eibenberger K, Fitzgerald R, Gosch M, Weinstabl C. Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular approach for regional anesthesia of the brachial plexus. Anesth Analg 1994; 78: 507-13.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Williams SR, Chouinard P, Arcand G, et al. Ultrasound guidance speeds execution and improves the quality of supraclavicular block. Anesth Analg 2003; 97: 1518-23.PubMedCrossRef Williams SR, Chouinard P, Arcand G, et al. Ultrasound guidance speeds execution and improves the quality of supraclavicular block. Anesth Analg 2003; 97: 1518-23.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Heil JW, Ilfeld BM, Loland VJ, Mariano ER. Preliminary experience with a novel ultrasound-guided supraclavicular perineural catheter insertion technique for perioperative analgesia of the upper extremity. J Ultrasound Med 2010; 29: 1481-5.PubMed Heil JW, Ilfeld BM, Loland VJ, Mariano ER. Preliminary experience with a novel ultrasound-guided supraclavicular perineural catheter insertion technique for perioperative analgesia of the upper extremity. J Ultrasound Med 2010; 29: 1481-5.PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Mariano ER, Sandhu NS, Loland VJ, et al. A randomized comparison of infraclavicular and supraclavicular continuous peripheral nerve blocks for postoperative analgesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2011; 36: 26-31.PubMedCrossRef Mariano ER, Sandhu NS, Loland VJ, et al. A randomized comparison of infraclavicular and supraclavicular continuous peripheral nerve blocks for postoperative analgesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2011; 36: 26-31.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Chawda PM, Sharma G. A clinical study comparing epinephrine 200 μg or clonidine 90 μg as adjuvants to local anaesthetic agent in brachial plexus block via supraclavicular approach. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2010; 26: 523-7.PubMed Chawda PM, Sharma G. A clinical study comparing epinephrine 200 μg or clonidine 90 μg as adjuvants to local anaesthetic agent in brachial plexus block via supraclavicular approach. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2010; 26: 523-7.PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Swami SS, Keniya VM, Ladi SD, Rao R. Comparison of dexmedetomidine and clonidine (alpha2 agonist drugs) as an adjuvant to local anaesthesia in supraclavicular brachial plexus block: a randomised double-blind prospective study. Indian J Anaesth 2012; 56: 243-9.PubMedCrossRef Swami SS, Keniya VM, Ladi SD, Rao R. Comparison of dexmedetomidine and clonidine (alpha2 agonist drugs) as an adjuvant to local anaesthesia in supraclavicular brachial plexus block: a randomised double-blind prospective study. Indian J Anaesth 2012; 56: 243-9.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Ip V, Bouliane M, Tsui B. Potential contamination of the surgical site caused by leakage from an interscalene catheter with the patient in a seated position: a case report. Can J Anesth 2012; 59: 1125-9.PubMedCrossRef Ip V, Bouliane M, Tsui B. Potential contamination of the surgical site caused by leakage from an interscalene catheter with the patient in a seated position: a case report. Can J Anesth 2012; 59: 1125-9.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsui BC, Tsui J. Less leakage and dislodgement with a catheter-over-needle versus a catheter-through-needle approach for peripheral nerve block: an ex vivo study. Can J Anesth 2012; 59: 655-61.PubMedCrossRef Tsui BC, Tsui J. Less leakage and dislodgement with a catheter-over-needle versus a catheter-through-needle approach for peripheral nerve block: an ex vivo study. Can J Anesth 2012; 59: 655-61.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Rivera AM, Strauss KW, van Zundert A, Mortier E. The history of peripheral intravenous catheters: how little plastic tubes revolutionized medicine. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg 2005; 56: 271-82.PubMed Rivera AM, Strauss KW, van Zundert A, Mortier E. The history of peripheral intravenous catheters: how little plastic tubes revolutionized medicine. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg 2005; 56: 271-82.PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Kulenkampff D. Brachial plexus anaesthesia: its indications, technique, and dangers. Ann Surg 1928; 87: 883-91.PubMedCrossRef Kulenkampff D. Brachial plexus anaesthesia: its indications, technique, and dangers. Ann Surg 1928; 87: 883-91.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu SS, Gordon MA, Shaw PM, Wilfred S, Shetty T, Yadeau JT. A prospective clinical registry of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia for ambulatory shoulder surgery. Anesth Analg 2010; 111: 617-23.PubMedCrossRef Liu SS, Gordon MA, Shaw PM, Wilfred S, Shetty T, Yadeau JT. A prospective clinical registry of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia for ambulatory shoulder surgery. Anesth Analg 2010; 111: 617-23.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Brown DL, Cahill DR, Bridenbaugh LD. Supraclavicular nerve block: anatomic analysis of a method to prevent pneumothorax. Anesth Analg 1993; 76: 530-4.PubMedCrossRef Brown DL, Cahill DR, Bridenbaugh LD. Supraclavicular nerve block: anatomic analysis of a method to prevent pneumothorax. Anesth Analg 1993; 76: 530-4.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Cornish PB. Supraclavicular regional anaesthesia revisited—the bent needle technique. Anaesth Intensive Care 2000; 28: 676-9.PubMed Cornish PB. Supraclavicular regional anaesthesia revisited—the bent needle technique. Anaesth Intensive Care 2000; 28: 676-9.PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Klaastad O, VadeBoncouer TR, Tillung T, Smedby O. An evaluation of the supraclavicular plumb-bob technique for brachial plexus block by magnetic resonance imaging. Anesth Analg 2003; 96: 862-7. Klaastad O, VadeBoncouer TR, Tillung T, Smedby O. An evaluation of the supraclavicular plumb-bob technique for brachial plexus block by magnetic resonance imaging. Anesth Analg 2003; 96: 862-7.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Neal JM, Gerancher JC, Hebl JR, et al. Upper extremity regional anesthesia: essentials of our current understanding, 2008. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2009; 34: 134-70.PubMedCrossRef Neal JM, Gerancher JC, Hebl JR, et al. Upper extremity regional anesthesia: essentials of our current understanding, 2008. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2009; 34: 134-70.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Jeng CL, Rosenblatt MA. Considerations when performing ultrasound-guided supraclavicular perineural catheter placement. J Ultrasound Med 2011; 30: 423-4. Jeng CL, Rosenblatt MA. Considerations when performing ultrasound-guided supraclavicular perineural catheter placement. J Ultrasound Med 2011; 30: 423-4.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kristman V, Manno M, Cote P. Loss to follow-up in cohort studies: how much is too much? Eur J Epidemiol 2004; 19: 751-60.PubMedCrossRef Kristman V, Manno M, Cote P. Loss to follow-up in cohort studies: how much is too much? Eur J Epidemiol 2004; 19: 751-60.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Little RJ, Rubin DB. Statistical Analysis of Missing Data. New York: Wiley; 1987. Little RJ, Rubin DB. Statistical Analysis of Missing Data. New York: Wiley; 1987.
Metadaten
Titel
The catheter-over-needle assembly facilitates delivery of a second local anesthetic bolus to prolong supraclavicular brachial plexus block without time-consuming catheterization steps: a randomized controlled study
verfasst von
Vivian H. Y. Ip, MBChB
Ban C. H. Tsui, MD
Publikationsdatum
01.07.2013
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie / Ausgabe 7/2013
Print ISSN: 0832-610X
Elektronische ISSN: 1496-8975
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-013-9951-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2013

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 7/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.