nach oben

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie

Erschienen in:

01.05.2014 | Review Article/Brief Review

Semi-invasive measurement of cardiac output based on pulse contour: a review and analysis

verfasst von: Thomas Schlöglhofer, BSc, Hermann Gilly, PhD, Heinrich Schima, PhD

Erschienen in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie | Ausgabe 5/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this review was to provide a meta-analysis of all five of the most popular systems for arterial pulse contour analysis compared with pulmonary artery thermodilution, the established reference method for measuring cardiac output (CO). The five investigated systems are FloTrac/Vigileo^®, PiCCO^®, LiDCO/PulseCO^®, PRAM/MostCare^®, and Modelflow.

Source

In a comprehensive literature search through MEDLINE^®, Web of Knowledge (v.5.11), and Google Scholar, we identified prospective studies and reviews that compared the pulse contour approach with the reference method (n = 316). Data extracted from the 93 selected studies included range and mean cardiac output, bias, percentage error, software versions, and study population. We performed a pooled weighted analysis of their precision in determining CO in various patient groups and clinical settings.

Principal findings

Results of the majority of studies indicate that the five investigated systems show acceptable accuracy during hemodynamically stable conditions. Forty-three studies provided adequate data for a pooled weighted analysis and resulted in a mean (SD) total pooled bias of −0.28 (1.25) L·min⁻¹, percentage error of 40%, and a correlation coefficient of r = 0.71. In hemodynamically unstable patients (n = 8), we found a higher percentage error (45%) and bias of −0.54 (1.64) L·min⁻¹.

Conclusion

During hemodynamic instability, CO measurement based on continuous arterial pulse contour analysis shows only limited agreement with intermittent bolus thermodilution. The calibrated systems seem to deliver more accurate measurements than the auto-calibrated or the non-calibrated systems. For reliable use of these semi-invasive systems, especially for critical therapeutic decisions during hemodynamic disorders, both a strategy for hemodynamic optimization and further technological improvements are necessary.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Hatib F, Roteliuk L, Pearce J (inventors). Pulse contour method and apparatus for continuous assessment of a cardiovascular parameter. International patent publication WO 2006/113337 A2, 2006 Oct. 26.

Roteliuk L (inventor). Arterial pressure-based automatic determination of a cardiovascular parameter. International patent publication WO2005/055825 A1, 2005 June 23.

LiDCO Ltd. User’s Manual LiDCO Rapid-Fluid management just got easier. http://www.lidcorapid.co.uk/pdfs/english-rapid-v1.04-user-manual.pdf (accessed February 2014).

Edwards. Lifesciences Inc. FloTrac System 3rd Generation Software. Available from URL: http://www.edwards.com/eu/products/mininvasive/Pages/flotrac3g.aspx (accessed February 2014).

Edwards. FloTrac Sensor. Available from URL: http://ht.edwards.com/scin/edwards/sitecollectionimages/products/mininvasive/flotracbrochurear05917.pdf (accessed February 2014).

Edwards Lifesciences Inc. EV1000 Clinical Platform 510(k) Summary. Available from URL: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf10/K100709.pdf (accessed February 2014).

Joeken S, Fahle M, Pfeiffer UJ (inventors). Devices for in-vivo determination of the compliance function and the systemic blood flow of a living being. US patent US 6315735 B1.

Band DM, Linton RA, O’Brien TK (inventors). Method and apparatus for the measurement of cardiac output. International patent publication WO 97/24982 A.

Band MS, Linton WM, Linton RA, O’Brien KT (inventors). Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Messen der Herzleistung. DE patent 697 23 847 T2. 2004 Jun. 03.

Romano S (inventor). Method and apparatus for measuring cardiac output. US patent US 6758822 B2.

Koo KK, Sun JC, Zhou Q, et al. Pulmonary artery catheters: evolving rates and reasons for use. Crit Care Med 2011; 39: 1613-8.PubMed

Sandham JD, Hull RD, Brant RF, et al. Canadian Critical Care Clinical Trials Group: a randomized, controlled trial of the use of pulmonary-artery catheters in high-risk surgical patients. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 5-14.PubMed

Evans DC, Doraiswamy VA, Prosciak MP, et al. Complications associated with pulmonary artery catheters: a comprehensive clinical review. Scand J Surg 2009; 98: 199-208.PubMed

Connors AF, Speroff T, Dawson NV, et al. The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients. JAMA 1996; 276: 889-97.PubMed

Schwann NM, Hillel Z, Hoeft A, et al. Lack of effectiveness of the pulmonary artery catheter in cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 2011; 113: 994-1002.PubMed

Rajaram SS, Desai NK, Kalra A, et al. Pulmonary artery catheters for adult patients in intensive care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 2: CD003408.

Balk E, Raman G, Chung M, et al. Evaluation of the evidence on benefits and harmfulness of pulmonary artery catheter use in critical care settings. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2008. Available from URL: http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Coverage/DeterminationProcess/downloads/id55TA.pdf (accessed 26 November 2013).

Benington S, Ferris P, Nirmalanc M. Emerging trends in minimally invasive haemodynamic monitoring and optimization of fluid therapy. Eur J Anaesth 2009; 26: 893-905.

Campos MML, Sellés FA, de Vera GG, et al. Techniques available for hemodynamic monitoring. Advantages and limitations. Med Intensiva 2012; 36: 434-44.

10.

Drummond KE, Murphy M. Minimally invasive cardiac output monitors. Continuing Education in Anaesthesia, Crit Care Pain 2012; 12: 5-10.

11.

Litton E, Morgan M. The PiCCO Monitor: a review. Anaesth Intensive Care 2012; 40: 393-409.PubMed

12.

Frank O. Die Grundform des arteriellen Pulses. Erste Abhandlung. Mathematische Analyse. Zeitschrift für Biologie 1899; 37: 485-526.

13.

Erlanger J, Hooker DR. An experimental study of blood pressure and of pulse pressure in man. John Hopkins Hospital Records 1904; 12: 145-378.

14.

Rhodes A, Sunderland R. Arterial pulse power analysis: the LiDCO™ plus system. In: Pinsky MR, Payen D, editors. Functional Hemodynamic Monitoring-Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 42. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2005. p. 183-92.

15.

Maus TM, Lee DE. Arterial pressure-based cardiac output assessment. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2008; 22: 468-73.PubMed

16.

Romagnoli S, Romano SM, Bevilacqua S, et al. Dynamic response of liquid-filled catheter systems for measurement of blood pressure: precision of measurements and reliability of the pressure recording analytical method with different disposable systems. J Crit Care 2011; 26: 415-22.PubMed

17.

Thiele RH, Durieux ME. Arterial waveform analysis for the anesthesiologist: past, present, and future concepts. Anesth Analg 2011; 113: 766-76.PubMed

18.

Alhashemi JA, Cecconi M, Hofer CK. Cardiac output monitoring: an integrative perspective. Crit Care 2011; 15: 214.PubMedCentralPubMed

19.

Morgan P, Al-Subaie N, Rhodes A. Minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring. Curr Opin Crit Care 2008; 14: 322-6.PubMed

20.

Funk DJ, Moretti EW, Gan TJ. Minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring in the perioperative setting. Anesth Analg 2009; 108: 887-97.PubMed

21.

de Wilde RBP, Schreuder JJ, van den Berg PC, Jansen JR. An evaluation of cardiac output by five arterial pulse contour techniques during cardiac surgery. Anaesthesia 2007; 62: 760-8.PubMed

22.

Mayer J, Boldt J, Poland R, et al. A continuous arterial pressure waveform-based cardiac output using the FloTrac/Vigileo: a review and meta-analysis. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2009; 23: 401-6.PubMed

23.

Peyton PJ, Chong SW. Minimally invasive measurement of cardiac output during surgery and critical care: a meta-analysis of accuracy and precision. Anesthesiology 2010; 113: 1220-35.PubMed

24.

Camporota L, Beale R. Pitfalls in haemodynamic monitoring based on the arterial pressure waveform. Crit Care 2010; 14: 124.PubMedCentralPubMed

25.

Marik PE. Noninvasive Cardiac Output Monitors: a State-of the-Art Review. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2013; 27: 121-34.PubMed

26.

Montenij LJ, de Waal EE, Buhre WF. Arterial waveform analysis in anesthesia and critical care. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2011; 24: 651-6.PubMed

27.

Stover JF, Stocker R, Lenherr R, et al. Noninvasive cardiac output and blood pressure monitoring cannot replace an invasive monitoring system in critically ill patients. BMC Anesthesiol 2009; 9: 6.PubMedCentralPubMed

28.

Bogert LW, Wesseling KH, Schraa O, et al. Pulse contour cardiac output derived from non-invasive arterial pressure in cardiovascular disease. Anaesthesia 2010; 65: 1119-25.PubMed

29.

Hohn A, Defosse JM, Becker S, Steffen C, Wappler F, Sakka SG. Non-invasive continuous arterial pressure monitoring with Nexfin^® does not sufficiently replace invasive measurements in critically ill patients. Br J Anaesth 2013; 111: 178-84.PubMed

30.

Critchley LA, Critchley JA. A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit Comput 1999; 15: 85-91.PubMed

31.

Hunter JE, Schmidt FL. Methods of Meta-analysis: correcting error and Bias in Research Findings. 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 2004: 89.

32.

Gruenewald M, Renner J, Meybohm P, Hocker J, Scholz J, Bein B. Reliability of continuous cardiac output measurement during intra-abdominal hypertension relies on repeated calibrations: an experimental animal study. Critical Care 2008; 12: R132.PubMedCentralPubMed

33.

Gruenewald M, Meybohm P, Renner J, et al. Effect of norepinephrine dosage and calibration frequency on accuracy of pulse contour-derived cardiac output. Crit Care 2011; 15: R22.PubMedCentralPubMed

34.

Rodig G, Prasser C, Keyl C, Liebold A, Hobbhahn J. Continuous cardiac output measurement: pulse contour analysis vs TD technique in cardiac surgical patients. Br J Anaesth 1999; 82: 525-30.PubMed

35.

Godje O, Höke K, Goetz AE, et al. Reliability of a new algorithm for continuous cardiac output determination by pulse-contour analysis during hemodynamic instability. Crit Care Med 2002; 30: 52-8.PubMed

36.

Sujatha P, Mehta Y, Dhar A, Sarkar D, Meharwal ZS, Trehan N. Comparison of cardiac output in OPCAB: bolus thermodilution technique versus pulse contour analysis. Ann Card Anaesth 2006; 9: 44-8.PubMed

37.

McGee WT, Horswell JL, Calderon J, et al. Validation of a continuous, arterial pressure-based cardiac output measurement: a multicenter, prospective clinical trial. Crit Care 2007; 11: R105.PubMedCentralPubMed

38.

Zimmermann A, Kufner C, Hofbauer S, et al. The accuracy of the Vigileo/FloTrac continuous cardiac output monitor. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2008; 22: 388-93.PubMed

39.

Sander M, Spies CD, Grubitzsch H, Foer A, Muller M, von Heymann C. Comparison of uncalibrated arterial waveform analysis in cardiac surgery patients with thermodilution cardiac output measurements. Crit Care 2006; 10: R164.PubMedCentralPubMed

40.

Opdam HI, Wan L, Bellomo R. A pilot assessment of the FloTrac™ cardiac output monitoring system. Intensive Care Med 2007; 33: 344-9.PubMed

41.

Prasser C, Bele S, Keyl C, et al. Evaluation of a new pressure-based cardiac output device requiring no external calibration. BMC Anesthesiol 2007; 7: 9.PubMedCentralPubMed

42.

Cecconi M, Dawson D, Casaretti R, Grounds RM, Rhodes A. A prospective study of the accuracy and precision of continuous cardiac output monitoring devices as compared to intermittent thermodilution. Minerva Anestesiol 2010; 76: 1010-7.PubMed

43.

Manecke GR Jr, Auger WR. Cardiac output determination from the arterial pressure wave: clinical testing of a novel algorithm that does not require calibration. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2007; 21: 3-7.PubMed

44.

Breukers RM, Sepehrkhouv S, Spiegelenberg SR, Groeneveld J. Cardiac output measured by a new arterial pressure waveform analysis method without calibration compared with thermodilution after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2007; 21: 632-5.PubMed

45.

Senn A, Button D, Zollinger A, Hofer CK. Assessment of cardiac output changes using a modified FloTrac/Vigileo™ algorithm in cardiac surgery patients. Crit Care 2009; 13: R32.l.

46.

Chakravarthy M, Jayaprakash K, Kalligudd P, Prabhakumar D, Jawali V. Comparison of simultaneous estimation of cardiac output by four techniques in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery—a prospective observational study. Ann Card Anaesth 2007; 10: 121-6.PubMed

47.

Button D, Weibel L, Reutehbuch O, Genoni M, Zollinger A, Hofer CK. Clinical evaluation of the FloTrac/Vigileo™ system and two established continuous cardiac output monitoring devices in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 2007; 99: 329-36.PubMed

48.

Mehta Y, Kumar R, Sawhney R, Bhise M, Singh A, Trehan N. Cardiac output monitoring: comparison of a new arterial pressure waveform analysis to the bolus thermodilution technique in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2008; 22: 394-9.PubMed

49.

Prasser C, Trabold B, Schwab A, Keyl C, Ziegler S, Wiesenack C. Evaluation of an improved algorithm for arterial pressure-based cardiac output assessment without external calibration. Intensive Care Med 2007; 33: 2223-5.PubMed

50.

Della Rocca G, Costa MG, Chiarandini P, et al. Arterial pulse cardiac output agreement with thermodilution in patients in hyperdynamic conditions. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2008; 22: 681-7.

51.

De Backer D, Marx G, Tan A, et al. Arterial pressure-based cardiac output monitoring: a multicenter validation of the third-generation software in septic patients. Intensive Care Med 2011; 37: 233-40.PubMedCentralPubMed

52.

Zimmermann A, Steinwendner J, Hofbauer S, et al. The accuracy of the Vigileo/FloTrac system has been improved-follow-up after a software update: a blinded comparative study of 30 cardiosurgical patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2009; 23: 929-31.PubMed

53.

Cannesson M, Attof Y, Rosamel P, Joseph P, Bastien O, Lehot JJ. Comparison of FloTrac™ cardiac output monitoring system in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with pulmonary artery cardiac output measurements. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2007; 24: 832-9.PubMed

54.

Staier K, Wiesenack C, Günkel L, Keyl C. Cardiac output determination by thermodilution and arterial pulse waveform analysis in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement. Can J Anesth 2008; 55: 22-8.PubMed

55.

Hofer CK, Button D, Weibel L, Genoni M, Zollinger A. Uncalibrated radial and femoral arterial pressure waveform analysis for continuous cardiac output measurement: an evaluation in cardiac surgery patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2010; 24: 257-64.PubMed

56.

Vetrugno L, Costa MG, Spagnesi L, et al. Uncalibrated arterial pulse cardiac output measurements in patients with moderately abnormal left ventricular function. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2011; 25: 53-8.PubMed

57.

Maxeiner H, Wenzel S, Weigand MA, Mueller M. Cardiac output measured by FloTrac/Vigileo system: does the “plug and play” principle work? Applied Cardiopulmonary Pathophysiology 2010; 14: 131-8.

58.

Biais M, Nouette-Gaulain K, Cottenceau V, et al. Cardiac output measurement in patients undergoing liver transplantation: pulmonary artery catheter versus uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis. Anesth Analg 2008; 106: 1480-6.PubMed

59.

Slagt C, Beute J, Hoeksema M, Malagon I, Mulder JW, Groeneveld JA. Cardiac output derived from arterial pressure waveform analysis without calibration vs. thermodilution in septic shock: evolving accuracy of software versions. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010; 27: 550-4.PubMed

60.

Schramm S, Albrecht E, Frascarolo P, Chassot PG, Spahn DR. Validity of an arterial pressure waveform analysis device: does the puncture site play a role in the agreement with intermittent pulmonary artery catheter TD measurements? J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2010; 24: 250-6.PubMed

61.

Saraceni E, Rossi S, Persona P, et al. Comparison of two methods for cardiac output measurement in critically ill patients. Br J Anaesth 2011; 106: 690-4.PubMed

62.

Biancofiore G, Critchley LA, Lee A, et al. Evaluation of an uncalibrated arterial pulse contour cardiac output monitoring system in cirrhotic patients undergoing liver surgery. Br J Anaesth 2009; 102: 47-54.PubMed

63.

Krejci V, Vannucci A, Abbas A, Chapman W, Kangrga IM. Comparison of calibrated and uncalibrated arterial pressure-based cardiac output monitors during orthotopic liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2010; 16: 773-82.PubMed

64.

Junttila EK, Koskenkari JK, Ohtonen PP, Ala-Kokko TI. Uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis for cardiac output monitoring is biased by low peripheral resistance in patients with intracranial haemorrhage. Br J Anaesth 2011; 107: 581-6.PubMed

65.

Tsai YF, Su BC, Lin CC, Liu FC, Lee WC, Yu HP. Cardiac Output derived from arterial pressure waveform analysis: validation of the third-generation software in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation. Transplant Pro 2012; 44: 433-7.

66.

Biancofiore G, Critchley LA, Lee A, et al. Evaluation of a new software version of the FloTrac/Vigileo (Version 3.02) and a comparison with previous data in cirrhotic patients undergoing liver transplant surgery. Anesth Analg 2011; 113: 515-22.PubMed

67.

Slagt C, de Leeuw MA, Beute J, et al. Cardiac output measured by uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis by recently released software version 3.02 versus thermodilution in septic shock. J Clin Monit Comput 2013; 27: 171-7.PubMed

68.

Vasdev S, Chauhan S, Choudhury M, Hote MP, Malik M, Kiran U. Arterial pressure waveform derived cardiac output FloTrac/Vigileo system (third generation software): comparison of two monitoring sites with the thermodilution cardiac output. J Clin Monit Comput 2012; 26: 115-20.PubMed

69.

Akiyoshi K, Kandabashi T, Kaji J, et al. Accuracy of arterial pressure waveform analysis for cardiac output measurement in comparison with thermodilution methods in patients undergoing living donor liver transplantation. J Anesth 2011; 25: 178-83.PubMed

70.

Eleftheriadis S, Galatoudis Z, Didilis V, et al. Variations in arterial blood pressure are associated with parallel changes in FlowTrac/Vigileo^®-derived cardiac output measurements: a prospective comparison study. Crit Care 2009; 13: R179.PubMedCentralPubMed

71.

Hadian M, Kim HK, Severyn DA, Pinsky MR. Cross-comparison of cardiac output trending accuracy of LiDCO, PiCCO, FloTrac and pulmonary artery catheters. Crit Care 2010; 14: R212.PubMedCentralPubMed

72.

Buhre W, Weyland A, Kazmaier S, Hanekop, et al. Comparison of cardiac output assessed by pulse-contour analysis and TD in patients undergoing minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1999; 13: 437-40.

73.

Zollner C, Haller M, Weis M, et al. Beat-to-beat measurement of cardiac output by intravascular pulse contour analysis: a prospective criterion standard study in patients after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesthesia 2000; 14: 125-9.

74.

Hamzaoui O, Monnet X, Richard C, Osman D, Chemla D, Teboul JL. Effects of changes in vascular tone on the agreement between pulse contour and transpulmonary TD cardiac output measurements within an up to 6-hour calibration-free period. Crit Care Med 2008; 36: 434-40.PubMed

75.

Bein B, Meybohm P, Cavus E, et al. The reliability of pulse contour-derived cardiac output during hemorrhage and after vasopressor administration. Anesth Analg 2007; 105: 107-13.PubMed

76.

Staier K, Wilhelm M, Wiesenack Ch, et al. Pulmonary artery vs. transpulmonary thermodilution for the assessment of cardiac output in mitral regurgitation: a prospective observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2012; 29: 431-7.PubMed

77.

Tzenkov IG, Velasco DA, Perez Pena JM, Olmedilla Arnal L, Garutti Martınez I, Sanz Fernandez J. Cardiac output by femoral arterial thermodilution-calibrated pulse contour analysis during liver transplantation: comparison with pulmonary artery thermodilution. Transplant Proc 2003; 35: 1920-2.

78.

Wouters PF, Quaghebeur B, Sergeant P, Van Hemelrijck J, Vandermeersch E. Cardiac output monitoring using a brachial arterial catheter during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2005; 2: 160-4.

79.

Rauch H, Müller M, Fleischer F, Bauer H, Martin E, Bottiger BW. Pulse contour analysis versus thermodilution in cardiac output surgery patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2002; 46: 424-9.PubMed

80.

Mielck F, Buhre W, Hanekop G, Tirilomis T, Hilgers R, Sonntag H. Comparison of continuous cardiac output measurements in patients after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2003; 17: 211-6.PubMed

81.

Halvorsen PS, Sokolov A, Cvancarova M, Hol PK, Lundblad R, Tonnessen TI. Continuous cardiac output during off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: pulse contour analysis vs pulmonary artery thermodilution. Br J Anaesth 2007; 99: 484-92.PubMed

82.

Sander M, von Heymann C, Foer A, et al. Pulse contour analysis after normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass in cardiac surgery patients. Crit Care 2005; 9: R729.PubMedCentralPubMed

83.

Ostergard M, Nielsen J, Rasmussen JP, Berthelsen PG. Cardiac output – pulse contour analysis vs. pulmonary artery thermodilution. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2006; 50: 1044-9.

84.

Della Rocca G, Costa MG, Coccia C, et al. Cardiac output monitoring: aortic transpulmonary thermodilution and pulse contour analysis agree with standard thermodilution methods in patients undergoing lung transplantation. Can J Anesth 2003; 50: 707-11.

85.

Yamashita K, Nishiyama T, Yokoyama T, Abe H, Manabe M. The effects of vasodilation on cardiac output measured by PiCCO. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2008; 22: 688-92.PubMed

86.

Della Rocca G, Costa MG, Pompei L, Coccia C, Pietropaoli P. Continuous and intermittent cardiac output measurement: pulmonary artery catheter versus aortic transpulmonary technique. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88: 350-6.

87.

Irlbeck M, Forst H, Briegel J, Haller M, Peter K. Continuous measurement of cardiac output with pulse contour analysis. Anaesthesist 1995; 44: 493-500.PubMed

88.

Felbinger TW, Reuter DA, Eltzschig HK, Moerstedt K, Goedje O, Goetz AE. Comparison of pulmonary arterial TD and arterial pulse contour analysis: evaluation of a new algorithm. J Clin Anesth 2002; 14: 296-301.PubMed

89.

Goedje O, Hoeke K, Lichtwarck-Aschoff M, Faltchauser A, Lamm P, Reichart B. Continuous cardiac output by femoral arterial thermodilution calibrated pulse contour analysis: comparison with pulmonary arterial thermodilution. Crit Care Med 1999; 27: 2407-12.PubMed

90.

Linton R, Band D, O’Brien T, Jonas M, Leach R. Lithium dilution cardiac output measurement: a comparison with TD. Crit Care Med 1997; 25: 1796-800.PubMed

91.

Garcia-Rodriquez C, Pittman J, Cassell C, et al. Lithium dilution cardiac output measurement: a clinical assessment of central venous and peripheral venous indicator injection. Crit Care Med 2002; 30: 2199-204.

92.

Hamilton TT, Huber LM, Jessen ME. PulseCO: a less-invasive method to monitor cardiac output from arterial pressure after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 74: 1408-12.

93.

Mora B, Ince I, Birkenberg B, et al. Validation of cardiac output measurement with the LiDCO^TM pulse contour system in patients with impaired left ventricular function after cardiac surgery. Anaesthesia 2011; 66: 675-81.PubMed

94.

Costa MG, Della Rocca G, Chiarandini P, et al. Continuous and intermittent cardiac output measurement in hyperdynamic conditions: pulmonary artery catheter vs. lithium dilution technique. Intensive Care Med 2008; 34: 257-63.

95.

Dyer RA, Piercy JL, Reed AR, et al. Comparison between pulse waveform analysis and thermodilution cardiac output determination in patients with severe pre-eclampsia. Br J Anaesth 2011; 106: 77-81.PubMed

96.

Missant C, Rex S, Wouters PF. Accuracy of cardiac output measurements with pulse contour analysis (PulseCO^TM) and Doppler echocardiography during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2008; 25: 243-8.PubMed

97.

Yamashita K, Nishiyama T, Yokoyama T, Abe H, Manabe M. Cardiac output by PulseCO is not interchangeable with thermodilution in patients undergoing OPCAB. Can J Anesth 2005; 52: 530-4.PubMed

98.

Nissen P, Van Lieshout JJ, Novovic S, Bundgaard-Nielsen M, Secher NH. Techniques of cardiac output measurement during liver transplantation: arterial pulse wave versus thermodilution. Liver Transpl 2009; 15: 287-91.PubMed

99.

Jansen JRC, Schreuder JJ, Mulier JP, Smith NT, Settels JJ, Wesseling KH. A comparison of cardiac output derived from the arterial pressure wave against thermodilution in cardiac surgery patients. Br J Anaesth 2001; 87: 212-22.PubMed

100.

Wesseling KH, Jansen JRC, Settels JJ, Schreuder JJ. Computation of aortic flow from pressure in humans using a nonlinear, three-element model. J Appl Physiol 1993; 74: 2566-73.PubMed

101.

Jellema WT, Wesseling KH, Groeneveld AB, Stoutenbeek CP, Thijs LG, van Lieshout JJ. Continuous cardiac output in septic shock by simulating a model of the aortic input impedance. Anesthesiology 1999; 90: 1317-28.PubMed

102.

de Vaal HB, de Wilde RB, van den Berg PC, Schreuder JJ, Jansen JR. Less invasive determination of cardiac output from the arterial pressure by aortic diameter-calibrated pulse contour. Br J Anaesth 2005; 95: 326-31.PubMed

103.

Hirschl MM, Kittler H, Woisetschlager C, et al. Simultaneous comparison of thoracic bioimpedance and arterial pulse waveform-derived cardiac output with thermodilution measurement. Crit Care Med 2000; 28: 1798-802.PubMed

104.

Romano SM, Pistolesi M. Assessment of cardiac output from systemic arterial pressure in humans. Crit Care Med 2002; 30: 1834-41.PubMed

105.

Romano SM, Conti AA, Giglioli C, et al. Blood flow assessment by arterial pressure wave without external calibration. Computers in Cardiology 2006; 33: 293-6.

106.

Giomarelli P, Biagioli B, Scolletta S. Cardiac output monitoring by pressure recording analytical method in cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004; 26: 515-20.PubMed

107.

Romano SM, Scolletta S, Olivotto I, et al. Systemic arterial waveform analysis and assessment of blood flow during extracorporeal circulation. Perfusion 2006; 21: 109-16.PubMed

108.

Zangrillo A, Maj G, Monaco F, et al. Cardiac index validation using the pressure recording analytic method in unstable patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2010; 24: 265-9.PubMed

109.

Scolletta S, Franchi F, Taccone FS, Donadello K, Biagioli B, Vincent JL. An uncalibrated pulse contour method to measure cardiac output during aortic counterpulsation. Anesth Analg 2011; 113: 1389-95.PubMed

110.

Franchi F, Silvestri R, Cubattoli L, et al. Comparison between an uncalibrated pulse contour method and thermodilution technique for cardiac output estimation in septic patients. Br J Anaesth 2011; 107: 202-8.PubMed

111.

Paarmann H, Groesdonk HW, Sedemund-Adib B, Hanke T, Heinze H, Heringlake M. Lack of agreement between pulmonary arterial thermodilution cardiac output and the pressure recording analytical method in postoperative cardiac surgery patients. Br J Anaesth 2011; 106: 475-81.PubMed

112.

Maj G, Monaco F, Landoni G, et al. Cardiac index assessment by the pressure recording analytic method in unstable patients with atrial fibrillation. J Cardiothorac Anesth 2011; 25: 476-80.

113.

Belda FJ, Aguilar G, Teboul JL, et al. Complications related to less-invasive haemodynamic monitoring. Br J Anaesth 2011; 106: 482-6.PubMed

114.

Reuter DA, Huang C, Edrich T, Shernan SK, Eltzschig HK. Cardiac output monitoring using indicator-dilution techniques: basics, limits, and perspectives. Anesth Analg 2010; 110: 799-811.PubMed

115.

Richard C, Monnet X, Teboul JL. Pulmonary artery catheter monitoring in 2011. Current Opinion in Critical Care 2011; 17: 296-302.PubMed

116.

van Grondelle A, Ditchey RV, Groves BM, Wagner WW, Reeves JT. Thermodilution method overestimates low cardiac output in humans. Am J Physiol 1983; 245: H690-2.PubMed

117.

Nishikawa T, Dohi S. Errors in the measurement of cardiac output by thermodilution. Can J Anaesth 1993; 40: 142-53.PubMed

118.

Jansen JR, Schreuder JJ, Bogaard JM, van Rooyen W, Versprille A. The thermodilution technique for measurement of cardiac output during artificial ventilation. J Appl Physiol 1981; 51: 584-91.PubMed

119.

Bazaral MG, Petre J, Novoa R. Errors in TD cardiac output measurements caused by rapid pulmonary artery temperature decreases after cardiopulmonary bypass. Anesthesiology 1992; 77: 31-7.PubMed

120.

Jansen JR, Schreuder JJ, Punt KD, van den Berg PC, Alfieri O. Mean cardiac output by thermodilution with a single controlled injection. Crit Care Med 2001; 29: 1868-73.PubMed

121.

Nilsson LB, Nilsson JC, Skovgaard LT, Berthelsen PG. Thermodilution cardiac output — are three injections enough? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2004; 48: 1322-7.PubMed

122.

Yang X-X, Critchley LA, Joynt GM. Determination of the precision error of the pulmonary artery thermodilution catheter using an in vitro continuous flow test rig. Anesth Analg 2011; 112: 70-7.PubMed

123.

Marque S, Gros A, Chimot L, et al. Cardiac output monitoring in septic shock: evaluation of the third-generation Flotrac-Vigileo. J Clin Monit Comput 2013; 27: 273-9.PubMed

124.

Cecconi M, Rhodes A, Poloniecki J, Della Rocca G, Grounds RM. Bench-to-bedside review: the importance of the precision of the reference technique in method comparison studies—with specific reference to the measurement of cardiac output. Crit Care 2009; 13: 201.PubMedCentralPubMed

125.

Hamilton C, Stamey J. Using Bland Altman to assess agreement between two medical devices! J Clin Monit Comput 2007; 21: 331-3.PubMed

126.

Hamm JB, Nguyen BV, Kiss G, et al. Assessment of a cardiac output device using arterial pulse waveform analysis, Vigileo, in cardiac surgery compared to pulmonary arterial TD. Anaesth Intensive Care 2010; 38: 295-301.PubMed

127.

Jeong YB, Kim TH, Roh YJ, Choi IC, Suh JH. Comparison of uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis with continuous thermodilution cardiac output measurements in patients undergoing elective off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2010; 5: 767-71.

128.

Haenggi M, Barthelmes D, Ulmer H, Takala J, Jakob SM. Comparison of non-calibrated pulse-contour analysis with continuous thermodilution for cardiac output assessment in patients with induced hypothermia after cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2011; 82: 423-6.PubMed

129.

Jo YY, Song JW, Yoo YC, Park JY, Shim JK, Kwak YL. The uncalibrated pulse contour cardiac output during offpump coronary bypass surgery: performance in patients with a low cardiac output status and a reduced left ventricular function. Korean J Anesthesiol 2011; 60: 237-43.PubMedCentralPubMed

130.

Su BC, Tsai YF, Chen CY, et al. Cardiac output derived from arterial pressure waveform analysis in patients undergoing liver transplantation: validity of a third-generation device. Transplant Proc 2012; 44: 424-8.PubMed

131.

Monnet X, Anguel N, Jozwiak M, Richard C, Teboul JL. Third-generation FloTrac/Vigileo does not reliably track changes in cardiac output induced by norepinephrine in critically ill patients. Br J Anaesth 2012; 108: 615-22.PubMed

132.

Metzelder S, Coburn M, Fries M, Reinges et al. Performance of cardiac output measurement derived from arterial pressure waveform analysis in patients requiring high-dose vasopressor therapy. Br J Anaesth 2011; 106: 776-84.

133.

Monnet X, Anguel N, Naudin B, Jabot J, Richard C, Teboul JL. Arterial pressure-based cardiac output in septic patients: different accuracy of pulse contour and uncalibrated pressure waveform devices. Crit Care 2010; 14: R109.PubMedCentralPubMed

134.

Chatti R, de Rudniki S, Marque S, et al. Comparison of two versions of the Vigileo-FloTrac system (1.03 and 1.07) for stroke volume estimation: a multicentre, blinded comparison with oesophageal Doppler measurements. Br J Anaesth 2009; 102: 463-9.PubMed

135.

Broch O, Renner J, Hocker J, et al. Uncalibrated pulse power analysis fails to reliably measure cardiac output in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Crit Care 2011; 15: R76.PubMedCentralPubMed

136.

McCoy JV, Hollenberg SM, Dellinger RB, et al. Continuous cardiac index monitoring: a prospective observational study of agreement between a pulmonary artery catheter and a calibrated minimally invasive technique. Resuscitation 2009; 80: 893-7.PubMed

137.

Reisner AT, Xu D, Ryan KL, Convertino VA, Rickards CA, Mukkamala R. Monitoring non-invasive cardiac output and stroke volume during experimental human hypovolaemia and resuscitation. Br J Anaesth 2011; 106: 23-30.PubMedCentralPubMed

138.

Singh S, Taylor MA. Con: the FloTrac device should not be used to follow cardiac output in cardiac surgical patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2010; 4: 709-11.

139.

Ambrisko TD, Coppens P, Kabes R, Moens Y. Lithium dilution, pulse power analysis, and continuous thermodilution cardiac output measurements compared with bolus thermodilution in anaesthetized ponies. Br J Anaesth 2012; 109: 864-9.PubMed

140.

Ambrisko TD, Kabes R, Moens Y. Influence of drugs on the response characteristics of the LiDCO sensor: an in vitro study. Br J Anaesth 2013; 110: 305-10.PubMed

141.

Critchley LA, Lee A, Ho A. A critical review of the ability of continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output. Anesth Analg 2010; 111: 1180-92.PubMed

142.

Suehiro K, Tanaka K, Funao T, et al. Systemic vascular resistance has an impact on the reliability of the Vigileo-FloTrac system in measuring cardiac output and tracking cardiac output changes. Br J Anaesth 2013; 111: 170-7.PubMed

143.

Chikhani M, Moppett IK. Minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring: what evidence do we need? Br J Anaesth 2011; 106: 451-3.PubMed

144.

Geerts B, de Wilde R, Aarts L, Jansen J. Pulse contour analysis to assess hemodynamic response to passive leg raising. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2011; 25: 48-52.PubMed

145.

Squara P, Cecconi M, Rhodes M, Singer M, Chiche JD. Tracking changes in cardiac output: methodological considerations for the validation of monitoring devices. Intensive Care Med 2009; 35: 1801-8.PubMed

146.

Critchley LA, Yang XX, Lee A. Assessment of trending ability of cardiac output monitors by polar plot methodology. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2011; 25: 536-46.PubMed

147.

Critchley LA. Self-calibrating pulse contour cardiac output: do validation studies really show its clinical reliability? Crit Care 2009; 13: 123.PubMedCentralPubMed

148.

Maquire S, Rinehart J, Vakharia S, Cannesson M. Respiratory variation in pulse pressure and plethysmographic waveform: intraoperative applicability in a North American academic center. Anesth Analg 2011; 112: 94-6.

149.

Hamilton MA, Cecconi M, Rhodes A. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of preemptive hemodynamic intervention to improve postoperative outcomes in moderate and high-risk surgical patients. Anesth Analg 2011; 112: 1392-402.PubMed

150.

Scheeren TW, Wiesenack C, Gerlach H, Marx G. Goal-directed intraoperative fluid therapy guided by stroke volume and its variation in high-risk surgical patients: a prospective randomized multicentre. J Clin Monit Comput 2013; 27: 225-33.PubMed

151.

Pearse R, Dawson D, Fawcett J, Rhodes A, Grounds RM, Bennett ED. Early goal-directed therapy after major surgery reduces complications and duration of hospital stay. A randomised, controlled trial [ISRCTN38797445]. Crit Care 2005; 9: R687-93.PubMedCentralPubMed

152.

Mayer J, Boldt J, Mengistu AM, Rohm KD, Suttner S. Goal-directed intraoperative therapy based on autocalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis reduces hospital stay in high-risk surgical patients: a randomized, controlled trial. Crit Care 2010; 14: R18.PubMedCentralPubMed

153.

Manecke GR. Edwards FloTrac^® sensor and Vigileo^® monitor: easy, accurate, reliable cardiac output assessment using the arterial pulse wave. Expert Rev Med Devices 2005; 2: 523-7.PubMed

154.

Boulain T, Achard JM, Teboul JL, Richard C, Perrotin D, Ginies G. Changes in BP induced by passive leg raising predict response to fluid loading in critically ill patients. Chest 2002; 121: 1245-52.PubMed

155.

Cecconi M, Wilson J, Rhodes A. Pulse pressure analysis. In: Vincent JL, editor. I Yearbook of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer; 2006. p. 176-83.

156.

Langewouters GJ, Wesseling KH, Goedhard WJ. The pressure dependent dynamic elasticity of 35 thoracic and 16 abdominal human aortas in vitro described by a five component model. J Biomech 1985; 18: 613-20.PubMed

157.

Wesseling KH, Smith NT, Nichols WW, Weber H, de Wit B, Beneken JE. Beat-to-beat cardiac output from the arterial pressure pulse contour. In: Feldman SA, Leigh JM, Spierdijk J, editors. Measurement in Anaesthesia. Leiden: Leiden University Press; 1974: 148-64.

158.

Wesseling KH, de Wit B, Smith NT. A simple device for the continuous measurement of cardiac output. Adv Cardiovasc Phys 1983; 5: 16-52.

159.

Jansen JR, van den Berg PC. Cardiac Output by thermodilution and arterial pulse contour techniques. In: Pinsky MR, Payen D, editors. Functional Hemodynamic Monitoring-Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 42. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2005: 135-52.

160.

Jonas MM, Tanser SJ. Lithium dilution measurement of cardiac output and arterial pulse waveform analysis: an indicator dilution calibrated beat-by-beat system for continuous estimation of cardiac output. Curr Opin Crit Care 2002; 8: 257-61.PubMed

161.

Jonas MM, Hett D, Morgan J. Real time, continuous monitoring of cardiac output and oxygen delivery. Int J Intensive Care 2002; 9: 1-6.

162.

Langewouters GJ, Wesseling KH, Goedhard WJ. The static elastic properties of 45 human thoracic and 20 abdominal aortas in vitro and the parameters of a new model. Journal Biomech 1984; 17: 425-35.

163.

Bogert LWJ, Lieshout JJ. Non-invasive pulsatile arterial pressure and stroke volume changes from the human finger. Exp Physiol 2005; 90: 437-46.PubMed

164.

Messiah A. Change of representation and perturbation treatment of a part of the Hamiltonian. In: Messiah A (Ed). Quantum Mechanics. Amsterdam: North Holland Physics Publishing; 1985; 2: 722-60.

165.

Scolletta S, Romano SM, Biagioli B, Capannini G, Giomarelli P. Pressure recording analytical method (PRAM) for measurement of cardiac output during various haemodynamic states. Br J Anaesth 2005; 95: 159-65.PubMed

Titel: Semi-invasive measurement of cardiac output based on pulse contour: a review and analysis
verfasst von: Thomas Schlöglhofer, BSc
Hermann Gilly, PhD
Heinrich Schima, PhD
Publikationsdatum: 01.05.2014
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie / Ausgabe 5/2014
Print ISSN: 0832-610X
Elektronische ISSN: 1496-8975
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-014-0135-8

Neu im Fachgebiet AINS

18.04.2024 | Wirbelsäulenmetastase | Nachrichten

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

hier abonnieren

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Semi-invasive measurement of cardiac output based on pulse contour: a review and analysis

Abstract

Purpose

Source

Principal findings

Conclusion

Neu im Fachgebiet AINS

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

Hochrisiko-Eingriffe für postoperative Übelkeit

Diclofenac-Gel versus Ibuprofen bei akuten Rückenschmerzen

Update AINS

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Source

Principal findings

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2014

Successful one-stage extraction of an intracardiac and intravenous leiomyoma through the right atrium under transesophageal ultrasound monitoring

A styletted tracheal tube with a posterior-facing bevel reduces epistaxis during nasal intubation: a randomized trial

Perioperative management of an IgA-deficient recipient of a double-lung transplant

Finding the sweet spot in preoperative assessment

From the Journal archives: Early clinical experience with a new video laryngoscope

Cesarean delivery under general anesthesia: Continuing Professional Development

Neu im Fachgebiet AINS

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

Hochrisiko-Eingriffe für postoperative Übelkeit

Diclofenac-Gel versus Ibuprofen bei akuten Rückenschmerzen

Update AINS