Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Indian Journal of Gastroenterology 2/2019

04.03.2019 | Original Article

Comparison of various prognostic scores in variceal and non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A prospective cohort study

verfasst von: Gyanranjan Rout, Sanchit Sharma, Deepak Gunjan, Saurabh Kedia, Baibaswata Nayak, Shalimar

Erschienen in: Indian Journal of Gastroenterology | Ausgabe 2/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background and Aims

Various prognostic scores like Glasgow–Blatchford bleeding score (GBS), modified Glasgow–Blatchford bleeding score (mGBS), full Rockall score (FRS) including endoscopic findings, clinical Rockall score (CRS), and albumin, international normalized ratio (INR), mental status, systolic blood pressure, age >65 (AIMS65) are used for risk stratification in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). The utility of these scores in variceal UGIB (VUGIB) is not well defined. In this prospective study, we aimed to assess the performance of these scores in patients with non-variceal (NVUGIB) and VUGIB.

Methods

We included 1011 patients (during March 2017 and August 2018) including 439 with NVUGIB and 572 VUGIB. Performance of GBS, mGBS, FRS, CRS, and AIMS65 for various outcome measures was analyzed using the area under receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC).

Results

The accuracy of prognostic scores in predicting the composite outcome including the need of hospital-based intervention and 42-day mortality was higher in NVUGIB as compared with VUGIB, AUROC: CRS: 0.641 vs. 0.537; FRS: 0.669 vs. 0.625; GBS: 0.719 vs. 0.587; mGBS: 0.711 vs. 0.594; AIMS65: 0.567 vs. 0.548. GBS and mGBS at a cut-off score of 1 had the highest negative predictive value, 91.7% and 91.3%, respectively, for predicting composite outcome in NVUGIB. Similarly, these scores had better accuracy for predicting 42-day rebleeding in NVUGIB as compared to VUGIB, AUROC: CRS: 0.680 vs. 0.537; FRS: 0.698 vs. 0.565; GBS: 0.661 vs. 0.543; mGBS: 0.627 vs. 0.540; AIMS65: 0.695 vs. 0.606.

Conclusion

The prognostic scores such as CRS, FRS, GBS, mGBS, and AIMS65 predict the need for hospital-based management, rebleeding, and mortality better among patients with NVUGIB than VUGIB.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Abougergi MS, Travis AC, Saltzman JR. The in-hospital mortality rate for upper GI hemorrhage has decreased over 2 decades in the United States: a nationwide analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:882–8.CrossRefPubMed Abougergi MS, Travis AC, Saltzman JR. The in-hospital mortality rate for upper GI hemorrhage has decreased over 2 decades in the United States: a nationwide analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:882–8.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Jairath V, Martel M, Logan RF, Barkun AN. Why do mortality rates for nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding differ around the world? A systematic review of cohort studies. Can J Gastroenterol. 2012;26:537–43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jairath V, Martel M, Logan RF, Barkun AN. Why do mortality rates for nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding differ around the world? A systematic review of cohort studies. Can J Gastroenterol. 2012;26:537–43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Chalasani N, Kahi C, Francois F, et al. Improved patient survival after acute variceal bleeding: a multicenter, cohort study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:653–9.CrossRefPubMed Chalasani N, Kahi C, Francois F, et al. Improved patient survival after acute variceal bleeding: a multicenter, cohort study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:653–9.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Augustin S, Muntaner L, Altamirano JT, et al. Predicting early mortality after acute variceal hemorrhage based on classification and regression tree analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7:1347–54.CrossRefPubMed Augustin S, Muntaner L, Altamirano JT, et al. Predicting early mortality after acute variceal hemorrhage based on classification and regression tree analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7:1347–54.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Tham TCK, James C, Kelly M. Predicting outcome of acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage without endoscopy using the clinical Rockall score. Postgrad Med J. 2006;82:757–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tham TCK, James C, Kelly M. Predicting outcome of acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage without endoscopy using the clinical Rockall score. Postgrad Med J. 2006;82:757–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Srirajaskanthan R, Conn R, Bulwer C, Irving P. The Glasgow Blatchford scoring system enables accurate risk stratification of patients with upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Int J Clin Pract. 2010;64:868–74.CrossRefPubMed Srirajaskanthan R, Conn R, Bulwer C, Irving P. The Glasgow Blatchford scoring system enables accurate risk stratification of patients with upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Int J Clin Pract. 2010;64:868–74.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Chandra S. AIMS65 score predicts short-term mortality but not the need for intervention in acute upper GI bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;78:381–2.CrossRefPubMed Chandra S. AIMS65 score predicts short-term mortality but not the need for intervention in acute upper GI bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;78:381–2.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheng DW, Lu YW, Teller T, Sekhon HK, Wu BU. A modified Glasgow Blatchford score improves risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleed: a prospective comparison of scoring systems. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012;36:782–9.CrossRefPubMed Cheng DW, Lu YW, Teller T, Sekhon HK, Wu BU. A modified Glasgow Blatchford score improves risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleed: a prospective comparison of scoring systems. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012;36:782–9.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Blatchford O, Murray WR, Blatchford M. A risk score to predict need for treatment for upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Lancet. 2000;356:1318–21.CrossRefPubMed Blatchford O, Murray WR, Blatchford M. A risk score to predict need for treatment for upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Lancet. 2000;356:1318–21.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Monteiro S, Gonçalves TC, Magalhães J, Cotter J. Upper gastrointestinal bleeding risk scores: who, when and why? World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol. 2016;7:86–96.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Monteiro S, Gonçalves TC, Magalhães J, Cotter J. Upper gastrointestinal bleeding risk scores: who, when and why? World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol. 2016;7:86–96.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim BJ, Park MK, Kim S-J, et al. Comparison of scoring systems for the prediction of outcomes in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a prospective study. Dig Dis Sci. 2009;54:2523–9.CrossRefPubMed Kim BJ, Park MK, Kim S-J, et al. Comparison of scoring systems for the prediction of outcomes in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a prospective study. Dig Dis Sci. 2009;54:2523–9.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen I-C, Hung M-S, Chiu T-F, Chen J-C, Hsiao C-T. Risk scoring systems to predict need for clinical intervention for patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding. Am J Emerg Med. 2007;25:774–9.CrossRefPubMed Chen I-C, Hung M-S, Chiu T-F, Chen J-C, Hsiao C-T. Risk scoring systems to predict need for clinical intervention for patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding. Am J Emerg Med. 2007;25:774–9.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Abraldes JG, Villanueva C, Bañares R, et al. Hepatic venous pressure gradient and prognosis in patients with acute variceal bleeding treated with pharmacologic and endoscopic therapy. J Hepatol. 2008;48:229–36.CrossRefPubMed Abraldes JG, Villanueva C, Bañares R, et al. Hepatic venous pressure gradient and prognosis in patients with acute variceal bleeding treated with pharmacologic and endoscopic therapy. J Hepatol. 2008;48:229–36.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat D’Amico G, De Franchis R, Cooperative Study Group. Upper digestive bleeding in cirrhosis. Post-therapeutic outcome and prognostic indicators. Hepatology. 2003;38:599–612.CrossRefPubMed D’Amico G, De Franchis R, Cooperative Study Group. Upper digestive bleeding in cirrhosis. Post-therapeutic outcome and prognostic indicators. Hepatology. 2003;38:599–612.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Reverter E, Tandon P, Augustin S, et al. A MELD-based model to determine risk of mortality among patients with acute variceal bleeding. Gastroenterology. 2014;146:412–9.CrossRefPubMed Reverter E, Tandon P, Augustin S, et al. A MELD-based model to determine risk of mortality among patients with acute variceal bleeding. Gastroenterology. 2014;146:412–9.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat British Society of Gastroenterology Endoscopy Committee. Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage: guidelines. Gut. 2002;51Suppl 4:iv1–6. British Society of Gastroenterology Endoscopy Committee. Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage: guidelines. Gut. 2002;51Suppl 4:iv1–6.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat de Franchis R, Faculty BVI. Expanding consensus in portal hypertension: report of the Baveno VI consensus workshop: stratifying risk and individualizing care for portal hypertension. J Hepatol. 2015;63:743–52.CrossRefPubMed de Franchis R, Faculty BVI. Expanding consensus in portal hypertension: report of the Baveno VI consensus workshop: stratifying risk and individualizing care for portal hypertension. J Hepatol. 2015;63:743–52.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Thanapirom K, Ridtitid W, Rerknimitr R, et al. Prospective comparison of three risk scoring systems in non-variceal and variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;31:761–7.CrossRefPubMed Thanapirom K, Ridtitid W, Rerknimitr R, et al. Prospective comparison of three risk scoring systems in non-variceal and variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;31:761–7.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Kalafateli M, Triantos CK, Nikolopoulou V, Burroughs A. Non-variceal gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis: a review. Dig Dis Sci. 2012;57:2743–54.CrossRefPubMed Kalafateli M, Triantos CK, Nikolopoulou V, Burroughs A. Non-variceal gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis: a review. Dig Dis Sci. 2012;57:2743–54.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Saltzman JR, Tabak YP, Hyett BH, Sun X, Travis AC, Johannes RS. A simple risk score accurately predicts in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and cost in acute upper GI bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74:1215–24.CrossRefPubMed Saltzman JR, Tabak YP, Hyett BH, Sun X, Travis AC, Johannes RS. A simple risk score accurately predicts in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and cost in acute upper GI bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74:1215–24.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Romagnuolo J, Barkun AN, Enns R, Armstrong D, Gregor J. Simple clinical predictors may obviate urgent endoscopy in selected patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:265–70.CrossRefPubMed Romagnuolo J, Barkun AN, Enns R, Armstrong D, Gregor J. Simple clinical predictors may obviate urgent endoscopy in selected patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:265–70.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Garcia-Tsao G, Abraldes JG, Berzigotti A, Bosch J. Portal hypertensive bleeding in cirrhosis: risk stratification, diagnosis, and management: 2016 practice guidance by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology. 2017;65:310–35.CrossRef Garcia-Tsao G, Abraldes JG, Berzigotti A, Bosch J. Portal hypertensive bleeding in cirrhosis: risk stratification, diagnosis, and management: 2016 practice guidance by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology. 2017;65:310–35.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Jun C-H, Park C-H, Lee W-S, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis using third-generation cephalosporins can reduce the risk of early rebleeding in the first acute gastroesophageal variceal hemorrhage: a prospective randomized study. J Korean Med Sci. 2006;21:883–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jun C-H, Park C-H, Lee W-S, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis using third-generation cephalosporins can reduce the risk of early rebleeding in the first acute gastroesophageal variceal hemorrhage: a prospective randomized study. J Korean Med Sci. 2006;21:883–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Sung JJ, Chiu PC, Chan FKL, et al. Asia-Pacific working group consensus on non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: an update 2018. Gut. 2018;67:1757–68.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sung JJ, Chiu PC, Chan FKL, et al. Asia-Pacific working group consensus on non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: an update 2018. Gut. 2018;67:1757–68.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Laursen SB, Hansen JM, Schaffalitzky de Muckadell OB. The Glasgow Blatchford score is the most accurate assessment of patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10:1130–5.CrossRefPubMed Laursen SB, Hansen JM, Schaffalitzky de Muckadell OB. The Glasgow Blatchford score is the most accurate assessment of patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10:1130–5.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Stanley AJ, Laine L, Dalton HR, et al. Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study. BMJ. 2017;356:i6432.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Stanley AJ, Laine L, Dalton HR, et al. Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study. BMJ. 2017;356:i6432.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Reed EA, Dalton H, Blatchford O, et al. Is the Glasgow Blatchford score useful in the risk assessment of patients presenting with variceal haemorrhage? Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;26:432–7.CrossRefPubMed Reed EA, Dalton H, Blatchford O, et al. Is the Glasgow Blatchford score useful in the risk assessment of patients presenting with variceal haemorrhage? Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;26:432–7.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Anand D, Gupta R, Dhar M, Ahuja V. Clinical and endoscopic profile of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding at tertiary care center of North India. J Dig Endosc. 2014;5:139–43. Anand D, Gupta R, Dhar M, Ahuja V. Clinical and endoscopic profile of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding at tertiary care center of North India. J Dig Endosc. 2014;5:139–43.
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Mahajan P, Chandail VS. Etiological and endoscopic profile of middle aged and elderly patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a tertiary care hospital in north India: A retrospective analysis. J Midlife Health. 2017;8:137-41. Mahajan P, Chandail VS. Etiological and endoscopic profile of middle aged and elderly patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a tertiary care hospital in north India: A retrospective analysis. J Midlife Health. 2017;8:137-41.
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee HH, Park JM, Han S, et al. A simplified prognostic model to predict mortality in patients with acute variceal bleeding. Dig Liver Dis. 2018;50:247–53.CrossRefPubMed Lee HH, Park JM, Han S, et al. A simplified prognostic model to predict mortality in patients with acute variceal bleeding. Dig Liver Dis. 2018;50:247–53.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang F, Cui S, Wang F, et al. Different scoring systems to predict 6-week mortality in cirrhosis patients with acute variceal bleeding: a retrospective analysis of 202 patients. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2018;53:885–90.CrossRefPubMed Wang F, Cui S, Wang F, et al. Different scoring systems to predict 6-week mortality in cirrhosis patients with acute variceal bleeding: a retrospective analysis of 202 patients. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2018;53:885–90.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Bryant RV, Kuo P, Williamson K, et al. Performance of the Glasgow–Blatchford score in predicting clinical outcomes and intervention in hospitalized patients with upper GI bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;78:576–83.CrossRefPubMed Bryant RV, Kuo P, Williamson K, et al. Performance of the Glasgow–Blatchford score in predicting clinical outcomes and intervention in hospitalized patients with upper GI bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;78:576–83.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Anchu AC, Mohsina S, Sureshkumar S, Mahalakshmy T, Kate V. External validation of scoring systems in risk stratification of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2017;36:105–12.CrossRefPubMed Anchu AC, Mohsina S, Sureshkumar S, Mahalakshmy T, Kate V. External validation of scoring systems in risk stratification of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2017;36:105–12.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Sharma V, Jeyaraman P, Rana SS, et al. Utility of clinical and complete Rockall score in Indian patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Trop Gastroenterol. 2017;37:276–82.CrossRef Sharma V, Jeyaraman P, Rana SS, et al. Utility of clinical and complete Rockall score in Indian patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Trop Gastroenterol. 2017;37:276–82.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison of various prognostic scores in variceal and non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A prospective cohort study
verfasst von
Gyanranjan Rout
Sanchit Sharma
Deepak Gunjan
Saurabh Kedia
Baibaswata Nayak
Shalimar
Publikationsdatum
04.03.2019
Verlag
Springer India
Erschienen in
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology / Ausgabe 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0254-8860
Elektronische ISSN: 0975-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-018-0928-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2019

Indian Journal of Gastroenterology 2/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.