Skip to main content
Log in

Impact positif sur le Programme élargi de vaccinations de l’envoi de SMS de rappel à partir d’un registre informatisé, Bobo-Dioulasso (Burkina Faso)

Positive impact on the expanded program on immunization when sending call-back SMS through a computerized immunization register, Bobo Dioulasso (Burkina Faso)

  • Santé Publique / Public Health
  • Published:
Bulletin de la Société de pathologie exotique

Résumé

L’impact dans le Programme élargi de vaccination (PEV) d’un registre informatisé de vaccination (RIV), avec l’envoi de SMS aux parents avant les sessions vaccinales, n’a jamais été estimé en Afrique sub-saharienne. Un Centre de santé et de promotion sociale (CSPS) urbain prodiguant le PEV a été tiré au sort (Colma 1, district de Do) à Bobo- Dioulasso (Burkina Faso), puis a été doté d’un RIV. Les mères des enfants ont été randomisées, au premier contact vaccinal, pour recevoir, ou non un SMS de rappel avant chaque session vaccinale fixée par la date de naissance de l’enfant. En fin d’étude, par téléphone, on a voulu savoir pourquoi un enfant, malgré les SMS envoyés, n’avait pas été enregistré comme correctement vacciné dans le RIV. Il existait une différence significative entre l’envoi ou non de SMS et la présence de l’enfant à la deuxième (p<0,001), troisième (p<0,001), et quatrième session PEV (p<0,001). Il existait aussi une relation significative pour la promptitude (rapidité) à venir faire vacciner l’enfant à la deuxième (p=0,03), troisième (p =0,02), mais pas à la quatrième session PEV (p=0,45). Sur les 523 enfants enregistrés dans le RIV, 77 enfants (14,8 %) n’ont pas été retrouvés dans les registres papier PEV de Colma 1. La principale cause de non complétude des vaccinations des enfants dans le RIV était la poursuite des vaccinations au CSPS voisin de Colma 2 (38 % des cas défaillants). L’entretien téléphonique a permis de rattraper 55 % des enfants de Colma 1, en retard pour le PEV malgré les SMS. Un RIV facilite l’envoi de SMS et augmente la complétude et la promptitude vaccinales. Un RIV, consultable par internet, permettrait de mieux connaître l’état vaccinal des enfants admis en urgence dans une structure de santé, et de faire un rattrapage vaccinal. L’abandon des registres papier et la synthèse des données RIV, envoyées aux niveaux supérieurs par internet, sont à recommander pour augmenter la promptitude et l’exactitude des données PEV. Les femmes enceintes, suivies en consultations prénatales et vaccinées par l’anatoxine tétanique, devraient être aussi inclues dans le RIV.

Abstract

The impact of a Computerized Immunization Register (CIR) on Expanded Program on Immunization (EPI), with sending SMS to parents before immunization sessions, has never been studied in sub-Saharan Africa. The objective of this study is to measure EPI quickness and completeness of vaccinations after sending call-back SMS to parents through CIR put in place in a health center. In a health center, chosen at random (Colma 1) in the city of Bobo Dioulasso, Burkina Faso, West Africa, mothers, at first EPI session, if they had a mobile phone available at hand or in her surrounding, were randomized for receiving, or not, a call-back SMS before following EPI sessions, after child registration on a Francophone CIR (Siloxane’s Intervax ©). Mothers, which were sent SMS and did not correctly followed sessions were asked through mobile phone why their child was late for EPI. 523 newborns were included in the study, with 253 whose parents were sent SMS, and 268 being informed of sessions only by ordinary methods. At second EPI session at 2 months of age, there was a statistical significant increase of coverage for children whose parents received SMS (p<0.001). Quickness to come also to this session was significantly shorter when parents received SMS (p=0.03). At third EPI session at 3 months of age, attendance to EPI for children whose parents were sent SMS was significantly better (p<0.001). Quickness to come to this session was shorter for children with SMS (p=0.02). At fourth EPI session at 4 months of age, attendance for children with SMS was significantly better for children whose parents were sent SMS (p<0.001). Quickness to come to this session was better but not significantly different (p=0.49). Out of 101 children registered as late for EPI sessions in Colma 1 CIR, even with call-back SMS, 19 (19%) parents could not be reached on the telephone. 31/82 (38%) mothers had shifted for EPI to a more proximate vaccination center (Colma 2), and 5 (6%) to private or civil servants clinic. 14/82 (17%) mothers had been travelling far from health center. Ten (12%) admitted neglect of EPI sessions. Two (2%) children had deceased, and one mother did not come back to Colma 1 after her child’s AEFI. One child has been dismissed two times of vaccination following recommendation not to open a measles multi-dose vial for a single child, and did not come back. Of 523 children registered in CIR, 77 (14.7%) could not be found in the paper registers of Colma 1. Quickness and completeness for EPI is increased by sending SMS with help of CIR. An official number should be given for each child registered in CIR, consulted by health staff admitting children in urgency, allowing EPI vaccinations completion. With CIR safeguards, CIR should replace paper registers and should be used to send EPI reports by internet at central levels, helping MOH coverage determination and MAPI surveillance. The fall of coverage due to restriction policy not to open a multidose vial for a single child is low. Health staff should institute telephone call-back for badly immunized children registered on CIR and incorporate in it, with SMS call-back, pregnant women, to better complete prenatal sessions and tetanus vaccination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Références

  1. Barnes K, Friedman SM, Brickner Namerow P, Honig J (1999) Impact of community volunteers on immunization rates of children younger than 2 years. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 153 (5):518–24

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Diallo O, Schlumberger M, Sanou C, et al (2012) Recours aux SMS pour convoquer les mères aux séances de vaccination à Bobo-Dioulasso. Bull Soc Pathol Exot 105(4):291–5 [http://www.pathexo.fr/documents/articles-bull/131490291.pdf]

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dini EF, Linkins RW, Chaney M (1995) Effectiveness of computer-generated telephone messages in increasing clinic visits. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 149(8):902–5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dini EF, Linkins RW, Sigafoos J (2000) The impact of computergenerated messages on childhood immunization coverage. Am J Prev Med 19(1):68–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dombkowski KJ, Reeves SL, Dong S, et al (2011) Assessing the burden of undeliverable immunization reminder and recall notifications. Prev Med 53(6):424–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Expanded Programme on Immunization (1991) Training for Mid- Level Managers: Identify Missed Opportunities (WHO/EPI/MLM/ 91.7). Geneva, World Health Organization, 69 p

  7. Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (2000) Second GAVI Board Meeting, January 2000 (GAVI/00.01), Geneva, World Health Organization, 102 p

  8. Grevendonk J (2011) Using mobile phones to track children’s immunization status in low and middle income countries. Trop Med Int Health S1:39–40

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hull BP, McIntyre PB, Couzos S (2004) Evaluation of immunisation coverage for aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children using the Australian Childhood Immunisation Register. Aust N Z J Public Health 28(1):47–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hutchins SS, Jansen HA, Robertson SE, et al (1993) Studies of missed opportunities for immunization in developing and industrialized countries. Bull World Health Organ 71(5):549–60

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jani JV, De Schacht C, Jani IV, Bjune G (2008) Risk factors for incomplete vaccination and missed opportunity for immunization in rural Mozambique. BMC Public Health 8:161

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Khare M, Piccinino L, Barker LE, Linkins RW (2006) Assessment of Immunization Registry Databases as supplemental sources of data to improve ascertainment of vaccination coverage estimates in the National Immunization Survey. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 160(8):838–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Linkins RW, Dini EF, Watson G, Patriarca PA (1994) A randomized trial of the effectiveness of computer-generated telephone messages in increasing immunization visits among preschool children. Arch Pediatr Adolecs Med 148(9):908–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Luhm KR, Cardoso MR, Waldman EA (2011) Vaccination coverage among children under two years of age based on electronic immunization registry in Southern Brazil. Rev Saude Publica 45 (1):90–8 [article en portuguais]

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Marchand RS, Paulin C (1992) Stratégies pour augmenter et maintenir de hautes couvertures vaccinales. Can J Public Health 83(2):113–5

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Menzies Rl, Turnour C, Chiu C, McIntyre P (2008) Vaccine preventable diseases and vaccination coverage in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, Australia 2003 to 2006. Commun Dis Intell Q Rep 32(Suppl):S2–67

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ministère de la Santé du Burkina Faso (2011) Plan pluriannuels combinés (PPAC): données 2006-2010 et prévisions 2011-2015

  18. Ministère de la Santé, Direction de la Prévention par les Vaccinations (DPV) du Burkina Faso (2010) Revue approfondie du PEV 2009 au Burkina Faso, 166 p

    Google Scholar 

  19. Olson JJ, Mannenbach MS, Moore BR, et al (2005) A reexamination of the feasibility of the administration of routine childhood vaccines in emergency departments in the era of electronic vaccine registries. Pediatr Emerg Care 21(9):565–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. OMS. Le Programme Elargi de Vaccination, OMS/GEN/74, Genève

  21. OMS (2000) La Politique de l’Utilisation de Flacons de Vaccins Entamés dans les sessions de vaccinations ultérieures, WHO/ V&B/00.09, Genève

  22. Ouedraogo S (2004) Etude des déterminants du non-respect du calendrier vaccinal du Programme élargi de vaccination dans le district sanitaire de Bousse en 2004, Burkina Faso. Mémoire de fin d’étude, 56 p

    Google Scholar 

  23. Painvin C, Schlumberger M, Chhem DB, et al (2011) Impact positif d’un documentaire vidéo-TV sur la vaccination antitétanique des femmes au Cambodge et causes de non-vaccination. Bull Soc Pathol Exot 104(1):29–37 [http://www.pathexo.fr/documents/articles-bull/sprexot000098.pdf]

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rank C, Menzies RI (2007) How reliable are Australian Childhood Immunisation Register coverage estimates for indigenous children? An assessment of data quality and coverage. Commun Dis Intell Q Rep 31(3):283–7

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Schlumberger M (2011) Measure of the impact of SMS reminders on mother’s compliance with EPI in Africa. Session 6, 15 June, 2nd International Conference and Exhibition towards sustainable global Health, Heidelberg, Allemagne

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sawadogo Y, Zongo I, Bagoro D, et al (2014) Fiabilité des données administratives en matière de vaccinations en 2011 dans le district sanitaire de Dandé au Burkina Faso. CR des 17e journées des sciences de la santé de Bobo, du 6 au 9 mai 2014. Ed: Association des sciences de la santé du Burkina Faso: 78–9

    Google Scholar 

  27. Siloxane (2015) Présentation de la société

  28. Stehr-Green PA, Dini EF, Lindegren ML, Patriarca PA (1993) Evaluation of telephoned computer-generated reminders to improve immunization coverage at inner-city clinics. Public Health Rep 108(4):426–30

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Szilagyi PG, Bordley C, Vann JC, et al (2000) Effect of patient reminder/recall interventions on immunization rates: A review. JAMA 284(14):1820–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Tierney CD, Yusuf H, McMahon SR, et al (2003) Adoption of reminder and recall messages for immunizations by pediatricians and public health clinics. Pediatrics 112(5):1076–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Schlumberger.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schlumberger, M., Bamoko, A., Yaméogo, T. et al. Impact positif sur le Programme élargi de vaccinations de l’envoi de SMS de rappel à partir d’un registre informatisé, Bobo-Dioulasso (Burkina Faso). Bull. Soc. Pathol. Exot. 108, 349–354 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13149-015-0455-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13149-015-0455-4

Mots clés

Keywords

Navigation