Role and potential mechanisms of anabolic resistance in sarcopenia

Anabolic stimulators such as insulin, branched chain amino acids (BCAA), and insulin-like growth factors (IGF-1) increase skeletal MPS in young healthy individuals. Anabolic stimulation in skeletal muscle causes MPS to exceed MPB, resulting in muscle hypertrophy. Insulin has been well described as a stimulator of MPS and has also been seen to participate in muscle amino acid uptake [11‐14]. However, more recent findings have highlighted insulin as permissive rather than modulatory in MPS. Insulin acts to prime the muscle for protein synthesis, but MPS is stimulated in a dose-dependent fashion by BCAA in young men. So availability of BCAA rather than insulin appears to regulate rate of protein synthesis observed [15]. Additionally, IGF-1 has also been shown to induce hypertrophy in muscle [16]. While these stimuli constitute the most commonly studied and well-characterized dietary and homeostatic drivers of MPS, exercise has also been shown to affect the dynamics of muscle equilibrium.

For years now exercise has been studied in the context of sarcopenic muscle loss [17, 18]. Aerobic exercise, while having no observable impact on muscle protein turnover, has been shown to increase MPS in older individuals [19]. Muscle contraction by resistance exercise increases the overall rate of muscle protein turnover, but does so disproportionately in favor of MPS [12]. Other studies have reported that an intense single bout of resistance training can increase MPS well above baseline in the post-exercise time period that extends from 1 to 72 h [20‐22]. Similar to BCAA availability, acute bouts of resistance training have been shown to affect MPS in a dose-dependent manner [23].

Anabolic signals provoke MPS by activating a highly diverse signaling pathway in skeletal muscle cells. The mammalian/mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a member of a family of signaling proteins that serve a myriad of roles in stress and survival pathways. Two distinct mTOR complexes, mTORC1 and mTORC2, act as nutrient sensors that are activated under specific conditions. In response to anabolic stimuli, mTORC1 targets and activates downstream kinases such as S6 kinase 1 (S6K1), or binding proteins like eIF4E-binding protein 1 (4E-BP1), as seen in Fig. 1. The action of mTOR and its downstream mediators heightens the efficiency of ribosomal biogenesis and ultimately translation [24‐26]. Additionally, the energy sensor AMP-activated kinase (AMPK) holds a measure of control over mTORC1, and the two together exert antagonistic control over muscle cell size [27].

Protein kinase B, also known as Akt, plays an important role in skeletal muscle homeostasis. A target of mTORC2, Akt is a member of the phosphoinositide 3 kinase (PI3K) family and involved in stress and survival signaling. It acts through control over the forkhead box protein O (FOXO) 1 and FOXO3 transcription factors, which mediate cellular stress responses such as apoptosis [28]. Akt has also been observed to play a role in lipid metabolism, meaning it may have additional culpability in disordered anabolic signaling [29, 30]. Zoncu et al. and Rivas et al. have written detailed reviews on these signaling pathways and their function in skeletal muscle homeostasis; they should be referenced for additional details [28, 34].

As aging is seen to be the root cause of sarcopenia, it has been studied as a potential root of the underlying problem, anabolic resistance. The study of anabolic resistance in both human and rodent models has allowed for a translational approach in determining the mechanism of disordered skeletal muscle metabolism. Initially, a study by Guillet and colleagues showed that the ability of insulin and BCAA to initiate protein translation was hampered in older individuals when compared with young subjects as well [31]. Rassmussen and colleagues corroborated these findings while also pointing out that a blunted vasodilatory response of older muscle to insulin may play a role in nutrient deficiency and unavailability [32]. It was also revealed that the ability of BCAA to foster MPS was blunted in old rats compared with their younger adult counterparts [10]. This observed decrease in MPS in response to anabolic stimulus with aging is thought to be a result of diminished mTOR signaling [26].

Precedent for diminished mTOR signaling in response to anabolic stimulus was established through experimentation with rapamycin, an immunosuppressant and inhibitor of mTOR phosphorylation [33‐35]. Cuthbertson and colleagues have observed decreased mTOR phosphorylation in older individuals as compared to young individuals in response to BCAA [15]. Others have seen attenuation of the mTOR signaling pathway despite muscle contraction or overload in aged animals [36‐39]. Overall, there seems to be consensus that age-induced anabolic resistance is grounded in the inability of hypertrophy controlling signaling pathways to successfully coordinate the proper response to their normal stimuli.

Approximately one decade ago, a study by Baumgartner revealed that older individuals categorized as both sarcopenic and obese were at the highest risk among those suffering from disorders of body composition [40]. Further investigation of this “sarcopenic obesity” would indicate that the two are pathophysiologically linked, perhaps even at a mechanistic level [41]. It comes as no surprise then that anabolic resistance has been observed to arise in response to obesity and high-fat feeding. Diet-induced obesity is often implicated in insulin resistance when studied as a contributor to metabolic syndrome [42]. A study in mice conducted by Anderson and colleagues showed that diet-induced obesity reduced skeletal MPS in response to nutrient intake [43]. Yet another study was able to find a link between impaired protein metabolism and reduced post-absorptive protein turnover in obese individuals [44].

In spite of compelling evidence, it is yet unclear how obesity and insulin resistance are linked mechanistically. It has been shown that increased activation of the mTOR pathway can diminish the ability of Akt to function properly in fat-fed obese rats [45]. The downstream effectors of the mTOR pathway have also been implicated as contributors to insulin resistance stemming from obesity [46]. Some mechanistic insight into anabolic signaling has been gleaned through the study of β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate (HMB), an active leucine metabolite. HMB has been shown to increase MPS through activation of the mTOR pathway and to attenuate MPB through various anticatabolic actions, such as inhibition of caspase-8 signaling [47‐49]. Still, the lack of concrete mechanisms for the roles of obesity and anabolic signaling in anabolic resistance makes this a rich area for study moving forward.

Obesity aside, lipid accumulation may have another important role in anabolic signaling and resistance. Accumulation of lipids in nonfatty tissue sites has been linked with activation of proinflammatory mediators such as toll-like receptor 4, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), and nuclear factor kappa-light-chain enhancer of activated B cells (NFκB) [50]. Several studies have shown that inflammation, mediated by these same intermediaries, may play a key role in the development of sarcopenia, especially through anabolic resistance [51, 52]. Cuthbertson and colleagues have suggested that increased basal expression of NFκB, as well as TNFα and interleukin-6, in older individuals is an inhibitor of muscle anabolism by interference with mTOR signaling [15]. Inflammation like this is viewed as chronic in older individuals, characterized by heightened production of cytokines and acute-phase proteins; the phenomenon has come to be called “inflammaging” by some [53‐56]. Furthermore, recent findings have linked lipid accumulation to proinflammatory macrophage infiltration in muscle tissue and intermuscular adipose tissue; this is certainly detrimental, as fatty acids can trigger macrophage secretion of factors that would further impair anabolic stimulation [57‐59].

Lipotoxicity contributes to anabolic resistance through the action of ceramides, sphingolipids composed of a sphingosine backbone and fatty acid chain. Ceramides function as regulators of cellular stress and are mechanistic modulators of metabolic diseases, especially insulin/anabolic resistance [60‐62]. Hyde and colleagues reported that ceramide diminished intracellular amino acid availability and reduced phosphorylation of translational regulators downstream of mTOR in vitro [63]. Others have gone on to show that ceramide activates protein phosphatase 2A, which targets and inhibits Akt and S6K1 by dephosphorylation [64‐66]. It has been hypothesized that ceramides are mediators of TNFα inhibition of anabolic signaling; but as of yet, there has been no mechanistic link between the two [67, 68].

Ceramide is not the only lipid species implicated in lipotoxicity; triglycerides have also been seen as detrimental to anabolic signaling in skeletal muscle. Recently, we were able to show that age-induced intramuscular triglyceride infiltration is associated with an increase in several lipogenic regulators including: sterol regulatory element-binding protein, fatty acid synthase, acetyl CoA carboxylase, and stearoyl CoA desaturase. Additionally, we demonstrated that AMPK activation and concentration are heightened in aged skeletal muscle, even in animals that were subjected to anabolic stimulus in the form of chronic muscle overload [69]. This would suggest that intramuscular lipid accumulation, especially of triglycerides, is somehow involved in the blunting of anabolic signaling pathways. Further investigation in this vein is warranted, as elucidation of the mechanistic underpinnings of lipotoxicity could present new and better ways to intervene in anabolic resistance at the protein or genetic level, stemming sarcopenia at the source.

Clearly, the story of anabolic resistance is compelling, but still being written. Further exploration of the mechanistic similarities between aging and obesity would clarify whether or not there is a link between resistances observed in both cases. From an interventional standpoint, diet and exercise could be better tailored to sarcopenia of specific origin to optimize recovery of muscle mass and function. But where intervention in diet and with exercise may be less effective, as in the oldest of individuals, development of therapeutic or pharmaceutical agents is warranted. A better idea of the role metabolic or age-related inflammation plays in anabolic resistance would be necessary to develop targeted countermeasures. Similarly, understanding how lipid infiltration and lipotoxicity adversely impact anabolic signaling at the genetic, protein, and metabolic levels is an area ripe for study. Luckily, this field of study is relatively new, so developments in all these areas will come in time. And with an improved understanding of anabolic resistance, we can better apply ourselves to the treatment of sarcopenia, thereby reducing the subsequent burden of disability from this condition.