nach oben

Applied Health Economics and Health Policy

Erschienen in:

01.12.2015 | Systematic Review

A Systematic Review of the State of Economic Evaluation for Health Care in India

verfasst von: Shankar Prinja, Akashdeep Singh Chauhan, Blake Angell, Indrani Gupta, Stephen Jan

Erschienen in: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy | Ausgabe 6/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background and objective

Economic evaluations are one of the important tools in policy making for rational allocation of resources. Given the very low public investment in the health sector in India, it is critical that resources are used wisely on interventions proven to yield best results. Hence, we undertook this study to assess the extent and quality of evidence for economic evaluation of health-care interventions and programmes in India.

Methods

A comprehensive search was conducted to search for published full economic evaluations pertaining to India and addressing a health-related intervention or programme. PubMed, Scopus, Embase, ScienceDirect, and York CRD database and websites of important research agencies were identified to search for economic evaluations published from January 1980 to the middle of November 2014. Two researchers independently assessed the quality of the studies based on Drummond and modelling checklist.

Results

Out of a total of 5013 articles enlisted after literature search, a total of 104 met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review. The majority of these papers were cost-effectiveness studies (64 %), led by a clinician or public-health professional (77 %), using decision analysis-based methods (59 %), published in an international journal (80 %) and addressing communicable diseases (58 %). In addition, 42 % were funded by an international funding agency or UN/bilateral aid agency, and 30 % focussed on pharmaceuticals. The average quality score of these full economic evaluations was 65.1 %. The major limitation was the inability to address uncertainties involved in modelling as only about one-third of the studies assessed modelling structural uncertainties (33 %), or ran sub-group analyses to account for heterogeneity (36.5 %) or analysed methodological uncertainty (32 %).

Conclusion

The existing literature on economic evaluations in India is inadequate to feed into sound policy making. There is an urgent need to generate awareness within the government of how economic evaluation can inform and benefit policy making, and at the same time build capacity of health-care professionals in understanding the economic principles of health-care delivery system.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Husereau D, Culyer AJ, Neumann P, Jacobs P. How do economic evaluations inform health policy decisions for treatment and prevention in Canada and the United States? Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2015;13(3):273–9. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40258-014-0133-6.PubMedCrossRef

Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care. Ontario guidelines for economic analysis of pharmaceutical products. 1994.

Buxton MJ. Economic evaluation and decision making in the UK. Pharmacoeconomics. 2006;24(11):1133–42.PubMedCrossRef

Jirawattanapisal T, Kingkaew P, Lee TJ, Yang MC. Evidence-based decision-making in Asia-Pacific with rapidly changing health-care systems: Thailand, South Korea, and Taiwan. Value Health. 2009;12(Suppl 3):S4–11.PubMedCrossRef

Thatte U, Hussain S, de Rosas-Valera M, Malik MA. Evidence-based decision on medical technologies in Asia Pacific: experiences from India, Malaysia, Philippines, and Pakistan. Value Health. 2009;12(Suppl 3S):18–25.CrossRef

Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Government of India. New Delhi: National Vacine Policy; 2011.

Department of Health Research. XII Plan document (2012-2017). New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Famuliy Welfare, Governemnt of India; 2012.

Indian chapter of International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.isporindia.com/. Cited 14 Mar 2015.

Desai PR, Chandwani HS, Rascati KL. Assessing the quality of pharmacoeconomic studies in India: a systematic review. Pharmacoeconomics. 2012;30(9):749–62.PubMedCrossRef

10.

Mishra D, Nair S. Systematic literature review to evaluate and characterize the health economics and outcomes research studies in India. Perspect Clin Res. 2015;6(1):20–33.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

11.

Higgins JP, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Wiley Online Library; 2008.

12.

Drummond MF, Jefferson TO. Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ. Br Med J. 1996;313(7052):275–83. Available from: http://www.bmj.com/content/313/7052/275.CrossRef

13.

Philips Z, Ginnelly L, Sculpher M, Claxton K, Golder S, Riemsma R, et al. Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment. 2004;8(36):iii–iv (ix–xi, 1–158).PubMed

14.

La Torre G, Nicolotti N, De Waure C, Ricciardi W. Development of a weighted scale to assess the quality of cost-effectiveness studies and an application to the economic evaluations of tetravalent HPV vaccine. J Public Health (Bangkok). 2011;19:103–11.CrossRef

15.

Jamison DT, Breman JG, Measham AR, Alleyne G, Claeson M, Evans DB, et al. Disease control priorities in developing countries. Washington (DC):World Bank Publications; 2006.

16.

Lok Sabha Secretariat. Reference note No. 6/RN/Ref./2013: price rise/inflation. Parliament Library and Reference, Research, Documentation and Information Service (lAARDIS). 2013.

17.

Edejer TTT, Baltussen R, Adam T, Hutubessy R, Acharya A, Evans DB, et al. Making choices in health: WHO guide to cost-effectiveness analysis: World Health Organization; 2003.

18.

The World Bank. [Internet]. Available from: http://data.worldbank.org/country/india. Cited 7 Mar 2015.

19.

Aggarwal K, Khandpur S, Khanna N, Sharma VK, Pandav CS. Comparison of clinical and cost-effectiveness of psoralen? ultraviolet A versus psoralen? sunlight in the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis in a developing economy. Int J Dermatol. 2013;52(4):478–85. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23431966.PubMedCrossRef

20.

Aggarwal R, Ghoshal UC, Naik SR. Assessment of cost effectiveness of universal hepatitis B immunization in a low income country with intermediate endimicity using a Markov model. J Hepatol. 2003;38(2):215–22.PubMedCrossRef

21.

Aggarwal R, Ghoshal UC, Naik SR. Treatment of Chronic hepatitis B with interferon-alpha: Cost-effectiveness in developing countries. Natl Med J India. 2002;15(6):320–7.PubMed

22.

Alexander A, John KR, Jayaraman T, Oommen A, Venkata Raghava M, Dorny P, et al. Economic implications of three strategies for the control of taeniasis. Trop Med Int Health. 2011;16(11):1410–6.PubMedCrossRef

23.

Awasthi S, Pande VK, Fletcher RH. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of albendazole in improving nutritional status of pre-school children in urban slums. Indian Pediatr. 2000;37(1):19–29.PubMed

24.

Bachewar NP, Thawani VR, Mali SN, Gharpure KJ, Shingade VP, Dakhale GN. Comparison of safety, efficacy, and cost effectiveness of benzyl benzoate, permethrin, and ivermectin in patients of scabies. Indian J Pharmacol. 2009;41(1):9–14.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

25.

Bender MA, Kumarasamy N, Mayer KH, Wang B, Walensky RP, Flanigan T, et al. Cost-effectiveness of tenofovir as first-line antiretroviral therapy in India. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50(3):416–25.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

26.

Bhagia LJ, Sadhu HG. Cost-benefit analysis of installing dust control devices in the agate industry, Khambhat (Gujarat). Indian J Occup Environ Med. 2008;12(3):128–31.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

27.

Bhatia MR, Fox-Rushby J, Mills A. Cost-effectiveness of malaria control interventions when malaria mortality is low: Insecticide-treated nets versus in-house residual spraying in India. Soc Sci Med. 2004;59(3):525–39.PubMedCrossRef

28.

Bhatia SJ, Kulkarni SG. Cost-effectiveness of Helicobacter pylori eradication in India: to live and let live … expensively? Indian J Gastroenterol. 1997;16(Suppl 1):S25–8.PubMed

29.

Brown HS, Stigler M, Perry C, Dhavan P, Arora M, Reddy KS. The cost-effectiveness of a school-based smoking prevention program in India. Health Promot Int. 2013;28(2):178–86.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

30.

Buttorff C, Hock RS, Weiss HA, Naik S, Araya R, Kirkwood BR, et al. Economic evaluation of a task-shifting intervention for common mental disorders in India. Bull World Health Organ. 2012;90(11):813–21. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3506405&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

31.

Cecchini M, Sassi F, Lauer JA, Lee YY, Guajardo-Barron V, Chisholm D. Tackling of unhealthy diets, physical inactivity, and obesity: health effects and cost-effectiveness. Lancet. 2010;376(9754):1775–84 (Elsevier Ltd).PubMedCrossRef

32.

Chow J, Klein EY, Laxminarayan R. Cost-effectiveness of “golden mustard” for treating vitamin a deficiency in India. PLoS One. 2010;5(8):e12046.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

33.

Clark AD, Griffiths UK, Abbas SS, Rao KD, Privor-Dumm L, Hajjeh R, et al. Impact and cost-effectiveness of haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccination in india. J Pediatr [Internet]. 2013;163(1):S60–72. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.03.032 (Elsevier Ltd).

34.

Cook J, Jeuland M, Whittington D, Poulos C, Clemens J, Sur D, et al. The cost-effectiveness of typhoid Vi vaccination programs: calculations for four urban sites in four Asian countries. Vaccine. 2008;26(50):6305–16.PubMedCrossRef

35.

Dabral M. Cost-effectiveness of supplementary immunization for measles in India. Indian Pediatr. 2009;46(3):957–62.PubMed

36.

Dandona L, Kumar SGP, Kumar GA, Dandona R. Cost-effectiveness of HIV prevention interventions in Andhra Pradesh state of India. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:117.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

37.

Dhivya PS, Swathy G, Pal S. Pharmacoeconomics of antihypertensive drugs prescribed in a multispecialty hospital in South India. Asian J Pharm. 2014;8(3):178–82.CrossRef

38.

Diaz M, Kim JJ, Albero G, de Sanjosé S, Clifford G, Bosch FX, et al. Health and economic impact of HPV 16 and 18 vaccination and cervical cancer screening in India. Br J Cancer. 2008;99(2):230–8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

39.

Donaldson EA, Waters HR, Arora M, Varghese B, Dave P, Modi B. A cost-effectiveness analysis of India’s 2008 prohibition of smoking in public places in Gujarat. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011;8(5):1271–86.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

40.

Dowdy DW, Steingart KR, Pai M. Serological testing versus other strategies for diagnosis of active tuberculosis in india: a cost-effectiveness analysis. PLoS Med. 2011;8(8):e1001074.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

41.

Dranitsaris G, Truter I, Lubbe MS, Sriramanakoppa NN, Mendonca VM, Mahagaonkar SB. Improving patient access to cancer drugs in India: Using economic modeling to estimate a more affordable drug cost based on measures of societal value. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27(1):23–30.PubMedCrossRef

42.

Eaton JW, Menzies NA, Stover J, Cambiano V, Chindelevitch L, Cori A, et al. Health benefits, costs, and cost-effectiveness of earlier eligibility for adult antiretroviral therapy and expanded treatment coverage: A combined analysis of 12 mathematical models. Lancet Glob Heal. 2014;2(1):e23–34.CrossRef

43.

Esposito DH, Tate JE, Kang G, Parashar UD. Projected impact and cost-effectiveness of a rotavirus vaccination program in India, 2008. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(2):171–7.PubMedCrossRef

44.

Ferroussier O, Kumar MKA, Dewan PK, Nair PKJ, Sahu S, Wares DF, et al. Cost and cost-effectiveness of a public-private mix project in Kannur District Kerala, India, 2001–2002. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2007;11(7):755–61.PubMed

45.

Floyd K, Arora VK, Murthy KJR, Lonnroth K, Singla N, Akbar Y, et al. Cost and cost-effectiveness of PPM-DOTS for tuberculosis control: evidence from India. Bull World Health Organ. 2006;84(05):437–45.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

46.

Freedberg KA, Kumarasamy N, Losina E, Cecelia AJ, Scott CA, Divi N, et al. Clinical impact and cost effectivceness of antiretroviral therapy in India: starting criteria and second line therapy. AIDS. 2007;21(Suppl 4):S117–28.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

47.

Frick KD, Riva-Clement L, Shankar MB. Screening for refractive error and fitting with spectacles in rural and urban India: cost-effectiveness. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2009;16(6):378–87.PubMedCrossRef

48.

Fung IC-H, Guinness L, Vickerman P, Watts C, Vannela G, Vadhvana J, et al. Modelling the impact and cost-effectiveness of the HIV intervention programme amongst commercial sex workers in Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India. BMC Public Health. 2007;7:195.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

49.

Ghoshal UC, Aggarwal R, Baba CS. Recurrent duodenal ulcer haemorrhage: a pharmacoeconomic comparison of various management strategies. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2003;4:1593–603.PubMedCrossRef

50.

Gogtay NJ, Kadam VS, Desai S, Kamtekar KD, Dalvi SS, Kshirsagar NA. A cost-effectiveness analysis of three antimalarial treatments for acute, uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Mumbai. India. J Assoc Physicians India. 2003;51:877–9.PubMed

51.

Goldie SJ, O’Shea M, Campos NG, Diaz M, Sweet S, Kim SY. Health and economic outcomes of HPV 16,18 vaccination in 72 GAVI-eligible countries. Vaccine. 2008;26(32):4080–93.PubMedCrossRef

52.

Goldie SJ, Sweet S, Carvalho N, Natchu UCM, Hu D. Alternative strategies to reduce maternal mortality in India: a cost-effectiveness analysis. PLoS Med. 2010;7(4):e1000264.

53.

Goldie SJ, Gaffikin L, Goldhaber-Fiebert JD, Gordillo-Tobar A, Levin C, Mahé C, et al. Cost-effectiveness of cervical-cancer screening in five developing countries. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(20):2158–68.PubMedCrossRef

54.

Goodchild M, Sahu S, Wares F, Dewan P, Shukla RS, Chauhan LS, et al. A cost-benefit analysis of scaling up tuberculosis control in India. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2011;15(3):358–62.PubMed

55.

Guerriero C, Cairns J, Perel P, Shakur H, Roberts I. Cost-effectiveness analysis of administering tranexamic acid to bleeding trauma patients using evidence from the crash-2 trial. PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e18987.

56.

Gupta M, Prinja S, Kumar R, Kaur M. Cost-effectiveness of Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) vaccine introduction in the universal immunization schedule in Haryana State, India. Health Policy Plan. 2013;28(1):51–61.PubMedCrossRef

57.

Jeuland M, Cook J, Poulos C, Clemens J, Whittington D. Cost-effectiveness of new-generation oral cholera vaccines: a multisite analysis. Value Health. 2009;12(6):899–908.PubMedCrossRef

58.

Jothi R, Ismail AM, Senthamarai R, Pal S. A comparative study on the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of bimatoprost/timolol and dorzolamide/timolol combinations in glaucoma patients. Indian J Pharmacol. 2010;42(6):362–5.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

59.

Kochhar P, Suvarna V, Duttagupta S, Sarkar S. Cost-effectiveness study comparing cefoperazone-sulbactam to a three-drug combination for treating intraabdominal infections in an Indian health-care setting. Value Health. 2008;11(Suppl 1):S33–8.

60.

Krishnamoorthy K, Rajendran R, Sunish IP, Reuben R. Cost effectiveness of the use of vectrol control and mass drug administration, seperately or in combination, against lymphatic filariasis. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2002;96:S77–90.PubMedCrossRef

61.

Kumar M, Birch S, Maturana A, Gafni A. Economic evaluation of HIV screening in pregnant women attending antenatal clinics in India. Health Policy (N Y). 2006;77(2):233–43.CrossRef

62.

Lee BY, Bacon KM, Shah M, Kitchen SB, Connor DL, Slayton RB. The economic value of a visceral leishmaniasis vaccine in Bihar State, India. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012;86(3):417–25.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

63.

Lohse N, Marseille E, Kahn JG. Development of a model to assess the cost-effectiveness of gestational diabetes mellitus screening and lifestyle change for the prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Int J Gynecol Obstet [Internet]. 2011;115 Suppl:S20–5. doi:10.1016/S0020-7292(11)60007-6 (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics).

64.

Lubell Y, Yeung S, Dondorp AM, Day NP, Nosten F, Tjitra E, et al. Cost-effectiveness of artesunate for the treatment of severe malaria. Trop Med Int Heal. 2009;14(3):332–7.CrossRef

65.

Mahajan R, Gupta A, Gupta RS, Gupta K. Efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of insulin sensitizers as add-on therapy in metabolic syndrome in patients with secondary sulfonylurea failure: a comparative study. J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2010;1(2):82–6.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

66.

Marseille E, Lohse N, Jiwani A, Hod M, Seshiah V, Yajnik CS, et al. The cost-effectiveness of gestational diabetes screening including prevention of type 2 diabetes: application of a new model in India and Israel. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013;26(8):802–10. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23311860.PubMedCrossRef

67.

Massad E, Behrens BC, Coutinho F a B, Behrens RH. Cost risk benefit analysis to support chemoprophylaxis policy for travellers to malaria endemic countries. Malar J [Internet]. 2011;10(1):130. Available from: http://www.malariajournal.com/content/10/1/130 (BioMed Central Ltd).

68.

McNeil BJ, Dudley RA, Hoop B, Metz C, Thompson M, Adelstein SJ. A cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for hepatitis B surface antigen in India. Med Decis Making. 1981;1(4):345–59.

69.

McNeil BJ, Thompson M, Adelstein SJ. Cost effectiveness calculations for the diagnosis and treatment of tuberculous meningitis. Eur J Nucl Med. 1980;5(3):271–6.PubMedCrossRef

70.

Meheus F, Balasegaram M, Olliaro P, Sundar S, Rijal S, Faiz MA, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of combination therapies for visceral leishmaniasis in the Indian subcontinent. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010;4(9). doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0000818.

71.

Miller MA, Kane M. Routine hepatitis B immunisation in India: cost-effectiveness assessment. Indian J Pediatr. 2000;67(4):299–300.PubMedCrossRef

72.

Mukherjee K. Cost-effectiveness of childbirth strategies for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV among mothers receiving nevirapine in India. Indian J Community Med. 2010;35(1):29–33.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

73.

Okonkwo QL, Draisma G, Der Kinderen A, Brown ML, De Koning HJ. Breast cancer screening policies in developing countries: a cost-effectiveness analysis for India. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100(18):1290–300.PubMedCrossRef

74.

Over M, Marseille E, Sudhakar K, Gold J, Gupta I, Indrayan A, et al. Antiretroviral therapy and HIV prevention in India: modeling costs and consequences of policy options. Sex Transm Dis. 2006;33(10):S145–52.PubMedCrossRef

75.

Pandav C. Economic evaluation of iodine deficiency disorder control program in Sikkim: a cost effectiveness study. Indian J Public Health. 2012;56(1):37.PubMedCrossRef

76.

Patel AB, Dhande LA, Rawat MS. Economic evaluation of zinc and copper use in treating acute diarrhea in children: a randomized controlled trial. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2003;1(1):7.

77.

Patel V, Chisholm D, Rabe-Hesketh S, Dias-Saxena F, Andrew G, Mann A. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of drug and psychological treatments for common mental disorders in general health care in Goa, India: A randomised, controlled trial. Lancet. 2003;361(9351):33–9.PubMedCrossRef

78.

Paul SB, Sreenivas V, Gulati MS, Madan K, Gupta AK, Mukhopadhyay S, et al. Economic evaluation of a surveillance program of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in India. Hepatol Int. 2008;2(2):231–6.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

79.

Pho MT, Swaminathan S, Kumarasamy N, Losina E, Ponnuraja C, Uhler LM, et al. The cost-effectiveness of tuberculosis preventive therapy for HIV-infected individuals in southern India: a trial-based analysis. PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e36001.

80.

Poulos C, Bahl R, Whittington D, Bhan MK, Clemens JD, Acosta CJ. A cost-benefit analysis of typhoid fever immunization programs in an Indian urban slum community. J Health Popul Nutr. 2004;22(3):311–21.PubMed

81.

Prinja S, Bahuguna P, Rudra S, Gupta I, Kaur M, Mehendale SM, et al. Cost effectiveness of targeted HIV prevention interventions for female sex workers in India. Sex Transm Infect. 2011;87(4):354–61.PubMedCrossRef

82.

Rachapelle S, Legood R, Alavi Y, Lindfield R, Sharma T, Kuper H, et al. The cost-utility of telemedicine to screen for diabetic retinopathy in india. Ophthalmology [Internet]. 2013;120(3):566–73. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.09.002 (Elsevier Inc.).

83.

Ramachandran A, Snehalatha C, Yamuna A, Mary S, Ping Z. Cost-effectiveness of the interventions. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(10):2548–52.PubMedCrossRef

84.

Reid S. Estimating the burden of disease from unsafe injections in India: a cost-benefit assessment of the auto-disable syringe in a country with low blood-borne virus prevalence. Indian J Community Med. 2012;37(2):89–94.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

85.

Rheingans R, Anderson JD, Anderson B, Chakraborty P, Atherly D, Pindolia D. Estimated impact and cost-effectiveness of rotavirus vaccination in India: effects of geographic and economic disparities. Vaccine [Internet]. 2014;32 Suppl 1:A140–50. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.05.073 (Elsevier Ltd).

86.

Rob B, Vinod JA, Monica P, Balraj A, Job A, Norman G, et al. Costs and health effects of screening and delivery of hearing aids in Tamil Nadu, India: an observational study. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:135.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

87.

Rose J, Hawthorn RL, Watts B, Singer ME. Public health impact and cost effectiveness of mass vaccination with live attenuated human rotavirus vaccine (RIX4414) in India: model based analysis. BMJ. 2009;339:b3653.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

88.

Sahni M, Jindal K, Abraham M, Aruldas K, Puliyel JM. Hepatitis B Immunization: cost calculation in a community based study in India. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2004;23(1):16–8.PubMed

89.

Schulman-Marcus J, Prabhakaran D, Gaziano TA. Pre-hospital ECG for acute coronary syndrome in urban India: a cost-effectiveness analysis. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2010;10:13.

90.

Shafiq N, Malhotra S, Pandhi P, Sharma N, Bhalla A, Grover A. A randomized controlled clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy, safety, cost-effectiveness and effect on PAI-1 levels of the three low-molecular-weight heparins - Enoxaparin, nadroparin and dalteparin: the ESCAPe-END study. Pharmacology. 2006;78(3):136–43.PubMedCrossRef

91.

Singh AJ, Garner P, Floyd K. Cost-effectiveness of public-funded options for cataract surgery in Mysore, India. Lancet. 2000;355(9199):180–4.

92.

Singh K. Economic evaluation of Japanese encephalitis vaccination programme in Uttar Pradesh, India : a cost-benefit study. J Vector Borne Dis. 2014;51(1):47–52.PubMed

93.

Sood S, Nambiar D. Comparative cost-effectiveness of the components of a behavior change communication campaign on HIV/AIDS in North India. J Health Commun. 2006;11(Suppl 2):143–62.PubMedCrossRef

94.

Sriram S, Aiswaria V, Cijo A, Mohankumar T. Antibiotic sensitivity pattern and cost-effectiveness analysis of antibiotic therapy in an Indian tertiary care teaching hospital. J Res Pharm Pract. 2013;2(2):70. Available from: http://www.jrpp.net/text.asp?2013/2/2/70/117386.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

95.

Srivastava A, Srinivas G, Misra MC, Pandav CS, Seenu V, Goyal A. Cost-effectiveness analysis of laparoscopic versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy for gallstone disease. A randomized trial. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2001;17(4):497–502.PubMed

96.

Subramaniam B, Madan R, Sadhasivam S, Sennaraj B, Tamilselvan P, Rajeshwari S, et al. Dexamethasone is a cost-effective alternative to ondansertron in preventing PONV after paediatric strabismur repair. Br J Anaesth. 2001;86(1):84–9.PubMedCrossRef

97.

Subramanian S, Sankaranarayanan R, Bapat B, Somanathan T, Thomas G, Mathew B, et al. Cost-effectiveness of oral cancer screening: Results from a cluster randomized controlled trial in India. Bull World Health Organ. 2009;87(3):200–6.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

98.

Suraratdecha C, Ramana CV, Kaipilyawar S, Krishnamurthy J, Sivalenka S, Ambatipudi N, et al. Cost and effectiveness analysis of immunization service delivery support in Andhra Pradesh, India. Bull World Health Organ. 2008;86(3):221–8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

99.

Sutherland T, Bishai DM. Cost-effectiveness of misoprostol and prenatal iron supplementation as maternal mortality interventions in home births in rural India. Int J Gynecol Obstet [Internet]. 2009;104(3):189–93. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.10.011 (Elsevier Ireland Ltd).

100.

Sutherland T, Meyer C, Bishai DM, Geller S, Miller S. Community-based distribution of misoprostol for treatment or prevention of postpartum hemorrhage: Cost-effectiveness, mortality, and morbidity reduction analysis. Int J Gynecol Obstet [Internet]. 2010;108(3):289–94. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.11.007 (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics).

101.

Thaker S, Mehta D, Shah H, Dave J, Kikani K. A comparative study to evaluate efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness between Whitfield′s ointment + oral fluconazole versus topical 1 % butenafine in tinea infections of skin. Indian J Pharmacol. 2013;45(6):622. Available from: http://www.ijp-online.com/text.asp?2013/45/6/622/121378.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

102.

Thaker S, Mehta D, Shah H, Dave J, Mundhava S. A comparative randomized open label study to evaluate efficacy, safety and cost effectiveness between topical 2 % sertaconazole and topical 1 % butenafine in tinea infections of skin. Indian J Dermatol. 2013;58(6):451. Available from: http://www.e-ijd.org/text.asp?2013/58/6/451/119955.

103.

Thomas K, Peter JV, Cherian AM, Guyatt G. Cost-effectiveness of inhaled β-agonists v. oral salbutamol in asthma: A randomized double-blind cross-over study. Natl Med J India. 1996;9(4):159–62.PubMed

104.

Uhler LM, Kumarasamy N, Mayer KH, Saxena A, Losina E, Muniyandi M, et al. Cost-effectiveness of HIV testing referral strategies among tuberculosis patients in India. PLoS One. 2010;5(9):1–9.CrossRef

105.

Van’t Hoog AH, Cobelens F, Vassall A, Van Kampen S, Dorman SE, Alland D, et al. Optimal triage test characteristics to improve the cost-effectiveness of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay for TB diagnosis: A decision analysis. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e82786.

106.

Vassall A, Pickles M, Chandrashekar S, Boily M-C, Shetty G, Guinness L, et al. Cost-effectiveness of HIV prevention for high-risk groups at scale: an economic evaluation of the Avahan programme in south India. Lancet Glob Heal [Internet]. 2014;2(9):e531–40. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2214109X14702773 (Vassall et al. Open Access article distributed under the terms of CC BY-NC-ND).

107.

Venkatesh KK, Becker JE, Kumarasamy N, Nakamura YM, Mayer KH, Losina E, et al. Clinical Impact and Cost-Effectiveness of Expanded Voluntary HIV Testing in India. PLoS One. 2013;8(5):e64604.

108.

Verguet S, Murphy S, Anderson B, Johansson KA, Glass R, Rheingans R. Public finance of rotavirus vaccination in India and Ethiopia: An extended cost-effectiveness analysis. Vaccine [Internet]. 2013;31(42):4902–10. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.07.014 (Elsevier Ltd).

109.

Vijendra R, Kumar A, Girish K, Harsha R, Reddy V, Lakshmi P. Cost-effectiveness analysis of baclofen and chlordiazepoxide in uncomplicated alcohol-withdrawal syndrome. Indian J Pharmacol. 2014;46(4):372. Available from: http://www.ijp-online.com/article.asp?issn=0253-7613;year=2014;volume=46;issue=4;spage=372;epage=377;aulast=Reddy.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

110.

Walensky RP, Ross EL, Kumarasamy N, Wood R, Noubary F, Paltiel AD, et al. Cost-effectiveness of HIV treatment as prevention in serodiscordant couples. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1715–25. Available from: http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMsa1214720.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

111.

Ghoshal UC, Aggarwal R, Kumar S, Naik SR. Pneumatic dilation versus intrasphincteric botulinum toxin injection in the treatment of achalasia cardia in India: an economic analysis. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2002;21(5):193–6.PubMed

112.

Prakash C. Crucial factors that influence cost effectiveness of Universal Hepatitis B immunization in India. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2003;19(1):28–40.PubMedCrossRef

113.

Pantoja A, Lönnroth K, Lal SS, Chauhan LS. Economic evaluation of public-private mix for tuberculosis care and control, India. Part II. Cost and cost-effectiveness. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2009;13(6):705–12.PubMed

114.

Bindoria SV, Devkar R, Gupta I, Ranebennur V, Saggurti N, Ramesh S, et al. Development and pilot testing of HIV screening program integration within public/primary health centers providing antenatal care services in Maharashtra, India. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7(1):177.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

115.

Burke MJ, Shenton RC, Taylor MJ. The economics of screening infants at risk of hearing impairment: an international analysis. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;76(2):212–8.PubMedCrossRef

116.

Singh SP, Hirve S, Huda MM, Banjara MR, Kumar N, Mondal D. Options for active case detection of visceral leishmaniasis in endemic districts of India, Nepal and Bangladesh, comparing yield, feasibility and costs. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011;5(2):e960.

117.

Pandav CS. Economic evaluation of iodine deficiency disorder control program in Sikkim: a cost effectiveness study. Indian J Public Heal. 2012;56(1):37–43.CrossRef

118.

Vassall A, Chandrashekar S, Pickles M, Beattie T, Shetty G, Bhattacharjee P, et al. Community mobilisation and empowerment interventions as part of HIV prevention for female sex workers in Southern India: A cost-effectiveness analysis. 2014;9(10):e110562.

119.

Suraratdecha C, Jacobson J, Sivalenka S, Narahari D. A cost-effectiveness analysis of strategies for controlling Japanese encephalitis in Andhra Pradesh, India. J Pharm Financ Econ Policy. 2006;15(1):21–40.CrossRef

120.

Olliaro P, Darley S, Laxminarayan R, Sundar S. Cost-effectiveness projections of single and combination therapies for visceral leishmaniasis in Bihar. India. Trop Med Int Heal. 2009;14(8):918–25.CrossRef

121.

Legood R, Gray AM, Mahé C, Wolstenholme J, Jayant K, Nene BM, et al. Screening for cervical cancer in India: How much will it cost? A trial based analysis of the cost per case detected. Int J Cancer. 2005;117(6):981–7.PubMedCrossRef

122.

Isaac MK, Kapur R. A cost-effectiveness analysis of three different methods of psychiatric case finding in the general population. Br J Psychiatry. 1980;137(6):540–6.PubMedCrossRef

123.

Elixhauser A, Halpern M, Schmier J, Luce BR. Health care CBAand CEA from 1991 to 1996: an updated bibliography. Med Care. 1998;36(5 Suppl):MS1–9 (MS18–147).PubMed

124.

Gavaza P, Rascati K, Oladapo AO, Khoza S. The State of Health Economic Research in South Africa: a systematic review. Pharmacoeconomics. 2012;30(10):925–40.PubMedCrossRef

125.

Teerawattananon Y, Russell S, Mugford M. A systematic review of economic evaluation literature in Thailand: are the data good enough to be used by policy-makers? Pharmacoeconomics. 2007;25(6):467–79.PubMedCrossRef

126.

Tran BX, Nong VM, Maher RM, Nguyen PK, Luu HN. A systematic review of scope and quality of Health Economic Evaluation Studies in Vietnam. PLoS One. 2014;9(8):e103825. Available from: http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103825.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

127.

Hoque ME, Khan JAM, Hossain SSA, Gazi R, Rashid H, Koehlmoos TP, et al. A systematic review of economic evaluations of health and health-related interventions in Bangladesh. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2011;9:12. Available from:http://www.resource-allocation.com/content/9/1/12 (BioMed Central Ltd).PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

128.

Gavaza P, Rascati KL, Oladapo AO, Khoza S. The state of health economic evaluation research in Nigeria: a systematic review. Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(7):539–53.PubMed

129.

Gavaza P, Rascati K, Brown C, Lawson K, Mann T. The state of health economic and pharmacoeconomic evaluation research in Zimbabwe: a review. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2008;69(3):268–85.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

130.

Indian Health Economics and Policy Association (IHEPA) [Internet]. Available from: http://ihepa.in/. Cited 11 Mar 2015.

131.

Health Economics Association of India (HEAI) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.heai.org.in/. Cited 11 Mar 2015.

132.

Online Certificate Course in Basic Health Economics [Internet]. Available from: www.healtheconomics.pgisph.in. Cited 14 Mar 2015.

133.

Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Government of India, National Rural Health Mission, Approval of State Programme Implementation Plan of NRHM 2014–15: Punjab [Internet]. Available from: http://www.pbnrhm.org/docs/pip_admin_approval_14_15.pdf. Cited 25 Aug 2015.

134.

Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Government of India, National Rural Health Mission, Approval of State Programme Implementation Plan of NRHM 2014–15: Andhra Pradesh [Internet]. Available from: http://cfw.ap.nic.in/pdf/Final%20ROP%20Andhra%20Pradesh%202014-15.pdf. Cited 25 Aug 2015.

135.

Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Government of India, National Rural Health Mission, Approval of State Programme Implementation Plan of NRHM 2012–13: Haryana [Internet]. Available from: http://pipnrhm-mohfw.nic.in/PIP2012-13_files/ROP%202012/Haryana/Approval%20of%20State%20Programme%20Implementation%20Plan-Haryana,%202012-13.pdf. Cited 25 Aug 2015.

136.

Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Government of India, National Rural Health Mission, Approval of State Programme Implementation Plan of NRHM: Himachal Pradesh, May 2012–13 [Internet]. Available from: http://pipnrhm-mohfw.nic.in/PIP2012-13_files/ROP%202012-13/Himachal%20Pradesh/Approval%20of%20State%20Programme%20Implementation%20Plan%20.pdf. Cited 25 Aug 2015.

137.

National List of Essential Medicines of India 2011 [Internet). Available from: http://pharmaceuticals.gov.in/nlem.pdf. Cited 26 Aug 2015.

138.

Essential Medicine List (2013–14) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.nrhmharyana.gov.in/files/essentialdruglist2013.pdf. Cited 26 Aug 2015.

139.

List of Essential Drugs, 2013, Punjab [Internet]. Available from: http://punjabhealth.co.in/downloads.aspx?ID=nh5DUDN8odM=&&Header=+g1BOwyDm98sKB5ssQYvWAv9KLvK9BlY. Cited 26 Aug 2015.

140.

GBD 2013 Mortality and Causes of Death Collaborators. Global, regional and national levels of age-specific mortality and 240 causes of death, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2015;385(9963):117–71

141.

NICE signs MoU with the Department of Health Research, Ministry of Health and family welfare, Government of India [Internet]. Available from: http://www.nice.org.uk/proxy/?sourceurl=http://www.nice.org.uk/aboutnice/niceinternational/projects/nicesignsmougovernmentindia.jsp. Cited 1 Jul 2015.

142.

Verguet S, Laxminarayan R, Jamison DT. Universal Public Finance of Tuberculosis treatment in India: an extended cost-effectiveness analysis. Heal econ. 2015;24:318–32.

143.

Verguet S, Murphy S, Anderson B, Johansson KA, Glass R, Rheingans R. Public finance of rotavirus vaccination in India and Ethiopia: an extended cost-effectiveness analysis. Vaccine [Internet]. 2013;31(42):4902–10 (Elsevier Ltd).

144.

Megiddo I, Colson AR, Nandi A, Chatterjee S, Prinja S, Khera A, et al. Analysis of the Universal Immunization Programme and introduction of a rotavirus vaccine in India with IndiaSim. Vaccine [Internet]. 2014;32(S1):A151–61 (Elsevier Ltd).

145.

Freemantle N, Mason J. Publication bias in clinical trials and economic analyses. Pharmacoeconomics. 1997;12(1):10–6.PubMedCrossRef

146.

Bell CM, Urbach DR, Ray JG, Bayoumi A, Rosen AB, Greenberg D. Bias in published cost effectiveness studies: systematic review. BMJ. 2006;332(7543):699–703.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

147.

Hillman AL, Eisenberg JM, Pauly MV, Bloom BS, Glick H, Kinosian B, et al. Avoiding bias in the conduct and reporting of cost-effectiveness research sponsored by pharmaceutical companies. N Engl J Med. 1991;324(19):1362–5.PubMedCrossRef

148.

Husereau D, Drummond M, Petrou S, Carswell C, Moher D, Greenberg D, et al. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)-explanation and elaboration: an ISPOR Task Force Report. Value Health. 2013;16:231–50.PubMedCrossRef

Titel: A Systematic Review of the State of Economic Evaluation for Health Care in India
verfasst von: Shankar Prinja
Akashdeep Singh Chauhan
Blake Angell
Indrani Gupta
Stephen Jan
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2015
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy / Ausgabe 6/2015
Print ISSN: 1175-5652
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-1896
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-015-0201-6

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

A Systematic Review of the State of Economic Evaluation for Health Care in India

Abstract

Background and objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Background and objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2015

Hospital Utilization and Universal Health Insurance Coverage: Evidence from the Massachusetts Health Care Reform Act

The Debrisoft® Monofilament Debridement Pad for Use in Acute or Chronic Wounds: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of High-Efficiency Hemodiafiltration Versus Low-Flux Hemodialysis Based on the Canadian Arm of the CONTRAST Study

Cost-Effectiveness of Glycopyrronium Bromide Compared with Tiotropium in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Sweden

The Role of Information Provision in Economic Evaluations of Newborn Bloodspot Screening: A Systematic Review

Acknowledgement to Referees