Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Clinical Drug Investigation 4/2013

01.04.2013 | Adis Drug Evaluation

Gadobutrol: A Review of Its Use for Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Adults and Children

verfasst von: Lesley J. Scott

Erschienen in: Clinical Drug Investigation | Ausgabe 4/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Since the introduction of the first gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) approximately 25 years ago, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using GBCAs has revolutionized diagnostic and follow-up imaging of pathological lesions, with clinical applications expanded to encompass almost all fields of medicine. Intravenous gadobutrol (Gadovist™ [EU]; Gadavist® [USA]) is a second-generation extracellular non-ionic macrocyclic GBCA that is used in patients undergoing diagnostic contrast-enhanced MRI for visualization of pathological lesions in the CNS and all other body regions or for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) to evaluate perfusion and flow-related abnormalities. Its unique physicochemical profile, along with the high thermostability of macrocyclic GBCAs, means gadobutrol is formulated at twice the gadolinium ion concentration of other currently licensed GBCAs. This reduces the injection volume and provides a narrower bolus, thereby improving image enhancement. Based on extensive clinical experience in a broad range of patients, including paediatric and adult patients (younger and elderly adults), and those with moderate to severe hepatic or renal impairment or cardiovascular disorders, gadobutrol is an effective and generally well tolerated extracellular GBCA for patients undergoing diagnostic contrast-enhanced MRI and contrast-enhanced MRA. As with all macrocyclic GBCAs, the potential for gadobutrol to cause nephrogenic systemic fibrosis appears to be lower than with linear GBCAs.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Anzalone N. Defining contrast: latest data on the safety of gadobutrol-enhanced MRI and efficacy in CNS applications. EJHP Pract. 2011;17(5):31–4. Anzalone N. Defining contrast: latest data on the safety of gadobutrol-enhanced MRI and efficacy in CNS applications. EJHP Pract. 2011;17(5):31–4.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Engelhorn T, Doerfler A. High-molar contrast agents for CNS application. Imag Decisions. 2008;11(4):26–32.CrossRef Engelhorn T, Doerfler A. High-molar contrast agents for CNS application. Imag Decisions. 2008;11(4):26–32.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Gutierrez JE, Koenig S, Breuer J. Overview on the efficacy and safety of gadbutrol: an MRI contrast agent for the CNS, body and vessels. Imaging Med. 2012;4(1):25–40.CrossRef Gutierrez JE, Koenig S, Breuer J. Overview on the efficacy and safety of gadbutrol: an MRI contrast agent for the CNS, body and vessels. Imaging Med. 2012;4(1):25–40.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Bellin MF, Vasile M, Morel-Precetti S. Currently used non-specific extracellular MR contrast media. Eur Radiol. 2003;13(12):2688–98.PubMedCrossRef Bellin MF, Vasile M, Morel-Precetti S. Currently used non-specific extracellular MR contrast media. Eur Radiol. 2003;13(12):2688–98.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Wollanka H, Weidenmaier W, Giersig C. NSF after Gadovist exposure: a case report and hypothesis of NSF development. Nephrol Dial Transpl. 2009;24(12):3882–4.CrossRef Wollanka H, Weidenmaier W, Giersig C. NSF after Gadovist exposure: a case report and hypothesis of NSF development. Nephrol Dial Transpl. 2009;24(12):3882–4.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Frenzel T, Lengsfeld P, Schirmer H, et al. Stability of gadolinium-based magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents in human serum at 37 °C. Invest Radiol. 2008;43(12):817–28.PubMedCrossRef Frenzel T, Lengsfeld P, Schirmer H, et al. Stability of gadolinium-based magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents in human serum at 37 °C. Invest Radiol. 2008;43(12):817–28.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Huppertz A, Rohrer M. Gadobutrol, a highly concentrated MR-imaging contrast agent: its physicochemical characteristics and the basis for its use in contrast-enhanced MR angiography and perfusion imaging. Eur Radiol. 2004;14 Suppl. 5:M12–8.PubMed Huppertz A, Rohrer M. Gadobutrol, a highly concentrated MR-imaging contrast agent: its physicochemical characteristics and the basis for its use in contrast-enhanced MR angiography and perfusion imaging. Eur Radiol. 2004;14 Suppl. 5:M12–8.PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Tombach B, Heindel W. Value of 1.0- M gadolinium chelates: review of preclinical and clinical data on gadobutrol. Eur Radiol. 2002;12(6):1550–6.PubMedCrossRef Tombach B, Heindel W. Value of 1.0- M gadolinium chelates: review of preclinical and clinical data on gadobutrol. Eur Radiol. 2002;12(6):1550–6.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Rohrer M, Bauer H, Mintorovitch J, et al. Comparison of magnetic properties of MRI contrast media solutions at different magnetic field strengths. Invest Radiol. 2005;40(11):715–24.PubMedCrossRef Rohrer M, Bauer H, Mintorovitch J, et al. Comparison of magnetic properties of MRI contrast media solutions at different magnetic field strengths. Invest Radiol. 2005;40(11):715–24.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Staks T, Schuhmann-Giampieri G, Frenzel T, et al. Pharmacokinetics, dose proportionality, and tolerability of gadobutrol after single intravenous injection in healthy volunteers. Invest Radiol. 1994;29(7):709–15.PubMedCrossRef Staks T, Schuhmann-Giampieri G, Frenzel T, et al. Pharmacokinetics, dose proportionality, and tolerability of gadobutrol after single intravenous injection in healthy volunteers. Invest Radiol. 1994;29(7):709–15.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kramer JH, Arnoldi E, Francois CJ, et al. Dynamic and static magnetic resonance angiography of the supra-aortic vessels at 3.0 T. Invest Radiol. 2013;48(3):121–8.PubMedCrossRef Kramer JH, Arnoldi E, Francois CJ, et al. Dynamic and static magnetic resonance angiography of the supra-aortic vessels at 3.0 T. Invest Radiol. 2013;48(3):121–8.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Sieber MA, Lengsfeld P, Frenzel T, et al. Preclinical investigation to compare different gadolinium-based contrast agents regarding their propensity to release gadolinium in vivo and to trigger nephrogenic systemic fibrosis-like lesions. Eur Radiol. 2008;18(10):2164–73.PubMedCrossRef Sieber MA, Lengsfeld P, Frenzel T, et al. Preclinical investigation to compare different gadolinium-based contrast agents regarding their propensity to release gadolinium in vivo and to trigger nephrogenic systemic fibrosis-like lesions. Eur Radiol. 2008;18(10):2164–73.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Sieber MA, Pietsch H, Walter J, et al. A preclinical study to investigate the development of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: a possible role for gadolinium-based contrast media. Invest Radiol. 2008;43(1):65–75.PubMedCrossRef Sieber MA, Pietsch H, Walter J, et al. A preclinical study to investigate the development of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: a possible role for gadolinium-based contrast media. Invest Radiol. 2008;43(1):65–75.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Voth M, Rosenberg M, Breuer J. Safety of gadobutrol, a new generation of contrast agents: experience from clinical trials and postmarketing surveillance. Invest Radiol. 2011;46(11):663–71.PubMed Voth M, Rosenberg M, Breuer J. Safety of gadobutrol, a new generation of contrast agents: experience from clinical trials and postmarketing surveillance. Invest Radiol. 2011;46(11):663–71.PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Hahn G, Sorge I, Gruhn B, et al. Pharmacokinetics and safety of gadobutrol-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric patients. Invest Radiol. 2009;44(12):776–83.PubMedCrossRef Hahn G, Sorge I, Gruhn B, et al. Pharmacokinetics and safety of gadobutrol-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric patients. Invest Radiol. 2009;44(12):776–83.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Tombach B, Bremer C, Reimer P, et al. Pharmacokinetics of 1 M gadobutrol in patients with chronic renal failure. Invest Radiol. 2000;35(1):35–40.PubMedCrossRef Tombach B, Bremer C, Reimer P, et al. Pharmacokinetics of 1 M gadobutrol in patients with chronic renal failure. Invest Radiol. 2000;35(1):35–40.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Tombach B, Bremer C, Reimer P, et al. Using highly concentrated gadobutrol as an MR contrast agent in patients also requiring hemodialysis: safety and dialysability. Am J Roentgen. 2002;178(1):105–9.CrossRef Tombach B, Bremer C, Reimer P, et al. Using highly concentrated gadobutrol as an MR contrast agent in patients also requiring hemodialysis: safety and dialysability. Am J Roentgen. 2002;178(1):105–9.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Benner T, Reimer P, Erb G, et al. Cerebral MR perfusion imaging: first clinical application of a 1 M gadolinium chelate (Gadovist 1.0) in a double-blinded randomized dose-finding study. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000;12(3):371–80.PubMedCrossRef Benner T, Reimer P, Erb G, et al. Cerebral MR perfusion imaging: first clinical application of a 1 M gadolinium chelate (Gadovist 1.0) in a double-blinded randomized dose-finding study. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000;12(3):371–80.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhargava R, Noga M. Safety and efficacy of gadobutrol-enhanced MRI in patients aged under 2 years: a single-center, observational study. Magnet Reson Insights. 2013;6:1–12.CrossRef Bhargava R, Noga M. Safety and efficacy of gadobutrol-enhanced MRI in patients aged under 2 years: a single-center, observational study. Magnet Reson Insights. 2013;6:1–12.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Anzalone N, Scarabino T, Venturi C, et al. Cerebral neoplastic enhancing lesions: multicenter, randomized, crossover intraindividual comparison between gadobutrol (1.0 M) and gadoterate meglumine (0.5 M) at 0.1 mmol Gd/kg body weight in a clinical setting. Eur J Radiol. 2013;82(1):139–45.PubMedCrossRef Anzalone N, Scarabino T, Venturi C, et al. Cerebral neoplastic enhancing lesions: multicenter, randomized, crossover intraindividual comparison between gadobutrol (1.0 M) and gadoterate meglumine (0.5 M) at 0.1 mmol Gd/kg body weight in a clinical setting. Eur J Radiol. 2013;82(1):139–45.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Katakami N, Inaba Y, Sugata S, et al. Magnetic resonance evaluation of brain metastases from systemic malignances with two doses of gadobutrol 1.0 M compared with gadoteridol: a multicenter, phase II/III study in patients with known or suspected brain metastases. Invest Radiol. 2011;46(7):411–8.PubMedCrossRef Katakami N, Inaba Y, Sugata S, et al. Magnetic resonance evaluation of brain metastases from systemic malignances with two doses of gadobutrol 1.0 M compared with gadoteridol: a multicenter, phase II/III study in patients with known or suspected brain metastases. Invest Radiol. 2011;46(7):411–8.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Hammerstingl R, Adam G, Ayuso J-R, et al. Comparison of 1.0 M gadobutrol and 0.5 M gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in five hundred seventy-two patients with known or suspected liver lesions: results of a multicenter, double-blind, interindividual, randomized clinical phase-III trial. Invest Radiol. 2009;44(3):168–76.PubMedCrossRef Hammerstingl R, Adam G, Ayuso J-R, et al. Comparison of 1.0 M gadobutrol and 0.5 M gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in five hundred seventy-two patients with known or suspected liver lesions: results of a multicenter, double-blind, interindividual, randomized clinical phase-III trial. Invest Radiol. 2009;44(3):168–76.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Tombach B, Bohndorf K, Brodtrager W, et al. Comparison of 1.0 M gadobutrol and 0.5 M gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI in 471 patients with known or suspected renal lesions: results of a multicenter, single-blind, interindividual, randomized clinical phase III trial. Eur Radiol. 2008;18(11):2610–9.PubMedCrossRef Tombach B, Bohndorf K, Brodtrager W, et al. Comparison of 1.0 M gadobutrol and 0.5 M gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI in 471 patients with known or suspected renal lesions: results of a multicenter, single-blind, interindividual, randomized clinical phase III trial. Eur Radiol. 2008;18(11):2610–9.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Pediconi F, Kubik-Huch R, Chilla B, et al. Intra-individual randomised comparison of gadobutrol 1.0 M versus gadobenate dimeglumine 0.5 M in patients scheduled for preoperative breast MRI. Eur Radiol. 2013;23(1):84–92.PubMedCrossRef Pediconi F, Kubik-Huch R, Chilla B, et al. Intra-individual randomised comparison of gadobutrol 1.0 M versus gadobenate dimeglumine 0.5 M in patients scheduled for preoperative breast MRI. Eur Radiol. 2013;23(1):84–92.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Hentsch A, Aschauer MA, Balzer JO, et al. Gadobutrol-enhanced moving-table magnetic resonance angiography in patients with peripheral vascular disease: a prospective, multi-centre blinded comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Eur Radiol. 2003;13(9):2103–14.PubMedCrossRef Hentsch A, Aschauer MA, Balzer JO, et al. Gadobutrol-enhanced moving-table magnetic resonance angiography in patients with peripheral vascular disease: a prospective, multi-centre blinded comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Eur Radiol. 2003;13(9):2103–14.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Schaefer FKW, Schaefer PJ, Altjohann C, et al. A multicenter, site-independent, blinded study to compare the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography using 1.0 M gadobutrol (Gadovist™) to intraarterial digital subtraction angiography in body arteries. Eur J Radiol. 2007;61(2):315–23.PubMedCrossRef Schaefer FKW, Schaefer PJ, Altjohann C, et al. A multicenter, site-independent, blinded study to compare the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography using 1.0 M gadobutrol (Gadovist™) to intraarterial digital subtraction angiography in body arteries. Eur J Radiol. 2007;61(2):315–23.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Forsting M, Palkowitsch P. Prevalence of acute adverse reactions to gadobutrol—a highly concentrated macrocyclic gadolinium chelate: review of 14,299 patients from observational trials. Eur J Radiol. 2010;74(3):e186–92.PubMedCrossRef Forsting M, Palkowitsch P. Prevalence of acute adverse reactions to gadobutrol—a highly concentrated macrocyclic gadolinium chelate: review of 14,299 patients from observational trials. Eur J Radiol. 2010;74(3):e186–92.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Palkowitsch P, Voth M. Summary of the safety data for gadobutrol and gadofosveset. Eur Radiol. 2009;18 Suppl. 5:E47–54. Palkowitsch P, Voth M. Summary of the safety data for gadobutrol and gadofosveset. Eur Radiol. 2009;18 Suppl. 5:E47–54.
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Elmholdt TR, Jorgensen B, Ramsing M, et al. Two cases of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis after exposure to the macrocyclic compound gadobutrol. NDT Plus. 2010;3:285–7.CrossRef Elmholdt TR, Jorgensen B, Ramsing M, et al. Two cases of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis after exposure to the macrocyclic compound gadobutrol. NDT Plus. 2010;3:285–7.CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Dillman JR, Ellis JH, Cohan RH, et al. Frequency and severity of acute allergic-like reactions to gadolinium-containing IV contrast media in children and adults. Am J Roentgen. 2007;189(6):1533–8.CrossRef Dillman JR, Ellis JH, Cohan RH, et al. Frequency and severity of acute allergic-like reactions to gadolinium-containing IV contrast media in children and adults. Am J Roentgen. 2007;189(6):1533–8.CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Tombach B, Bremer C, Reimer P, et al. Renal tolerance of a neutral gadolinium chelate (gadobutrol) in patients with chronic renal failure: results of a randomized study. Radiology. 2001;218(3):651–7.PubMed Tombach B, Bremer C, Reimer P, et al. Renal tolerance of a neutral gadolinium chelate (gadobutrol) in patients with chronic renal failure: results of a randomized study. Radiology. 2001;218(3):651–7.PubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Balzer JO, Loewe C, Davis K, et al. Safety of contrast-enhanced MR angiography employing gadobutrol 1.0 M as contrast material. Eur Radiol. 2003;13(9):2067–74.PubMedCrossRef Balzer JO, Loewe C, Davis K, et al. Safety of contrast-enhanced MR angiography employing gadobutrol 1.0 M as contrast material. Eur Radiol. 2003;13(9):2067–74.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Moriarty JM, Finn JP, Fonseca CG. Contrast agents used in cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: current issues and future directions. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2010;10(4):227–37.PubMedCrossRef Moriarty JM, Finn JP, Fonseca CG. Contrast agents used in cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: current issues and future directions. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2010;10(4):227–37.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Anonymous. What is an MRI scan and what can it do? Drugs Ther Bull. 2011;49(12):141–44. Anonymous. What is an MRI scan and what can it do? Drugs Ther Bull. 2011;49(12):141–44.
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller DH, Altmann DR, Chard DT. Advances in imaging to support the development of novel therapies for multiple sclerosis. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012;91(4):621–34.PubMedCrossRef Miller DH, Altmann DR, Chard DT. Advances in imaging to support the development of novel therapies for multiple sclerosis. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012;91(4):621–34.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Filippi M, Rocca MA, De Stefano N, et al. Magnetic resonance techniques in multiple sclerosis: the present and the future. Arch Neurol. 2011;68(12):1514–20.PubMedCrossRef Filippi M, Rocca MA, De Stefano N, et al. Magnetic resonance techniques in multiple sclerosis: the present and the future. Arch Neurol. 2011;68(12):1514–20.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Essig M, Anzalone N, Combs SE, et al. MR imaging of neoplastic central nervous system lesions: review and recommendations for current practice. Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33(5):803–17.PubMedCrossRef Essig M, Anzalone N, Combs SE, et al. MR imaging of neoplastic central nervous system lesions: review and recommendations for current practice. Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33(5):803–17.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Lovblad KO, Anzalone N, Dorfler A, et al. MR imaging in multiple sclerosis: review and recommendations for current practice. Am J Neuroradiol. 2010;31(6):983–9.PubMedCrossRef Lovblad KO, Anzalone N, Dorfler A, et al. MR imaging in multiple sclerosis: review and recommendations for current practice. Am J Neuroradiol. 2010;31(6):983–9.PubMedCrossRef
41.
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Holloway BJ, Rosewarne D, Jones RG. Imaging of thoracic aortic disease. Br J Radiol. 2011;84(3):S338–54.PubMedCrossRef Holloway BJ, Rosewarne D, Jones RG. Imaging of thoracic aortic disease. Br J Radiol. 2011;84(3):S338–54.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Gadobutrol: A Review of Its Use for Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Adults and Children
verfasst von
Lesley J. Scott
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2013
Verlag
Springer International Publishing AG
Erschienen in
Clinical Drug Investigation / Ausgabe 4/2013
Print ISSN: 1173-2563
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-1918
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-013-0066-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2013

Clinical Drug Investigation 4/2013 Zur Ausgabe