Anzeige
Erschienen in:
01.01.2015 | Original Research Article
Pharmacokinetics of Hydrocodone Extended-Release Tablets Formulated with Different Levels of Coating to Achieve Abuse Deterrence Compared with a Hydrocodone Immediate-Release/Acetaminophen Tablet in Healthy Subjects
Erschienen in: Clinical Drug Investigation | Ausgabe 1/2015
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhaltenAbstract
Background and Objective
A hydrocodone extended-release (ER) formulation employing the CIMA® Abuse-Deterrence Technology platform was developed to provide resistance against rapid release of hydrocodone when tablets are comminuted or taken with alcohol. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics of three hydrocodone ER tablet prototypes with varying levels of polymer coating to identify the prototype expected to have the greatest abuse deterrence potential based on pharmacokinetic characteristics that maintain systemic exposure to hydrocodone comparable to that of a commercially available hydrocodone immediate-release (IR) product.
Methods
In this four-period crossover study, healthy subjects aged 18–45 years were randomized to receive a single intact, oral 45-mg tablet of one of three hydrocodone ER prototypes (low-, intermediate-, or high-level coating) or an intact, oral tablet of hydrocodone IR/acetaminophen (APAP) 10/325 mg every 6 h until four tablets were administered, with each of the four treatments administered once over the four study periods. Dosing periods were separated by a minimum 5-day washout. Naltrexone 50 mg was administered to block opioid receptors. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic assessments were collected predose and through 72 h postdose. Parameters assessed included maximum observed plasma hydrocodone concentration (C
max), time to C
max (t
max), and area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC0–∞).
Results
Mean C
max values were 49.2, 32.6, and 28.4 ng/mL for the low-, intermediate-, and high-level coating hydrocodone ER tablet prototypes, respectively, and 37.3 ng/mL for the hydrocodone IR/APAP tablet; respective median t
max values were 5.9, 8.0, 8.0, and 1.0 h. Total systemic exposure to hydrocodone (AUC0–∞) was comparable between hydrocodone ER tablet prototypes (640, 600, and 578 ng·h/mL, respectively) and hydrocodone IR/APAP (581 ng·h/mL). No serious adverse events or deaths were reported. The most common adverse events included headache (26 %) and nausea (18 %).
Conclusion
All three hydrocodone ER tablet prototypes (low-, intermediate-, and high-level polymer coating) demonstrated ER pharmacokinetic characteristics. The hydrocodone ER tablet prototype with the high-level coating was selected for development because of its comparable exposure to the hydrocodone IR/APAP formulation and potentially increased ability to resist rapid drug release upon product tampering because of a higher polymer coating level. All study medications were well tolerated in healthy naltrexone-blocked volunteers.