Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Drugs 9/2017

01.06.2017 | Review Article

Current Status of Biosimilars in Oncology

verfasst von: Luis H. Camacho

Erschienen in: Drugs | Ausgabe 9/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Four medicinal cancer biological blockbusters will end their patent lifespan by 2020. It is estimated that the total market for cancer biologicals will reach approximately US$68 billion at that time. Approximately 20 biosimilars have entered the European market since the launch of the original approval guidelines in 2005, and four biosimilars have been approved in the USA since 2015. Data from European countries with the highest market entrance of biosimilars suggest that the incorporation of biosimilars into healthcare systems worldwide may result in a 30–45% cost savings. Initial levels of apprehension expressed by healthcare providers regarding the safety and efficacy of integrating biosimilars into the treatment of cancer patients have gradually decreased through active educational programs. The trust generated by regulatory agencies and drug manufacturers will ultimately make the adoption of biosimilars by healthcare providers and patients a smooth process. Future efforts to improve on the global acceptance and safety of biosimilars must include standardization of naming, regulatory requirements, and pharmacovigilance programs worldwide. High expectations are being placed on the cost savings, safety, and efficacy of these products. The entry costs for biosimilars and the pricing reaction of their originator products will determine the true savings by troubled health systems in dire need of cost cuts. This article discusses basic principles of biosimilars in hematology and oncology, the current status of their clinical development, and trends of acceptance by healthcare providers, and provides insight into potential future challenges.
Fußnoten
1
Blockbusters are drugs that generate at least US$1 billion for the company that develops them.
 
2
The biosimilar forum is a network of pharmaceutical companies including Allergan, Amgen, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Coherus, EMD-Serono, Merck, Pfizer, Samsung Bioepis, Sandoz, and Teva.
 
Literatur
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Chabner BA, Longo DL. Cancer chemotherapy and biotherapy—principles and practice. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001. Chabner BA, Longo DL. Cancer chemotherapy and biotherapy—principles and practice. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Brennan Z. FDA calls on companies to select 10 suffixes for biosimilar, biologic names. Rockville: Regulatory Affairs Professionals Society (RAPS); 2016. Brennan Z. FDA calls on companies to select 10 suffixes for biosimilar, biologic names. Rockville: Regulatory Affairs Professionals Society (RAPS); 2016.
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Rugo HS, Barve A, Waller CF, Hernandez-Bronchud M, Herson J, Yuan J, et al. Heritage: a phase III safety and efficacy trial of the proposed trastuzumab biosimilar Myl-1401O versus Herceptin [abstract no. LBA503]. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34 suppl. Rugo HS, Barve A, Waller CF, Hernandez-Bronchud M, Herson J, Yuan J, et al. Heritage: a phase III safety and efficacy trial of the proposed trastuzumab biosimilar Myl-1401O versus Herceptin [abstract no. LBA503]. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34 suppl.
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Yin D, Barker KB, Li R, Meng X, Reich SD, Ricart AD, et al. A phase I pharmacokinetics trial comparing PF-05280014 (a potential biosimilar) and trastuzumab in healthy volunteers (REFLECTIONS B327-01) [abstract no. 612]. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31 suppl. Yin D, Barker KB, Li R, Meng X, Reich SD, Ricart AD, et al. A phase I pharmacokinetics trial comparing PF-05280014 (a potential biosimilar) and trastuzumab in healthy volunteers (REFLECTIONS B327-01) [abstract no. 612]. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31 suppl.
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Stenina MB, Ignatova E, Frolova MA, Burdaeva ON, Nechaeva MP, Kopp MV, et al. Pharmacokinetics and safety of BCD-022, trastuzumab biosimilar candidate, compared to Herceptin in patients [abstract no. e11576]. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32 suppl. Stenina MB, Ignatova E, Frolova MA, Burdaeva ON, Nechaeva MP, Kopp MV, et al. Pharmacokinetics and safety of BCD-022, trastuzumab biosimilar candidate, compared to Herceptin in patients [abstract no. e11576]. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32 suppl.
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Thatcher N, Thomas M, Paz-Ares L, Ostoros G, Pan Z, Goldschmidt JH, et al. Randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study evaluating efficacy and safety of ABP 215 compared with bevacizumab in patients with non-squamous NSCLC [abstract no. 9095]. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34 suppl. Thatcher N, Thomas M, Paz-Ares L, Ostoros G, Pan Z, Goldschmidt JH, et al. Randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study evaluating efficacy and safety of ABP 215 compared with bevacizumab in patients with non-squamous NSCLC [abstract no. 9095]. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34 suppl.
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Zelenetz AD, Ahmed I, Braud EL, Cross JD, Davenport-Ennis N, Dickinson BD, et al. NCCN Biosimilars White Paper: regulatory, scientific, and patient safety perspectives. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2011;9(Suppl 4):S1–22.CrossRef Zelenetz AD, Ahmed I, Braud EL, Cross JD, Davenport-Ennis N, Dickinson BD, et al. NCCN Biosimilars White Paper: regulatory, scientific, and patient safety perspectives. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2011;9(Suppl 4):S1–22.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Current Status of Biosimilars in Oncology
verfasst von
Luis H. Camacho
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2017
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Drugs / Ausgabe 9/2017
Print ISSN: 0012-6667
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-1950
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-017-0743-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2017

Drugs 9/2017 Zur Ausgabe