Skip to main content
Erschienen in: PharmacoEconomics 9/2014

01.09.2014 | Systematic Review

Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Review of the Literature

verfasst von: Michael D. Clark, Domino Determann, Stavros Petrou, Domenico Moro, Esther W. de Bekker-Grob

Erschienen in: PharmacoEconomics | Ausgabe 9/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are increasingly used in health economics to address a wide range of health policy-related concerns.

Objective

Broadly adopting the methodology of an earlier systematic review of health-related DCEs, which covered the period 2001–2008, we report whether earlier trends continued during 2009–2012.

Methods

This paper systematically reviews health-related DCEs published between 2009 and 2012, using the same database as the earlier published review (PubMed) to obtain citations, and the same range of search terms.

Results

A total of 179 health-related DCEs for 2009–2012 met the inclusion criteria for the review. We found a continuing trend towards conducting DCEs across a broader range of countries. However, the trend towards including fewer attributes was reversed, whilst the trend towards interview-based DCEs reversed because of increased computer administration. The trend towards using more flexible econometric models, including mixed logit and latent class, has also continued. Reporting of monetary values has fallen compared with earlier periods, but the proportion of studies estimating trade-offs between health outcomes and experience factors, or valuing outcomes in terms of utility scores, has increased, although use of odds ratios and probabilities has declined. The reassuring trend towards the use of more flexible and appropriate DCE designs and econometric methods has been reinforced by the increased use of qualitative methods to inform DCE processes and results. However, qualitative research methods are being used less often to inform attribute selection, which may make DCEs more susceptible to omitted variable bias if the decision framework is not known prior to the research project.

Conclusions

The use of DCEs in healthcare continues to grow dramatically, as does the scope of applications across an expanding range of countries. There is increasing evidence that more sophisticated approaches to DCE design and analytical techniques are improving the quality of final outputs. That said, recent evidence that the use of qualitative methods to inform attribute selection has declined is of concern.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
Lower income countries in 2008–2012 included Kenya, South Africa, Thailand, China, Ghana, Vietnam, Ethiopia, Peru, Ukraine, India, Cuba, Nepal, Turkey, and Burkina Faso.
 
2
‘Other’ packages used included Gauss for two analyses; nGene (a Bayesian efficient design) for four analyses; and the statistical design procedure Gosset for one analysis; a D-efficient design advocated by Rose and Bliemer for one analysis; STATA for one design; a design described as “an experimental design algorithm optimizing orthogonality, attribute balance, and efficiency” for one design; and Street and Burgess Software for one design.
 
3
‘Other’ methods used in 2009–2012 included weighted probit [68]; OLS with a hetero-robust covariance matrix estimator [192]; a method described as “modelling including interaction effects” [45]; Cox’s proportional hazards model with time-dependent covariate [105]; weighted least squares regression to estimate utility weights [105]; multivariate ordered probit to estimate conjoint utility parameters [76]; mixed logit with hierarchical Bayesian modeling and ordered probit [115]; generalized estimated equations [109, 125]; random parameter logit estimated using a hierarchical Bayesian algorithim [208]; conditional logit and parameter weighting functions [160]; a series of multivariate regressions [50, 65]; a method described as Bayesian-like for preference weights [80]; OLS [87]; hierarchical Bayesian analysis [48, 70, 114, 205, 212]; multinomial exploded logit [177]; Firth’s unbiased estimator [193]; combined conditional logit and ranked logit model [127]; multivariate multilevel logistic regression [46]; generalized multinomial logit [119]; mixed effect logistic regression [184], error components mixed logit analysis [63]; a combination of Bayes theorem, Monte Carlo Markov chain procedure and the Metropolis Hastings algorithm [182]; and logistic and probit regression using cluster-robust standard error (SE), random effects and GEE and multinomial logistic and probit regressions with cluster-robust SE and random effects multinomial logistic model and probit model with cluster-robust SE treating the choices from two stages as two correlated binary outcomes [94].
 
4
In 2009–2012, one study explored how changing the number of responses elicited from respondents might affect estimates of WTP [204]; another looked at parents’ preferences for management of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder [206]; one study looked at general public preferences for long-term care [137]; another two studies looked at preferences for human papillomavirus vaccine, one case looking a societal preferences [207] and the other [63] looking at mothers’ preferences; another study looked at the valuation of diagnostic testing for idiopathic developmental disability by the general population [208]; another looked at various stakeholder groups’ preferences for coagulation factor concentrates to treat hemophilia [145]; one study looked at general public preferences for tele-endocopy services [158]; another compared Dutch and German preferences for health insurance amongst their populations [214]; one paper looked at public and decision maker preferences for pharmaceutical subsidy decisions [215]; one study explored how individuals perceive various coronary heart disease factors [203], whilst another described the relative importance of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events to be used when analyzing trials [212]. Two other DCEs were performed on the area of quality improvement; one investigated how to best disseminate evidence-based practices to addiction service providers and administrators [205], while the other was used to investigate which indicators had the greatest impact on the decisions of health service inspectors concerning the assessment of quality of mental health care [211]. Other applications included a study on preferences of health workers in Burkina Faso for health-insurance payment mechanisms [209]; a study on how respondents valued mortality risk attributable to climate change reductions [210]; and a study on the preferences for reducing contaminated sites to reduce the risk for cancer [213].
 
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Lancaster K. New approach to consumer theory. J Polit Econ. 1966;74(2):132–57. Lancaster K. New approach to consumer theory. J Polit Econ. 1966;74(2):132–57.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat McFadden D. Computing willingness-to-pay in random utility models. Trade theory and econometrics, chap. 15. In: Essays in honour of John S. Chipman. Studies in the Modern World Economy; 1999. p. 253–74. McFadden D. Computing willingness-to-pay in random utility models. Trade theory and econometrics, chap. 15. In: Essays in honour of John S. Chipman. Studies in the Modern World Economy; 1999. p. 253–74.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat de Bekker-Grob EW, Ryan M, Gerard K. Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature. Health Econ. 2012;21(2):145–72.PubMed de Bekker-Grob EW, Ryan M, Gerard K. Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature. Health Econ. 2012;21(2):145–72.PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Ryan M, Gerard K. Using discrete choice experiments to value health care programmes: current practice and future research reflections. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2003;2(1):55–64.PubMed Ryan M, Gerard K. Using discrete choice experiments to value health care programmes: current practice and future research reflections. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2003;2(1):55–64.PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat de Bekker-Grob EW, Chorus CG. Random regret-based discrete-choice modelling: an application to healthcare. Pharmacoeconomics. 2013;31(7):623–34.PubMed de Bekker-Grob EW, Chorus CG. Random regret-based discrete-choice modelling: an application to healthcare. Pharmacoeconomics. 2013;31(7):623–34.PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Petrou S, McIntosh E. Commentary: Using stated preference discrete choice experiments to elicit women’s preferences for aspects of maternity care. Birth. 2011;38(1):47–8.PubMed Petrou S, McIntosh E. Commentary: Using stated preference discrete choice experiments to elicit women’s preferences for aspects of maternity care. Birth. 2011;38(1):47–8.PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Lagarde M, Blaauw D. A review of the application and contribution of discrete choice experiments to inform human resources policy interventions. Hum Resour Health. 2009;7:62.PubMedCentralPubMed Lagarde M, Blaauw D. A review of the application and contribution of discrete choice experiments to inform human resources policy interventions. Hum Resour Health. 2009;7:62.PubMedCentralPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Clark MD, et al. ‘A better way to measure choices’, discrete choice experiment/conjoint analysis studies in Nephrology—a literature review. Eur Med J Nephrol. 2013;1:52–9. Clark MD, et al. ‘A better way to measure choices’, discrete choice experiment/conjoint analysis studies in Nephrology—a literature review. Eur Med J Nephrol. 2013;1:52–9.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Marshall D, et al. Conjoint analysis applications in health—how are studies being designed and reported? An update on current practice in the published literature between 2005 and 2008. Patient. 2010;3(4):249–56.PubMed Marshall D, et al. Conjoint analysis applications in health—how are studies being designed and reported? An update on current practice in the published literature between 2005 and 2008. Patient. 2010;3(4):249–56.PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson JL, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2011;123(18):e426–579.PubMed Anderson JL, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2011;123(18):e426–579.PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Reed Johnson F, et al. Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task Force. Value Health. 2013;16(1):3–13.PubMed Reed Johnson F, et al. Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task Force. Value Health. 2013;16(1):3–13.PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Coast J, Horrocks S. Developing attributes and levels for discrete choice experiments using qualitative methods. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2007;12(1):25–30.PubMed Coast J, Horrocks S. Developing attributes and levels for discrete choice experiments using qualitative methods. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2007;12(1):25–30.PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Fraenkel L. Conjoint analysis at the individual patient level: issues to consider as we move from a research to a clinical tool. Patient. 2008;1(4):251–3.PubMedCentralPubMed Fraenkel L. Conjoint analysis at the individual patient level: issues to consider as we move from a research to a clinical tool. Patient. 2008;1(4):251–3.PubMedCentralPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Lancsar E, Louviere J. Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making: a user’s guide. Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26(8):661–77.PubMed Lancsar E, Louviere J. Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making: a user’s guide. Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26(8):661–77.PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Coast J, et al. Using qualitative methods for attribute development for discrete choice experiments: issues and recommendations. Health Econ. 2012;21(6):730–41.PubMed Coast J, et al. Using qualitative methods for attribute development for discrete choice experiments: issues and recommendations. Health Econ. 2012;21(6):730–41.PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Bridges JF, et al. Conjoint analysis applications in health—a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force. Value Health. 2011;14(4):403–13.PubMed Bridges JF, et al. Conjoint analysis applications in health—a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force. Value Health. 2011;14(4):403–13.PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Flynn TN. Valuing citizen and patient preferences in health: recent developments in three types of best–worst scaling. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2010;10(3):259–67.PubMed Flynn TN. Valuing citizen and patient preferences in health: recent developments in three types of best–worst scaling. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2010;10(3):259–67.PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Lancsar E, et al. Best worst discrete choice experiments in health: methods and an application. Soc Sci Med. 2013;76(1):74–82.PubMed Lancsar E, et al. Best worst discrete choice experiments in health: methods and an application. Soc Sci Med. 2013;76(1):74–82.PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Bell RA, et al. Encouraging patients with depressive symptoms to seek care: a mixed methods approach to message development. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;78(2):198–205.PubMedCentralPubMed Bell RA, et al. Encouraging patients with depressive symptoms to seek care: a mixed methods approach to message development. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;78(2):198–205.PubMedCentralPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat de Achaval S, et al. Impact of educational and patient decision aids on decisional conflict associated with total knee arthroplasty. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012;64(2):229–37. de Achaval S, et al. Impact of educational and patient decision aids on decisional conflict associated with total knee arthroplasty. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012;64(2):229–37.
21.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Fraenkel L. Feasibility of using modified adaptive conjoint analysis importance questions. Patient. 2010;3(4):209–15.PubMedCentralPubMed Fraenkel L. Feasibility of using modified adaptive conjoint analysis importance questions. Patient. 2010;3(4):209–15.PubMedCentralPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Gregorian RS Jr, et al. Importance of side effects in opioid treatment: a trade-off analysis with patients and physicians. J Pain. 2010;11(11):1095–108.PubMed Gregorian RS Jr, et al. Importance of side effects in opioid treatment: a trade-off analysis with patients and physicians. J Pain. 2010;11(11):1095–108.PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat de Groot IB, et al. Is the impact of hospital performance data greater in patients who have compared hospitals? BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11:214.PubMedCentralPubMed de Groot IB, et al. Is the impact of hospital performance data greater in patients who have compared hospitals? BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11:214.PubMedCentralPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat de Groot IB, et al. Choosing between hospitals: the influence of the experiences of other patients. Med Decis Making. 2012;32(6):764–78.PubMed de Groot IB, et al. Choosing between hospitals: the influence of the experiences of other patients. Med Decis Making. 2012;32(6):764–78.PubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Meister H, et al. Utility and importance of hearing-aid features assessed by hearing-aid acousticians. Trends Amplif. 2010;14(3):155–63.PubMed Meister H, et al. Utility and importance of hearing-aid features assessed by hearing-aid acousticians. Trends Amplif. 2010;14(3):155–63.PubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Pieterse AH, et al. Adaptive conjoint analysis as individual preference assessment tool: feasibility through the internet and reliability of preferences. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;78(2):224–33.PubMed Pieterse AH, et al. Adaptive conjoint analysis as individual preference assessment tool: feasibility through the internet and reliability of preferences. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;78(2):224–33.PubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Pieterse AH, Stiggelbout AM, Marijnen CA. Methodologic evaluation of adaptive conjoint analysis to assess patient preferences: an application in oncology. Health Expect. 2010;13(4):392–405.PubMed Pieterse AH, Stiggelbout AM, Marijnen CA. Methodologic evaluation of adaptive conjoint analysis to assess patient preferences: an application in oncology. Health Expect. 2010;13(4):392–405.PubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Rochon D, et al. Elderly patients’ experiences using adaptive conjoint analysis software as a decision aid for osteoarthritis of the knee. Health Expect. 2012. Rochon D, et al. Elderly patients’ experiences using adaptive conjoint analysis software as a decision aid for osteoarthritis of the knee. Health Expect. 2012.
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Halme M, Linden K, Kaaria K. Patients’ preferences for generic and branded over-the-counter medicines: an adaptive conjoint analysis approach. Patient. 2009;2(4):243–55.PubMed Halme M, Linden K, Kaaria K. Patients’ preferences for generic and branded over-the-counter medicines: an adaptive conjoint analysis approach. Patient. 2009;2(4):243–55.PubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Ahmed SF, Smith WA, Blamires C. Facilitating and understanding the family’s choice of injection device for growth hormone therapy by using conjoint analysis. Arch Dis Child. 2008;93(2):110–4.PubMed Ahmed SF, Smith WA, Blamires C. Facilitating and understanding the family’s choice of injection device for growth hormone therapy by using conjoint analysis. Arch Dis Child. 2008;93(2):110–4.PubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Beusterien KM, et al. Understanding patient preferences for HIV medications using adaptive conjoint analysis: feasibility assessment. Value Health. 2005;8(4):453–61.PubMed Beusterien KM, et al. Understanding patient preferences for HIV medications using adaptive conjoint analysis: feasibility assessment. Value Health. 2005;8(4):453–61.PubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Beusterien KM, et al. Patient preferences among third agent HIV medications: a US and German perspective. AIDS Care. 2007;19(8):982–8.PubMed Beusterien KM, et al. Patient preferences among third agent HIV medications: a US and German perspective. AIDS Care. 2007;19(8):982–8.PubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Gan TJ, et al. Patient preferences for acute pain treatment. Br J Anaesth. 2004;92(5):681–8.PubMed Gan TJ, et al. Patient preferences for acute pain treatment. Br J Anaesth. 2004;92(5):681–8.PubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Fraenkel L, Bodardus S, Wittnik DR. Understanding patient preferences for the treatment of lupus nephritis with adaptive conjoint analysis. Med Care. 2001;39(11):1203–16.PubMed Fraenkel L, Bodardus S, Wittnik DR. Understanding patient preferences for the treatment of lupus nephritis with adaptive conjoint analysis. Med Care. 2001;39(11):1203–16.PubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Fraenkel L, Bogardus ST Jr, Wittink DR. Risk-attitude and patient treatment preferences. Lupus. 2003;12(5):370–6.PubMed Fraenkel L, Bogardus ST Jr, Wittink DR. Risk-attitude and patient treatment preferences. Lupus. 2003;12(5):370–6.PubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Fraenkel L, et al. Informed choice and the widespread use of antiinflammatory drugs. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;51(2):210–4.PubMed Fraenkel L, et al. Informed choice and the widespread use of antiinflammatory drugs. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;51(2):210–4.PubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Fraenkel L, et al. Patient preferences for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63(11):1372–8.PubMedCentralPubMed Fraenkel L, et al. Patient preferences for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63(11):1372–8.PubMedCentralPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Fraenkel L, et al. Are preferences for cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors influenced by the certainty effect? J Rheumatol. 2004;31(3):591–3.PubMed Fraenkel L, et al. Are preferences for cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors influenced by the certainty effect? J Rheumatol. 2004;31(3):591–3.PubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Fraenkel L, Gulanski B, Wittink D. Patient treatment preferences for osteoporosis. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;55(5):729–35.PubMedCentralPubMed Fraenkel L, Gulanski B, Wittink D. Patient treatment preferences for osteoporosis. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;55(5):729–35.PubMedCentralPubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Fraenkel L, Gulanski B, Wittink D. Patient willingness to take teriparatide. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;65(2):237–44.PubMedCentralPubMed Fraenkel L, Gulanski B, Wittink D. Patient willingness to take teriparatide. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;65(2):237–44.PubMedCentralPubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Fraenkel L, Fried T. If you want patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) to exercise: tell them about NSAIDS. Patient. 2008;1(1):21–6.PubMedCentralPubMed Fraenkel L, Fried T. If you want patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) to exercise: tell them about NSAIDS. Patient. 2008;1(1):21–6.PubMedCentralPubMed
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Pieterse AH, et al. Benefit from preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer treatment: disease-free patients’ and oncologists’ preferences. Br J Cancer. 2007;97(6):717–24.PubMedCentralPubMed Pieterse AH, et al. Benefit from preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer treatment: disease-free patients’ and oncologists’ preferences. Br J Cancer. 2007;97(6):717–24.PubMedCentralPubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Stiggelbout AM, et al. Individual quality of life: adaptive conjoint analysis as an alternative for direct weighting? Qual Life Res. 2008;17(4):641–9.PubMedCentralPubMed Stiggelbout AM, et al. Individual quality of life: adaptive conjoint analysis as an alternative for direct weighting? Qual Life Res. 2008;17(4):641–9.PubMedCentralPubMed
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Boonen LH, et al. Which preferred providers are really preferred? Effectiveness of insurers’ channeling incentives on pharmacy choice. Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2009;9(4):347–66.PubMed Boonen LH, et al. Which preferred providers are really preferred? Effectiveness of insurers’ channeling incentives on pharmacy choice. Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2009;9(4):347–66.PubMed
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Damman OC, et al. Consumers’ interpretation and use of comparative information on the quality of health care: the effect of presentation approaches. Health Expect. 2012;15(2):197–211.PubMed Damman OC, et al. Consumers’ interpretation and use of comparative information on the quality of health care: the effect of presentation approaches. Health Expect. 2012;15(2):197–211.PubMed
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Davison SN, Kromm SK, Currie GR. Patient and health professional preferences for organ allocation and procurement, end-of-life care and organization of care for patients with chronic kidney disease using a discrete choice experiment. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25(7):2334–41.PubMed Davison SN, Kromm SK, Currie GR. Patient and health professional preferences for organ allocation and procurement, end-of-life care and organization of care for patients with chronic kidney disease using a discrete choice experiment. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25(7):2334–41.PubMed
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Eisingerich AB, et al. Attitudes and acceptance of oral and parenteral HIV preexposure prophylaxis among potential user groups: a multinational study. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(1):e28238.PubMedCentralPubMed Eisingerich AB, et al. Attitudes and acceptance of oral and parenteral HIV preexposure prophylaxis among potential user groups: a multinational study. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(1):e28238.PubMedCentralPubMed
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Gerard K, et al. Valuing the extended role of prescribing pharmacist in general practice: results from a discrete choice experiment. Value Health. 2012;15(5):699–707.PubMed Gerard K, et al. Valuing the extended role of prescribing pharmacist in general practice: results from a discrete choice experiment. Value Health. 2012;15(5):699–707.PubMed
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Gidengil CT, et al. Parental and societal values for the risks and benefits of childhood combination vaccines. Vaccine. 2012;30(23):3445–52.PubMed Gidengil CT, et al. Parental and societal values for the risks and benefits of childhood combination vaccines. Vaccine. 2012;30(23):3445–52.PubMed
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Goodall S, et al. Preferences for support services among adolescents and young adults with cancer or a blood disorder: a discrete choice experiment. Health Policy. 2012;107(2–3):304–11.PubMed Goodall S, et al. Preferences for support services among adolescents and young adults with cancer or a blood disorder: a discrete choice experiment. Health Policy. 2012;107(2–3):304–11.PubMed
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Hancock-Howard RL, et al. Public preferences for counseling regarding antidepressant use during pregnancy: a discrete choice experiment. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2012;94(7):532–9.PubMed Hancock-Howard RL, et al. Public preferences for counseling regarding antidepressant use during pregnancy: a discrete choice experiment. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2012;94(7):532–9.PubMed
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Hill M, et al. Women’s and health professionals’ preferences for prenatal tests for Down syndrome: a discrete choice experiment to contrast noninvasive prenatal diagnosis with current invasive tests. Genet Med. 2012;14(11):905–13.PubMed Hill M, et al. Women’s and health professionals’ preferences for prenatal tests for Down syndrome: a discrete choice experiment to contrast noninvasive prenatal diagnosis with current invasive tests. Genet Med. 2012;14(11):905–13.PubMed
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Kimman ML, et al. Follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: one strategy fits all? An investigation of patient preferences using a discrete choice experiment. Acta Oncol. 2010;49(3):328–37.PubMed Kimman ML, et al. Follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: one strategy fits all? An investigation of patient preferences using a discrete choice experiment. Acta Oncol. 2010;49(3):328–37.PubMed
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Kruk ME, et al. Women’s preferences for obstetric care in rural Ethiopia: a population-based discrete choice experiment in a region with low rates of facility delivery. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010;64(11):984–8.PubMed Kruk ME, et al. Women’s preferences for obstetric care in rural Ethiopia: a population-based discrete choice experiment in a region with low rates of facility delivery. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010;64(11):984–8.PubMed
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Landfeldt E, et al. Patient preferences for characteristics differentiating ovarian stimulation treatments. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(3):760–9.PubMed Landfeldt E, et al. Patient preferences for characteristics differentiating ovarian stimulation treatments. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(3):760–9.PubMed
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Mentzakis E, Ryan M, McNamee P. Using discrete choice experiments to value informal care tasks: exploring preference heterogeneity. Health Econ. 2011;20(8):930–44.PubMed Mentzakis E, Ryan M, McNamee P. Using discrete choice experiments to value informal care tasks: exploring preference heterogeneity. Health Econ. 2011;20(8):930–44.PubMed
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Miners A, et al. Assessing user preferences for sexually transmitted infection testing services: a discrete choice experiment. Sex Transm Infect. 2012;88(7):510–6.PubMedCentralPubMed Miners A, et al. Assessing user preferences for sexually transmitted infection testing services: a discrete choice experiment. Sex Transm Infect. 2012;88(7):510–6.PubMedCentralPubMed
59.
Zurück zum Zitat Mohamed AF, et al. Patient and parent preferences for immunoglobulin treatments: a conjoint analysis. J Med Econ. 2012;15(6):1183–91.PubMed Mohamed AF, et al. Patient and parent preferences for immunoglobulin treatments: a conjoint analysis. J Med Econ. 2012;15(6):1183–91.PubMed
60.
Zurück zum Zitat Naik-Panvelkar P, et al. Patients’ value of asthma services in Australian pharmacies: the way ahead for asthma care. J Asthma. 2012;49(3):310–6.PubMed Naik-Panvelkar P, et al. Patients’ value of asthma services in Australian pharmacies: the way ahead for asthma care. J Asthma. 2012;49(3):310–6.PubMed
61.
Zurück zum Zitat Naik-Panvelkar P, et al. Patient preferences for community pharmacy asthma services: a discrete choice experiment. Pharmacoeconomics. 2012;30(10):961–76.PubMed Naik-Panvelkar P, et al. Patient preferences for community pharmacy asthma services: a discrete choice experiment. Pharmacoeconomics. 2012;30(10):961–76.PubMed
62.
Zurück zum Zitat Pedersen LB, et al. Do general practitioners know patients’ preferences? An empirical study on the agency relationship at an aggregate level using a discrete choice experiment. Value Health. 2012;15(3):514–23.PubMed Pedersen LB, et al. Do general practitioners know patients’ preferences? An empirical study on the agency relationship at an aggregate level using a discrete choice experiment. Value Health. 2012;15(3):514–23.PubMed
63.
Zurück zum Zitat Poulos C, et al. Consumer preferences for household water treatment products in Andhra Pradesh, India. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75(4):738–46.PubMed Poulos C, et al. Consumer preferences for household water treatment products in Andhra Pradesh, India. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75(4):738–46.PubMed
64.
Zurück zum Zitat van der Pol M, et al. Eliciting individual preferences for health care: a case study of perinatal care. Health Expect. 2010;13(1):4–12.PubMed van der Pol M, et al. Eliciting individual preferences for health care: a case study of perinatal care. Health Expect. 2010;13(1):4–12.PubMed
65.
Zurück zum Zitat Waltzman JT, Scholz T, Evans GR. What patients look for when choosing a plastic surgeon: an assessment of patient preference by conjoint analysis. Ann Plast Surg. 2011;66(6):643–7.PubMed Waltzman JT, Scholz T, Evans GR. What patients look for when choosing a plastic surgeon: an assessment of patient preference by conjoint analysis. Ann Plast Surg. 2011;66(6):643–7.PubMed
66.
Zurück zum Zitat Yeo ST, et al. Preferences of people with diabetes for diabetic retinopathy screening: a discrete choice experiment. Diabet Med. 2012;29(7):869–77.PubMed Yeo ST, et al. Preferences of people with diabetes for diabetic retinopathy screening: a discrete choice experiment. Diabet Med. 2012;29(7):869–77.PubMed
67.
Zurück zum Zitat Yi D, et al. Using discrete choice experiments to inform randomised controlled trials: an application to chronic low back pain management in primary care. Eur J Pain. 2011;15(5):531e1–10. Yi D, et al. Using discrete choice experiments to inform randomised controlled trials: an application to chronic low back pain management in primary care. Eur J Pain. 2011;15(5):531e1–10.
68.
Zurück zum Zitat Bederman S, Mahomed N. In the eye of the beholder: preferences of patients, family physicians, and surgeons for lumbar spinal surgery. Spine. 2009;35(1):108–15. Bederman S, Mahomed N. In the eye of the beholder: preferences of patients, family physicians, and surgeons for lumbar spinal surgery. Spine. 2009;35(1):108–15.
69.
Zurück zum Zitat Bridges JF, et al. Patients’ preferences for treatment outcomes for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a conjoint analysis. Lung Cancer. 2012;77(1):224–31.PubMed Bridges JF, et al. Patients’ preferences for treatment outcomes for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a conjoint analysis. Lung Cancer. 2012;77(1):224–31.PubMed
70.
Zurück zum Zitat Chancellor J, et al. Stated preferences of physicians and chronic pain sufferers in the use of classic strong opioids. Value Health. 2012;15(1):106–17.PubMed Chancellor J, et al. Stated preferences of physicians and chronic pain sufferers in the use of classic strong opioids. Value Health. 2012;15(1):106–17.PubMed
71.
Zurück zum Zitat Clark M, et al. Prioritizing patients for renal transplantation? Analysis of patient preferences for kidney allocation according to ethnicity and gender. J Divers Health Soc Care. 2009;6:181–91. Clark M, et al. Prioritizing patients for renal transplantation? Analysis of patient preferences for kidney allocation according to ethnicity and gender. J Divers Health Soc Care. 2009;6:181–91.
72.
Zurück zum Zitat Clark MD, et al. Who should be prioritized for renal transplantation? Analysis of key stakeholder preferences using discrete choice experiments. BMC Nephrol. 2012;13:152.PubMedCentralPubMed Clark MD, et al. Who should be prioritized for renal transplantation? Analysis of key stakeholder preferences using discrete choice experiments. BMC Nephrol. 2012;13:152.PubMedCentralPubMed
73.
Zurück zum Zitat Hauber AB, et al. Treatment preferences and medication adherence of people with type 2 diabetes using oral glucose-lowering agents. Diabet Med. 2009;26(4):416–24.PubMed Hauber AB, et al. Treatment preferences and medication adherence of people with type 2 diabetes using oral glucose-lowering agents. Diabet Med. 2009;26(4):416–24.PubMed
74.
Zurück zum Zitat Hauber AB, et al. Estimating importance weights for the IWQOL-Lite using conjoint analysis. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(5):701–9.PubMed Hauber AB, et al. Estimating importance weights for the IWQOL-Lite using conjoint analysis. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(5):701–9.PubMed
75.
Zurück zum Zitat Hauber AB, et al. Patient preferences for reducing toxicities of treatments for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Patient Prefer Adherence. 2011;5:307–14.PubMedCentralPubMed Hauber AB, et al. Patient preferences for reducing toxicities of treatments for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Patient Prefer Adherence. 2011;5:307–14.PubMedCentralPubMed
76.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson FR, Hauber AB, Ozdemir S. Using conjoint analysis to estimate healthy-year equivalents for acute conditions: an application to vasomotor symptoms. Value Health. 2009;12(1):146–52.PubMed Johnson FR, Hauber AB, Ozdemir S. Using conjoint analysis to estimate healthy-year equivalents for acute conditions: an application to vasomotor symptoms. Value Health. 2009;12(1):146–52.PubMed
77.
Zurück zum Zitat Potoglou D, et al. Best–worst scaling vs. discrete choice experiments: an empirical comparison using social care data. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72(10):1717–27.PubMed Potoglou D, et al. Best–worst scaling vs. discrete choice experiments: an empirical comparison using social care data. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72(10):1717–27.PubMed
78.
Zurück zum Zitat Ratcliffe J, et al. Using DCE and ranking data to estimate cardinal values for health states for deriving a preference-based single index from the sexual quality of life questionnaire. Health Econ. 2009;18(11):1261–76.PubMed Ratcliffe J, et al. Using DCE and ranking data to estimate cardinal values for health states for deriving a preference-based single index from the sexual quality of life questionnaire. Health Econ. 2009;18(11):1261–76.PubMed
79.
Zurück zum Zitat van Til JA, Stiggelbout AM, Ijzerman MJ. The effect of information on preferences stated in a choice-based conjoint analysis. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;74(2):264–71.PubMed van Til JA, Stiggelbout AM, Ijzerman MJ. The effect of information on preferences stated in a choice-based conjoint analysis. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;74(2):264–71.PubMed
80.
Zurück zum Zitat Wittink MN, et al. Towards patient-centered care for depression: conjoint methods to tailor treatment based on preferences. Patient. 2010;3(3):145–57.PubMedCentralPubMed Wittink MN, et al. Towards patient-centered care for depression: conjoint methods to tailor treatment based on preferences. Patient. 2010;3(3):145–57.PubMedCentralPubMed
81.
Zurück zum Zitat Ahmed A, Fincham JE. Patients’ view of retail clinics as a source of primary care: boon for nurse practitioners? J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2011;23(4):193–9.PubMed Ahmed A, Fincham JE. Patients’ view of retail clinics as a source of primary care: boon for nurse practitioners? J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2011;23(4):193–9.PubMed
82.
Zurück zum Zitat Albada A, Triemstra M. Patients’ priorities for ambulatory hospital care centres. A survey and discrete choice experiment among elderly and chronically ill patients of a Dutch hospital. Health Expect. 2009;12(1):92–105.PubMed Albada A, Triemstra M. Patients’ priorities for ambulatory hospital care centres. A survey and discrete choice experiment among elderly and chronically ill patients of a Dutch hospital. Health Expect. 2009;12(1):92–105.PubMed
83.
Zurück zum Zitat Bansback N, et al. The effect of direct-to-consumer genetic tests on anticipated affect and health-seeking behaviors: a pilot survey. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2012;16(10):1165–71.PubMed Bansback N, et al. The effect of direct-to-consumer genetic tests on anticipated affect and health-seeking behaviors: a pilot survey. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2012;16(10):1165–71.PubMed
84.
Zurück zum Zitat Bijlenga D, Bonsel GJ, Birnie E. Eliciting willingness to pay in obstetrics: comparing a direct and an indirect valuation method for complex health outcomes. Health Econ. 2011;20(11):1392–406.PubMed Bijlenga D, Bonsel GJ, Birnie E. Eliciting willingness to pay in obstetrics: comparing a direct and an indirect valuation method for complex health outcomes. Health Econ. 2011;20(11):1392–406.PubMed
85.
Zurück zum Zitat Bogelund M, et al. Patient preferences for diabetes management among people with type 2 diabetes in Denmark—a discrete choice experiment. Curr Med Res Opin. 2011;27(11):2175–83.PubMed Bogelund M, et al. Patient preferences for diabetes management among people with type 2 diabetes in Denmark—a discrete choice experiment. Curr Med Res Opin. 2011;27(11):2175–83.PubMed
86.
Zurück zum Zitat Bridges JF, et al. Can patients diagnosed with schizophrenia complete choice-based conjoint analysis tasks? Patient. 2011;4(4):267–75.PubMed Bridges JF, et al. Can patients diagnosed with schizophrenia complete choice-based conjoint analysis tasks? Patient. 2011;4(4):267–75.PubMed
87.
Zurück zum Zitat Bridges JF, et al. Consumer preferences for hearing aid attributes: a comparison of rating and conjoint analysis methods. Trends Amplif. 2012;16(1):40–8.PubMed Bridges JF, et al. Consumer preferences for hearing aid attributes: a comparison of rating and conjoint analysis methods. Trends Amplif. 2012;16(1):40–8.PubMed
88.
Zurück zum Zitat Bridges JF, et al. Designing family-centered male circumcision services: a conjoint analysis approach. Patient. 2012;5(2):101–11.PubMed Bridges JF, et al. Designing family-centered male circumcision services: a conjoint analysis approach. Patient. 2012;5(2):101–11.PubMed
89.
Zurück zum Zitat Brown DS, et al. Estimating older adults’ preferences for walking programs via conjoint analysis. Am J Prev Med. 2009;36(3):201–7 e4.PubMed Brown DS, et al. Estimating older adults’ preferences for walking programs via conjoint analysis. Am J Prev Med. 2009;36(3):201–7 e4.PubMed
90.
Zurück zum Zitat Brown TM, et al. The perspective of patients with haemophilia with inhibitors and their care givers: preferences for treatment characteristics. Haemophilia. 2011;17(3):476–82.PubMed Brown TM, et al. The perspective of patients with haemophilia with inhibitors and their care givers: preferences for treatment characteristics. Haemophilia. 2011;17(3):476–82.PubMed
91.
Zurück zum Zitat Bunge E, et al. Patients’ preferences for scoliosis brace treatment. Spine. 2009;35(1):57–63. Bunge E, et al. Patients’ preferences for scoliosis brace treatment. Spine. 2009;35(1):57–63.
92.
Zurück zum Zitat Burnett HF, et al. Parents’ preferences for drug treatments in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a discrete choice experiment. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012;64(9):1382–91. Burnett HF, et al. Parents’ preferences for drug treatments in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a discrete choice experiment. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012;64(9):1382–91.
93.
Zurück zum Zitat Chan YM, et al. Chinese women’s preferences for prenatal diagnostic procedure and their willingness to trade between procedures. Prenat Diagn. 2009;29(13):1270–6.PubMed Chan YM, et al. Chinese women’s preferences for prenatal diagnostic procedure and their willingness to trade between procedures. Prenat Diagn. 2009;29(13):1270–6.PubMed
94.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheng J, et al. An empirical comparison of methods for analyzing correlated data from a discrete choice survey to elicit patient preference for colorectal cancer screening. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:15.PubMedCentralPubMed Cheng J, et al. An empirical comparison of methods for analyzing correlated data from a discrete choice survey to elicit patient preference for colorectal cancer screening. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:15.PubMedCentralPubMed
95.
Zurück zum Zitat Damen TH, et al. Patients’ preferences for breast reconstruction: a discrete choice experiment. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011;64(1):75–83.PubMed Damen TH, et al. Patients’ preferences for breast reconstruction: a discrete choice experiment. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011;64(1):75–83.PubMed
96.
Zurück zum Zitat Darba J, et al. Patient preferences for osteoporosis in Spain: a discrete choice experiment. Osteoporos Int. 2011;22(6):1947–54.PubMed Darba J, et al. Patient preferences for osteoporosis in Spain: a discrete choice experiment. Osteoporos Int. 2011;22(6):1947–54.PubMed
97.
Zurück zum Zitat de Bekker-Grob EW, et al. Preferences of GPs and patients for preventive osteoporosis drug treatment: a discrete-choice experiment. Pharmacoeconomics. 2009;27(3):211–9.PubMed de Bekker-Grob EW, et al. Preferences of GPs and patients for preventive osteoporosis drug treatment: a discrete-choice experiment. Pharmacoeconomics. 2009;27(3):211–9.PubMed
98.
Zurück zum Zitat de Bekker-Grob EW, et al. Girls’ preferences for HPV vaccination: a discrete choice experiment. Vaccine. 2010;28(41):6692–7.PubMed de Bekker-Grob EW, et al. Girls’ preferences for HPV vaccination: a discrete choice experiment. Vaccine. 2010;28(41):6692–7.PubMed
99.
Zurück zum Zitat Deverill M, et al. Antenatal care for first time mothers: a discrete choice experiment of women’s views on alternative packages of care. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;151(1):33–7.PubMed Deverill M, et al. Antenatal care for first time mothers: a discrete choice experiment of women’s views on alternative packages of care. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;151(1):33–7.PubMed
100.
Zurück zum Zitat Eberth B, et al. Does one size fit all? Investigating heterogeneity in men’s preferences for benign prostatic hyperplasia treatment using mixed logit analysis. Med Decis Making. 2009;29(6):707–15.PubMed Eberth B, et al. Does one size fit all? Investigating heterogeneity in men’s preferences for benign prostatic hyperplasia treatment using mixed logit analysis. Med Decis Making. 2009;29(6):707–15.PubMed
101.
Zurück zum Zitat Essers BA, et al. Assessing the public’s preference for surgical treatment of primary basal cell carcinoma: a discrete-choice experiment in the south of the Netherlands. Dermatol Surg. 2010;36(12):1950–5.PubMed Essers BA, et al. Assessing the public’s preference for surgical treatment of primary basal cell carcinoma: a discrete-choice experiment in the south of the Netherlands. Dermatol Surg. 2010;36(12):1950–5.PubMed
102.
Zurück zum Zitat Essers BA, et al. Does the inclusion of a cost attribute result in different preferences for the surgical treatment of primary basal cell carcinoma? A comparison of two discrete-choice experiments. Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(6):507–20.PubMed Essers BA, et al. Does the inclusion of a cost attribute result in different preferences for the surgical treatment of primary basal cell carcinoma? A comparison of two discrete-choice experiments. Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(6):507–20.PubMed
103.
Zurück zum Zitat Faggioli G, et al. Preferences of patients, their family caregivers and vascular surgeons in the choice of abdominal aortic aneurysms treatment options: the PREFER study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011;42(1):26–34.PubMed Faggioli G, et al. Preferences of patients, their family caregivers and vascular surgeons in the choice of abdominal aortic aneurysms treatment options: the PREFER study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011;42(1):26–34.PubMed
104.
Zurück zum Zitat Glenngard AH, et al. Patient preferences and willingness-to-pay for ADHD treatment with stimulants using discrete choice experiment (DCE) in Sweden, Denmark and Norway. Nord J Psychiatry. 2013;67(5):351–9.PubMed Glenngard AH, et al. Patient preferences and willingness-to-pay for ADHD treatment with stimulants using discrete choice experiment (DCE) in Sweden, Denmark and Norway. Nord J Psychiatry. 2013;67(5):351–9.PubMed
105.
Zurück zum Zitat Goto R, et al. A cohort study to examine whether time and risk preference is related to smoking cessation success. Addiction. 2009;104(6):1018–24.PubMed Goto R, et al. A cohort study to examine whether time and risk preference is related to smoking cessation success. Addiction. 2009;104(6):1018–24.PubMed
106.
Zurück zum Zitat Goto R, Takahashi Y, Ida T. Changes in smokers’ attitudes toward intended cessation attempts in Japan. Value Health. 2011;14(5):785–91.PubMed Goto R, Takahashi Y, Ida T. Changes in smokers’ attitudes toward intended cessation attempts in Japan. Value Health. 2011;14(5):785–91.PubMed
107.
Zurück zum Zitat Green C, Gerard K. Exploring the social value of health-care interventions: a stated preference discrete choice experiment. Health Econ. 2009;18(8):951–76.PubMed Green C, Gerard K. Exploring the social value of health-care interventions: a stated preference discrete choice experiment. Health Econ. 2009;18(8):951–76.PubMed
108.
Zurück zum Zitat Guimaraes C, et al. A valuation of patients’ willingness-to-pay for insulin delivery in diabetes. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25(3):359–66.PubMed Guimaraes C, et al. A valuation of patients’ willingness-to-pay for insulin delivery in diabetes. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25(3):359–66.PubMed
109.
Zurück zum Zitat Hodgkins P, et al. Patient preferences for first-line oral treatment for mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis: a discrete-choice experiment. Patient. 2012;5(1):33–44.PubMed Hodgkins P, et al. Patient preferences for first-line oral treatment for mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis: a discrete-choice experiment. Patient. 2012;5(1):33–44.PubMed
110.
Zurück zum Zitat Hol L, et al. Preferences for colorectal cancer screening strategies: a discrete choice experiment. Br J Cancer. 2010;102(6):972–80.PubMedCentralPubMed Hol L, et al. Preferences for colorectal cancer screening strategies: a discrete choice experiment. Br J Cancer. 2010;102(6):972–80.PubMedCentralPubMed
111.
Zurück zum Zitat Hong SH, et al. Conjoint analysis of patient preferences on Medicare medication therapy management. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2011;51(3):378–87. Hong SH, et al. Conjoint analysis of patient preferences on Medicare medication therapy management. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2011;51(3):378–87.
112.
Zurück zum Zitat Howard K, Salkeld G. Does attribute framing in discrete choice experiments influence willingness to pay? Results from a discrete choice experiment in screening for colorectal cancer. Value Health. 2009;12(2):354–63.PubMed Howard K, Salkeld G. Does attribute framing in discrete choice experiments influence willingness to pay? Results from a discrete choice experiment in screening for colorectal cancer. Value Health. 2009;12(2):354–63.PubMed
113.
Zurück zum Zitat Howard K, et al. Preferences for CT colonography and colonoscopy as diagnostic tests for colorectal cancer: a discrete choice experiment. Value Health. 2011;14(8):1146–52.PubMedCentralPubMed Howard K, et al. Preferences for CT colonography and colonoscopy as diagnostic tests for colorectal cancer: a discrete choice experiment. Value Health. 2011;14(8):1146–52.PubMedCentralPubMed
114.
Zurück zum Zitat Ijzerman MJ, van Til JA, Bridges JF. A comparison of analytic hierarchy process and conjoint analysis methods in assessing treatment alternatives for stroke rehabilitation. Patient. 2012;5(1):45–56.PubMed Ijzerman MJ, van Til JA, Bridges JF. A comparison of analytic hierarchy process and conjoint analysis methods in assessing treatment alternatives for stroke rehabilitation. Patient. 2012;5(1):45–56.PubMed
115.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson FR, Ozdemir S, Phillips KA. Effects of simplifying choice tasks on estimates of taste heterogeneity in stated-choice surveys. Soc Sci Med. 2010;70(2):183–90.PubMedCentralPubMed Johnson FR, Ozdemir S, Phillips KA. Effects of simplifying choice tasks on estimates of taste heterogeneity in stated-choice surveys. Soc Sci Med. 2010;70(2):183–90.PubMedCentralPubMed
116.
Zurück zum Zitat Kauf TL, et al. Patients’ willingness to accept the risks and benefits of new treatments for chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Patient. 2012;5(4):265–78.PubMedCentralPubMed Kauf TL, et al. Patients’ willingness to accept the risks and benefits of new treatments for chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Patient. 2012;5(4):265–78.PubMedCentralPubMed
117.
Zurück zum Zitat Kinter ET, et al. A comparison of two experimental design approaches in applying conjoint analysis in patient-centered outcomes research: a randomized trial. Patient. 2012;5(4):279–94.PubMed Kinter ET, et al. A comparison of two experimental design approaches in applying conjoint analysis in patient-centered outcomes research: a randomized trial. Patient. 2012;5(4):279–94.PubMed
118.
Zurück zum Zitat Kiiskinen U, Suominen-Taipale AL, Cairns J. Think twice before you book? Modelling the choice of public vs private dentist in a choice experiment. Health Econ. 2010;19(6):670–82.PubMed Kiiskinen U, Suominen-Taipale AL, Cairns J. Think twice before you book? Modelling the choice of public vs private dentist in a choice experiment. Health Econ. 2010;19(6):670–82.PubMed
119.
Zurück zum Zitat Koopmanschap MA, Stolk EA, Koolman X. Dear policy maker: have you made up your mind? A discrete choice experiment among policy makers and other health professionals. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2010;26(2):198–204.PubMed Koopmanschap MA, Stolk EA, Koolman X. Dear policy maker: have you made up your mind? A discrete choice experiment among policy makers and other health professionals. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2010;26(2):198–204.PubMed
120.
Zurück zum Zitat Kruijshaar ME, et al. A labelled discrete choice experiment adds realism to the choices presented: preferences for surveillance tests for Barrett esophagus. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9:31.PubMedCentralPubMed Kruijshaar ME, et al. A labelled discrete choice experiment adds realism to the choices presented: preferences for surveillance tests for Barrett esophagus. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9:31.PubMedCentralPubMed
121.
Zurück zum Zitat Laba TL, Brien JA, Jan S. Understanding rational non-adherence to medications. A discrete choice experiment in a community sample in Australia. BMC Fam Pract. 2012;13:61.PubMedCentralPubMed Laba TL, Brien JA, Jan S. Understanding rational non-adherence to medications. A discrete choice experiment in a community sample in Australia. BMC Fam Pract. 2012;13:61.PubMedCentralPubMed
122.
Zurück zum Zitat Lagarde M, Smith Paintain L. Evaluating health workers’ potential resistance to new interventions: a role for discrete choice experiments. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(8):e23588.PubMedCentralPubMed Lagarde M, Smith Paintain L. Evaluating health workers’ potential resistance to new interventions: a role for discrete choice experiments. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(8):e23588.PubMedCentralPubMed
123.
Zurück zum Zitat Laver K, et al. Early rehabilitation management after stroke: what do stroke patients prefer? J Rehabil Med. 2011;43(4):354–8.PubMed Laver K, et al. Early rehabilitation management after stroke: what do stroke patients prefer? J Rehabil Med. 2011;43(4):354–8.PubMed
124.
Zurück zum Zitat de Bekker-Grob EW, Rose JM, Bliemer MC. A closer look at decision and analyst error by including nonlinearities in discrete choice models: implications on willingness-to-pay estimates derived from discrete choice data in healthcare. Pharmacoeconomics. 2013;31(12):1169–83. de Bekker-Grob EW, Rose JM, Bliemer MC. A closer look at decision and analyst error by including nonlinearities in discrete choice models: implications on willingness-to-pay estimates derived from discrete choice data in healthcare. Pharmacoeconomics. 2013;31(12):1169–83.
125.
Zurück zum Zitat Lloyd A, et al. Methylphenidate delivery mechanisms for the treatment of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: heterogeneity in parent preferences. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27(3):215–23.PubMed Lloyd A, et al. Methylphenidate delivery mechanisms for the treatment of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: heterogeneity in parent preferences. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27(3):215–23.PubMed
126.
Zurück zum Zitat Lloyd A, et al. Willingness to pay for improvements in chronic long-acting insulin therapy in individuals with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clin Ther. 2011;33(9):1258–67.PubMed Lloyd A, et al. Willingness to pay for improvements in chronic long-acting insulin therapy in individuals with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clin Ther. 2011;33(9):1258–67.PubMed
127.
Zurück zum Zitat Manjunath R, Yang JC, Ettinger AB. Patients’ preferences for treatment outcomes of add-on antiepileptic drugs: a conjoint analysis. Epilepsy Behav. 2012;24(4):474–9.PubMed Manjunath R, Yang JC, Ettinger AB. Patients’ preferences for treatment outcomes of add-on antiepileptic drugs: a conjoint analysis. Epilepsy Behav. 2012;24(4):474–9.PubMed
128.
Zurück zum Zitat Marti J. Assessing preferences for improved smoking cessation medications: a discrete choice experiment. Eur J Health Econ. 2012;13(5):533–48.PubMed Marti J. Assessing preferences for improved smoking cessation medications: a discrete choice experiment. Eur J Health Econ. 2012;13(5):533–48.PubMed
129.
Zurück zum Zitat Mentzakis E, Stefanowska P, Hurley J. A discrete choice experiment investigating preferences for funding drugs used to treat orphan diseases: an exploratory study. Health Econ Policy Law. 2011;6(3):405–33.PubMed Mentzakis E, Stefanowska P, Hurley J. A discrete choice experiment investigating preferences for funding drugs used to treat orphan diseases: an exploratory study. Health Econ Policy Law. 2011;6(3):405–33.PubMed
130.
Zurück zum Zitat Mohamed AF, Epstein JD, Li-McLeod JM. Patient and parent preferences for haemophilia A treatments. Haemophilia. 2011;17(2):209–14.PubMed Mohamed AF, Epstein JD, Li-McLeod JM. Patient and parent preferences for haemophilia A treatments. Haemophilia. 2011;17(2):209–14.PubMed
131.
Zurück zum Zitat Morton RL, et al. Factors influencing patient choice of dialysis versus conservative care to treat end-stage kidney disease. CMAJ. 2012;184(5):E277–83.PubMedCentralPubMed Morton RL, et al. Factors influencing patient choice of dialysis versus conservative care to treat end-stage kidney disease. CMAJ. 2012;184(5):E277–83.PubMedCentralPubMed
132.
Zurück zum Zitat Morton RL, et al. Dialysis modality preference of patients with CKD and family caregivers: a discrete-choice study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2012;60(1):102–11.PubMed Morton RL, et al. Dialysis modality preference of patients with CKD and family caregivers: a discrete-choice study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2012;60(1):102–11.PubMed
133.
Zurück zum Zitat Muhlbacher AC, Nubling M. Analysis of physicians’ perspectives versus patients’ preferences: direct assessment and discrete choice experiments in the therapy of multiple myeloma. Eur J Health Econ. 2011;12(3):193–203.PubMed Muhlbacher AC, Nubling M. Analysis of physicians’ perspectives versus patients’ preferences: direct assessment and discrete choice experiments in the therapy of multiple myeloma. Eur J Health Econ. 2011;12(3):193–203.PubMed
134.
Zurück zum Zitat Muhlbacher AC, et al. Preferences for treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): a discrete choice experiment. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009;9:149.PubMedCentralPubMed Muhlbacher AC, et al. Preferences for treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): a discrete choice experiment. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009;9:149.PubMedCentralPubMed
135.
Zurück zum Zitat Musters AM, et al. Women’s perspectives regarding subcutaneous injections, costs and live birth rates in IVF. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(9):2425–31.PubMed Musters AM, et al. Women’s perspectives regarding subcutaneous injections, costs and live birth rates in IVF. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(9):2425–31.PubMed
136.
Zurück zum Zitat Nayaradou M, et al. Eliciting population preferences for mass colorectal cancer screening organization. Med Decis Making. 2010;30(2):224–33.PubMed Nayaradou M, et al. Eliciting population preferences for mass colorectal cancer screening organization. Med Decis Making. 2010;30(2):224–33.PubMed
137.
Zurück zum Zitat Nieboer AP, Koolman X, Stolk EA. Preferences for long-term care services: willingness to pay estimates derived from a discrete choice experiment. Soc Sci Med. 2010;70(9):1317–25.PubMed Nieboer AP, Koolman X, Stolk EA. Preferences for long-term care services: willingness to pay estimates derived from a discrete choice experiment. Soc Sci Med. 2010;70(9):1317–25.PubMed
138.
Zurück zum Zitat Ozdemir S, Johnson FR, Hauber AB. Hypothetical bias, cheap talk, and stated willingness to pay for health care. J Health Econ. 2009;28(4):894–901.PubMed Ozdemir S, Johnson FR, Hauber AB. Hypothetical bias, cheap talk, and stated willingness to pay for health care. J Health Econ. 2009;28(4):894–901.PubMed
139.
Zurück zum Zitat Park MH, et al. A comparison of preferences of targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma between the patient group and health care professional group in South Korea. Value Health. 2012;15(6):933–9.PubMed Park MH, et al. A comparison of preferences of targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma between the patient group and health care professional group in South Korea. Value Health. 2012;15(6):933–9.PubMed
140.
Zurück zum Zitat Pavlova M, et al. The choice of obstetric care by low-risk pregnant women in the Netherlands: implications for policy and management. Health Policy. 2009;93(1):27–34.PubMed Pavlova M, et al. The choice of obstetric care by low-risk pregnant women in the Netherlands: implications for policy and management. Health Policy. 2009;93(1):27–34.PubMed
141.
Zurück zum Zitat Pereira CC, et al. Determinants of influenza vaccine purchasing decision in the US: a conjoint analysis. Vaccine. 2011;29(7):1443–7.PubMed Pereira CC, et al. Determinants of influenza vaccine purchasing decision in the US: a conjoint analysis. Vaccine. 2011;29(7):1443–7.PubMed
142.
Zurück zum Zitat Pignone MP, et al. Conjoint analysis versus rating and ranking for values elicitation and clarification in colorectal cancer screening. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(1):45–50.PubMedCentralPubMed Pignone MP, et al. Conjoint analysis versus rating and ranking for values elicitation and clarification in colorectal cancer screening. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(1):45–50.PubMedCentralPubMed
143.
Zurück zum Zitat Regier DA, et al. Discrete choice experiment to evaluate factors that influence preferences for antibiotic prophylaxis in pediatric oncology. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(10):e47470.PubMedCentralPubMed Regier DA, et al. Discrete choice experiment to evaluate factors that influence preferences for antibiotic prophylaxis in pediatric oncology. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(10):e47470.PubMedCentralPubMed
144.
Zurück zum Zitat Ryan M, Watson V. Comparing welfare estimates from payment card contingent valuation and discrete choice experiments. Health Econ. 2009;18(4):389–401.PubMed Ryan M, Watson V. Comparing welfare estimates from payment card contingent valuation and discrete choice experiments. Health Econ. 2009;18(4):389–401.PubMed
145.
Zurück zum Zitat Scalone L, et al. Patients’, physicians’, and pharmacists’ preferences towards coagulation factor concentrates to treat haemophilia with inhibitors: results from the COHIBA Study. Haemophilia. 2009;15(2):473–86.PubMed Scalone L, et al. Patients’, physicians’, and pharmacists’ preferences towards coagulation factor concentrates to treat haemophilia with inhibitors: results from the COHIBA Study. Haemophilia. 2009;15(2):473–86.PubMed
146.
Zurück zum Zitat Scalone L, et al. Evaluation of patients’ preferences for genital herpes treatment. Sex Transm Dis. 2011;38(9):802–7.PubMed Scalone L, et al. Evaluation of patients’ preferences for genital herpes treatment. Sex Transm Dis. 2011;38(9):802–7.PubMed
147.
Zurück zum Zitat Schaarschmidt ML, et al. Patient preferences for psoriasis treatments: process characteristics can outweigh outcome attributes. Arch Dermatol. 2011;147(11):1285–94.PubMed Schaarschmidt ML, et al. Patient preferences for psoriasis treatments: process characteristics can outweigh outcome attributes. Arch Dermatol. 2011;147(11):1285–94.PubMed
148.
Zurück zum Zitat Schwappach DL, et al. Is less more? Patients’ preferences for drug information leaflets. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011;20(9):987–95.PubMed Schwappach DL, et al. Is less more? Patients’ preferences for drug information leaflets. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011;20(9):987–95.PubMed
149.
Zurück zum Zitat Scotland GS, et al. Women’s preferences for aspects of labor management: results from a discrete choice experiment. Birth. 2011;38(1):36–46.PubMed Scotland GS, et al. Women’s preferences for aspects of labor management: results from a discrete choice experiment. Birth. 2011;38(1):36–46.PubMed
150.
Zurück zum Zitat Skjoldborg US, Lauridsen J, Junker P. Reliability of the discrete choice experiment at the input and output level in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Value Health. 2009;12(1):153–8.PubMed Skjoldborg US, Lauridsen J, Junker P. Reliability of the discrete choice experiment at the input and output level in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Value Health. 2009;12(1):153–8.PubMed
151.
Zurück zum Zitat Sung L, et al. Discrete choice experiment produced estimates of acceptable risks of therapeutic options in cancer patients with febrile neutropenia. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012;65(6):627–34.PubMed Sung L, et al. Discrete choice experiment produced estimates of acceptable risks of therapeutic options in cancer patients with febrile neutropenia. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012;65(6):627–34.PubMed
152.
Zurück zum Zitat Sweeting KR, et al. Patient preferences for treatment of Achilles tendon pain: results from a discrete-choice experiment. Patient. 2011;4(1):45–54.PubMed Sweeting KR, et al. Patient preferences for treatment of Achilles tendon pain: results from a discrete-choice experiment. Patient. 2011;4(1):45–54.PubMed
153.
Zurück zum Zitat Swinburn P, et al. Preferences for antimuscarinic therapy for overactive bladder. BJU Int. 2011;108(6):868–73.PubMed Swinburn P, et al. Preferences for antimuscarinic therapy for overactive bladder. BJU Int. 2011;108(6):868–73.PubMed
154.
Zurück zum Zitat Thrumurthy SG, et al. Discrete-choice preference comparison between patients and doctors for the surgical management of oesophagogastric cancer. Br J Surg. 2011;98(8):1124-31 (discussion 1132). Thrumurthy SG, et al. Discrete-choice preference comparison between patients and doctors for the surgical management of oesophagogastric cancer. Br J Surg. 2011;98(8):1124-31 (discussion 1132).
155.
Zurück zum Zitat Tinelli M, Ryan M, Bond C. Patients’ preferences for an increased pharmacist role in the management of drug therapy. Int J Pharm Pract. 2009;17(5):275–82.PubMed Tinelli M, Ryan M, Bond C. Patients’ preferences for an increased pharmacist role in the management of drug therapy. Int J Pharm Pract. 2009;17(5):275–82.PubMed
156.
Zurück zum Zitat Tinelli M, et al. What determines patient preferences for treating low risk basal cell carcinoma when comparing surgery vs imiquimod? A discrete choice experiment survey from the SINS trial. BMC Dermatol. 2012;12:19.PubMedCentralPubMed Tinelli M, et al. What determines patient preferences for treating low risk basal cell carcinoma when comparing surgery vs imiquimod? A discrete choice experiment survey from the SINS trial. BMC Dermatol. 2012;12:19.PubMedCentralPubMed
157.
Zurück zum Zitat van Dam L, et al. What determines individuals’ preferences for colorectal cancer screening programmes? A discrete choice experiment. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46(1):150–9.PubMed van Dam L, et al. What determines individuals’ preferences for colorectal cancer screening programmes? A discrete choice experiment. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46(1):150–9.PubMed
158.
Zurück zum Zitat van der Pol M, McKenzie L. Costs and benefits of tele-endoscopy clinics in a remote location. J Telemed Telecare. 2010;16(2):89–94.PubMed van der Pol M, McKenzie L. Costs and benefits of tele-endoscopy clinics in a remote location. J Telemed Telecare. 2010;16(2):89–94.PubMed
159.
Zurück zum Zitat van Empel IW, et al. Physicians underestimate the importance of patient-centredness to patients: a discrete choice experiment in fertility care. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(3):584–93.PubMed van Empel IW, et al. Physicians underestimate the importance of patient-centredness to patients: a discrete choice experiment in fertility care. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(3):584–93.PubMed
160.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Houtven G, et al. Eliciting benefit-risk preferences and probability-weighted utility using choice-format conjoint analysis. Med Decis Making. 2011;31(3):469–80.PubMed Van Houtven G, et al. Eliciting benefit-risk preferences and probability-weighted utility using choice-format conjoint analysis. Med Decis Making. 2011;31(3):469–80.PubMed
161.
Zurück zum Zitat Witt J, Scott A, Osborne RH. Designing choice experiments with many attributes. An application to setting priorities for orthopaedic waiting lists. Health Econ. 2009;18(6):681–96.PubMed Witt J, Scott A, Osborne RH. Designing choice experiments with many attributes. An application to setting priorities for orthopaedic waiting lists. Health Econ. 2009;18(6):681–96.PubMed
162.
Zurück zum Zitat Wong MK, et al. Patients rank toxicity against progression free survival in second-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma. J Med Econ. 2012;15(6):1139–48.PubMed Wong MK, et al. Patients rank toxicity against progression free survival in second-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma. J Med Econ. 2012;15(6):1139–48.PubMed
163.
Zurück zum Zitat Bansback N, et al. Using a discrete choice experiment to estimate health state utility values. J Health Econ. 2012;31(1):306–18.PubMed Bansback N, et al. Using a discrete choice experiment to estimate health state utility values. J Health Econ. 2012;31(1):306–18.PubMed
164.
Zurück zum Zitat Stolk EA, et al. Discrete choice modeling for the quantification of health states: the case of the EQ-5D. Value Health. 2010;13(8):1005–13.PubMed Stolk EA, et al. Discrete choice modeling for the quantification of health states: the case of the EQ-5D. Value Health. 2010;13(8):1005–13.PubMed
165.
Zurück zum Zitat Lancsar E, et al. Deriving distributional weights for QALYs through discrete choice experiments. J Health Econ. 2011;30(2):466–78.PubMed Lancsar E, et al. Deriving distributional weights for QALYs through discrete choice experiments. J Health Econ. 2011;30(2):466–78.PubMed
166.
Zurück zum Zitat van der Wulp I, et al. Societal preferences for standard health insurance coverage in the Netherlands: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2012;2(2):e001021.PubMedCentralPubMed van der Wulp I, et al. Societal preferences for standard health insurance coverage in the Netherlands: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2012;2(2):e001021.PubMedCentralPubMed
167.
Zurück zum Zitat Blaauw D, et al. Policy interventions that attract nurses to rural areas: a multicountry discrete choice experiment. Bull World Health Organ. 2010;88(5):350–6.PubMedCentralPubMed Blaauw D, et al. Policy interventions that attract nurses to rural areas: a multicountry discrete choice experiment. Bull World Health Organ. 2010;88(5):350–6.PubMedCentralPubMed
168.
Zurück zum Zitat Grindrod KA, et al. Pharmacists’ preferences for providing patient-centered services: a discrete choice experiment to guide health policy. Ann Pharmacother. 2010;44(10):1554–64.PubMed Grindrod KA, et al. Pharmacists’ preferences for providing patient-centered services: a discrete choice experiment to guide health policy. Ann Pharmacother. 2010;44(10):1554–64.PubMed
169.
Zurück zum Zitat Gunther OH, et al. The role of monetary and nonmonetary incentives on the choice of practice establishment: a stated preference study of young physicians in Germany. Health Serv Res. 2010;45(1):212–29.PubMedCentralPubMed Gunther OH, et al. The role of monetary and nonmonetary incentives on the choice of practice establishment: a stated preference study of young physicians in Germany. Health Serv Res. 2010;45(1):212–29.PubMedCentralPubMed
170.
Zurück zum Zitat Huicho L, et al. Job preferences of nurses and midwives for taking up a rural job in Peru: a discrete choice experiment. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(12):e50315.PubMedCentralPubMed Huicho L, et al. Job preferences of nurses and midwives for taking up a rural job in Peru: a discrete choice experiment. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(12):e50315.PubMedCentralPubMed
171.
Zurück zum Zitat Kolstad JR. How to make rural jobs more attractive to health workers. Findings from a discrete choice experiment in Tanzania. Health Econ. 2011;20(2):196–211.PubMed Kolstad JR. How to make rural jobs more attractive to health workers. Findings from a discrete choice experiment in Tanzania. Health Econ. 2011;20(2):196–211.PubMed
172.
Zurück zum Zitat Miranda JJ, et al. Stated preferences of doctors for choosing a job in rural areas of Peru: a discrete choice experiment. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(12):e50567.PubMedCentralPubMed Miranda JJ, et al. Stated preferences of doctors for choosing a job in rural areas of Peru: a discrete choice experiment. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(12):e50567.PubMedCentralPubMed
173.
Zurück zum Zitat Rockers PC, et al. Preferences for working in rural clinics among trainee health professionals in Uganda: a discrete choice experiment. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:212.PubMedCentralPubMed Rockers PC, et al. Preferences for working in rural clinics among trainee health professionals in Uganda: a discrete choice experiment. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:212.PubMedCentralPubMed
174.
Zurück zum Zitat Sivey P, et al. Junior doctors’ preferences for specialty choice. J Health Econ. 2012;31(6):813–23.PubMed Sivey P, et al. Junior doctors’ preferences for specialty choice. J Health Econ. 2012;31(6):813–23.PubMed
175.
Zurück zum Zitat Carlsen B, et al. When you can’t have the cake and eat it too: a study of medical doctors’ priorities in complex choice situations. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75(11):1964–73.PubMed Carlsen B, et al. When you can’t have the cake and eat it too: a study of medical doctors’ priorities in complex choice situations. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75(11):1964–73.PubMed
176.
Zurück zum Zitat Defechereux T, et al. Health care priority setting in Norway a multicriteria decision analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:39.PubMedCentralPubMed Defechereux T, et al. Health care priority setting in Norway a multicriteria decision analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:39.PubMedCentralPubMed
177.
Zurück zum Zitat Diederich A, Swait J, Wirsik N. Citizen participation in patient prioritization policy decisions: an empirical and experimental study on patients’ characteristics. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(5):e36824.PubMedCentralPubMed Diederich A, Swait J, Wirsik N. Citizen participation in patient prioritization policy decisions: an empirical and experimental study on patients’ characteristics. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(5):e36824.PubMedCentralPubMed
178.
Zurück zum Zitat Kjaer T, et al. Public preferences for establishing nephrology facilities in Greenland: estimating willingness-to-pay using a discrete choice experiment. Eur J Health Econ. 2013;14(5):739–48.PubMed Kjaer T, et al. Public preferences for establishing nephrology facilities in Greenland: estimating willingness-to-pay using a discrete choice experiment. Eur J Health Econ. 2013;14(5):739–48.PubMed
179.
Zurück zum Zitat Lim MK, et al. Eliciting public preference for health-care resource allocation in South Korea. Value Health. 2012;15(1 Suppl):S91–4.PubMed Lim MK, et al. Eliciting public preference for health-care resource allocation in South Korea. Value Health. 2012;15(1 Suppl):S91–4.PubMed
180.
Zurück zum Zitat Marsh K, et al. Prioritizing investments in public health: a multi-criteria decision analysis. J Public Health (Oxf). 2013;35(3):460–6. Marsh K, et al. Prioritizing investments in public health: a multi-criteria decision analysis. J Public Health (Oxf). 2013;35(3):460–6.
181.
Zurück zum Zitat Mirelman A, et al. Decision-making criteria among national policymakers in five countries: a discrete choice experiment eliciting relative preferences for equity and efficiency. Value Health. 2012;15(3):534–9.PubMed Mirelman A, et al. Decision-making criteria among national policymakers in five countries: a discrete choice experiment eliciting relative preferences for equity and efficiency. Value Health. 2012;15(3):534–9.PubMed
182.
Zurück zum Zitat Ng V, Sargeant JM. A quantitative and novel approach to the prioritization of zoonotic diseases in North America: a public perspective. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e48519.PubMedCentralPubMed Ng V, Sargeant JM. A quantitative and novel approach to the prioritization of zoonotic diseases in North America: a public perspective. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e48519.PubMedCentralPubMed
183.
Zurück zum Zitat Philips H, et al. Predicting the place of out-of-hours care—a market simulation based on discrete choice analysis. Health Policy. 2012;106(3):284–90.PubMed Philips H, et al. Predicting the place of out-of-hours care—a market simulation based on discrete choice analysis. Health Policy. 2012;106(3):284–90.PubMed
184.
Zurück zum Zitat Promberger M, Dolan P, Marteau TM. “Pay them if it works”: discrete choice experiments on the acceptability of financial incentives to change health related behaviour. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75(12):2509–14.PubMedCentralPubMed Promberger M, Dolan P, Marteau TM. “Pay them if it works”: discrete choice experiments on the acceptability of financial incentives to change health related behaviour. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75(12):2509–14.PubMedCentralPubMed
185.
Zurück zum Zitat Rennie L, Porteous T, Ryan M. Preferences for managing symptoms of differing severity: a discrete choice experiment. Value Health. 2012;15(8):1069–76.PubMed Rennie L, Porteous T, Ryan M. Preferences for managing symptoms of differing severity: a discrete choice experiment. Value Health. 2012;15(8):1069–76.PubMed
186.
Zurück zum Zitat Scuffham PA, et al. Health system choice: a pilot discrete-choice experiment eliciting the preferences of British and Australian citizens. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2010;8(2):89–97.PubMed Scuffham PA, et al. Health system choice: a pilot discrete-choice experiment eliciting the preferences of British and Australian citizens. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2010;8(2):89–97.PubMed
187.
Zurück zum Zitat Watson V, et al. Involving the public in priority setting: a case study using discrete choice experiments. J Public Health (Oxf). 2012;34(2):253–60. Watson V, et al. Involving the public in priority setting: a case study using discrete choice experiments. J Public Health (Oxf). 2012;34(2):253–60.
188.
Zurück zum Zitat Watson V, et al. Managing poorly performing clinicians: health care providers’ willingness to pay for independent help. Health Policy. 2012;104(3):260–71.PubMed Watson V, et al. Managing poorly performing clinicians: health care providers’ willingness to pay for independent help. Health Policy. 2012;104(3):260–71.PubMed
189.
Zurück zum Zitat Youngkong S, et al. Criteria for priority setting of HIV/AIDS interventions in Thailand: a discrete choice experiment. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:197.PubMedCentralPubMed Youngkong S, et al. Criteria for priority setting of HIV/AIDS interventions in Thailand: a discrete choice experiment. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:197.PubMedCentralPubMed
190.
Zurück zum Zitat Arden NK, et al. How do physicians weigh benefits and risks associated with treatments in patients with osteoarthritis in the United Kingdom? J Rheumatol. 2012;39(5):1056–63.PubMed Arden NK, et al. How do physicians weigh benefits and risks associated with treatments in patients with osteoarthritis in the United Kingdom? J Rheumatol. 2012;39(5):1056–63.PubMed
191.
Zurück zum Zitat Benjamin L, et al. Physicians’ preferences for prescribing oral and intravenous anticancer drugs: a discrete choice experiment. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48(6):912–20.PubMed Benjamin L, et al. Physicians’ preferences for prescribing oral and intravenous anticancer drugs: a discrete choice experiment. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48(6):912–20.PubMed
192.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhatt M, et al. Current practice and tolerance for risk in performing procedural sedation and analgesia on children who have not met fasting guidelines: a Canadian survey using a stated preference discrete choice experiment. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17(11):1207–15.PubMed Bhatt M, et al. Current practice and tolerance for risk in performing procedural sedation and analgesia on children who have not met fasting guidelines: a Canadian survey using a stated preference discrete choice experiment. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17(11):1207–15.PubMed
193.
Zurück zum Zitat Jackman J, et al. Minding the gap: an approach to determine critical drivers in the development of point of care diagnostics. Point Care. 2012;11(2):130–9.PubMedCentralPubMed Jackman J, et al. Minding the gap: an approach to determine critical drivers in the development of point of care diagnostics. Point Care. 2012;11(2):130–9.PubMedCentralPubMed
194.
Zurück zum Zitat Mohamed AF, et al. Physicians’ stated trade-off preferences for chronic hepatitis B treatment outcomes in Germany, France, Spain, Turkey, and Italy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;24(4):419–26.PubMed Mohamed AF, et al. Physicians’ stated trade-off preferences for chronic hepatitis B treatment outcomes in Germany, France, Spain, Turkey, and Italy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;24(4):419–26.PubMed
195.
Zurück zum Zitat Nathan H, et al. Treating patients with colon cancer liver metastasis: a nationwide analysis of therapeutic decision making. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(12):3668–76.PubMedCentralPubMed Nathan H, et al. Treating patients with colon cancer liver metastasis: a nationwide analysis of therapeutic decision making. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(12):3668–76.PubMedCentralPubMed
196.
Zurück zum Zitat Torbica A, Fattore G. Understanding the impact of economic evidence on clinical decision making: a discrete choice experiment in cardiology. Soc Sci Med. 2010;70(10):1536–43.PubMed Torbica A, Fattore G. Understanding the impact of economic evidence on clinical decision making: a discrete choice experiment in cardiology. Soc Sci Med. 2010;70(10):1536–43.PubMed
197.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsung-Tai C, Heng-Chaing C, Lao-Nga M. Using discrete choice experiments to elicit doctors’ preferences for report card design of diabetes care in Taiwan—a pilot study. J Eval Clin Pract. 2010;16:14–20. Tsung-Tai C, Heng-Chaing C, Lao-Nga M. Using discrete choice experiments to elicit doctors’ preferences for report card design of diabetes care in Taiwan—a pilot study. J Eval Clin Pract. 2010;16:14–20.
198.
Zurück zum Zitat van Helvoort-Postulart D, et al. Discrete choice experiments for complex health-care decisions: does hierarchical information integration offer a solution? Health Econ. 2009;18(8):903–20.PubMed van Helvoort-Postulart D, et al. Discrete choice experiments for complex health-care decisions: does hierarchical information integration offer a solution? Health Econ. 2009;18(8):903–20.PubMed
199.
Zurück zum Zitat van Helvoort-Postulart D, van der Weijden T. Investigating the complementary value of discrete choice experiments for the evaluation of barriers and facilitators in implementation research: a questionnaire survey. Implement Sci. 2009;4. van Helvoort-Postulart D, van der Weijden T. Investigating the complementary value of discrete choice experiments for the evaluation of barriers and facilitators in implementation research: a questionnaire survey. Implement Sci. 2009;4.
200.
Zurück zum Zitat Wyatt JC, Batley RP, Keen J. GP preferences for information systems: conjoint analysis of speed, reliability, access and users. J Eval Clin Pract. 2010;16(5):911–5.PubMed Wyatt JC, Batley RP, Keen J. GP preferences for information systems: conjoint analysis of speed, reliability, access and users. J Eval Clin Pract. 2010;16(5):911–5.PubMed
201.
Zurück zum Zitat Pedersen LB, et al. General practitioners’ preferences for the organisation of primary care: a discrete choice experiment. Health Policy. 2012;106(3):246–56.PubMed Pedersen LB, et al. General practitioners’ preferences for the organisation of primary care: a discrete choice experiment. Health Policy. 2012;106(3):246–56.PubMed
202.
Zurück zum Zitat Al Hamarneh YN, et al. Public perceptions of coronary events risk factors: a discrete choice experiment. BMJ Open. 2012;2(5). Al Hamarneh YN, et al. Public perceptions of coronary events risk factors: a discrete choice experiment. BMJ Open. 2012;2(5).
203.
Zurück zum Zitat Bech M, Kjaer T, Lauridsen J. Does the number of choice sets matter? Results from a web survey applying a discrete choice experiment. Health Econ. 2011;20(3):273–86.PubMed Bech M, Kjaer T, Lauridsen J. Does the number of choice sets matter? Results from a web survey applying a discrete choice experiment. Health Econ. 2011;20(3):273–86.PubMed
204.
Zurück zum Zitat Cunningham CE, et al. Preferences for evidence-based practice dissemination in addiction agencies serving women: a discrete-choice conjoint experiment. Addiction. 2012;107(8):1512–24.PubMed Cunningham CE, et al. Preferences for evidence-based practice dissemination in addiction agencies serving women: a discrete-choice conjoint experiment. Addiction. 2012;107(8):1512–24.PubMed
205.
Zurück zum Zitat Fegert JM, et al. Assessment of parents’ preferences for the treatment of school-age children with ADHD: a discrete choice experiment. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2011;11(3):245–52.PubMed Fegert JM, et al. Assessment of parents’ preferences for the treatment of school-age children with ADHD: a discrete choice experiment. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2011;11(3):245–52.PubMed
206.
Zurück zum Zitat Oteng B, Marra F, Another A. Evaluating societal preferences for human papillomavirus vaccine and cervical smear test screening programme. Sex Transm Infect. 2011;87(1):52–7.PubMed Oteng B, Marra F, Another A. Evaluating societal preferences for human papillomavirus vaccine and cervical smear test screening programme. Sex Transm Infect. 2011;87(1):52–7.PubMed
207.
Zurück zum Zitat Regier DA, et al. Valuing the benefit of diagnostic testing for genetic causes of idiopathic developmental disability: willingness to pay from families of affected children. Clin Genet. 2009;75(6):514–21.PubMed Regier DA, et al. Valuing the benefit of diagnostic testing for genetic causes of idiopathic developmental disability: willingness to pay from families of affected children. Clin Genet. 2009;75(6):514–21.PubMed
208.
Zurück zum Zitat Robyn PJ, et al. Health worker preferences for community-based health insurance payment mechanisms: a discrete choice experiment. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:159.PubMedCentralPubMed Robyn PJ, et al. Health worker preferences for community-based health insurance payment mechanisms: a discrete choice experiment. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:159.PubMedCentralPubMed
209.
Zurück zum Zitat Scasny M, Alberini A. Valuation of mortality risk attributable to climate change: investigating the effect of survey administration modes on a VSL. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012;9(12):4760–81.PubMedCentralPubMed Scasny M, Alberini A. Valuation of mortality risk attributable to climate change: investigating the effect of survey administration modes on a VSL. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012;9(12):4760–81.PubMedCentralPubMed
210.
Zurück zum Zitat Schellings R, et al. The development of quality indicators in mental healthcare: a discrete choice experiment. BMC Psychiatry. 2012;12:103.PubMedCentralPubMed Schellings R, et al. The development of quality indicators in mental healthcare: a discrete choice experiment. BMC Psychiatry. 2012;12:103.PubMedCentralPubMed
211.
Zurück zum Zitat Tong BC, et al. Weighting composite endpoints in clinical trials: essential evidence for the heart team. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;94(6):1908–13.PubMedCentralPubMed Tong BC, et al. Weighting composite endpoints in clinical trials: essential evidence for the heart team. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;94(6):1908–13.PubMedCentralPubMed
212.
Zurück zum Zitat Tonin S, Alberini A, Turvani M. The value of reducing cancer risks at contaminated sites: are more knowledgeable people willing to pay more? Risk Anal. 2012;32(7):1157–82.PubMed Tonin S, Alberini A, Turvani M. The value of reducing cancer risks at contaminated sites: are more knowledgeable people willing to pay more? Risk Anal. 2012;32(7):1157–82.PubMed
213.
Zurück zum Zitat Vroomen J, Zweifel P. Preferences for health insurance and health status: does it matter whether you are Dutch or German? Eur J Health Econ. 2011;12(1):87–95. Vroomen J, Zweifel P. Preferences for health insurance and health status: does it matter whether you are Dutch or German? Eur J Health Econ. 2011;12(1):87–95.
214.
Zurück zum Zitat Whitty JA, Scuffham PA, Rundle-Thiele SR. Public and decision maker stated preferences for pharmaceutical subsidy decisions: a pilot study. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2011;9(2):73–9.PubMed Whitty JA, Scuffham PA, Rundle-Thiele SR. Public and decision maker stated preferences for pharmaceutical subsidy decisions: a pilot study. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2011;9(2):73–9.PubMed
215.
Zurück zum Zitat Idkowiak J, et al. Premature adrenarche: novel lessons from early onset androgen excess. Eur J Endocrinol. 2011;165(2):189–207.PubMed Idkowiak J, et al. Premature adrenarche: novel lessons from early onset androgen excess. Eur J Endocrinol. 2011;165(2):189–207.PubMed
216.
Zurück zum Zitat Hole AR. Modelling heterogeneity in patients’ preferences for the attributes of a general practitioner appointment. J Health Econ. 2008;27(4):1078–94.PubMed Hole AR. Modelling heterogeneity in patients’ preferences for the attributes of a general practitioner appointment. J Health Econ. 2008;27(4):1078–94.PubMed
217.
Zurück zum Zitat Mark TL, Swait J. Using stated preference modeling to forecast the effect of medication attributes on prescriptions of alcoholism medications. Value Health. 2003;6(4):474–82.PubMed Mark TL, Swait J. Using stated preference modeling to forecast the effect of medication attributes on prescriptions of alcoholism medications. Value Health. 2003;6(4):474–82.PubMed
218.
Zurück zum Zitat Lancsar E, Louviere J. Deleting ‘irrational’ responses from discrete choice experiments: a case of investigating or imposing preferences? Health Econ. 2006;15(8):797–811.PubMed Lancsar E, Louviere J. Deleting ‘irrational’ responses from discrete choice experiments: a case of investigating or imposing preferences? Health Econ. 2006;15(8):797–811.PubMed
219.
Zurück zum Zitat Ryan M. Using conjoint analysis to take account of patient preferences and go beyond health outcomes: an application to in vitro fertilisation. Soc Sci Med. 1999;48(4):535–46.PubMed Ryan M. Using conjoint analysis to take account of patient preferences and go beyond health outcomes: an application to in vitro fertilisation. Soc Sci Med. 1999;48(4):535–46.PubMed
220.
Zurück zum Zitat Ryan M, et al. Using discrete choice experiments to estimate a preference-based measure of outcome—an application to social care for older people. J Health Econ. 2006;25(5):927–44.PubMed Ryan M, et al. Using discrete choice experiments to estimate a preference-based measure of outcome—an application to social care for older people. J Health Econ. 2006;25(5):927–44.PubMed
221.
Zurück zum Zitat Burr JM, et al. Developing a preference-based Glaucoma Utility Index using a discrete choice experiment. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84(8):797–808.PubMed Burr JM, et al. Developing a preference-based Glaucoma Utility Index using a discrete choice experiment. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84(8):797–808.PubMed
222.
Zurück zum Zitat Slothuus Skjoldborg U, Gyrd-Hansen D. Conjoint analysis. The cost variable: an Achilles’ heel? Health Econ. 2003;12(6):479–91.PubMed Slothuus Skjoldborg U, Gyrd-Hansen D. Conjoint analysis. The cost variable: an Achilles’ heel? Health Econ. 2003;12(6):479–91.PubMed
223.
Zurück zum Zitat Gyrd-Hansen D, Skjoldborg US. The price proxy in discrete choice experiments: Issues of relevance for future research. In: Ryan M, Gerard K, Amaya-Amaya M, editors. Using discrete choice experiments to value health and health care; 2008. p. 175–193. Gyrd-Hansen D, Skjoldborg US. The price proxy in discrete choice experiments: Issues of relevance for future research. In: Ryan M, Gerard K, Amaya-Amaya M, editors. Using discrete choice experiments to value health and health care; 2008. p. 175–193.
224.
Zurück zum Zitat Louviere JJ, Lancsar E. Choice experiments in health: the good, the bad, the ugly and toward a brighter future. Health Econ Policy Law. 2009;4(Pt 4):527–46.PubMed Louviere JJ, Lancsar E. Choice experiments in health: the good, the bad, the ugly and toward a brighter future. Health Econ Policy Law. 2009;4(Pt 4):527–46.PubMed
225.
Zurück zum Zitat Mark TL, Swait J. Using stated preference and revealed preference modeling to evaluate prescribing decisions. Health Econ. 2004;13(6):563–73.PubMed Mark TL, Swait J. Using stated preference and revealed preference modeling to evaluate prescribing decisions. Health Econ. 2004;13(6):563–73.PubMed
226.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson FR, et al. How does cost matter in health-care discrete-choice experiments? Health Econ. 2011;20(3):323–30.PubMedCentralPubMed Johnson FR, et al. How does cost matter in health-care discrete-choice experiments? Health Econ. 2011;20(3):323–30.PubMedCentralPubMed
227.
Zurück zum Zitat Ratcliffe J, et al. Patients’ preferences for characteristics associated with treatments for osteoarthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2004;43(3):337–45. Ratcliffe J, et al. Patients’ preferences for characteristics associated with treatments for osteoarthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2004;43(3):337–45.
228.
Zurück zum Zitat Deal K. Segmenting patients and physicians using preferences from discrete choice experiments. Patient. 2014;7(1):5–21.PubMed Deal K. Segmenting patients and physicians using preferences from discrete choice experiments. Patient. 2014;7(1):5–21.PubMed
229.
Zurück zum Zitat Miguel FS, Ryan M, Amaya-Amaya M. ‘Irrational’ stated preferences: a quantitative and qualitative investigation. Health Econ. 2005;14(3):307–22.PubMed Miguel FS, Ryan M, Amaya-Amaya M. ‘Irrational’ stated preferences: a quantitative and qualitative investigation. Health Econ. 2005;14(3):307–22.PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Review of the Literature
verfasst von
Michael D. Clark
Domino Determann
Stavros Petrou
Domenico Moro
Esther W. de Bekker-Grob
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2014
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
PharmacoEconomics / Ausgabe 9/2014
Print ISSN: 1170-7690
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-2027
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-014-0170-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2014

PharmacoEconomics 9/2014 Zur Ausgabe