Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
PharmacoEconomics
Erschienen in: PharmacoEconomics 10/2015

01.10.2015 | Review Article

A Review of the Development and Application of Generic Multi-Attribute Utility Instruments for Paediatric Populations

verfasst von: Gang Chen, Julie Ratcliffe

Erschienen in: PharmacoEconomics | Ausgabe 10/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Multi-attribute utility instruments (MAUIs) are increasingly being used as a means of quantifying utility for the calculation of quality-adjusted life-years within the context of cost utility analysis. Traditionally, MAUIs have been developed and applied in adult populations. However, increasingly, researchers in health economics and other disciplines are recognising the importance of the measurement and valuation of health in both children and adolescents. Presently, there are nine generic MAUIs available internationally that have been used in paediatric populations: the Quality of Well-Being Scale (QWB), the Health Utility Index Mark 2 (HUI2), the HUI3, the Sixteen-dimensional measure of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) (16D), the Seventeen-dimensional measure of HRQoL (17D), the Assessment of Quality of Life 6-Dimension (AQoL-6D) Adolescent, the Child Health Utility 9D (CHU9D), the EQ-5D Youth version (EQ-5D-Y) and the Adolescent Health Utility Measure (AHUM). This paper critically reviews the development and application of the above nine MAUIs and discusses the specific challenges of health utility measurement in children and adolescents. Areas for further research relating to the development and application of generic MAUIs in paediatric populations are highlighted.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
2.
3.
Kromm SK, Bethell J, Kraglund F, Edwards SA, Laporte A, Coyte PC, Ungar WJ. Characteristics and quality of pediatric cost-utility analyses. Qual Life Res. 2012;21:1315–25.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Brazier J, Ratcliffe J, Salomon JA, Tsuchiya A. Measuring and valuing health benefits for economic evaluation: New York: Oxford University Press Inc.; 2007.
5.
Torrance GW. Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal: a review. J Health Econ. 1986;5(1):1–30.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Torrance GW, Feeny D, Furlong W. Visual analog scales: do they have a role in the measurement of preferences for health states? Med Decis Making. 2001;21(4):329–34.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Bansback N, Brazier J, Tsuchiya A, Anis A. Using a discrete choice experiment to estimate health state utility values. J Health Econ. 2012;31(1):306–18.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Ratcliffe J, Flynn T, Terlich F, Stevens K, Brazier J, Sawyer M. Developing adolescent-specific health state values for economic evaluation: an application of profile case best-worst scaling to the Child Health Utility 9D. Pharmacoeconomics. 2012;30(8):713–27.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Richardson J, McKie J, Bariola E. Multi attribute utility instruments and their use. In: Culyer AJ, editor. Encyclopedia of health economics. San Diego: Elsevier Science; 2014. p. 341–57.CrossRef
10.
Kaplan RM, Bush JW, Berry CC. Health status: types of validity and the index of well-being. Health Serv Res. 1976;11(4):478–507.PubMedCentralPubMed
11.
Kaplan RM, Sieber WJ, Ganiats TG. The quality of well-being scale: comparison of the interviewer-administered version with a self-administered questionnaire. Psychol Health. 1997;12(6):783–91.CrossRef
12.
Seiber WJ, Groessl EJ, David KM, Ganiats TG, Kaplan RM. Quality of Well Being Self-Administered (QWB-SA) Scale user’s manual. San Diego: Health Services Research Center, University of California; 2008.
13.
Torrance G, Feeny D, Furlong W, Barr R, Zhang Y, Wang Q. Multiattribute utility function for a comprehensive health status classification system: Health Utilities Index Mark 2. Med Care. 1996;34:702–22.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Feeny D, Furlong W, Torrance G. Multi-attribute and single-attribute utility functions for the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 system. Med Care. 2002;40(2):113–28.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Horsman J, Furlong W, Feeny D, Torrance G. The Health Utilities Index (HUI®): concepts, measurement properties and applications. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1:54.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
16.
McCabe CJP, Stevens KJM, Brazier JEP. Utility scores for the Health Utilities Index Mark 2: an empirical assessment of alternative mapping functions. Med Care. 2005;43(6):627–35.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Stevens K, McCabe C, Brazier J, Roberts J. Multi-attribute utility function or statistical inference models: a comparison of health state valuation models using the HUI2 health state classification system. J Health Econ. 2007;26(5):992–1002.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Saigal S, Rosenbaum P, Stoskopf B, Hoult L, Furlong W, Feeny D, et al. Development, reliability and validity of a new measure of overall health for pre-school children. Qual Life Res. 2005;14(1):243–52.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Apajasalo M, Sintonen H, Holmberg C, Sinkkonen J, Aalberg V, Pihko H, et al. Quality of life in early adolescence: a sixteen-dimensional health-related measure (16D). Qual Life Res. 1996;5(2):205–11.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Apajasalo M, Rautonen J, Holmberg C, Sinkkonen J, Aalberg V, Pihko H, et al. Quality of life in pre-adolescence: a 17-dimensional health-related measure (17D). Qual Life Res. 1996;5(6):532–8.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Moodie M, Richardson J, Rankin B, Iezzi A, Sinha K. Predicting time trade-off health state valuations of adolescents in four Pacific countries using the Assessment of Quality-of-Life (AQoL-6D) instrument. Value Health. 2010;13(8):1014–27.CrossRefPubMed
22.
23.
Ravens-Sieberer U, Wille N, Badia X, Bonsel G, Burström K, Cavrini G, et al. Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the EQ-5D-Y: results from a multinational study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(6):887–97.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
24.
25.
Wu XY, Ohinmaa A, Johnson JA, Veugelers PJ. Assessment of children’s own health status using visual analogue scale and descriptive system of the EQ-5D-Y: linkage between two systems. Qual Life Res. 2014;23(2):393–402.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Stevens K. Developing a descriptive system for a new preference-based measure of health-related quality of life for children. Qual Life Res. 2009;18:1105–13.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Ratcliffe J, Couzner L, Flynn T, Sawyer M, Stevens K, Brazier J, Burgess L. Valuing Child Health Utility 9D health states with a young adolescent sample: a feasibility study to compare best-worst scaling discrete-choice experiment, standard gamble and time trade-off methods. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2011;9:15–27.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Ratcliffe J, Stevens K, Flynn T, Brazier J, Sawyer M. An assessment of the construct validity of the CHU9D in the Australian adolescent general population. Qual Life Res. 2012;21:717–25.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Stevens K, Ratcliffe J. Measuring and valuing health benefits for economic evaluation in adolescence: an assessment of the practicality and validity of the Child Health Utility 9D in the Australian adolescent population. Value Health. 2012;15(8):1092–9.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Stevens K. Valuation of the Child Health Utility 9D Index. Pharmacoeconomics. 2012;30(8):729–47.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Beusterien K, Yeung J-E, Pang F, Brazier J. Development of the multi-attribute Adolescent Health Utility Measure (AHUM). Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012;10:102.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
32.
Petrou S, Kupek E. Estimating preference-based health utilities index mark 3 utility scores for childhood conditions in England and Scotland. Med Decis Making. 2009;29(3):291–303.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Noyes J, Edwards RT. EQ-5D for the assessment of health-related quality of life and resource allocation in children: a systematic methodological review. Value Health. 2011;14(8):1117–29.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Griebsch I, Coast J, Brown J. Quality-adjusted life-years lack quality in pediatric care: a critical review of published cost-utility studies in child health. Pediatrics. 2005;115:e600–14.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Petrou S. Methodological issues raised by preference-based approaches to measuring the health status of children. Health Econ. 2003;12(8):697–702.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Matza L, Swensen A, Flood E, Secnik K, Leidy N. Assessment of health-related quality of life in children: a review of conceptual, methodological, and regulatory issues. Value Health. 2004;7(1):79–92.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Tsiros M, Olds T, Buckley J, Grimshaw P, Brennan L, Walkley J, et al. Health-related quality of life in obese children and adolescents. Int J Obes. 2009;33(4):387–400.CrossRef
38.
Morrow AM, Hayen A, Quine S, Scheinberg A, Craig JC. A comparison of doctors’, parents’ and children’s reports of health states and health-related quality of life in children with chronic conditions. Child Care Health Dev. 2012;38(2):186–95.CrossRefPubMed
39.
40.
Ratcliffe J, Stevens K, Flynn T, Brazier J, Sawyer MG. Whose values in health? An empirical comparison of the application of adolescent and adult values for the CHU-9D and AQOL-6D in the Australian adolescent general population. Value Health. 2012;15(5):730–6.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Ratcliffe J, Chen G, Stevens K, Bradley S, Couzner L, Brazier J, et al. Valuing Child Health Utility 9D health states with young people: a time trade off study. Working Paper 01/14. Adelaide; Flinders Centre for Clinical Change and Health Care Research, Flinders University; 2014.
42.
Hammitt JK, Keren R, Prosser LA. Measuring health preferences for use in cost-utility and cost-benefit analyses of interventions in children: theoretical and methodological considerations. PharmacoEconomics. 2007;25:713–26.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Yi MS, Britto MT, Wilmott RW, Kotagal UR, Eckman MH, Nielson DW, et al. Health values of adolescents with cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr. 2003;142(2):133–40.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Juniper E, Guyatt G, Feeny D, Griffith L, Ferrie P. Minimum skills required by children to complete health-related quality of life instruments for asthma: comparison of measurement properties. Eur Respir J. 1997;10:2285–94.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Flynn T, Louviere J, Marley A, Coast J, Peters T. Rescaling quality of life values from discrete choice experiments for use as QALYs: a cautionary tale. Population Health Metrics. 2008;6:6.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
46.
47.
Tilling C, Devlin N, Tsuchiya A, Buckingham K. Protocols for time tradeoff valuations of health states worse than dead. Med Decis Making. 2010;30(5):610–9.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Copay AG, Subach BR, Glassman SD, Polly DW Jr, Schuler TC. Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods. Spine J. 2007;7(5):541–6.CrossRefPubMed
49.
Revicki D, Hays RD, Cella D, Sloan J. Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(2):102–9.CrossRefPubMed
50.
Nokso-Koivisto J, Blomgren K, Roine RP, Sintonen H, Pitkäranta A. Impact of tonsillectomy on health-related quality of life and healthcare costs in children and adolescents. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;78(9):1508–12.CrossRefPubMed
51.
Alanne S, Roine RP, Räsänen P, Vainiola T, Sintonen H. Estimating the minimum important change in the 15D scores. Qual Life Res. 2015;24(3):599–606.CrossRefPubMed
52.
Mortimer D, Segal L. Comparing the incomparable? A systematic review of competing techniques for converting descriptive measures of health status into QALY-weights. Med Decis Making. 2008;28(1):66–89.CrossRefPubMed
53.
Brazier JE, Yang Y, Tsuchiya A, Rowen DL. A review of studies mapping (or cross walking) non-preference based measures of health to generic preference-based measures. Eur J Health Econ. 2010;11(2):215–25.CrossRefPubMed
54.
Longworth L, Rowen D. Mapping to obtain EQ-5D utility values for use in NICE health technology assessments. Value Health. 2013;16(1):202–10.CrossRefPubMed
55.
56.
Furber G, Segal L, Leach M, Cocks J. Mapping scores from the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) to preference-based utility values. Qual Life Res. 2014;23(2):403–11.CrossRefPubMed
57.
Chen G, Stevens K, Rowen D, Ratcliffe J. From KIDSCREEN-10 to CHU9D: creating a unique mapping algorithm for application in economic evaluation. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;12(1):134.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
58.
Payakachat N, Tilford JM, Kuhlthau KA, van Exel NJ, Kovacs E, Bellando J, et al. Predicting health utilities for children with autism spectrum disorders. Autism Res. 2014;7(6):649–63.CrossRefPubMed
59.
Tilford JM, Payakachat N, Kovacs E, Pyne JM, Brouwer W, Nick TG, et al. Preference-based health-related quality-of-life outcomes in children with autism spectrum disorders: a comparison of generic instruments. Pharmacoeconomics. 2012;30(8):661–79.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
60.
Bradlyn AS, Harris CV, Warner JE, Ritchey AK, Zaboy K. An investigation of the validity of the quality of well-being scale with pediatric oncology patients. Health Psychology. 1993;12(3):246–50.CrossRefPubMed
61.
Munzenberger PJ, Van Wagnen CA, Abdulhamid I, Walker PC. Quality of life as a treatment outcome in patients with cystic fibrosis. Pharmacotherapy. 1999;19(4):393–8.CrossRefPubMed
62.
Smith-Olinde L, Grosse SD, Olinde F, Martin PF, Tilford JM. Health state preference scores for children with permanent childhood hearing loss: a comparative analysis of the QWB and HUI3. Qual life Res. 2008;17:943–53.CrossRefPubMed
63.
Martin-Herz S, Zatzick D, McMahon R. Health-related quality of life in children and adolescents following traumatic injury: a review. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2012;15(3):192–214.CrossRefPubMed
64.
Ungar WJ, Boydell K, Dell S, Feldman BM, Marshall D, Willan A, et al. A parent-child dyad approach to the assessment of health status and health-related quality of life in children with asthma. Pharmacoeconomics. 2012;30(8):697–712.CrossRefPubMed
65.
Trudel JG, Rivard M, Dobkin PL, Leclerc JM, Robaey P. Psychometric properties of the Health Utilities Index Mark 2 system in paediatric oncology patients. Qual Life Res. 1998;7(5):421–32.CrossRefPubMed
66.
Janssens L, Gorter J, Ketelaar M, Kramer WM, Holtslag H. Health-related quality-of-life measures for long-term follow-up in children after major trauma. Qual Life Res. 2008;17(5):701–13.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
67.
Tong A, Wong G, McTaggart S, Henning P, Mackie F, Carroll RP, et al. Quality of life of young adults and adolescents with chronic kidney disease. J Pediatr. 2013;163(4):1179–85.e5.
68.
Bier J-AB, Prince A, Tremont M, Msall M. Medical, functional, and social determinants of health-related quality of life in individuals with myelomeningocele. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2005;47(9):609–12.
69.
Petrou S, Johnson S, Wolke D, Hollis C, Kochhar P, Marlow N. Economic costs and preference-based health-related quality of life outcomes associated with childhood psychiatric disorders. Br J Psychiatry. 2010;197(5):395–404.CrossRefPubMed
70.
Stevens KJ, Brazier JE, McKenna SP, Doward LC, Cork MJ. The development of a preference-based measure of health in children with atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol. 2005;153(2):372–7.CrossRefPubMed
71.
Tilford J, Grosse S, Robbins J, Pyne JM, Cleves MA, Hobbs CA. Health state preference scores of children with spina bifida and their caregivers. Qual Life Res. 2005;14(4):1087–98.CrossRefPubMed
72.
Taylor R, Franck LS, Gibson F, Dhawan A. A critical review of the health-related quality of life of children and adolescents after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2005;11(1):51–60.CrossRefPubMed
73.
Barr RD, Sek J, Horsman J, Furlong W, Saleh M, Pai M, et al. Health status and health-related quality of life associated with von Willebrand disease. Am J Hematol. 2003;73(2):108–14.CrossRefPubMed
74.
Sung L, Greenberg ML, Doyle JJ, Young NL, Ingber S, Rubenstein J, et al. Construct validation of the Health Utilities Index and the Child Health Questionnaire in children undergoing cancer chemotherapy. Br J Cancer. 2003;88(8):1185–90.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
75.
Knapp C, Madden V, Revicki D, Feeny D, Wang H, Curtis C, et al. Health status and health-related quality of life in a pediatric palliative care program. J Palliat Med. 2012;15(7):790–7.CrossRefPubMed
76.
Feeny D, Furlong W, Saigal S, Sun J. Comparing directly measured standard gamble scores to HUI2 and HUI3 utility scores: group- and individual-level comparisons. Soc Sci Med. 2004;58(4):799–809.CrossRefPubMed
77.
Belfort M, Zupancic J, Riera K, Turner J, Prosser L. Health state preferences associated with weight status in children and adolescents. BMC Pediatr. 2011;11(1):12.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
78.
van Litsenburg RRL, Kunst A, Huisman J, Ket JCF, Kaspers GJL, Gemke RJBJ. Health status utilities in pediatrics: a systematic review of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Med Decis Making. 2014;34(1):21–32.CrossRefPubMed
79.
Peetsold MG, Huisman J, Hofman VE, Heij HA, Raat H, Gemke RJ. Psychological outcome and quality of life in children born with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Arch Dis Child. 2009;94(11):834–40.CrossRefPubMed
80.
Lee JM, Rhee K, O’Grady MJ, Basu A, Winn A, John P, et al. Health utilities for children and adults with type 1 diabetes. Med Care. 2011;49(10):924.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
81.
Kulkarni AV, Cochrane DD, McNeely PD, Shams I. Medical, social, and economic factors associated with health-related quality of life in Canadian children with hydrocephalus. J Pediatr. 2008;153(5):689–95.CrossRefPubMed
82.
Calvert S, Miller HE, Curran A, Hameed B, McCarter R, Edwards RJ, et al. The King’s Outcome Scale for Childhood Head Injury and injury severity and outcome measures in children with traumatic brain injury. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008;50(6):426–31.CrossRefPubMed
83.
Brunner HI, Maker D, Grundland B, Young NL, Blanchette V, Stain A-M, et al. Preference-based measurement of health-related quality of life (HRQL) in children with chronic musculoskeletal disorders (MSKDs). Med Decis Making. 2003;23(4):314–22.CrossRefPubMed
84.
Kulkarni A, Hui S, Shams I, Donnelly R. Quality of life in obstructive hydrocephalus: endoscopic third ventriculostomy compared to cerebrospinal fluid shunt. Childs Nerv Syst. 2010;26(1):75–9.CrossRefPubMed
85.
Legood R, Coen PG, Knox K, Viner RM, El Bashir H, Christie D, et al. Health related quality of life in survivors of pneumococcal meningitis. Acta Pædiatrica. 2009;98(3):543–7.CrossRefPubMed
86.
Tong A, Tjaden L, Howard K, Wong G, Morton R, Craig JC. Quality of life of adolescent kidney transplant recipients. J Pediatr. 2011;159(4):670–5.e2.
87.
Gray R, Petrou S, Hockley C, Gardner F. Self-reported health status and health-related quality of life of teenagers who were born before 29 weeks’ gestational age. Pediatrics. 2007;120(1):e86–93.CrossRefPubMed
88.
Rhodes ET, Goran MI, Lieu TA, Lustig RH, Prosser LA, Songer TJ, et al. Health-related quality of life in adolescents with or at risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Pediatr. 2012;160(6):911–7.CrossRefPubMed
89.
Mört S, Salanterä S, Matomäki J, Salmi T, Lähteenmäki P. Self-reported health-related quality of life of children and adolescent survivors of extracranial childhood malignancies: a Finnish nationwide survey. Qual Life Res. 2011;20(5):787–97.CrossRefPubMed
90.
Suominen PK, Vähätalo R, Sintonen H, Haverinen A, Roine RP. Health-related quality of life after a drowning incident as a child. Resuscitation. 2011;82(10):1318–22.CrossRefPubMed
91.
Haapamäki J, Roine RP, Sintonen H, Kolho K-L. Health-related quality of life in paediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease related to disease activity. J Paediatr Child Health. 2011;47(11):832–7.CrossRefPubMed
92.
Arkkila E, Räsänen P, Roine RP, Sintonen H, Saar V, Vilkman E. Health-related quality of life of adolescents with childhood diagnosis of specific language impairment. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2009;73(9):1288–96.CrossRefPubMed
93.
Sipilä I, Sintonen H, Hietanen H, Apajasalo M, Alanne S, Viita A-M, et al. Long-term effects of growth hormone therapy on patients with Prader-Willi syndrome. Acta Paediatrica. 2010;99(11):1712–8.CrossRefPubMed
94.
Granö N, Karjalainen M, Suominen K, Roine M. Poor functioning ability is associated with high risk of developing psychosis in adolescents. Nord J Psychiatry. 2011;65(1):16–21.CrossRefPubMed
95.
Apajasalo M, Sintonen H, Rautonen J, Kaitila I. Health-related quality of life of patients with genetic skeletal dysplasias. Eur J Pediatr. 1998;157(2):114–21.CrossRefPubMed
96.
Haavisto A, Korkman M, Sintonen H, Holmberg C, Jalanko H, Lipsanen J, Qvist E. Risk factors for impaired quality of life and psychosocial adjustment after pediatric heart, kidney, and liver transplantation. Pediatr Transplant. 2013;17(3):256–65.CrossRefPubMed
97.
Geneid A, Pakkasjärvi N, Aherto A, Roine R, Sintonen H, Lindahl H, Pitkäranta A. Outcomes of early infancy laryngeal reconstruction on health- and voice-related quality of life. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;75(3):351–5.CrossRefPubMed
98.
Arkkila E, Räsänen P, Roine RP, Sintonen H, Saar V, Vilkman E. Health-related quality of life of children with specific language impairment aged 8–11. Folia Phoniatri Logop. 2011;63(1):27–35.CrossRef
99.
Qvist E, Närhi V, Apajasalo M, Rönnholm K, Jalanko H, Almqvist F, et al. Psychosocial adjustment and quality of life after renal transplantation in early childhood. Pediatr Transplant. 2004;8(2):120–5.CrossRefPubMed
100.
Keating CL, Moodie ML, Richardson J, Swinburn BA. Utility-based quality of life of overweight and obese adolescents. Value Health. 2011;14(5):752–8.CrossRefPubMed
101.
Foster Page L, Thomson W, Marshman Z, Stevens K. The potential of the Child Health Utility 9D Index as an outcome measure for child dental health. BMC Oral Health. 2014;14(1):90.
102.
Chen G, Ratcliffe J, Olds T, Magarey A, Jones M, Leslie E. BMI, health behaviors, and quality of life in children and adolescents: a school-based study. Pediatrics. 2014;133(4):e868–74.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
A Review of the Development and Application of Generic Multi-Attribute Utility Instruments for Paediatric Populations
verfasst von
Gang Chen
Julie Ratcliffe
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2015
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
PharmacoEconomics / Ausgabe 10/2015
Print ISSN: 1170-7690
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-2027
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-015-0286-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2015

PharmacoEconomics 10/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Systematic Review

Pre-eclampsia Diagnosis and Treatment Options: A Review of Published Economic Assessments

Original Research Article

Cost-Effectiveness of Proton Pump Inhibitor Co-Therapy in Patients Taking Aspirin for Secondary Prevention of Ischemic Stroke

Original Research Article

Adjusting for Baseline Covariates in Net Benefit Regression: How You Adjust Matters

Practical Application

The MAPS Reporting Statement for Studies Mapping onto Generic Preference-Based Outcome Measures: Explanation and Elaboration

Practical Application

Preferred Reporting Items for Studies Mapping onto Preference-Based Outcome Measures: The MAPS Statement

Systematic Review

A Systematic Review of the Economic and Humanistic Burden of Gout