Skip to main content
Erschienen in: PharmacoEconomics 7/2019

01.07.2019 | Review Article

Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation with Chondrosphere for Treating Articular Cartilage Defects in the Knee: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal

verfasst von: Xavier Armoiry, Ewen Cummins, Martin Connock, Andrew Metcalfe, Pamela Royle, Rhona Johnston, Jeremy Rodrigues, Norman Waugh, Hema Mistry

Erschienen in: PharmacoEconomics | Ausgabe 7/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Chondrosphere (Spherox) is a form of autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI). It is licensed for repair of symptomatic articular cartilage defects of the femoral condyle and the patella of the knee with defect sizes up to 10 cm2 in adults. In a single technology appraisal (STA) [TA508] undertaken by the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Warwick Evidence was the Evidence Review Group (ERG) invited to independently review the evidence submitted by the manufacturer, Co.Don. The clinical effectiveness data came from their COWISI randomised controlled trial (RCT), which compared Chondrosphere with microfracture (MF). The timing of this appraisal was unfortunate given that MF was no longer the most relevant comparator because NICE had contemporaneously published guidance approving ACI in place of MF. Moreover, the COWISI RCT enrolled mostly patients with small defect sizes. Evidence of clinical effectiveness for Chondrosphere used in people with larger defect size came from another RCT, which compared three doses of Chondrosphere and that by design could not provide evidence comparing Chondrosphere to any other forms of ACI. To estimate the relative clinical performance of Chondrosphere versus other ACI, Co.Don conducted an indirect treatment comparison by network meta-analyses (NMA). The NMA was flawed in that the distribution of population characteristics that are effect modifiers greatly differed across the treatment comparisons of the network. The ERG questioned both the appropriateness of the NMA and the validity of the resulting estimates. Co.Don estimated the cost-effectiveness of Chondrosphere using a lifetime Markov model with all patients receiving the first repair during the first cycle of the model then moving into one of three health states: success, no further repair (NFR), or a second repair, if necessary. Subsequent to the first cycle, those who were a success either remained a success or moved to second repair. All those in NFR remained in NFR. The cost-effectiveness of Chondrosphere compared to other ACI forms relied on the clinical effectiveness estimates of success and failure rates obtained from the company’s indirect comparisons, the validity of which the ERG questioned. The company revised cost-effectiveness estimates for Chondrosphere versus MF and for Chondrosphere versus matrix-applied characterised autologous cultured chondrocyte implant (MACI) were £4360 and around £18,000 per quality-adjusted life year gained, respectively. NICE recommended ACI using Chondrosphere for treating symptomatic articular cartilage defects of the femoral condyle and patella of the knee in adults only if certain requirements were met.
Literatur
4.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Urquhart DM, et al. What is the effect of physical activity on the knee joint? A systematic review. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(3):432–42.CrossRefPubMed Urquhart DM, et al. What is the effect of physical activity on the knee joint? A systematic review. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(3):432–42.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Becher C, et al. Safety of three different product doses in autologous chondrocyte implantation: results of a prospective, randomised, controlled trial. J Orthop Surg Res. 2017;12(1):71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Becher C, et al. Safety of three different product doses in autologous chondrocyte implantation: results of a prospective, randomised, controlled trial. J Orthop Surg Res. 2017;12(1):71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Niemeyer P, et al. The effect of cell dose on the early magnetic resonance morphological outcomes of autologous cell implantation for articular cartilage defects in the knee: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(8):2005–14.CrossRefPubMed Niemeyer P, et al. The effect of cell dose on the early magnetic resonance morphological outcomes of autologous cell implantation for articular cartilage defects in the knee: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(8):2005–14.CrossRefPubMed
12.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Saris DB, et al. Treatment of symptomatic cartilage defects of the knee: characterized chondrocyte implantation results in better clinical outcome at 36 months in a randomized trial compared to microfracture. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(Suppl 1):10s–9s.CrossRefPubMed Saris DB, et al. Treatment of symptomatic cartilage defects of the knee: characterized chondrocyte implantation results in better clinical outcome at 36 months in a randomized trial compared to microfracture. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(Suppl 1):10s–9s.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Vanlauwe J, et al. Five-year outcome of characterized chondrocyte implantation versus microfracture for symptomatic cartilage defects of the knee: early treatment matters. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(12):2566–74.CrossRefPubMed Vanlauwe J, et al. Five-year outcome of characterized chondrocyte implantation versus microfracture for symptomatic cartilage defects of the knee: early treatment matters. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(12):2566–74.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Fickert S, et al. One-year clinical and radiological results of a prospective, investigator-initiated trial examining a novel, purely autologous 3-dimensional autologous chondrocyte transplantation product in the knee. Cartilage. 2012;3(1):27–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fickert S, et al. One-year clinical and radiological results of a prospective, investigator-initiated trial examining a novel, purely autologous 3-dimensional autologous chondrocyte transplantation product in the knee. Cartilage. 2012;3(1):27–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Maiotti M, et al. Transplantation of tissue-engineered cartilage for repair of osteochondral defects in the knee (SS-27). Arthroscopy J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2012;28(6):e15–6.CrossRef Maiotti M, et al. Transplantation of tissue-engineered cartilage for repair of osteochondral defects in the knee (SS-27). Arthroscopy J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2012;28(6):e15–6.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Roessing S, et al. The full arthroscopic technique of autologous chondrocyte transplantation using chondrospheres-safety study with 2 years follow up. Cartilage. 2010;1(2 Supplement 1):55S. Roessing S, et al. The full arthroscopic technique of autologous chondrocyte transplantation using chondrospheres-safety study with 2 years follow up. Cartilage. 2010;1(2 Supplement 1):55S.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Schreyer T. Comparison in clinical outcome of first generation ACT with ACT of third generation with spheroids. Cartilage. 2010;1(2 Supplement 1):58S. Schreyer T. Comparison in clinical outcome of first generation ACT with ACT of third generation with spheroids. Cartilage. 2010;1(2 Supplement 1):58S.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Siebold R, et al. Second-look assessment after all-arthroscopic autologous chondrocyte implantation with spheroides at the knee joint. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Off J ESSKA. 2016;24(5):1678–85.CrossRef Siebold R, et al. Second-look assessment after all-arthroscopic autologous chondrocyte implantation with spheroides at the knee joint. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Off J ESSKA. 2016;24(5):1678–85.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Mistry H, et al. Autologous chondrocyte implantation in the knee: systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2017;21(6):1–294.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mistry H, et al. Autologous chondrocyte implantation in the knee: systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2017;21(6):1–294.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Gerlier L, et al. The cost utility of autologous chondrocytes implantation using ChondroCelect (R) in symptomatic knee cartilage lesions in Belgium. Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(12):1129–46.CrossRefPubMed Gerlier L, et al. The cost utility of autologous chondrocytes implantation using ChondroCelect (R) in symptomatic knee cartilage lesions in Belgium. Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(12):1129–46.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Dong H, Buxton M. Early assessment of the likely cost-effectiveness of a new technology: a Markov model with probabilistic sensitivity analysis of computer-assisted total knee replacement. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2006;22(2):191–202.CrossRefPubMed Dong H, Buxton M. Early assessment of the likely cost-effectiveness of a new technology: a Markov model with probabilistic sensitivity analysis of computer-assisted total knee replacement. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2006;22(2):191–202.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ. 2002;21(2):271–92.CrossRefPubMed Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ. 2002;21(2):271–92.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation with Chondrosphere for Treating Articular Cartilage Defects in the Knee: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal
verfasst von
Xavier Armoiry
Ewen Cummins
Martin Connock
Andrew Metcalfe
Pamela Royle
Rhona Johnston
Jeremy Rodrigues
Norman Waugh
Hema Mistry
Publikationsdatum
01.07.2019
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
PharmacoEconomics / Ausgabe 7/2019
Print ISSN: 1170-7690
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-2027
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-018-0737-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2019

PharmacoEconomics 7/2019 Zur Ausgabe