Skip to main content
Log in

Microstructural differences between osteoporotic and osteoarthritic femoral cancellous bone: an in vitro magnetic resonance micro-imaging investigation

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently has been highlighted that topological properties of trabecular microstructure and microarchitectural deterioration of bone tissue are important factors in determining bone strength and its resistance to fracture. Magnetic resonance (MR) techniques allow investigation of both trabecular networks and bone marrow providing precious information on the physiological and functional changes associated with osteoporosis. The aim of the present work was to show the ability of MR micro-imaging investigation to describe cancellous bone status as related to its trabecular bone density and quality. For this purpose we measured in vitro, at high magnetic field (9.4T), the MR parameter \( T_{2}^{\text{APP}} \) of cancellous bone samples extracted from femoral head of osteoporotic and osteoarthritic women as classified by dual energy X ray absorptiometry bone mineral density. We assessed \( T_{2}^{\text{APP}} \) associations with T-scores, Harris Hip score and age. Results show that \( T_{2}^{\text{APP}} \) is able to discriminate between osteoarthritic and osteoporotic bone samples. Moreover, the micro-imaging \( T_{2}^{\text{APP}} \) investigation has highlighted a different trabecular bone density in cancellous bone specimens of osteoarthritic patients only, which is higher in subchondral compared to metaphysis section of each sample.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Kanis JA (2002) Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk. Lancet 359:1929–1936

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tarantino U, Celi M, Baldi J, Scialdoni A, Liuni FM, Perrone FL, Gasbarra E (2012) Osteoporosis and muscles changes: the connection. Arch Osteoporos 7:S141–S151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Arokoski JPA, Arokoski MH, Jurvelin JS, Helminen HJ, Niemitukia LH, Kröger H (2001) Increased femoral neck bone mineral content and bone size in men with hip osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 61:45–150

    Google Scholar 

  4. Griffith JF, Genant HK (2008) Bone mass and architecture determination: state of the art. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 22:737–764

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Majumdar S, Genant HK (1995) A review of the recent advances in magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 5:79–92

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. De Santis S, Rebuzzi M, Di Pietro G, Fasano F, Maraviglia B, Capuani S (2010) In vitro and in vivo MR evaluation of internal gradient to assess trabecular bone density. Phys Med Biol 55:5767–5785

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hahn EL (1950) Spin Echoes. Phys Rev 80:580–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Davis GA, Genant HK, Dunham JS (1986) The effect of bone on proton NMR relaxation times of surrounding liquids. Invest Radiol 21:472–477

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chung H, Wehrli FW, Williams JL, Kugelmass SD (1993) Relationship between NMR transverse relaxation, trabecular bone architecture, and strength. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:10250–10254

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Carr HY, Purcell EM (1954) Effects of diffusion on free precession in nuclear magnetic resonance experiments. Phys Rev 94:630–638

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Capuani S, Rossi C, Alesiani M, Maraviglia B (2005) Diffusion tensor imaging to study anisotropy in a particular porous system: the trabecular bone network. Solid State Nucl Magn Reson 28:266–272

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Manenti G, Capuani S, Fanucci E, Parfait Assako E, Sorge R, Iundusi R, Tarantino U, Simonetti G (2013) Diffusion tensor imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopy assessment of cancellous bone quality in femoral neck of healthy, osteopenic and osteoporotic subjects at 3T: preliminary experience. Bone 55:7–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Capuani S (2013) Water diffusion in cancellous bone. Micropor Mesopor Mater 178:34–38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Silvia Capuani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Capuani, S., Piccirilli, E., Di Pietro, G. et al. Microstructural differences between osteoporotic and osteoarthritic femoral cancellous bone: an in vitro magnetic resonance micro-imaging investigation. Aging Clin Exp Res 25 (Suppl 1), 51–54 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-013-0095-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-013-0095-9

Keywords

Navigation