Skip to main content
Log in

Characteristics of the personal and environmental components of person-environment fit in very old age: a comparison between people with self-reported Parkinson’s disease and matched controls

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aims

To investigate differences and similarities in person–environment (P–E) fit problems between very old people with self-reported Parkinson’s disease (PD) and matched controls.

Methods

Data collected for the cross-national ENABLE-AGE Survey Study were used to identify people with self-reported PD (n = 20), and to select three matched controls per individual (n = 60). The matching criteria were age (mean = 82 years), sex, country, and type of housing. The data analysis targeted P–E fit (i.e. accessibility) problems, including studying the personal and environmental components separately. The personal component was analyzed in terms of functional limitations, and the environmental component in terms of physical environmental barriers.

Results

In comparison to the matched controls, the participants with PD had more functional limitations, used more mobility devices and were subjected to more P–E fit problems, though the number of environmental barriers did not differ from the controls. In the PD sample, P–E fit problems were significantly stronger associated with poor balance and incoordination, and the environmental barriers that generated the most severe P–E fit problems were more often located to the exterior surroundings of the housing compared to the controls.

Conclusions

The novel contribution of this explorative study is the demonstration of the type of knowledge that can be generated by unfolding and comparing the composition of P–E fit (accessibility) problems among people with self-reported PD as compared with matched controls. The knowledge thereby generated can be used to develop more targeted rehabilitation approaches, efficient housing adaptation services and societal planning for people with neurodegenerative disorders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. SOU 2008:113. Slutbetänkande: Bo bra hela livet [in Swedish]. Stockholm: Fritzes offentliga publikationer, 2008

  2. Vossius C, Nilsen OB, Larsen JP (2009) Parkinson’s disease and nursing home placement: the economic impact of the need for care. Eur J Neurol 16:194–200

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jensen MP, Molton IR (2010) Aging with a physical disability. W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  4. World Health Organization (2001) Classification of functioning, disability and health

  5. World report on disability (2011) World Health Organization

  6. Iwarsson S, Wahl H-W, Nygren C (2004) Challenges of cross-national housing research with older people: lessons learned from the ENABLE-AGE Project. J Ageing 1:79–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wahl H-W, Fänge A, Oswald F, Gitlin L, Iwarsson S (2009) The home environment and disability-related outcomes in aging individuals: what is the empirical evidence? Gerontologist 49:55–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hariz GM, Forsgren L (2011) Activities of daily living and quality of life in persons with newly diagnosed Parkinson’s disease according to subtype of disease, and in comparison to healthy controls. Acta Neurol Scand 123:20–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schrag A, Ben-Shlomo Y, Quinn N (2002) How common are complications of Parkinson’s disease? J Neurol 249:419–423

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fitzsimmons PR, Blayney S, Mina-Corkill S, Scott GO (2012) Older participants are frequently excluded from Parkinson’s disease research. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 18:585–589

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lawton MP, Nahemow L (1973) Ecology and the ageing process. In: Eisdorfer C, Lawton M (eds) The psychology of adult development and ageing. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp 619–674

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Scheidt RJ, Norris-Baker C (2004) The general ecological model revisited: evolution, current status, continuing challenges. In: Wahl HW, Scheidt RJ, Windley PG (eds) Aging in context: socio-physical environments (annual review of gerontology and geriatrics 2003). Springer, New York, pp 34–58

    Google Scholar 

  13. Carp FM (1987) Environment and aging. In: Stokols D, Altman I (eds) Handbook of environmental psychology. Wiley, New York, pp 330–360

    Google Scholar 

  14. Iwarsson S, Ståhl A (2003) Accessibility, usability and universal design—positioning and definition of concepts describing person–environment relationships. Disabil Rehabil 25:57–66

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Iwarsson S, Slaug B, Haak M (2012) Current developments of the housing enabler methodology. Br J Occup Ther 75:517–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Helle T, Nygren C, Slaug B, Brandt Å, Pikkarainen A, Hansen A-G, Pétersdóttir E, Iwarsson S (2010) The Nordic housing enabler: inter-rater reliability in cross-Nordic occupational therapy practice. Scand J Occup Ther 17:258–266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Iwarsson S, Wahl HW, Nygren C, Oswald F, Sixsmith A, Sixsmith J et al (2007) Importance of the home environment for healthy aging: conceptual and methodological background of the European ENABLE-AGE Project. Gerontologist 47:78–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Iwarsson S, Wahl H-W, Nygren C (2004) Challenges of cross-national housing research with older persons: lessons from the ENABLE-AGE Project. Eur J Ageing 1:79–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Oswald F, Wahl HW, Schilling O, Nygren C, Fange A, Sixsmith A et al (2007) Relationships between housing and healthy aging in very old age. Gerontologist 47:96–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Grimes DA, Schulz KF (2005) Compared to what? Finding controls for case–control studies. Lancet 365:1429–1433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Iwarsson S, Nygren C, Slaug B (2005) Cross-national and multi-professional inter-rater reliability of the Housing enabler. Scand J Occup Ther 12:29–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Iwarsson S, Slaug B (2001) The Housing Enabler. An instrument for assessing and analysing accessibility problems in housing. (http://www.enabler.nu). Nävlinge and Staffanstorp: Veten & Skapen HB & Slaug Data Management

  23. Erfurth E, Bülow B, Svahn-Tapper G, Norrving B, Odh K, Mikoczy Z et al (2002) Risk factors for cerebrovascular deaths in patients operated and irradiated for pituitary tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:4892–4899

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Scheidt RJ, Windley PG (2006) Environmental gerontology: progress in the post Lawton era. In: Birren JE, Schaie KW (eds) Handbook of the psychology of ageing, 6th edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 105–125

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Tomlinson CL, Patel S, Meek C, Clarke CE, Stowe R, Shah L, Sackley CM, Deane KHO, Herd CP, Wheatley K, Ives N (2012) Physiotherapy versus placebo or no intervention in Parkinson’s disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7:CD002817

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nilsson MH, Hariz GM, Iwarsson S, Hagell P (2012) Walking ability is a major contributor to fear of falling in people with Parkinson’s disease: implications for rehabilitation. Parkinsons Dis 2012:713236

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lamont RM, Morris ME, Woollacott MH, Brauer SG (2012) Community walking in people with Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsons Dis 2012:856237

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Koller WC, Glatt S, Vetere-Overfield B, Hassanein R (1989) Falls and Parkinson’s disease. Clin Neuropharmacol 12:98–105

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Pretzer-Aboff I, Galik E, Resnick B (2009) Parkinson’s disease: barriers and facilitators to optimizing function. Rehabil Nurs 34:55–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Terriff DL, Williams JVA, Patten SB, Lavorato DH, Bulloch AGM (2012) Patterns of disability, care needs, and quality of life of people with Parkinson’s disease in a general population sample. Park Relat Dis 18:828–832

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Snijders AH, Nijkrake MJ, Bakker M, Munneke M, Wind C, Bloem BR (2008) Clinimetrics of freezing of gait. Mov Disord 23 (Suppl 2):468–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The project “Enabling Autonomy, Participation, and Well-Being in Old Age: The Home Environment as a Determinant for Healthy Ageing” (ENABLE-AGE) was funded by the European Commission (QLRT-2001-00334). We thank all study participants, consortium and national team members, and sub-contractors for their contribution. We are specifically grateful for the valuable support by S. Ullén (statistician, PhD) and Helene Jacobsson (statistician, MSc), R&D Centre Skåne, Skåne University hospital, Sweden. This paper was prepared within MultiPark, financed by Lund University, and the Centre for Ageing and Supportive Environments (CASE), financed by the Swedish Research Council on Social Science and Working Life. Financial support was provided also by the Ribbing Foundation, Lund, Sweden.

Conflict of interest

In terms of financial interests, BS and SI are the copyright holders and owners of the Housing Enabler (HE) instrument and software, provided as commercial products (see http://www.enabler.nu). The third author has no competing interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Björn Slaug.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Slaug, B., Nilsson, M.H. & Iwarsson, S. Characteristics of the personal and environmental components of person-environment fit in very old age: a comparison between people with self-reported Parkinson’s disease and matched controls. Aging Clin Exp Res 25, 667–675 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-013-0165-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-013-0165-z

Keywords

Navigation