Abstract
Background and aims
This study assessed the association between frailty and sociodemographic, socioeconomic and lifestyle factors in community-dwelling older people.
Methods
This was a cross-sectional survey in a population-based sample of 542 community-dwelling subjects aged 65 years and older living in a metropolitan area in Italy. Frailty was evaluated by means of the FRAIL scale proposed by the International Association of Nutrition and Aging. Basal and instrumental activities of daily living (ADL, IADL), physical activity, sociodemographic (age, gender, marital status and cohabitation), socioeconomic (education, economic conditions and occupational status) and lifestyle domains (cultural and technological fruition and social activation) were assessed through specific validated tools. Statistical analysis was performed through multinomial logistic regression.
Results
Impairments in ADL and IADL were significantly associated with frailty, while moderate and high physical activity were inversely associated with frailty. Moreover, regarding both socioeconomic variables and lifestyle factors, more disadvantaged socioeconomic conditions and low levels of cultural fruition were significantly associated with frailty.
Conclusions
Socioeconomic and lifestyle factors, particularly cultural fruition, are associated with frailty independently from functional impairment and low physical activity. Cultural habits may therefore represent a new target of multimodal interventions against geriatric frailty.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ferrucci L, Guralnik JM, Studenski S et al (2004) Designing randomized, controlled trials aimed at preventing or delaying functional decline and disability in frail, older persons: a consensus report. J Am Geriatr Soc 52:625–634
Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S et al (2013) Frailty in elderly people. Lancet 381:752–762
Marmot M, Wilkinson R (eds) (2006) Social determinants of health. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Pampel FC, Krueger PM, Denney JT (2010) Socioeconomic disparities in health behaviors. Annu Rev Sociol 36:349–370
House JS, Lepkowski JM, Kinney AM et al (1994) The social stratification of aging and health. J Health Soc Behav 35:213–234
Mirovsky J, Ross C (1998) Education, personal control, lifestyle and health: a human capital hypothesis. Res Aging 20:415–449
Ross CE, Wu CL (1996) Education, age, and the cumulative advantage in health. J Health Soc Behav 37:104–120
Seeman TE, Crimmins E, Huang M (2001) Social environment effects on health and aging: integrating epidemiologic and demographic approaches and perspectives. Ann N Y Acad Sci 954:88–117
Gutierrez-Robledo LM, Avila-Funes JA (2012) How to include the social factor for determining frailty? J Frailty Aging 1:13–17
Lang IA, Hubbard RE, Andrew MK et al (2009) Neighborhood deprivation, individual socioeconomic status, and frailty in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 57:1776–1780. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02480.x
Szanton SL, Seplaki CL, Thorpe RJ Jr et al (2010) Socioeconomic status is associated with frailty: the Women’s Health and Aging Studies. J Epidemiol Community Health 64:63–67. doi:10.1136/jech.2008.078428
Etman A, Kamphuis CBM, van der Cammen TJM et al (2014) Do lifestyle, health and social participation mediate educational inequalities in frailty worsening? Eur J public Health 25:345–350. doi:10.1093/eurpub/cku093
Soler-Vila H, García-Esquinas E, León-Muñoz LM et al (2016) Contribution of health behaviours and clinical factors to socioeconomic differences in frailty among older adults. J Epidemiol Community Health. doi:10.1136/jech-2015-206406
Alvarado BE, Zunzunegui MV, Béland F et al (2008) Life course social and health conditions linked to frailty in Latin American older men and women. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 63:1399–1406
Etman A, Burdorf A, Van der Cammen TJ et al (2012) Socio-demographic determinants of worsening in frailty among community-dwelling older people in 11 European countries. J Epidemiol Community Health 66:1116–1121. doi:10.1136/jech-2011-200027
Rodríguez López S, Montero P, Carmenate M (2014) Educational inequalities and frailty in spain: what is the role of obesity? J Frailty Aging 3:120–125. doi:10.14283/jfa.2014.12
Hoogendijk EO, van Hout HP, Heymans MW et al (2014) Explaining the association between educational level and frailty in older adults: results from a 13-year longitudinal study in the Netherlands. Ann Epidemiol 24:538–544. doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2014.05.002
Herr M, Robine JM, Aegerter P et al (2015) Contribution of socioeconomic position over life to frailty differences in old age: comparison of life-course models in a French sample of 2350 old people. Ann Epidemiol 25:674–680. doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2015.05.006
Morley J, Malmstrom TK, Miller DK (2012) A simple frailty questionnaire (FRAIL) predicts outcomes in middle aged African Americans. J Nutr Health Aging 16:601–608
Poli S, Pandolfini V (2016) Social factors and elderly frailty: an application of the frail scale in Italy. BMS. doi:10.1177/0759106316642720
Katz S (1983) Assessing self-maintenance: activities of daily living, mobility and instrumental activities of daily living. JAGS 31:721–726
Lawton M, Brody E (1969) Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 9:179–186
Laslett P (1972) Famille et ménage. Annales 4–5:847–872
Breen R (2007) Foundations of a neo-weberian class analysis. In: Wright EO (ed) Approaches to Class Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 31–50
De Lillo A, Schizzerotto A (1985) La valutazione sociale delle occupazioni. Una scala di stratificazione occupazionale per l’Italia contemporanea. Il Mulino, Bologna
Erikson R, Goldthorpe JH (1992) The constant flux: a study on class mobility in industrial societies. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Bourdieu P (1984) Distinction: a social critique of the judgement of taste, translated by Richard Nice. Harvard university Press, Cambridge
Cesareo V (ed) (2007) La distanza sociale: una ricerca nelle aree urbane italiane. FrancoAngeli, Milano
Selwyn N (2004) The information aged: a qualitative study of older adults’ use of information and communications technology. J Aging Stud 18:369–384
Poli S (2014) Beyond stereotypes talent resources and social activity among the postmodern elderly. Res Aging Soc Polic 2:58–86
Bergman H, Ferrucci L, Guralnik J et al (2007) Frailty: an emerging research and clinical paradigm: issues and controversies. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 62:731–737
Waite LJ (2006) Marriage and family. In: Polston DL, Micklin M (eds) Handbook of population. Springer, New York, pp 87–108
Ross CE, Mirowsky J (2010) Why education is the key to socioeconomic differentials in health. In: Bird CE, Conrad P, Fremont AM, Timmermans S (eds) Handbook of medical sociology, 6th edn. Vanderbilt University Press, Nashville
Hirsch C, Anderson ML, Newman A et al (2006) The association of race with frailty: the cardiovascular health study. Ann Epidemiol 16:545–553
Woo J, Chan R, Leung J, Wong M (2010) Relative contributions of geographic, socioeconomic, and lifestyle factors to quality of life, frailty, and mortality in elderly. PLoS One 5:e8775
Ferrucci L, Windham BG, Fried LP (2005) Frailty in older persons. Genus 56:39–53
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.
Human and animal rights
The research was approved by the Ethical Committee of Di.S.For., University of Genoa, in adherence to the Declaration of Helsinki.
Informed consent
Informed consent was given by participants.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Poli, S., Cella, A., Puntoni, M. et al. Frailty is associated with socioeconomic and lifestyle factors in community-dwelling older subjects. Aging Clin Exp Res 29, 721–728 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-016-0623-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-016-0623-5