Skip to main content
Log in

Barriers and Strategies for Recruitment of Racial and Ethnic Minorities: Perspectives from Neurological Clinical Research Coordinators

  • Published:
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard within evidence-based research. Low participant accrual rates, especially of underrepresented groups (e.g., racial-ethnic minorities), may jeopardize clinical studies’ viability and strength of findings. Research has begun to unweave clinical trial mechanics, including the roles of clinical research coordinators, to improve trial participation rates.

Methods

Two semi-structured focus groups were conducted with a purposive sample of 29 clinical research coordinators (CRCs) at consecutive international stroke conferences in 2013 and 2014 to gain in-depth understanding of coordinator-level barriers to racial-ethnic minority recruitment and retention into neurological trials. Coded transcripts were used to create themes to define concepts, identify associations, summarize findings, and posit explanations.

Results

Barriers related to translation, literacy, family composition, and severity of medical diagnosis were identified. Potential strategies included a focus on developing personal relationships with patients, community and patient education, centralized clinical trial administrative systems, and competency focused training and education for CRCs.

Conclusion

Patient level barriers to clinical trial recruitment are well documented. Less is known about barriers facing CRCs. Further identification of how and when barriers manifest and the effectiveness of strategies to improve CRCs recruitment efforts is warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tunis SR, Stryer DB, Clancy CM. Practical clinical trials: increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy. JAMA. 2003;290(12):1624–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lamas GA, Pfeffer MA, Hamm P, Wertheimer J, Rouleau J-L, Braunwald E. Do the results of randomized clinical trials of cardiovascular drugs influence medical practice? N Engl J Med. 1992;327(4):241–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Emberson J, Lees KR, Lyden P, Blackwell L, Albers G, Bluhmki E, et al. Effect of treatment delay, age, and stroke severity on the effects of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. Lancet. 2014;384(9958):1929–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Haidich A-B, Ioannidis JP. Patterns of patient enrollment in randomized controlled trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54(9):877–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hussain-Gambles M, Atkin K, Leese B. Why ethnic minority groups are under-represented in clinical trials: a review of the literature. Health & Social Care in the Community. 2004;12(5):382–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Roberts J, Waddy S, Kaufmann P. Recruitment and retention monitoring: facilitating the mission of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS). JVIN. 2012;5(1.5).

  7. Sanoff HK, Sargent DJ, Green EM, McLeod HL, Goldberg RM. Racial differences in advanced colorectal cancer outcomes and pharmacogenetics: a subgroup analysis of a large randomized clinical trial. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(25):4109–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen MS, Lara PN, Dang JH, Paterniti DA, Kelly K. Twenty years post-NIH revitalization act: enhancing minority participation in clinical trials (EMPaCT): laying the groundwork for improving minority clinical trial accrual. Cancer. 2014;120(S7):1091–6.

  9. NIH Revitalization Act of 1993, Subtitle B, Part 1, Sec 131-133, June 10, 1993.

  10. Lai GY, Gary TL, Tilburt J, Bolen S, Baffi C, Wilson RF, et al. Effectiveness of strategies to recruit underrepresented populations into cancer clinical trials. Clinical Trials (London, England). 2006;3(2):133–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Branson RD, Davis K, Butler KL. African Americans’ participation in clinical research: importance, barriers, and solutions. Am J Surg. 2007;193(1):32–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. George S, Duran N, Norris K. A systematic review of barriers and facilitators to minority research participation among African Americans, Latinos, Asian Americans, and Pacific Islanders. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(2):e16–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Ford JG, Howerton MW, Lai GY, Gary TL, Bolen S, Gibbons MC, et al. Barriers to recruiting underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials: a systematic review. Cancer. 2008;112(2):228–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Daverio-Zanetti S, Schultz K, del Campo MAM, Malcarne V, Riley N, Sadler GR. Is religiosity related to attitudes toward clinical trials participation? J Cancer Educ. 2015;30(2):220–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Rivers D, August EM, Sehovic I, Green BL, Quinn GP. A systematic review of the factors influencing African Americans’ participation in cancer clinical trials. Contemp Clin Trials. 2013;35(2):13–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Giuliano AR, Mokuau N, Hughes C, Tortolero-Luna G, Risendal B, Ho RC, et al. Participation of minorities in cancer research: the influence of structural, cultural, and linguistic factors. Ann Epidemiol. 2000;10(8):S22–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kurt A, Semler L, Jacoby JL, Johnson MB, Careyva BA, Stello B et al. Racial differences among factors associated with participation in clinical research trials. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities. 2016:1–10.

  18. Watson JM, Torgerson DJ. Increasing recruitment to randomised trials: a review of randomised controlled trials. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6(1):1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Foy R, Parry J, Duggan A, Delaney B, Wilson S, Lewin-van den Broek N, et al. How evidence based are recruitment strategies to randomized controlled trials in primary care? Experience from seven studies. Fam Pract. 2003;20(1):83–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pelke S, Easa D. The role of the clinical research coordinator in multicenter clinical trials. J Obstet, Gynecol, Neonatal Nurs. 1997;26(3):279–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Davis AM, Hull SC, Grady C, Wilfond BS, Henderson GE. The invisible hand in clinical research: the study coordinator’s critical role in human subjects protection. J Law, Med Ethics. 2002;30(3):411–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Poston RD, Buescher CR. The essential role of the clinical research nurse (CRN). Urol Nurs. 2010;30(1):55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ross S, Grant A, Counsell C, Gillespie W, Russell I, Prescott R. Barriers to participation in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999;52(12):1143–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mills EJ, Seely D, Rachlis B, Griffith L, Wu P, Wilson K, et al. Barriers to participation in clinical trials of cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review of patient-reported factors. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7(2):141–8. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70576-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Speicher LA, Fromell G, Avery S, Brassil D, Carlson L, Stevens E, et al. The critical need for academic health centers to assess the training, support, and career development requirements of clinical research coordinators: recommendations from the clinical and translational science award research coordinator taskforce. Clin Transl Sci. 2012;5(6):470–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Morgan SE, Mouton A, Occa A, Potter J. Clinical trial and research study recruiters’ verbal communication behaviors. J Health Commun. 2016:1–8.

  27. Moskowitz GB, Okten IO, Gooch CM. On race and time. Psychol Sci. 2015;26(11):1783–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Moskowitz GB, Stone J, Childs A. Implicit stereotyping and medical decisions: unconscious stereotype activation in practitioners’ thoughts about African Americans. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(5):996–1001.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Bean MG, Stone J, Badger TA, Focella ES, Moskowitz GB. Evidence of nonconscious stereotyping of Hispanic patients by nursing and medical students. Nurs Res. 2013;62(5):362.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N. Qualitative research in health care: analysing qualitative data. BMJ: British Medical Journal. 2000;320(7227):114–6. doi:10.2307/25186804.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. The qualitative researcher’s companion. 2002:305-29.

  32. Heifetz RA, Laurie DL. The work of leadership. Harv Bus Rev. 1997;75:124–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Feagin J, Bennefield Z. Systemic racism and US health care. Soc Sci Med. 2014;103:7–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Boulware LE, Cooper LA, Ratner LE, LaVeist TA, Powe NR. Race and trust in the health care system. Public Health Rep. 2003;118(4):358.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Jones JH. Bad blood. New York: Simon and Schuster; 1993. 

  36. Beach MC, Price EG, Gary TL, Robinson KA, Gozu A, Palacio A, et al. Cultural competency: a systematic review of health care provider educational interventions. Med Care. 2005;43(4):356.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Anderson LM, Scrimshaw SC, Fullilove MT, Fielding JE, Normand J, Services TFoCP. Culturally competent healthcare systems: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2003;24(3):68–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Steinhauser KE, Clipp EC, Hays JC, Olsen M, Arnold R, Christakis NA, et al. Identifying, recruiting, and retaining seriously-ill patients and their caregivers in longitudinal research. Palliat Med. 2006;20(8):745–54. doi:10.1177/0269216306073112.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sonstein SA, Seltzer J, Li R, Silva H, Jones CT, Daemen E. Moving from compliance to competency: a harmonized core competency framework for the clinical research professional. Clin Res. 2014;28(3):17–23.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Snyder DC, Brouwer RN, Ennis CL, Spangler LL, Ainsworth TL, Budinger S, et al. Retooling institutional support infrastructure for clinical research. Contemp Clin Trials. 2016;48:139–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Williams MV, Baker DW, Parker RM, Nurss JR. Relationship of functional health literacy to patients’ knowledge of their chronic disease: a study of patients with hypertension and diabetes. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158(2):166–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. National Institutes of Health. Clear communication: an NIH health literacy initiative. 2012. https://www.nih.gov/institutes-nih/nih-office-director/office-communications-public-liaison/clear-communication.

  43. Malat J, Clark-Hitt R, Burgess DJ, Friedemann-Sanchez G, Van Ryn M. White doctors and nurses on racial inequality in health care in the USA: whiteness and colour-blind racial ideology. Ethn Racial Stud. 2010;33(8):1431–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Hall S. The spectacle of the other. Discourse theory and practice: a reader. 2001;1:324–44.

  45. Olson DP, Windish DM. Communication discrepancies between physicians and hospitalized patients. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(15):1302–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Paasche-Orlow MK, Parker RM, Gazmararian JA, Nielsen-Bohlman LT, Rudd RR. The prevalence of limited health literacy. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(2):175–84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Safeer RS, Keenan J. Health literacy: the gap between physicians and patients. Am Fam Physician. 2005;72(3):463–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Krieger JL, Parrott RL, Nussbaum JF. Metaphor use and health literacy: a pilot study of strategies to explain randomization in cancer clinical trials. J Health Commun. 2010;16(1):3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Internal Revenue Service. Internal Revenue Bulletin: 2011–30 2012. http://www.irs.gov/irb/2011-30_IRB/ar08.html. Accessed February 20 2015.

  50. State of Rhode Island. Health equity. 2016. http://www.health.ri.gov/equity/. Accessed December 12 2016.

  51. Bay Areas Regional Health Inequities Initiative. Health equity and community engagement report: best practices, challenges and recommendations for local health departments. 2013. http://barhii.org/download/publications/hecer_regionalsummary.pdf. Accessed December 12, 2016.

  52. Featherstone K, Donovan JL. “Why don’t they just tell me straight, why allocate it?” The struggle to make sense of participating in a randomised controlled trial. Soc Sci Med. 2002;55(5):709–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Ford ME, Siminoff LA, Pickelsimer E, Mainous AG, Smith DW, Diaz VA et al. Unequal burden of disease, unequal participation in clinical trials: solutions from African American and Latino community members. Health & Social Work. 2013:hlt001.

  54. Swanson GM, Ward AJ. Recruiting minorities into clinical trials toward a participant-friendly system. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;87(23):1747–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Heather Carman Kuczynski, MPH, CHES for focus group facilitation; Noa Appleton, MPH for review of manuscript and technical assistance; and the participants of the 2013 and 2014 ISC focus groups. This work was supported by National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) and the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD) (U24#MD006961, PI: Bernadette Boden-Albala).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sean J. Haley.

Ethics declarations

The New York University’s Committee on Activities Involving Human Subjects (UCAIHS) approved the study.

Funding

This work was supported by National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) and the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD) (U24#MD006961, PI: Bernadette Boden-Albala).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Haley, S.J., Southwick, L.E., Parikh, N.S. et al. Barriers and Strategies for Recruitment of Racial and Ethnic Minorities: Perspectives from Neurological Clinical Research Coordinators. J. Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities 4, 1225–1236 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-016-0332-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-016-0332-y

Keywords

Navigation