The use of road humps for moderating speeds on Urban streets
References (9)
- et al.
Dynamic considerations of speed control humps
Transportation Research
(1982) Speed control humps—Further public road trials
Speed humps and the Thousand Oaks experience
Institute of Traffic Engineers Journal
(1983)- et al.
The loading of pavements in the vicinity of road humps
Australian Road Research Board, Proceedings of the 11th Conference
(1982)
Cited by (34)
The influence of inferred traffic safety culture on traffic safety performance in U.S. States (1994–2014)
2022, Journal of Safety ResearchCitation Excerpt :The potential causal mechanism of other significant predictors was less intuitive: It is difficult to explain why a larger resident population may reduce the crash fatality rate unless we assume this represents the relationship between lower speeds in higher populated (urban) areas (Zaidel et al., 1992) and reduced severity of crash outcomes (Aarts & van Schagen, 2006). Regardless, the effect size of this predictor variable was negligible and may also reflect a statistical aberration.
An investigation into the effect of parabolic speed hump profiles on ride comfort and driving safety under variable vehicle speeds: A campus experience
2019, Sustainable Cities and SocietyCitation Excerpt :A speed hump is characterized by an elevated pavement surface, oriented transversely to the flow of traffic and having various profiles such as sinusoidal, circular, parabolic or flat-topped (Parkhill, Sooklall, & Bahar, 2007; Pau & Angius, 2001). Also known as "pavement undulations" and "sleeping policemen" (Huang & Cynecki, 2000), speed humps are placed to protect specific locations such as intersections or crosswalks, to keep a uniform and low speed in a residental street, to achieve a smooth transition to a lower speed zone and to serve as a pedestrian crosswalk (Zaidel, Hakkert, & Pistiner, 1992). Although ignorance of the effect of humps on the stability of vehicles impeded the early application of humps (Kjemtrup & Herrstedt, 1992), speed humps are currently one of the most effective and most popular traffic calming devices (i.e., 46% of all) in controlling the vehicle speeds on urban roads (Rahman, Takemoto, Sakamoto, & Kubota, 2005).
A fundamental experimental approach for optimal design of speed bumps
2018, Accident Analysis and PreventionCitation Excerpt :One study included the search for ways to solve those problems arising from the passing of public transportation and emergency vehicles over speed humps. This study of speed bumps located in several countries over the face of the globe demonstrated that if speed bumps are designed and executed correctly such problems as vehicle damage or driver’s loss of control can be effectively eliminated (Zaidel et al., 1992). According to the preliminary findings of a research study conducted in 2010, a significant increase in tail pipe emissions was noted after the speed hump was crossed.
A theoretical overview of road hump effects on traffic noise in improving residential well-being
2017, Transportation Research ProcediaThe history of road safety research: A quantitative approach
2014, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and BehaviourCitation Excerpt :A large variety of topics associated with speed are included in research articles in this keyword-set, such as speed as a road accident factor (e.g., Wilmot & Khanal, 1999), speed limits (e.g., Kunna, 1980), speed reduction measures (e.g., Zaidel, Hakkert, & Pistiner, 1992), and ISA (e.g., Carsten & Tate, 2005). Literature reviews on the topic of speed and road safety clearly illustrate the importance of speed in road safety research; it encompasses all types of research and includes driver-, vehicle- as well as road-related research (see, e.g., Aarts & van Schagen, 2006; Anon, 1938; Lamm et al., 1999; McCarthy, 2001; Zaidel et al., 1992). Fig. 6 shows that accident proneness is a recurring topic over the years.
The influence of speed bumps heights to the decrease of the vehicle speed - Belgrade experience
2013, Safety ScienceCitation Excerpt :The influence of the third type of vertical raising of the road pavement – speed bumps on speed reducing in Europe was analysed by Broadbent and Salmon (1991), who determined that 85th percentile of speed goes from 39.2 to 46.4 km/h, whereas Pau and Angius (2001), conducted a comparative speed analysis at 23 locations where speed bumps were installed and found that 85th percentile of speed was above speed limit (50 km/h). Still, the effectiveness of these measures and their acceptance by the community is frequently discussed in the scientific circles (Zaidel et al., 1992), and traffic calming obtained due to implementation of the vertical raising of the road pavement also has some harmful effects, which are specially reflected in the noise increasing (Rylander and Bjorkman, 2002; Kokowski and Makarewicz, 2006; Behzad et al., 2007), vibration increasing (Watts and Krylov, 2000; Lee and Kim, 2008) increasing of fuel consumption and harmful gases emission (Ahn and Rakha, 2009). Analysing the influence of speed humps at pedestrian crossings, Dixon et al. (1997), came to the conclusion that the installed speed humps increase the subjective risk and provoke the driver to slow down, what makes a pedestrian who is crossing the road safer.