The effect of percutaneous estradiol and natural progesterone on postmenopausal bone loss

https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(87)90203-1Get rights and content

Abstract

The effect of percutaneous estradiol alone and combined with natural progesterone on postmenopausal bone loss was studied. A total of 57 women who had experienced a natural menopause 6 months to 3 years previously entered the study. After an initial examination the women were allocated in a blinded pattern to treatment with 3 mg of percutaneous estradiol or placebo. The code was broken after 1 year of treatment, and the women receiving estradiol continued with a cyclic addition of progesterone, whereas those receiving placebo continued with placebo. The women were examined every 3 months during the 2 years of treatment. Measurement of the bone mineral content in the forearms (single photon absorptiometry) and the spine and total skeleton (dual photon absorptiometry) showed a significant decrease of 5% to 7% in the placebo group during the 2 years of treatment, whereas it remained constant in all bone compartments in the estradiol group. Addition of progesterone did not influence the results. Biochemical estimates of calcium metabolism changed toward a premenopausal level in the estradiol group but remained unchanged in the placebo group. We conclude that percutaneous estradiol is effective as preventive therapy of postmenopausal bone loss and that addition of progesterone does not influence bone or calcium metabolism.

References (18)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (191)

  • Hormone Replacement Therapy in the Geriatric Patient: Current State of the Evidence and Questions for the Future. Estrogen, Progesterone, Testosterone, and Thyroid Hormone Augmentation in Geriatric Clinical Practice: Part 1

    2011, Clinics in Geriatric Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    In the 1980s and early 1990s, research scientists expressed concern that (synthetic) MPA used in hormone therapy could increase the risk of breast cancer.42,43 At the same time, the literature contained reports of numerous small in vitro and in vivo studies hinting at the possibility of greater safety with the use of bioidentical/“natural” hormones.19–22,32-35,38,44–49 These studies show that replacing a synthetic progestin with bioidentical progesterone results in improved efficacy, fewer side effects, improved quality of life, and greater patient satisfaction.50–54

  • Hormones in Wellness and Disease Prevention: Common Practices, Current State of the Evidence, and Questions for the Future

    2008, Primary Care - Clinics in Office Practice
    Citation Excerpt :

    Place and colleagues26 conducted a double-blind comparison of estradiol in transdermal form and Premarin that demonstrated improved relief of postmenopausal symptoms in the patient group on estradiol with no side effects. Riis and colleagues,27 in a double-blind clinical controlled study, demonstrated that bioidentical estradiol and micronized progesterone helped improve bone density in postmenopausal women. Moorjani and colleagues31 reported on the improved lipoprotein profile in patients receiving oral bioidentical estrogen with progesterone over those on progestins with androgenic action.9–17,26–33

  • Treatment of Osteoporosis

    2007, Treatment of the Postmenopausal Woman: Basic and Clinical Aspects, Third Edition
  • Interventions for Osteoporosis

    2007, Treatment of the Postmenopausal Woman: Basic and Clinical Aspects, Third Edition
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text