A comparison of misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction

https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(95)91415-3Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective: Our purpose was to compare the safety ad efficacy of intravaginal misoprostal versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 (dinoprostone) gel for preinduction cervical ripening and induction of labor.

Study design: One hundred thirty-five patients with indications for induction of labor and unfavorable cercices were randomly assigned to receive either intravaginal misoprostol or intracervical dinoprostate. Fifty microgram tablets of misoprostol were placed in the posterior vaginal fornix every 3 hours for a maximum of six doses. Prostaglandin E2 in gel form, 0.5 mg, was placed into the endocervix every 6 hours for a maximum of three doses. Medication was not given after either spontaneous rupture of membranes or beginning of active labor.

Results: Among 135 patients enrolled, 68 received misprostol and 67 dinoprostone. The average interval from start of induction to vaginal delivery was shorter in the misoprostol group (903.3 ± 482.1 minutes) than in the dinoprostone group (1410.9 ± 869.1 minutes) (p < 0.001). Oxytocin augmentation of labor occurred more often in the dinoprostone group (65.7%) than in the misoprostal group (33.8%) p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between routes of delivery. Ten of the misoprostol-treated patients (14.7%) and 13 of the dinoprostone-treated patients (19.4%) had cesarean deliveries. There was a higher prevalence of tachysystole (six or more uterine contractions in a 10-minute window for two consecutive 10-minute periods) in the misoprostol group (36.7%) than in the dinoprostone group (11.9%) (p < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences in frequency of uterine hyperstimulation or hypertonus. There was a higher prevalence of meconium passage in the misoprostol group (27.9%) than in the dinoprostone group (10.5%) (p < 0.05). Thee was no significant difference in frequency of abnormal fetal heart rate tracings, 1- or 5-minute Apgar scores <7, neonatal resuscitations, or admissions to the neonatal intensive care unit between the two groups.

Conclusions: Vaginally administered misoprostol is an effective agent for cervical ripening and induction of labor; however when given at this dosage, it is associated with a higher prevalence of tachysystole and meconium passage than is dinoprostone. Further studies to compare the safety of misoprostol to that of dinoprostone and to delineate an optimal dosing regimen for misoprostol are needed.

References (7)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (227)

  • Methods for the induction of labor: efficacy and safety

    2024, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Comparison of intracervical and intravaginal prostaglandin E2 for induction of labor in term pregnancies with unfavorable cervix: Randomized controlled trial

    2022, European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Maternal outcomes included postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), 3rd and 4th degree perineal tear, uterus rupture, NICU admission and septicemia. Before study commencement sample size analysis was performed based on data from previously published studies [13,14]. For an alpha error of 5%, test power of 80% and possible drop-out of 15%, it was calculated that a total of 212 pregnant women should be randomly included in the study, 106 in each group.

  • Abnormal Labor and Induction of Labor

    2016, Obstetrics: Normal and Problem Pregnancies
View all citing articles on Scopus

Frank W. Lynch Memorial Essay, presented at the Sixty-first Annual Meeting of the Pacific Coast Obstetrical and Gynecological Society, Scottsdale, Arizona, October 24–29, 1994.

View full text