Elsevier

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Volume 56, Issue 5, November 1993, Pages 1085-1089
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Original article
Different vascular reactivity of human internal mammary and inferior epigastric arteries in vitro

https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(95)90020-9Get rights and content

Abstract

Vascular responses io endogenous agonists may determine patency rates of bypass graft conduits. The effect of constrictors (noradrenaline, phenylephrine, serotonin, histamine, angiotensin II) and dilators (acetylcholine, substance P, bradykinin, nitroglycerin) were compared in human internal mammary and inferior epigastric arteries in vitro. The latter vessel type has been recently advocated as an additional conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting. Whereas the α-adrenoceptor- (noradrenaline, phenylephrine) and serotonin receptor-mediated contractions were similar in both vessels, histamine-induced contractions were greatly enhanced in internal mammary arteries (maximal responses in percent of 80 mmol/L KCl, 131% ± 15% versus 59% ± 8%). Maximal contractions in response to angiotensin II were greater in inferior epigastric arteries (50% ± 6% versus 25% ± 5%). The endothelium-independent relaxations in response to nitroglycerin were identical in both vessels. In contrast, the endothelium-dependent relaxations in response to acetylcholine, substance P, and bradykinin were significantly greater in the inferior epigastric than in the internal mammary arteries (maximal relaxations expressed as percent of prostaglandin F-induced precontraction: acelylcholine, 94% ± 5% versus 77% ± 5%; substance P, 85% ± 4% versus 24% ± 5%; bradykinin, 77% ± 5% versus 26% ± 3%). It is concluded that the inferior epigastric artery has a high endothelial capacity to release endothelium-derived relaxing factor. It appears that the inferior epigastric artery possesses credentials to be successfully used for coronary artery bypass grafting.

References (23)

  • E Milgater et al.

    The inferior epigastric arteries: additional arterial conduits for aorta-coronary bypass operations?

    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

    (1991)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text