Elsevier

Applied Ergonomics

Volume 27, Issue 2, April 1996, Pages 89-99
Applied Ergonomics

Special issue paper
Ergonomic effects of a management-based rationalization in assembly work — a case study

https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(95)00063-1Get rights and content

Abstract

Due to unsatisfactory productivity, a large company in the Swedish manufacturing industry decided to rationalize their assembly system. The intended rationalization comprised several changes with deliberate ergonomic implications. The main aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of the rationalization on the physical work load of the operators. The work load was assessed before and after the changes using expert observations, company records and direct technical measurements. The results indicate that the intervention led to only minor changes in muscle load, body postures and movement patterns. Several of the planned initiatives were never implemented, e.g. teaching the workers multiple skills and designing work stations at which a major part of the assembly sequence could be performed. This was mainly due to a policy revision caused by changes in the market situation. In spite of the company's original intentions, the revised production system contained only minor ergonomic improvements. Thus, the realization of the ergonomic potential in a rationalization seems to depend on management culture, as well as factors outside the company.

References (22)

  • S.E. Mathiassen et al.

    A comprehensive program package — MUFDAP — for analyzing data from ergonomic studies

  • Cited by (46)

    • Cardiovascular load assessment in the workplace: A systematic review

      2023, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
    • Trapezius muscle activity variation during computer work performed by individuals with and without neck-shoulder pain

      2019, Applied Ergonomics
      Citation Excerpt :

      In this context, exposure variation analysis (EVA) (Mathiassen and Winkel, 1991) is a tool that expresses continuous exposure-vs-time data in categories defined by exposure amplitude and accumulated time, thus giving way to an understanding of the differences in the temporal structure of exposures at different amplitude levels. EVA has been shown in studies of muscle activity, in particular in the upper trapezius, to be sensitive in various tasks outside computer work (Attebrant et al., 1997; Bao et al., 1996; Delisle et al., 2005; Fjellman-Wiklund et al., 2004; Januario et al., 2018; Mathiassen and Winkel, 1996; Reynolds et al., 2014). Specifically with regard to upper trapezius muscle activity during computer work, EVA has been shown to be sensitive to variation in task (Ciccarelli et al., 2013; Jensen et al., 1999; Mathiassen et al., 2003; Straker et al., 2009; Wærsted and Westgaard, 1997), demographic groups (pain, age and pregnant vs. non-pregnant) (Dumas et al., 2008; Hägg and Åström, 1997; Maslen and Straker, 2009), and configuration of work environment (Dumas et al., 2009; Samani et al., 2009a, 2009b).

    • Trunk posture assessment during work tasks at a Canadian recycling center

      2018, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
      Citation Excerpt :

      This finding was similar to other industrial workers’ studies that have been conducted. For instance, sewing machine assemble workers had a median 50th percentile flexion/extension angle of 14° (BaoM. S. E and Winkel, 1996), material pickers in car assembly workers 14° (Christmansson et al., 2002), and craft-type car disassembly workers 10.1° (Kazmierczak et al., 2005). The 90th percentile is frequently used as an estimate of peak exposures encountered during a task or work shift (Kazmierczak et al., 2005), (Trask et al., 2006).

    • New easy to use postural assessment method through visual management

      2016, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Excessive standing may also cause the joints in the spine, hips, knees and feet to become stiff or locked (Balasubramanian et al., 2009). Bao et al. (1996) followed optimization and rationalization processes of a big production firm dealing with ergonomics of production processes. Their aim was to evaluate the ergonomic impact of workloads before the planned improvements and to compare them with the future state of the line.

    • Mechanical stress

      2015, Handbook of Clinical Neurology
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text