Excitatory and inhibitory inputs to single neurones in the solitary tract nucleus and adjacent reticular formation

doi:10.1016/0006-8993(73)90217-5

Brain Research

Volume 53, Issue 2, 27 April 1973, Pages 319-331

https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(73)90217-5 Get rights and content

Summary

Microelectrode recordings were made from single neurones located in the solitary tract nucleus and adjacent reticular formation of decerebrate or anaesthetized cats. Stimulation of various cranial nerves and cutaneous areas and the cerebral cortex was used to characterize the excitatory and inhibitory inputs to these brain stem regions.

Most solitary tract units could be excited by stimulation of only the superior laryngeal nerve (SLN) or glossopharyngeal nerve (IX). In particular the laryngeal input was examined, and both primary afferent fibres and neurones in the nucleus could be activated with a short-latency to SLN stimulation. The neurones could be inhibited for as long as 700 msec by conditioning stimulation especially of SLN and IX and of the infraorbital nerve (IO). Other conditioning stimuli used were rarely effective.

Neurones in the reticular formation ventral to the nucleus exhibited an excitatory input from SLN, IX, IO and sometimes other cranial nerves. However, some neurones could be excited only by IO stimulation. The latencies of the neurones to SLN stimulation were longer in general than those noted in solitary tract neurones. The neurones were subject to more widespread inhibitory influences than those in solitary tract neurones, and the responses of some could also be facilitated. On the basis of antidromic activation, many reticular formation neurones were found to project rostrally to the vicinity of the trigeminal motor nucleus.

The excitatory and inhibitory influences acting on the solitary tract and reticular formation neurones are discussed in relation to their possible involvement in the perceptual and reflex activities with which the orofacial and pharyngeal-laryngeal areas are concerned.

References (35)

Darian-SmithI.
Neural mechanisms of facial sensation
Int. Rev. Neurobiol.
(1966)
DubnerR. et al.
Presynaptic excitability changes of primary afferent and corticofugal fibers projecting to trigeminal brain stem nuclei
Exp. Neurol.
(1971)
KerrF.W.L.
Structural relation of the trigeminal spinal tract to upper cervical roots and the solitary nucleus in the cat
Exp. Neurol.
(1961)
O'BrienJ.H. et al.
Evoked cortical responses to vagal, laryngeal and facial afferents in monkeys under chloralose anaesthesia
Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.
(1971)
SessleB.J.
Presynaptic excitability changes induced in single laryngeal primary afferent fibres
Brain Research
(1973)
SessleB.J. et al.
Periodontal and facial influences on the laryngeal input to the brain stem of the cat
Arch. oral Biol.
(1972)
BiscoeT.J. et al.
Field potentials evoked in the brain stem of the cat by stimulation of the carotid sinus, glossopharyngeal, aortic and superior laryngeal nerves
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
(1970)
BiscoeT.J. et al.
Responses of cells in the brain stem of the cat to stimulation of the sinus, glossopharyngeal, aortic and superior laryngeal nerves
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
(1970)
BishopP.O. et al.
The identification of single units in central visual pathways
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
(1962)
BowsherD.
Place and modality analysis in caudal reticular formation
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
(1970)

Darian-SmithI.

Somatic sensation

Ann. Rev. Physiol.

(1969)

DotyR.W.

Neural organization of deglutition

DubnerR. et al.

Presynaptic modification of corticofugal fibers participating in a feedback loop between trigeminal brain-stem nuclei and sensorimotor cortex

HubelD.H.

Tungsten micro-electrode for recording from single units

Science

(1957)

HubelD.H.

Single unit activity in lateral geniculate body and optic tract of unrestrained cats

J. Physiol. (Lond.)

(1960)

KerrF.W.L.

The divisional organization of afferent fibres of the trigeminal nerve

Brain

(1963)

LamR.L. et al.

Afferent projection of the superior laryngeal nerve in the brain stem

Neurology (Minneap.)

(1954)

Cited by (111)

The blink reflex and its modulation – Part 1: Physiological mechanisms
2024, Clinical Neurophysiology
The blink reflex (BR) is a protective eye-closure reflex mediated by brainstem circuits. The BR is usually evoked by electrical supraorbital nerve stimulation but can be elicited by a variety of sensory modalities. It has a long history in clinical neurophysiology practice. Less is known, however, about the many ways to modulate the BR. Various neurophysiological techniques can be applied to examine different aspects of afferent and efferent BR modulation. In this line, classical conditioning, prepulse and paired-pulse stimulation, and BR elicitation by self-stimulation may serve to investigate various aspects of brainstem connectivity. The BR may be used as a tool to quantify top-down modulation based on implicit assessment of the value of blinking in a given situation, e.g., depending on changes in stimulus location and probability of occurrence. Understanding the role of non-nociceptive and nociceptive fibers in eliciting a BR is important to get insight into the underlying neural circuitry. Finally, the use of BRs and other brainstem reflexes under general anesthesia may help to advance our knowledge of the brainstem in areas not amenable in awake intact humans. This review summarizes talks held by the Brainstem Special Interest Group of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology at the International Congress of Clinical Neurophysiology 2022 in Geneva, Switzerland, and provides a state-of-the-art overview of the physiology of BR modulation. Understanding the principles of BR modulation is fundamental for a valid and thoughtful clinical application (reviewed in part 2) (Gunduz et al., submitted).
Circuits in the rodent brainstem that control whisking in concert with other orofacial motor actions
2018, Neuroscience
Citation Excerpt :
Tactile signals from the oral cavity, including the tongue and teeth, are carried by trigeminal ganglia to all divisions of the trigeminal sensory complex, particularly in dorsal regions of the subnuclei (Sessle and Greenwood, 1976; Shigenaga et al., 1986a,b). In complement to trigeminal complex signaling, visceral afferent and taste signals are topographically organized in the nucleus of the tractus solitarius (Sessle, 1973; King, 2007). Taste and sensory signals from the mucous membranes of the pharynx, the posterior third of the tongue, and the tonsils are carried via the facial, glossopharyngeal, and vagus nerves (Torvik, 1956; Carleton et al., 2010).
The world view of rodents is largely determined by sensation on two length scales. One is within the animal’s peri-personal space; sensorimotor control on this scale involves active movements of the nose, tongue, head, and vibrissa, along with sniffing to determine olfactory clues. The second scale involves the detection of more distant space through vision and audition; these detection processes also impact repositioning of the head, eyes, and ears. Here we focus on orofacial motor actions, primarily vibrissa-based touch but including nose twitching, head bobbing, and licking, that control sensation at short, peri-personal distances. The orofacial nuclei for control of the motor plants, as well as primary and secondary sensory nuclei associated with these motor actions, lie within the hindbrain. The current data support three themes: First, the position of the sensors is determined by the summation of two drive signals, i.e., a fast rhythmic component and an evolving orienting component. Second, the rhythmic component is coordinated across all orofacial motor actions and is phase-locked to sniffing as the animal explores. Reverse engineering reveals that the preBötzinger inspiratory complex provides the reset to the relevant premotor oscillators. Third, direct feedback from somatosensory trigeminal nuclei can rapidly alter motion of the sensors. This feedback is disynaptic and can be tuned by high-level inputs. A holistic model for the coordination of orofacial motor actions into behaviors will encompass feedback pathways through the midbrain and forebrain, as well as hindbrain areas.
Jaw-opening and -closing premotoneurons in the nucleus of the solitary tract making contacts with laryngeal and pharyngeal afferent terminals in rats
2013, Brain Research
Citation Excerpt :
In the present study, CTb-labeled afferent fibers and terminals of both SLN and GpN-ct showed similar distribution patterns in the Sol; they were found mainly in the dorsal and middle parts of the Sol (the me-Sol, im-Sol, la-Sol and is-Sol according to the divisions defined in this study) at its rostral three-fourths level, in general agreement with earlier studies (Altschuler et al., 1989; Corson et al., 2012; Hamilton and Norgren, 1984; Lucier et al., 1986; Nomura and Mizuno, 1982, 1983; Sweazey and Bradley, 1986). Interestingly, the convergence of inputs from the SLN and glossopharyngeal nerve occurs in more than 80% of Sol neurons (Ootani et al., 1995; also see Sessle, 1973). The SLN is composed of the internal and external branches conveying sensory information mainly from laryngeal mucosal and taste bud receptors and from the cricothyroid muscle (Andrew and Oliver, 1951; Stedman et al., 1983), while the GpN-ct is of the pharyngeal and lingual-tonsilar branches conveying pharyngeal mucosal mechanosensory and gustatory sensory information, and a muscular branch innervating the stylopharyngeal muscle (Oakley, 1974; Whiteside, 1927).
This study clarified the neural mechanisms underlying jaw movements in pharyngolaryngeal reflexes such as swallowing in rats. After retrograde tracer injections into the ventromedial division (Vmovm) of the trigeminal motor nucleus (Vmo) containing jaw-opening (JO) motoneurons or into the dorsolateral division (Vmodl) of Vmo containing jaw-closing (JC) motoneurons, JO and JC premotoneurons were labeled with an ipsilateral predominance in the medial and intermediate subnuclei of the rostrocaudal middle two-thirds of the nucleus of the solitary tract (Sol); JC premotoneurons were also in the lateral subnucleus of Sol. After anterograde tracer injections into the Sol, axons were labeled with an ipsilateral predominance in the Vmovm and Vmodl, prominently in the ipsilateral Vmovm. After transganglionic tracer applications to the superior laryngeal nerve (SLN) or the cervical trunk of the glossopharyngeal nerve (GpN-ct), labeled afferents were seen in the medial, intermediate, lateral and interstitial subnuclei of Sol at the rostral three-fourths of Sol, indicating considerable overlap with the JO and JC premotoneurons in the Sol. Double labeling experiments demonstrated contacts between the afferent terminals and the JO and JC premotoneurons. The present study has for the first time revealed the differential distribution of JO and JC premotoneurons in the Sol and features of their projections from the Sol, as well as their connections with SLN and GpN-ct afferent inputs. The JO and JC premotoneurons in the Sol may play an important role in generation and organization of jaw movements in pharyngolaryngeal reflexes evoked by SLN and GpN-ct inputs, such as swallowing.
Effects of aging and levodopa on the laryngeal adductor reflex in rats
2012, Experimental Gerontology
Citation Excerpt :
The afferent fibers in the internal branch of the superior laryngeal nerve (iSLN) involve cell bodies in the nodose ganglion terminating in the brainstem solitary nucleus tract (NTS). Stimulation of these afferents produces vocal fold adduction via the laryngeal motor neurons in the nucleus ambiguus (Ambalavanar et al., 2004; Gestreau et al., 1997; Jean, 2001; Mrini and Jean, 1995; Sessle, 1973; Sun et al., 2011). Sensory deficits and laryngopharyngeal muscle weakness associated with aging may increase the risk of aspiration in aging adults (Aviv, 1997; Aviv et al., 2002; Martin et al., 1994; Rosenberg et al., 1989).
Dopaminergic neurotransmission plays an essential role in sensorimotor function, and declines with age. Previously, we found the laryngeal adductor reflex (LAR) was increased in excitation by a dopamine receptor antagonist. If this airway-protective reflex is similarly affected by aging, it will interfere with volitional control in older adults. The current study tested whether the LAR was affected by aging, and whether such deficits were reversed by levodopa administration in aging rats. We recorded thyroarytenoid (TA) muscle activity at rest and during elicitation of LAR responses by stimulation of the internal branch of the superior laryngeal nerve (iSLN) in 6-, 18- and 30-month-old rats under alpha-chloralose anesthesia. Using paired stimuli at different inter-stimulus intervals (ISIs), LAR central conditioning, resting muscle activity, and reflex latency and amplitudes were quantified. Numbers of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc) were measured using tyrosine hydroxylase staining. We found: (1) increased resting TA muscle activity and LAR amplitude occurred with fewer dopaminergic neurons in the SNpc in 18- and 30-month-old rats; (2) decreases in LAR latency and increases in amplitude correlated with reduced numbers of dopaminergic neurons in the SNpc; (3) test responses were greater at 1000 ms ISI in 18-month-old rats compared with 6-month-old rats; and (4) levodopa administration further increased response latency but did not alter muscle activity, response amplitude, or central conditioning. In conclusion, increases in laryngeal muscle activity levels and reflex amplitudes accompanied age reductions in dopaminergic neurons but were not reversed with levodopa administration.
Research priorities in spasmodic dysphonia
2008, Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Citation Excerpt :
The larynx is sensitive to many types of stimuli.52 Sensory fibers in the internal branch of the superior laryngeal nerve (SLN) terminate in the brain stem in the nucleus tractus solitarius53 and include sensors for pressure on the laryngeal mucosa54; negative supraglottal pressure55; flow receptors56; a lack of chloride ions57; and muscle activity.58 Proprioceptive information from the cricoarytenoid joint is conveyed via the SLN, and subglottal afferents are conveyed via the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN).
To identify research priorities to increase understanding of the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and improved treatment of spasmodic dysphonia.
A multidisciplinary working group was formed that included both scientists and clinicians from multiple disciplines (otolaryngology, neurology, speech pathology, genetics, and neuroscience) to review currently available information on spasmodic dysphonia and to identify research priorities.
Operational definitions for spasmodic dysphonia at different levels of certainty were recommended for diagnosis and recommendations made for a multicenter multidisciplinary validation study.
The highest priority is to characterize the disorder and identify risk factors that may contribute to its onset. Future research should compare and contrast spasmodic dysphonia with other forms of focal dystonia. Development of animal models is recommended to explore hypotheses related to pathogenesis. Improved understanding of the pathophysiology of spasmodic dysphonia should provide the basis for developing new treatment options and exploratory clinical trials.
This document should foster future research to improve the care of patients with this chronic debilitating voice and speech disorder by otolaryngology, neurology, and speech pathology.
Central nervous system control of the laryngeal muscles in humans
2005, Respiratory Physiology and Neurobiology
Laryngeal muscle control may vary for different functions such as: voice for speech communication, emotional expression during laughter and cry, breathing, swallowing, and cough. This review discusses the control of the human laryngeal muscles for some of these different functions. Sensori-motor aspects of laryngeal control have been studied by eliciting various laryngeal reflexes. The role of audition in learning and monitoring ongoing voice production for speech is well known; while the role of somatosensory feedback is less well understood. Reflexive control systems involving central pattern generators may contribute to swallowing, breathing and cough with greater cortical control during volitional tasks such as voice production for speech. Volitional control is much less well understood for each of these functions and likely involves the integration of cortical and subcortical circuits. The new frontier is the study of the central control of the laryngeal musculature for voice, swallowing and breathing and how volitional and reflexive control systems may interact in humans.

View all citing articles on Scopus

View full text

Excitatory and inhibitory inputs to single neurones in the solitary tract nucleus and adjacent reticular formation

Summary

Int. Rev. Neurobiol.

Exp. Neurol.

Exp. Neurol.

Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.

Brain Research

Arch. oral Biol.

Field potentials evoked in the brain stem of the cat by stimulation of the carotid sinus, glossopharyngeal, aortic and superior laryngeal nerves

J. Physiol. (Lond.)

Responses of cells in the brain stem of the cat to stimulation of the sinus, glossopharyngeal, aortic and superior laryngeal nerves

J. Physiol. (Lond.)

The identification of single units in central visual pathways

J. Physiol. (Lond.)

Place and modality analysis in caudal reticular formation

J. Physiol. (Lond.)

Somatic sensation

Ann. Rev. Physiol.

Neural organization of deglutition

Presynaptic modification of corticofugal fibers participating in a feedback loop between trigeminal brain-stem nuclei and sensorimotor cortex

Tungsten micro-electrode for recording from single units

Science

Single unit activity in lateral geniculate body and optic tract of unrestrained cats

J. Physiol. (Lond.)

The divisional organization of afferent fibres of the trigeminal nerve

Brain

Afferent projection of the superior laryngeal nerve in the brain stem

Neurology (Minneap.)