Use-effectiveness of the ovulation method initiated during postpartum breastfeeding
References (15)
A prospective field trial of the “Ovulation Method” of avoiding conception
Eur. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Reprod. Biol.
(1976)- et al.
Factors related to Ovulation Method efficacy in three programs: Bangladesh, Kenya, Korea
Contraception
(1988) - et al.
Symptoms and hormonal changes accompanying ovulation
Lancet
(February 5, 1972) - et al.
The Billings Method
(1980) Natural Family Planning: a review
Obstet. and Gynecol. Survey
(1982)- et al.
Periodic abstinence: how well do new approaches work?
Population Reports Series I
(September 1981) - et al.
Breastfeeding, fertility and family planning
Population Reports Series J
(1981)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (14)
Effectiveness of fertility awareness-based methods for pregnancy prevention during the postpartum period
2022, ContraceptionCitation Excerpt :For the first 6 months of use after the first menses postpartum, typical and perfect-use pregnancy probabilities were 11.8 (95% confident interval (CI) 6.01–17.16) and 3.7 (95% CI 0.00–7.44), respectively. Two low-quality studies assessed the Billings Ovulation Method, a cervical mucus-based method, use among breastfeeding women [34,35]. The Labbok study was conducted in a rural population in Kenya and was ranked low quality for 3/13 indicators (see Supplemental Table 3).
Efficacy studies in natural family planning: Issues and management implications illustrated with data from five studies
1991, American Journal of Obstetrics and GynecologyOvulation method use during breastfeeding: Is there increased risk of unplanned pregnancy?
1991, American Journal of Obstetrics and GynecologyIs the lactational amenorrhea method a part of natural family planning? Biology and policy
1991, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Copyright © 1988 Published by Elsevier Inc.