Elsevier

Atherosclerosis

Volume 125, Issue 1, 23 August 1996, Pages 53-61
Atherosclerosis

Research paper
The relative electrophoretic mobility of apo(a) isoforms depends on the gel system: proposal of a nomenclature for apo(a) phenotypes

https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9150(96)05844-3Get rights and content

Abstract

Genetic apo(a) isoforms were originally defined according to their relative mobility in SDS-PAGE compared to apoB-100 and were designated as F, B or S1–S4 isotypes. This widely accepted nomenclature does not accommodate the broad spectrum of apo(a) isoforms (>30) detected by high resolution SDS-agarose gel electrophoresis. Moreover we here show that the relative mobilities of apo(a) isoforms depend on the SDS-gel system used. Comparison of the SDS-PAGE system originally used for phenotyping with SDS-agarose gel electrophoresis and two commercial SDS-PAGE systems (PhastGel, Pharmacia, Sweden and NOVEX, USA) demonstrated marked differences in resolving power and resulted in very different Rf values for identical isoforms. Hence phenotyping results from laboratories using different systems are not comparable. We therefore propose a nomenclature of apo(a) isoforms which reports the number of kringle IV repeats in the apo(a) allele (e.g. apo(a) K-IV20 would designate an isoform with 20 K-IV repeats). This is achieved by using standards in which the number of kringle IV repeats has been determined by pulsed field gel electrophoresis of genomic DNA. The proposed nomenclature (i) accounts for the increased resolution of apo(a) phenotyping methods; (ii) is flexible to the introduction of smaller or larger isoforms; (iii) allows to report data from systems with lower resolution as ‘binned’ isoform categories; (iv) allows the comparison of phenotyping results between different investigators; and (v) can be applied on DNA as well as on protein based apo(a) phenotyping.

References (27)

  • E Boerwinkle et al.

    Apolipoprotein(a) gene accounts for greater than 90% of the variation in plasma lipoprotein(a) concentrations

    J Clin Invest

    (1992)
  • HG Kraft et al.

    The apolipoprotein(a) gene — a transcribed hypervariable locus controlling plasma lipoprotein(a) concentration

    Hum Genet

    (1992)
  • SM Marcovina et al.

    Lipoprotein(a) concentrations and apolipoprotein(a) phenotypes in Caucasians and African Americans — The CARDIA Study

    Arterioscler Thromb

    (1993)
  • Cited by (46)

    • Lipoprotein(a) beyond the kringle IV repeat polymorphism: The complexity of genetic variation in the LPA gene

      2022, Atherosclerosis
      Citation Excerpt :

      Genetic variants associated with certain Lp(a) concentration ranges were already in the past very helpful to support causality between Lp(a) and outcomes. Lp(a) was the first use case for Mendelian randomization studies in the 1990s [33,34], long before this term was coined (see review [35] in this series). Nevertheless, the causality of Lp(a) has been debated for a long time [36] until numerous genetic studies underscored the causality of Lp(a) concentrations using genetic variants strongly associated with high Lp(a) concentrations and subsequent cardiovascular disease [37–44].

    • Lack of association of rs3798220 with small apolipoprotein(a) isoforms and high lipoprotein(a) levels in East and Southeast Asians

      2015, Atherosclerosis
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, minor allele frequencies (MAFs) of this SNP range from only approximately 1%–2% in the general European population. Therefore, genotyping for the variant allele as a surrogate for the laborious laboratory assessment of apo(a) isoform size by pulsed-field gel [4,5] or SDS gel electrophoresis [25] captures only a small proportion of the individuals with small apo(a) isoforms and increased risk [26]. Nevertheless, rs3798220 has found commercial application in genetic risk evaluation for CAD [27].

    • Analysis of the apo(a) size polymorphism in Asian Indian populations: Association with Lp(a) concentration and coronary heart disease

      2003, Atherosclerosis
      Citation Excerpt :

      The size of the genomic fragments from which the number of K-IV repeats was estimated was determined by comparison with a commercial DNA size marker (Midrange II PFG marker, New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA). Apo(a) phenotyping was performed by SDS-agarose gel electrophoresis (SDS-AGE) and immunoblotting with an apo(a) specific antibody as described [20]. As standard a combination of five isoforms containing 15, 19, 22, 27, and 34 K-IV repeats, respectively, was used and apo(a) isoforms were designated according to their number of K-IV repeats [20].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text