A model for the calculation of mechanical power during distance running

https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(83)90035-0Get rights and content

Abstract

Because widely varying estimates of mechanical power have been calculated for a given speed of running by previous investigators, the effects of various assumptions necessary for mechanical power calculations were evaluated via a segmental energy analysis using 3-D cine data from 31 well-trained subjects running overground at 3.57 m s−1. The magnitude of power calculated was very dependent upon assumptions involving the amount of between segment energy transfer occurring, the relative metabolic cost of positive vs negative work, the amount of the total negative work attributed to muscular work, the effects of elastic storage of energy and on the choice of cutoff frequency in filtering the coordinate data. Mechanical power values ranged from 273 to 1775 W depending on the particular assumptions made and computational methods employed giving efficiency ratios from 0.31 to 1.97. These results point to a need for more definitive research into the role played by energy transfer, negative work, and elastic storage of energy before confidence in measured mechanical power can be established.

References (28)

  • M.Y. Zarrugh

    Power requirements and mechanical efficiency of treadmill walking

    J. Biomechanics

    (1981)
  • B.C. Abbott et al.

    The effects of force and speed changes on the rate of oxygen consumption during negative work

    J. Physiol.

    (1953)
  • Y.I. Abdel-Aziz et al.

    Direct linear transformation from computer coordinates into object space coordinates in close-range photogrammetry

  • E. Asmussen et al.

    Apparent efficiency and storage of elastic energy in human muscles during exrcise

    Acta Physiol. scand.

    (1974)
  • B. Bresler et al.

    Energy and power in the leg during normal level walking

  • G.A. Cavagna et al.

    Mechanical work in running

    J. appl. Physiol.

    (1964)
  • G.A. Cavagna et al.

    Effect of negative work on the amount of positive work performed by an isolated muscle

    J. appl. Physiol.

    (196)
  • G.A. Cavagna et al.

    Positive work done by a previously stretched muscle

    J. appl. Physiol.

    (1968)
  • G.A. Cavagna et al.

    The mechanics of sprint running

    J. Physiol.

    (1971)
  • G.A. Cavagna et al.

    The sources of external work in level walking and running

    J. Physiol.

    (1976)
  • G.A. Cavagna et al.

    Mechanical work and efficiency in level walking and running

    J. Physiol.

    (1977)
  • C.E. Clauser et al.

    Weight, volume, and center of mass of segments of the human body

    Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, AMRL-TR-69-70

    (1969)
  • W.O. Fenn

    Frictional and kinetic factors in the work of sprint running

    Am. J. Physiol.

    (1930)
  • W.O. Fenn

    Work against gravity and work due to velocity changes in running

    Am. J. Physiol.

    (1930)
  • Cited by (131)

    • A passive perspiration biofuel cell: High energy return on investment

      2021, Joule
      Citation Excerpt :

      The integrated system allows substantial energy harvesting using the pinching motion and natural sweat flow with negligible energy input. Considering the energy input of pressing the fingers every 10 s (∼1 mW), such energy-harvesting behavior is attractive compared with the typical tribo/piezoelectric harvesters and BFCs that require movements or exercise as energy input (>100 W).21,22 These results exemplify the potential of the hybrid BFC-PZT harvesters’ integration for practical applications, demonstrating the most favorable EROI ever reported among all bioenergy harvesters and setting higher standards in the bioenergy collection efficiency of wearable harvesters.

    • Mechanical energy patterns in nordic walking: comparisons with conventional walking

      2017, Gait and Posture
      Citation Excerpt :

      In particular, having assumed the transfer between energies as possible, %R calculated here represents the upper limit of possible transfer between energies and WEXT correspond to the low boundary. The effects of the different assumptions have been explored in detailed by Williams and Cavanagh [24]. We believe that, despite these limitations, the method is still valuable in comparing Nordic Walking with conventional walking.

    • The effects of load carriage on joint work at different running velocities

      2016, Journal of Biomechanics
      Citation Excerpt :

      The increase in total negative work during constant velocity load carriage running means that there was an increase in energy absorption by the lower limb during the stance phase (Winter, 1983). Part of this negative work occurs during the first half of stance, as the ankle and knee extensors eccentrically contract to decelerate the body, reducing both the potential and kinetic energy of the body segments plus the carried load (Williams and Cavanagh, 1983; Winter, 1983). Greater negative work performed during the first half of stance in load carriage running, as compared to unloaded running, could be due to a greater vertical displacement of the total centre of mass (body plus load) as a result of greater lower limb compression in mid-stance (Silder et al., 2015), coupled with the need to decelerate a greater total weight (body plus load).

    • Joint power and kinematics coordination in load carriage running: Implications for performance and injury

      2016, Gait and Posture
      Citation Excerpt :

      Therefore the increased work at the knee during mid stance is likely to be more energetically costly and potentially damaging. At toe-off, an increased hip negative power with load absorbs power from the thigh segment, with simultaneous power transfer to the trunk segments [29]. This pattern of hip power absorption was seen in our findings and was largest at 3.0 m/s, and smallest at 5.0 m/s (Supplementary material).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text