Effects of surface roughness on the coefficients of friction in model orthodontic systems

https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(90)90356-8Get rights and content

Abstract

Orthodontists, like others (Engel, P. A. (1976) Impact Wear of Materials. Elsevier Scientific, New York.), often equate the smoothness of surfaces with the absence of friction. To investigate whether the surface roughnesses of opposing materials influence the coefficients of friction and ultimately the movement of teeth, arch wires were slid between contact flats to simulate orthodontic arch wire-bracket appliances. From laser specular reflectance measurements, the RMS surface roughnesses of these arch wires varied from 0.04 μm for stainless steel to 0.23 μm for nickel titanium. Using the same technique, the roughnesses of the contact flats varied from 0.03 μm for the 1 μm lapped stainless steel, to 0.26 μm for the as-received alumina. After each of the arch wire-contact flat couples was placed in a friction tester, fifteen normal forces were systematically applied at 34°C. From plots of the static and kinetic frictional forces vs the normal forces, dry coefficients of friction were obtained that were greater than those reported in the dental literature. The allstainless steel couples had lower kinetic coefficients (0.120–0.148) than the stainless steel-polycrystalline alumina couple (0.187). When pressed against the various flats, the beta-titanium arch wire (RMS = 0.14 μm) had the highest coefficients of friction (0.445–0.658), although the nickel titanium arch wire was the roughest (RMS = 0.23 μm). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX) verified that mass transfer of the beta-titanium arch wire occurred by adhesion onto the stainless steel flats or by abrasion from the sharply faceted polycrystalline alumina flats.

References (32)

Cited by (108)

  • A matter of morphology: The role of asperity characteristics in hydrogel friction

    2022, Tribology International
    Citation Excerpt :

    There are several advantages relevant to biomimetic applications when using hydrogels: Hydrogels are biocompatible and biodegradable and their viscoelastic properties as well as their surface properties can be readily modified. The challenge in studying hydrogel friction is that hydrogels often do not follow classic frictional laws, such as Amontons-Coulombs laws, that dictate that the friction coefficient is unaffected by changes in the contact area. [6,7–13] Instead, most hydrogels do provide contact area-dependent frictional behavior.

  • Surface topography of plain nickel-titanium (NiTi), as-received aesthetic (coated) NiTi, and aesthetic NiTi archwires sterilized by autoclaving or glutaraldehyde immersion: A profilometry/SEM/AFM study

    2019, International Orthodontics
    Citation Excerpt :

    Therefore, attempts have been made to manufacture aesthetic brackets or archwires from tooth-coloured materials or coating metal archwires with materials such as epoxy resin Teflon [3–7]. Aesthetic archwires might also reduce plaque accumulation and improve sliding mechanics by reducing the frictional force compared to uncoated wires, while removal of the coating film might reduce the aesthetics and increase the friction [3–5,7–12]. Although the coating material is usually inert and bonded with strong adhesives to the underlying metal [12,13], it can be peeled off due to various mechanical/thermal/chemical disturbances.

View all citing articles on Scopus

Present address: Bldg 210-H, Room 313, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7455, U.S.A.

View full text