Phonatory function of neurologically impaired patients

https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9924(91)90004-3Get rights and content

Abstract

Previous studies investigated the use of acoustic perturbation measures as a screening tool for neuropathologies with conflicting results. In the present study, five parameters of phonatory function (jitter, shimmer, signal-to-noise ratio, fundamental frequency, and standard deviation of fundamental frequency) were obtained from samples of sustained phonation in three neuropathological groups (Parkinson, Huntington, cerebellar ataxia) and a normal control group to assess the use of acoustic measures in differential diagnosis. In addition, perceptual judgements of the severity of dysphonia for each patient were obtained. The results indicated that perturbation measures of the neuropathological groups showed a higher degree of variability compared to normals. From the five parameters studied, only the standard deviation of fundamental frequency differentiated among neuropathological subgroups. The acoustic parameters studied did not clearly reflect the perceived dysphonia for all subgroups.

References (17)

  • C.L. Ludlow et al.

    Phonatory characteristics of vocal fold tremor

    J. Phonet.

    (1986)
  • E.J. Metter et al.

    Clinical and acoustical variability in hypokinetic dysarthria

    J. Common. Disord.

    (1986)
  • A.E. Aronson

    Clinical Voice Disorders

    (1985)
  • F.L. Darley et al.

    Motor Speech Disorders

    (1975)
  • D.G. Hanson et al.

    Cinegraphic observations of laryngeal function in Parkinson's Disease

    Laryngoscope

    (1984)
  • M.M. Hoehn et al.

    Parkinsonism: Onset, progression and mortality

    Neurology

    (1967)
  • J.A. Logemann et al.

    Frequency and occurence of vocal tract dysfunction in the speech of a large sample of Parkinson patients

    J. Speech Hear. Disord.

    (1978)
  • C.L. Ludlow et al.

    The results of acoustic and perceptual assesment of two types dysarthria

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (70)

  • Acoustic and Physiological Voice Assessment And Maximum Phonation Time In Patients With Different Types Of Dysarthria

    2024, Journal of Voice
    Citation Excerpt :

    Due to the compensatory mechanisms observed in upper motor neuron lesions, spastic dysarthria is associated with vocal abnormalities consistent with laryngeal hyperfunction, except for some cases in which patients may show features of laryngeal hypofunction.64,65 Measures of F0 and amplitude are the most relevant in the vocal assessment of patients with spastic dysarthria and are preferable to measures of perturbation such as jitter and shimmer.66,67,68 In ataxic dysarthria, vocal instability as measured by auditory-perceptual and acoustic voice assessments is the main feature of speech, together with a high variability of sustained phonation as observed in the acoustic analysis.69

  • Voice Quality Evaluation in Patients With COVID-19: An Acoustic Analysis

    2022, Journal of Voice
    Citation Excerpt :

    Except F0, all the other acoustic parameters were significantly different between the experimental and control groups. The results obtained in this study showed a notable difference in fundamental frequency variation (F0SD) between the healthy and infected participants, which could stem from tremor and insufficient control over laryngeal muscles in the experimental group.23,46 An increase in jitter and shimmer was also observed in both female and male patients.

  • Objective vowel sound characteristics and their relationship with motor dysfunction in Asian Parkinson's disease patients

    2021, Journal of the Neurological Sciences
    Citation Excerpt :

    In our study, STD was significantly higher in PD patients compared to controls. Indeed, STD has been identified as the parameter that can also differentiate between PD, Huntington's disease and cerebellar ataxia [45]. In addition to STD, SPI was also an interesting parameter, found to be significantly higher in our PD patients compared to controls.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text